Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vitro
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
December 2020 to March 2021
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2021
Report date:
2021

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 442E (In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT))
Version / remarks:
June 2018
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Reaction mass of (Tetramethylcyclotetrasiloxane propylether) prop-1-enylether bisphenol A and Di(tetramethylcyclotetrasiloxane propylether) bisphenol A
Cas Number:
203874-34-4
Molecular formula:
(OSiHxCH3)4-CH2-CH2 -CH2- O-C6H4-C(CH3)2-C6H4-0-CH2-CH2-CH2-(SiHxCH3O)4
IUPAC Name:
Reaction mass of (Tetramethylcyclotetrasiloxane propylether) prop-1-enylether bisphenol A and Di(tetramethylcyclotetrasiloxane propylether) bisphenol A
Test material form:
liquid
Details on test material:
Appearance: Pale yellow liquid

In vitro test system

Details of test system:
THP-1 cell line [442E]
Details on the study design:
* Dose Finding Assay:
The test article working solutions or solvent controls were mixed 1:1 (v/v) with the cell suspensions in the 96-well plates. The plates were sealed and then incubated for 24±0.5 hours (incubator set to 37ºC, 5% CO2).
After the 24-hour incubation period, all cells from the 96-well flat-bottomed plate were transferred into a 96-well round-bottomed plate. The cells were washed at least twice in 200 µL of phosphate buffered saline containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin (FACS buffer) and re-suspended in 190 µL of FACS buffer. 10 µL of propidiumiodide solution (PI) was added just before FACS analysis (final concentration of PI = 0.625 µg/mL). PI uptake was analysed using flow cytometry with the acquisition channel FL-3. A total of 10,000 viable cells were acquired.

* CD86/CD54 Expression Measurement:
Two independent runs (experiments) were needed to drive a prediction. Each independent run was performed on the same day provided that for each run:
a) Independent fresh stock solutions and working solutions of the test article and antibody solutions were prepared and
b) Independently harvested cells were used (i.e. cells were collected from different culture flasks).

On the days of testing, cells harvested from the flasks were resuspended with fresh culture medium at 2 x 10E6 cells/mL. The cells were then distributed into a 24-well plate (500 µL/1 x 10E6 cells per well).

The test article working solution or solvent control was mixed 1:1 (v/v) with the cell suspensions in the 24-well plates. The plates were sealed and then incubated for 24±0.5 hours (incubator set to 37ºC, 5% CO2).

After the 24-hour incubation period, the cells were transferred into sample tubes, collected by centrifugation (approximately 250 g, 5 minutes) and washed twice with 1 mL of FACS buffer. After washing, the cells were blocked with 600 µL of blocking solution (FACS buffer containing 0.01% (w/v) globulin) on ice for 15 minutes.

After blocking, the cells were split into three aliquots of 180 µL into a 96-well plate and centrifuged (approximately 250 g, 3 minutes).

After centrifugation, the cells were stained with 50 µL of FITC-labelled anti-CD86, anti-CD54 or mouse IgG1 antibodies on ice for 30 minutes.

The stained cells were washed three times with an excess of FACS buffer, re-suspended in FACS buffer and 12.5 µg/mL PI solution was added (to give a final PI concentration of 0.625 µg/mL).

The expression levels of CD86 and CD54 and cell viability were analysed using flow cytometry.
Vehicle / solvent control:
DMSO
Positive control:
dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) [442E]

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
For the positive control, RFI values were =150% for CD86 and =200% for CD54, and cell viability was >50% in each independent run.

In vitro / in chemico

Results
Key result
Group:
test chemical
Run / experiment:
mean
Parameter:
EC150, CD86 [442E]
Value:
314.14 µg/mL
Cell viability:
>50%
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation
Other effects / acceptance of results:
In both experiments, the RFI values for CD86 were >150% (with cell viability >50%) at multiple concentrations and the RFI values for CD54 were <200% at all concentrations.
The EC150 value for CD86 calculated by linear regression of endpoint assay data was
314.14 µg/mL. No EC200 value was calculated for CD54 as this marker was negative in both experiments.

All assay acceptance criteria were met. The cell viabilities of medium and solvent/vehicle control were higher than 90% in each independent run. In the solvent control, RFI values of both CD86 and CD54 did not exceed the positive criteria (CD86 RFI =150% and CD54 RFI =200%).

For both medium and solvent/vehicle controls, the MFI ratio of both CD86 and CD54 to isotype control was >105% on all occasions. For the positive control, RFI values were 150% for CD86 and 200% for CD54, and cell viability was >50% in each independent run.

For the test article, the cell viability was more than 50% in all tested concentrations in each independent run.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Dose Finding Assay: Cell Viability










































Viability (%) at Concentration (μg/mL)



Run



7.81



15.63



31.25



62.5



125



250



500



1000



1



99.1



98.6



99



98.8



98.7



98.1



98.3



98.1



2



98.8



98.6



98.8



98.9



99



98.2



98.3



97.9



Expression Assay: MFI and Cell Viability Values


Experiment 1















































































































































Concentration (µg/mL)



MFI (Geo Mean)



Corrected MFI



Viability



CD86



CD54



Isotype



CD86



CD54



IgG



CD86



CD54



279.08



1425



575



481



944



94



97.5



96.6



97.0



334.90



1567



561



480



1087



81



96.4



96.0



96.2



401.88



1420



544



469



951



75



96.3



95.7



96.0



482.25



1224



557



463



761



94



97.7



96.5



95.6



578.70



1244



520



423



821



97



99.1



96.8



96.8



694.44



1453



573



485



968



88



96.7



95.1



95.4



833.33



1346



589



493



853



96



96.4



95.3



95.4



1000.00



1197



587



497



700



90



96.9



95.8



96.8



Culture medium



922



555



467



455



88



98.9



98.8



98.5



DMSO 0.2%



940



498



418



522



80



99.6



99.1



99.3



DNCB 4 μg/mL



2475



1687



580



1895



1107



84.9



80.9



82.3



Experiment 2















































































































































Concentration (µg/mL)



MFI (Geo Mean)



Corrected MFI



Viability



CD86



CD54



Isotype



CD86



CD54



IgG



CD86



CD54



279.08



1139



591



502



637



89



95.9



96.2



94.9



334.90



1350



568



471



879



97



95.6



95.1



94.8



401.88



1380



587



505



875



82



93.1



95.1



93.5



482.25



1254



568



489



765



79



94.1



94.5



93.8



578.70



1350



583



511



839



72



94.5



93.6



93.8



694.44



1354



603



529



825



74



92.6



93.3



92.5



833.33



1331



605



525



806



80



95.4



92.5



94.2



1000.00



1207



604



510



697



94



97.2



95.5



94.7



Culture medium



913



539



457



456



82



98.3



98.4



98.1



DMSO 0.2%



981



555



455



526



100



98.7



98.5



98.3



DNCB 4 μg/mL



2173



1115



569



1604



546



84.9



85.1



85.5



The relative fluorescence intensity (RFI) values:









































































Concentration (μg/mL)



RFI (CD86)



RFI (CD54)



Exp1



Exp2



Exp1



Exp2



279.08



181



121



118



89



334.90



208



167



101



97



401.88



182



166



94



82



482.25



146



145



118



79



578.70



157



160



121



72



694.44



185



157



110



74



833.33



163



153



120



80



1000.00



134



133



113



94


Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Remarks:
The data can only be used as part of an integrated approach to testing and assessment (IATA) to support the discrimination between skin sensitisers and non-sensitisers for the purpose of hazard classification and labelling.
Conclusions:
The results of an in vitro skin sensitization test, performed according to OECD/EC guidelines and under GLP principles indicate that the test item has skin sensitizing properties.
Executive summary:

An in vitro skin sensitisation study (human Cell Line Activation Test) was conducted to investigate the potential of the test item to activate monocytes and dendritic cells in the human monocytic leukemia cell line THP-1 by quantifying changes in the expression of cell surface markers (CD86 and CD54). For the dose finding assay, the test item was formulated in dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) at a concentration of 500 mg/mL giving a maximum test concentration of 1000 μg/mL. No reduction in viability was observed.


For the expression measurements, test concentrations in a range from 279.08 to 1000 μg/mL (after dilution in medium) were used. Aliquots of 500 μL of each of the working solutions were mixed 1:1 with cell suspensions at 1 x 106 cells per well. After blocking, the cells were stained with FITC-labelled anti-CD86, anti-CD54 or mouse IgG1 antibodies on ice for 30 minutes. The stained cells were washed, re-suspended in FACS buffer and propidium iodide solution was added. The expression levels of CD86 and CD54 and cell viability were analysed using flow cytometry.


In the two experiments performed, the RFI values for CD86 were >150% (with cell viability >50%) at multiple concentrations and the RFI values for CD54 were <200% at all concentrations. The EC150 value for CD86 was calculated to be 314.14 μg/mL. All acceptance criteria of the h-CLAT assay parameters were met in each experiment.


As a result, the substance was considered to be positive in the human Cell Line Activation Test.