Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
oxidising solids
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
13 Jul - 1 Oct 2020
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2020
Report date:
2020

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
UN Manual of Tests and Criteria: Test O.3 (Gravimetric test for oxidizing solids)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, Klimaschutz, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, Wiesbaden, Germany

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1-(2,2,4-trimethyl-3,4-dihydroquinolin-l (2H)-yl)ethanone
EC Number:
855-228-0
Cas Number:
4497-59-0
Molecular formula:
C14 H19 N O
IUPAC Name:
1-(2,2,4-trimethyl-3,4-dihydroquinolin-l (2H)-yl)ethanone

Study design

Contact with:
powdered cellulose

Results and discussion

Test results (Oxidising solids)open allclose all
Sample tested:
reference: 1:2 mixture calcium peroxide + cellulose
Parameter:
burning rate
Result:
>= 0.22 - <= 0.33 g/s
Remarks on result:
other: The mean burning rate of the mixture of the reference item/cellulose 1:2 was 0.28 g/s.
Sample tested:
1:1 sample-to-cellulose ratio
Parameter:
burning rate
Result:
>= 0.04 - <= 0.06 g/s
Remarks on result:
other: The mean burning rate of the mixture of the test item/cellulose 1:1 was 0.05 g/s.
Sample tested:
4:1 sample-to-cellulose ratio
Parameter:
burning rate
Result:
>= 0.02 - <= 0.03 g/s
Remarks on result:
other: Burning and sooting, The mean burning rate of the mixture of the test item/cellulose 4:1 was 0.03 g/s.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Individual results
The test item contained more than 10 % of particles below 500 µm (see granulometry study M-754106-01-1 in section 4.5 of this IUCLID dossier). Therefore, the test item was ground with mortar and pistil and sieved over a 500 µm sieve. However after four times of grounding and sieving approximately 8 % were still > 500 µm. Therefore, it was considered that the remaining test item was not friable enough and both fractions (>500 µm and <500 µm) were united and taken for the measurement.
The residual moisture of the test item was determined in drying chamber at ambient temperature under vacuum. The test item had a content of residual moisture of 0 % (the test item used for the tests had not been dried).
The ambient temperature was 22 °C and the air humidity was approximately 50 % during the test.
Five tests were performed on the mixture of the reference substance with cellulose in the ratio 1:2. The results are shown in the following table.


Table: Burning times of calcium peroxide/ cellulose mixtures 1:2





















































ExperimentmCaO2 / gmcellulose / gt20-80 / sBR20-80 / g/sObservations
110.0420.0339.750.30-
210.0120.0093.250.31-
310.0120.0040.000.30-
410.0420.0045.750.26-
510.0120.0055.630.22-

The mean burning rate of the mixture of the reference item/cellulose 1:2 was 0.28 g/s. According to the UN manual the tolerable range is ± 20 % of the mean burning rate (0.22 - 0.33 g/s). The correlation coefficient of the mass loss as a function of time was for all experiments >= 0.90.



Five tests were performed on the mixture of the test item with cellulose in the ratios 4:1 and 1:1 . The results are shown in the following tables.


Table: Burning times of test item/ cellulose mixtures 4:1





















































Experimentmtest item / gmcellulose / gt20-80 / sBR20-80 / g/sObservations
124.005.99133.00.03Burning and sooting
224.036.03113.80.03Burning and sooting
324.016.02145.00.02Burning and sooting
424.016.00121.00.03Burning and sooting
524.036.06154.90.02Burning and sooting

The mean burning rate of the mixture of the test item/cellulose 4:1 was 0.03 g/s. According to the UN manual the tolerable range is ± 20 % of the mean burning rate (0.02 - 0.03 g/s). The correlation coefficient of the mass loss as a function of time was for each experiment >= 0.90.


 


Table: Burning times of test item/ cellulose mixtures 1:1





















































Experimentmtest item / gmcellulose / gt20-80 / sBR20-80 / g/sObservations
115.0215.01183.60.05Burning and sooting
215.0015.01195.10.05Burning and sooting
315.0015.00189.90.05Burning and sooting
415.0315.00214.30.04Burning and sooting
515.0015.04197.30.05Burning and sooting

The mean burning rate of the mixture of the test item/cellulose 1:1 was 0.05 g/s. According to the UN manual the tolerable range is ± 20 % of the mean burning rate (0.04 - 0.06 g/s). The correlation coefficient of the mass loss as a function of time was for each experiment >= 0.90.


 


No tests were performed on the mixture of the reference substance with cellulose in the ratio 3:1 and 1:1 as the test item mixtures were slower than the slowest reference mixture. Due to the fact that the mixtures of test item with cellulose had a slower burning rate than the 1:2 mixture of the reference item, it was concluded that the test item had no oxidizing properties.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test item, technical substance had no oxidizing properties according to UN Test O.3. The burning rates of the test item mixtures were slower than the burning rate of the 1:2 mixture of the reference item.

Due to these results the test item has not been classified as “oxidising solid”, division 5.1 of the UN manual of Tests and Criteria, revision 7 (2019).

Due to these results the test item has not to be classified as “oxidising solid” according to chapter 2.14 of the CLP regulation and GHS regulation, revision 8.