Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
oxidising solids
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
08.01.2018 - 12.01.2018
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.17 (Oxidising Properties (Solids))
Version / remarks:
Council Regulation (EC) No.440/2008, published in O.J. L 142, 2008
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Contact with:
powdered cellulose
Duration of test (contact time):
0 s
Sample tested:
reference mixture as specified
Remarks:
60% barium nitrate with cellulose
Parameter:
maximum burning rate
Result:
1.82 mm/s
Key result
Sample tested:
inert atmosphere
Parameter:
maximum burning rate
Result:
2.15 mm/s
Remarks on result:
other: With red and yellow flame

Preliminary Test

The mixture of the test substance with cellulose was ignited by touching with the flame, but the reaction was not vigorous. The yellowish smoke released. Because of no violent reaction, it was not possible to consider the test substance as an oxidant and the train test was performed according to a defined procedure.

Test

The test substance cellulose mixture having the fastest burning rate was retested in an inert atmosphere (under nitrogen) for exclusion of false positive result.

It was evident that mixture of test substance with fastest burning rate didn’t burn in the nitrogen atmosphere. The test substance should not be considered as oxidizing despite higher burning rate of test substance mixture with cellulose (60:40, w/w) than reference mixture (60:40, w/w) measured in normal laboratory conditions.

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Based on results obtained from trial test, it is obvious that none of the test substance mixtures with cellulose did not burn in inert atmosphere. Thus test substance, Pigment Yellow 4, should not be considered as a substance with oxidizing properties.
Executive summary:

The oxidizing properties of test substance, Pigment Yellow 4, were determined. The procedure was performed according to the Method A.17 Oxidizing properties (Solids), Council Regulation (EC) No.440/2008, published in O.J. L 142, 2008. Based on results obtained from trial test, it is obvious that test substance mixture with cellulose did not burn in inert atmosphere. Thus test substance, Pigment Yellow 4, should not be considered as a substance with oxidizing properties.

Description of key information

The procedure was performed according to the Method A.17 Oxidizing properties (Solids), Council Regulation (EC) No.440/2008, published in O.J. L 142, 2008. Based on results obtained from trial test, it is obvious that none of the test substance mixtures with cellulosedid not burn in inert atmosphere. Thus test substance, Pigment Yellow 4, should not be considered as a substance with oxidizing properties.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Oxidising properties:
non oxidising

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification