Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Specific investigations: other studies

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
mechanistic studies
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Well-documented mechanistic investigation which meets basic scientific principles

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Diethanolamine Induces Hepatic Choline Deficiency in Mice
Author:
Lehman-McKeeman, L.D. et al.
Year:
2002
Bibliographic source:
Toxicological sciences 67, 39-45 (2002)
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
TOXICOLOGICAL HIGHLIGHT Choline Deficiency Associated with Diethanolamine Carcinogenicity
Author:
Newberne, P.M.
Year:
2002
Bibliographic source:
Toxicological Sciences 67, 1-3

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
A subacute screening study on effects of dermally administered DEA on choline (Cho) and metabolites (phosphocholine (PCho); glycerophosphocholine (GCP); phosphatidylcholine (PC); s-adenosylmethionine (SAM); s-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) was examined in groups of 6 – 8 male mice of two different strains.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
in vivo
Endpoint addressed:
carcinogenicity

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2,2'-iminodiethanol
EC Number:
203-868-0
EC Name:
2,2'-iminodiethanol
Cas Number:
111-42-2
Molecular formula:
C4H11NO2
IUPAC Name:
2,2'-iminodiethanol
Details on test material:
DEA (99% purity) was obtained ftom Aldrich Chemical Co. (Milwaukee, WI) . Absolute ethanol (Aaper Alcohol and Chemical Co., Shelbyville, KY) was used to prepare 95% ethanol used as the vehicle in these studies. Betaine (HCl salt) was obtained from Aldrich, SAM and SAH were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO), and all standards for choline analyses were as described by Fornfict el al. (1989) .

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
other: B6C3F1 and C57BL6
Sex:
male
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Male B6C3F1 mice, approximately 5 weeks of age at receipt, mice were housed in a temperature- and humidity-controlled environment and acclimated for approximately 1 week prior to study initiation. Unless otherwise noted, were allowed rodent chow (Purina 5001 ; Ralston-Purina. St. Louis, MO) and water ad libitum throughout the study. Dietary concentrations of choline and methionine in the Purina diet were 0.2 and 0.4%, respectively, whereas the fat composition was approximately 5%.
The same holds true for the male C57BL/6 mice.

DIETARY CHOLINE DEFICIENCY
Male B6C3F1 and C57BL6 mice (approximately 6-weeks old at study initiadon) were allowed ad libitum exposure to a control or choline-devoid diet (Dyets, Bethlehem, PA) for a period of 2 weeks (n = 8/group). The control diet contained 0.25% choline (as choline bitartrate) and the methionine content in the control and choline-devoid diets was 0.6% . At the end of the 2-week exposure period, livers were rapidly removed under anesthesia, immediately flash-frozen in liquid N, and stored at -80°C pending analysis of choline metabolites. In a separate group of mice (n - 4/group), blood was collected for clinical chemistry analyses, and livers were weighed and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for histopathological assessment.

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
dermal
Vehicle:
ethanol
Details on exposure:
For dosing, the backs of all mice were shaved, and the dosing solutions (1.8 ml/kg) were applied to a region approximately 2 cm2 (from the mid-back to the interscapular region) using a pipette . All mice, including the untreated controls, were shaved on an as-needed basis during the study period . At the end of the dosing or recovery period, livers were harvested as described above and analyzed for choline metabolites.
To evaluate potential strain differences in the response to DEA, male C57BL/6 mice, also about 6-weeks-old at study initiation, were dosed with 0 or 160 mg, DEA/kg for a similar 4-week period. The untreated and ethanol-treated control groups were also used in this study.
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
not specified
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 weeks
Frequency of treatment:
5 days/week
Doses / concentrations
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
10, 20, 40, 80 and 160 mg/kg
Basis:

No. of animals per sex per dose:
6
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
Male B6C3F1 mice (approximately 6-weeks old at study initiation) were housed individually and dosed dermally with DEA dissolved in 95% ethanol at 0, 10, 20, 40, 80, or 160 mg/kg (n = 6/group) for a period of 4 weeks (5 days/week). These dosages were selected to include those shown to be carcinogenic (40, 80, and 160 mg/kg/day; NTP, 1999). There were 2 control groups for this study including untreated and ethanol treated mice. A separate group of mice was dosed with the ethanol vehicle or 160 mg DEA/kg/day for 4 weeks (5 days/week) and then allowed a 2-week recovery prior to necropsy . For dosing, the backs of all mice were shaved, and the dosing solutions (1.8 ml/kg) were applied to a region approximately 2 cm2 (from the mid-back to the interscapular region) using a pipette . All mice, including the untreated controls, were shaved on an as-needed basis during the study period . At the end of the dosing or recovery period, livers were harvested as described above and analyzed for choline metabolites.
To evaluate potential strain differences in the response to DEA, male C57BL/6 mice, also about 6-weeks-old at study initiation, were dosed with 0 or 160 mg, DEA/kg for a similar 4 -week period. The untreated and ethanol-treated control groups were also used in this study.


Examinations

Examinations:
Analysis of hepatic choline metabolites

Results and discussion

Details on results:
After dermal treatment of B6C3F1 mice with DEA at 0, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160 mg/kg bw/day for 4 weeks, PCho was most sensitive to DEA treatment, decreasing at ≥20 mg/kg bw/day. GPC, choline, and PC also decreased in a dose-dependent manner. At ≥80 mg/kg bw/day, SAM levels decreased, while SAH levels increased in liver. The no-observed effect level (NOEL) for DEA induced changes was 10 mg/kg bw/day. Choline metabolites, SAM and SAH returned to control levels in mice allowed a 2-week recovery period. No fatty change was observed in the liver of DEA treated mice in a manner similar to dietary choline deficiency. In C57BL/6 mice, DEA treatment also decreased PCho concentrations, without affecting hepatic SAM levels. Dermal application of 95% ethanol for 4 weeks alone decreased hepatic betaine levels, suggesting that the use of ethanol as a vehicle for dermal application of DEA may exacerbate or confound the biochemical actions of DEA.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Effect of dietary choline deficiency on hepatic choline metabolites

Parameter

Control

Choline-devoid

Body weight (g)

24.8±0.4

24.9±0.6

Liver/BW (%)

5.1±0.1

4.8±0.1

PCho (nmol/g liver)

1146±100

297±53

GPC (nmol/g liver)

615±83

460±27

Cho (nmol/g liver)

139±4

95±18

PC (umol/g liver)

16.6±1.6

15.2±0.6

SAM (nmol/g liver)

69.2±4.2

56.8±3.3

SAH (nmol/g liver)

31.8±2.3

41.1±2.4

Effect of DEA Treatment on Hepatic Choline Metabolites

 

DEA (mg/kg/day)

Parameter

0

10

20

40

80

160

160-R

Body weight (g)

26.6±0.8

25.9±0.4

26.6±0.1

25.8±0.4

26.1±0.4

27.1±0.6

25.8±0.8

Liver/BW (%)

5.6±0.1

5.6±0.1

5.7±0.1

5.5±0.1

5.5±0.1

6.2±0.1

5.5±0.1

PCho (nmol/g liver)

1220±44

1192±77

994±78

959±70

831±52

615±37

1224±114

GPC (nmol/g liver)

372±34

463±34

303±32

275±14

281±23

193±20

318±38

Cho (nmol/g liver)

155±14

137±12

152±11

126±7

94±14

106±13

180±21

PC (umol/g liver)

19.6±1.0

17.7±1.0

17.0±0.4

18.0±1.0

17.4±0.8

16.8±0.4

17.7±0.7

SAM (nmol/g liver)

83.9±1.1

84.1±4.1

84.7±3.9

82.1±7.2

65.1±6.4

53.3±4.3

84.9±1.0

SAH (nmol/g liver)

48.1±1.9

52.2±6.2

49.1±1.8

52.6±1.4

61.8±4.4

58.5±2.7

46.1±4.2

Applicant's summary and conclusion