Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 309-264-4 | CAS number: 100208-62-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From November 13th to December 6th, 2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 019
- Report date:
- 2019
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 492 (Reconstructed Human Cornea-like Epithelium (RhCE) Test Method for Identifying Chemicals Not Requiring Classification and Labelling for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Aluminum, 2-(2-quinolinyl)-1H-indene-1,3(2H)-dione sulfo derivs. complexes
- EC Number:
- 309-264-4
- EC Name:
- Aluminum, 2-(2-quinolinyl)-1H-indene-1,3(2H)-dione sulfo derivs. complexes
- Cas Number:
- 100208-62-6
- Molecular formula:
- Not applicable
- IUPAC Name:
- Aluminum, 2-(2-quinolinyl)-1H-indene-1,3(2H)-dione sulfo derivs. complexes
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- human
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- The reconstructed human cornea-like epithelial model EpiOcular™ (OCL-200 ver. 2.0) were used.
The RhCE tissues are reconstructed from primary human cells, which have been cultured for several days to form a stratified, highly differentiated squamous epithelium, morphologically similar to that found in the human cornea. The EpiOcular™ RhCE tissue construct consists of at least 3 viable layers of cells and a non-keratinized surface, showing a cornea-like structure analogous to that found in vivo.
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- The test item (50 mg of item/surface ratio 39.7 mg/cm2) was placed directly atop to the tissue moistened with 20 µL of PBS.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 6 ± 0.25 hours
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- 18 ± 0.25 hours
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Two tissues were used for the test item and every control
- Details on study design:
- - Tissues preparation and treatment: on the day of receipt, EpiOcularTM tissues were conditioned to release transport stress related compounds and debris by incubation in assay medium for test performance for 1 hour at standard culture conditions and, after media replacement, overnight at culture conditions. After pre-incubations, tissues were wetted with 20 μL of PBS. After 30 minutes incubation, tissues were topically exposed to the test item (50 mg per tissue) for 6 ± 0.25 hours. Two tissues were used per test item, two for the positive control and two for the negative control. At the end of the treatment time, the test item was removed by extensively rinsing the tissues with PBS brought to room temperature. After rinsing, tissues were immediately transferred to and immersed in 5 ml of previously warmed assay medium (room temperature) in a pre-labelled 12-well plate for a 25 ±2 minutes immersion incubation (post-soak) at room temperature. This incubation in assay medium was intended to remove any test item absorbed into the tissue. At the end of the post-soak immersion, each insert was removed from the assay medium, the medium was decanted off the tissue, and the insert was blotted on absorbent material and transferred to the appropriate well of the pre-labelled 6-well plate containing 1 mL of warm assay medium. The tissues were incubated for 18 ± 0.25 hours at standard culture conditions (post-treatment incubation).
MTT assay: at the end of the post-treatment incubation, each insert was removed from the 6-well plate and gently blotted on absorbent material. Tissues were placed into the 24-well plate containing 0.3 ml of MTT solution and incubated for 180±10 minutes at standard culture conditions. Afterwards, the bottom of all inserts was blotted on absorbent material, inserts were then transferred to a pre-labelled 24-well plate and immersed in 2 mL of isopropyl alcohol. The plates were sealed with parafilm, and were let in refrigerator overnight. The second day, the plates were placed on an orbital plate shaker and shaken for 2-3 hours at room temperature.
- OD570 measuring: extracts were collected, mixed and two 200 μL aliquots from every well were transferred to the appropriate wells of a pre-labelled 96-well plate for OD570 reading. As average OD570 of negative control was higher than 1.999, the same measurement was performed with 100 μL aliquots. OD570 was measured on a plate reader Biotek Epoch. Isopropyl alcohol serves as a blank. No external filter was used.
Results and discussion
In vitro
Results
- Irritation parameter:
- other: Mean tissue viability (%)
- Value:
- 83.8
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- The test item was hardly washable as it adhered to tissue. The experiment had to be repeated because of damage of tissue at stripping of the test item off tissues. The test item got stuck on tissues and it was present on them even after rinsing, stripping with spatula, post-soaking and post-incubation also in the repeated experiment. Average NC OD570 of neat extracts was 2.099 which is higher than 1.999. for this reason, 0.1 mL of extracts and controls were pipetted into other wells.
The mean negative control (neat extract) OD570 was 2.099 which is > 0.8 and < 2.5. This criterion was fulfilled.
The mean relative viability of the positive control was 34.7 % which is below 50% of negative control viability. This criterion was fulfilled.
The difference of viability between the two relating tissues of the negative control was 1.8 %. The difference of viability between the two relating tissues of the test item was 9.9 %. The difference of viability between the positive control tissues was 12.0 % what is < 20%. This criterion was fulfilled.
Under the above-described experimental design, average viability of tissues treated by the test item Quinoline Yellow Lake was 83.8 % of negative control average value. i.e. viability was > to 60 %. The effect of the test item was negative in EpiOcularTM model (tissues were not damaged).
Any other information on results incl. tables
MTT test results
Code |
Treatment |
OD570 |
avg |
DT |
Viability %NC |
|
Tissue 1 |
Tissue 2 |
%NC |
%NC |
|||
NC |
water |
0.967 |
0.985 |
0.976 |
1.8 |
100.0 |
% NC |
99.1 |
100.9 |
100.0 |
|||
C1 |
85/18 |
0.769 |
0.866 |
0.818 |
9.9 |
83.8 |
% NC |
78.8 |
88.8 |
83.8 |
|||
PC |
99% MA |
0.397 |
0.280 |
0.339 |
12.0 |
34.7 |
Notes:
NC |
negative control |
PC |
positive control |
DT |
difference between tissues |
C1, 85/18 |
the test item |
avg |
arithmetic average |
SD |
standard deviation calculated from individual % tissue viabilities |
viability (%) |
viability of single tissues compared with negative control |
NT |
not tested |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- other: No classification required according to CLP Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
- Conclusions:
- Average viability of treated tissues was 83.8 % i.e. viability was > 60 %.
The effect of the test item was negative in EpiOcularTM model (tissues were not damaged).
Non-eye irritant - Executive summary:
Results of the repeated experiment were used for evaluation. Experimental design average viability of treated tissues in the second experiment was 83.8 %i.e. viability was >60 %. The effect of the test item was negative in EpiOcularTMmodel (tissues were not damaged). According to the classification criteria, the test item is identified as not requiring classification and labelling according to UN GHS (No Category).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.