Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
Study not GLP

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1982
Report date:
1982

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
N,N,N-trimethyl-C12-14 (even numbered)-alkyl-1-aminium chloride
Molecular formula:
C15H34Cl1N1 (representative molecular formula of C12 chain)
IUPAC Name:
N,N,N-trimethyl-C12-14 (even numbered)-alkyl-1-aminium chloride
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Water
EC Number:
231-791-2
EC Name:
Water
Cas Number:
7732-18-5
Molecular formula:
H2O
IUPAC Name:
Dihydrogen oxide
Test material form:
liquid
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Präpagen 2916 (Hoe S 2916)
- Composition: ca. 40% C12-14 alkylmethylammonium chloride, ca. 1% amine/aminehydrochloride with mentioned C chain, ca. 1% salt, ca. 60% water
- Form: Clear liquid
- Storage: in the dark at 2°C

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Hoechst AG, conventional breeding
- Weight at study initiation: 2.2 - 2.5 kg
- Housing: individual cages in climatised room
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ERKA Z 6000 (Robert Koch oHG, Germany)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): deinosed chlorinated water
Lighting: 12 h daily

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-24°C
- Humidity (%): 30-70%

Test system

Controls:
other: Untreated eye served as control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit):0.1 ml
- Concentration (if solution): undiluted
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 h
Observation period (in vivo):
7 d
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): with physiological saline at 37°C
- Time after start of exposure: 24 h

SCORING SYSTEM: as per OECD guideline

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: biomicroscope

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 2.1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 7 d
Remarks on result:
positive indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 1.3
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 7 d
Remarks on result:
positive indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
(redness)
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 2.1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 7 d
Remarks on result:
positive indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
(swelling)
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 3.2
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 7 d
Remarks on result:
positive indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Corneal opacity was observed in all animals at the 1 h time point and was still present after 7 d when vascularisation of the cornea was also seen in 2/3 rabbits. Effects on the iris appeared after 1 h and increased in intensity until the 7 d timepoint when they were still scored at 2 in all rabbits. Conjunctival redness and swelling was also present from 1 h to the end of the study, with no reversibility of the symptoms. After 7 d, the nictating membrane was milky in all treated eyes. There was also bleeding of the conjunctiva and hair loss in a large area around the eyes.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Individual results are presented in the attachment entitled 'Präpagen eye irritation'.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on CLP criteria
Conclusions:
Under the study conditions, the test substance was considered to be severely irritating to eyes.
Executive summary:

A study was conducted to determine the eye irritation potential of the test substance, C12-14 TMAC (active ingredient 40%) in rabbit, according to OECD 405 Guideline. Three New Zealand White rabbits were exposed to undiluted substance (i.e., 40% test substance) applied as a 0.1 mL drop in the left conjunctival sack. The right eye was untreated and served as control. After 24 h of exposure, the eyes were gently washed with physiological saline solution at 37°C. Observations for corneal opacity, effects on the iris and conjunctival reddening/swelling were made 1, 4, 24, 48 and 72 h after eye washing, then after 7 d. Corneal opacity was observed in all animals at the 1 h time point and was still present after 7 d when vascularisation of the cornea was also seen in 2/3 rabbits. Effects on the iris appeared after 1 h and increased in intensity until the 7 d timepoint when they were still scored at 2 in all rabbits. Conjunctival redness and swelling was also present from 1 h to the end of the study, with no reversibility of the symptoms. After 7 d, the nictating membrane was milky in all treated eyes. There was also bleeding of the conjunctiva and hair loss in a large area around the eyes. Under the study conditions, the test substance was considered to be severely irritating to eyes (Jung and Weigand, 1982).