Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
This study was conducted between 12 May 2017 and 06 June 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Justification for type of information:
None
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 201 (Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test)
Version / remarks:
2006
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
Version / remarks:
EC No. 761/2009
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Identification: FAT 93588/A TE
Physical state/Appearance: White solid
Batch: 0041847900
Purity: 98.5%
Expiry Date: 01 January 2018
Storage Conditions: Room temperature in the dark
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
Range-finding Test
A sample of each test concentration was taken for chemical analysis at 0 and 72 hours in order to determine the stability of the test item under test conditions. All samples were stored frozen prior to analysis.

Definitive Test
The concentration and stability of the test item in the test preparations were verified by chemical analysis at 0 and 72 hours
Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
Range-Finding Test
The test concentration to be used in the definitive test was determined by a preliminary range-finding test. The test was conducted in 250 mL glass conical flasks each containing 100 mL of test preparation and plugged with polyurethane foam bungs to reduce evaporation. Two replicate flasks were used for each control and test concentration. The test item was dissolved directly in culture medium. A nominal amount of test item (50 mg) was dissolved in culture medium and the volume adjusted to 500 mL to give a 100 mg/L stock solution from which a series of dilutions was made to give further stock solutions of 10, 1.0 and 0.10 mg/L. An aliquot (450 mL) of each of the stock solutions was separately inoculated with algal suspension (7.7 mL) to give the required test concentrations of 0.10, 1.0, 10 and 100 mg/L. The stock solutions and each of the prepared concentrations were inverted several times to ensure adequate mixing and homogeneity.

Definitive Test
Based on the result of the range-finding test a "limit test" was conducted at a concentration of 100 mg/L to confirm that at the maximum concentration given in the OECD/EC Test Guidelines, no effect on algal growth was observed. A nominal amount of test item (100 mg) was dissolved in culture medium and the volume adjusted to 1 liter to give a 100 mg/L stock solution. This stock solution was inoculated with algal suspension (13.9 mL) to give the required test concentration of 100 mg/L. The stock solution and the prepared concentration were inverted several times to ensure adequate mixing and homogeneity.
Test organisms (species):
Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
Details on test organisms:
The test was carried out using Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata strain CCAP 278/4. Liquid cultures of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata were obtained from the Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa (CCAP), SAMS Research Services Ltd, Scottish Marine Institute, Oban, Argyll, Scotland. Master cultures were maintained in the laboratory by the periodic replenishment of culture medium (below). The master cultures were maintained in the laboratory under constant aeration and illumination at 21 ± 2 °C. Prior to the start of the test sufficient master culture was added to approximately 100 mL volumes of culture media contained in conical flasks to give an initial cell density of approximately 10^3 cells/mL. The flasks were plugged with polyurethane foam stoppers and kept under constant agitation by orbital shaker (100 – 150 rpm) and constant illumination at 24 ± 1 °C until the algal cell density was approximately 10^4 – 10^5 cells/mL.


Culture Medium
NaNO3 25.5 mg/L
MgCl2.6H2O 12.16 mg/L
CaCl2.2H2O 4.41 mg/L
MgSO4.7H2O 14.6 mg/L
K2HPO4 1.044 mg/L
NaHCO3 15.0 mg/L
H3BO3 0.186 mg/L
MnCl2.4H2O 0.415 mg/L
ZnCl2 0.00327 mg/L
FeCl3.6H2O 0.160 mg/L
CoCl2.6H2O 0.00143 mg/L
Na2MoO4.2H2O 0.00726 mg/L
CuCl2.2H2O 0.000012 mg/L
Na2EDTA.2H2O 0.30 mg/L
The culture medium was prepared using reverse osmosis purified deionized water and the pH adjusted to 7.5 with 0.1N NaOH or HCl.
Test type:
semi-static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
yes
Total exposure duration:
72 h
Hardness:
not reported
Test temperature:
Temperature was maintained at 24 ± 1 °C
pH:
The pH value of the control cultures (see Table 2) was observed to increase from pH 7.3 at 0 hours to pH 8.0 at 72 hours. The pH deviation in the control cultures was less than 1.5 pH units after 72 hours and therefore was within the limits given in the Test Guidelines.
Dissolved oxygen:
Not reported
Salinity:
Not reported
Conductivity:
Not reported
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Analysis of the test preparations at 0 and 72 hours showed measured test concentrations to range from 100% to 102% of nominal and so the results are based on nominal test concentrations only.
Details on test conditions:
Experimental Design and Study Conduct

Range-Finding Test
The test concentration to be used in the definitive test was determined by a preliminary range-finding test. The range-finding test was conducted by exposing Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata cells to a series of nominal test concentrations of 0.10, 1.0, 10 and 100 mg/L for a period of 72 hours.
The test was conducted in 250 mL glass conical flasks each containing 100 mL of test preparation and plugged with polyurethane foam bungs to reduce evaporation. Two replicate flasks were used for each control and test concentration. The test item was dissolved directly in culture medium.
A nominal amount of test item (50 mg) was dissolved in culture medium and the volume adjusted to 500 mL to give a 100 mg/L stock solution from which a series of dilutions was made to give further stock solutions of 10, 1.0 and 0.10 mg/L. An aliquot (450 mL) of each of the stock solutions was separately inoculated with algal suspension (7.7 mL) to give the required test concentrations of 0.10, 1.0, 10 and 100 mg/L.
The stock solutions and each of the prepared concentrations were inverted several times to ensure adequate mixing and homogeneity.
The control group was maintained under identical conditions but not exposed to the test item.
At the start of the range-finding test a sample of each test and control culture was removed and the cell density determined using a Coulter® Multisizer Particle Counter. The flasks were then plugged with polyurethane foam bungs and incubated (INFORS Multitron Version 2 incubator) at 24 ± 1 ºC under continuous illumination (intensity approximately 7000 lux) provided by warm white lighting (380 – 730 nm) and constantly shaken at approximately 150 rpm for 72 hours.
After 72 hours the cell density of each flask was determined using a Coulter® Multisizer Particle Counter.
A sample of each test concentration was taken for chemical analysis at 0 and 72 hours in order to determine the stability of the test item under test conditions. All samples were stored frozen prior to analysis.

Definitive Test
Based on the result of the range-finding test a "limit test" was conducted at a concentration of 100 mg/L to confirm that at the maximum concentration given in the OECD/EC Test Guidelines, no effect on algal growth was observed.

Experimental Preparation
A nominal amount of test item (100 mg) was dissolved in culture medium and the volume adjusted to 1 liter to give a 100 mg/L stock solution. This stock solution was inoculated with algal suspension (13.9 mL) to give the required test concentration of 100 mg/L. The stock solution and the prepared concentration were inverted several times to ensure adequate mixing and homogeneity. The concentration and stability of the test item in the test preparations were verified by chemical analysis at 0 and 72 hours.

Exposure Conditions
As in the range-finding test 250 mL glass conical flasks were used. Six flasks each containing 100 mL of test preparation were used for the control and 100 mg/L treatment group. The control group was maintained under identical conditions but not exposed to the test item. Pre-culture conditions gave an algal suspension in log phase growth characterized by a cell density of 3.61 x 105 cells per mL. Inoculation of 1 liter of test medium with 13.9 mL of this algal suspension gave an initial nominal cell density of 5.00 x 10^3 cells per mL and had no significant dilution effect on the final test concentration. The flasks were plugged with polyurethane foam bungs and incubated (INFORS Multitron Version 2 incubator) at 24 ± 1 °C under continuous illumination (intensity approximately 7000 lux) provided by warm white lighting (380 – 730 nm) and constantly shaken at approximately 150 rpm for 72 hours.

Assessments
Test Organism Observations
Samples were taken at 23, 47 and 72 hours and the cell densities determined using a Coulter® Multisizer Particle Counter. Three determinations were made for each sample. The nominally inoculated cell concentration (5.00 x 10^3 cells/mL) was taken as the starting cell density. To determine the potential effect of the test item on the appearance of algal cells, a sample was removed from each test and control culture (replicates pooled) at the end of the test. The shape and size of the algal cells was inspected microscopically and any abnormalities recorded.

Water Quality Criteria
The pH of the control and 100 mg/L test preparation was determined at initiation of the test and after 72 hours exposure. The pH was measured using a Hach HQ30d Flexi handheld meter. The temperature within the incubator was recorded daily. The appearance of the test media was recorded daily.

Verification of Test Concentrations
Samples were taken from the control and the 100 mg/L test group from the bulk test preparation at 0 hours and from the pooled replicates at 72 hours for quantitative analysis. All samples were stored frozen prior to analysis. Duplicate samples were taken at 0 and 72 hours and stored frozen for further analysis if necessary.
Reference substance (positive control):
yes
Remarks:
Potassium dichromate
Key result
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
> 100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
> 100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
> 100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
cell number
Remarks:
Yield
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
> 100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
cell number
Remarks:
Yield
Details on results:
Range-finding Test
The results showed no effect on growth at the test concentrations of 0.10, 1.0, 10 and 100 mg/L.
Based on this information a single test concentration of six replicates, of 100 mg/L was selected for the definitive test. This experimental design conforms to a "limit test" to confirm that at the maximum test concentration given in the OECD/EC Test Guidelines, no effect on growth was observed. Chemical analysis of the 100 mg/L test preparations at 0 and 72 hours showed measured test concentrations to range from 97 % to 98 % of nominal indicating that the test item was stable under test conditions.

Definitive Test
Verification of Test Concentrations
Analysis of the test preparations at 0 and 72 hours showed measured test concentrations to range from 100 % to 102 % of nominal and so the results are based on nominal test concentrations only.

Growth Data
Growth rate and yield values for the control and test cultures after 72 hours and percentage inhibition values are given in Table 1. From the data it is clear that the growth rate (r) and yield (y) of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (CCAP 278/4)were not affected by the presence of the test item at a nominal test concentration of 100 mg/L over the 72-Hour exposure period. It was considered unnecessary and unrealistic to test at concentrations in excess of 100 mg/L.
Accordingly the following results were determined from the data:

Inhibition of Growth Rate
ErC10 (0 - 72 h): >100 mg/L
ErC20 (0 - 72 h): >100 mg/L
ErC50 (0 - 72 h): >100 mg/L
where ErCx is the test concentration that reduced growth rate by x%. Statistical analysis of the growth rate data was carried out for the control and 100 mg/L test group using a Student’s t-test incorporating Bartlett's test for homogeneity of variance (Sokal and Rohlf, 1981). There were no statistically significant differences (P0.05), between the control and 100 mg/L test group and therefore the "No Observed Effect Concentration" (NOEC) based on growth rate was 100 mg/L.

Inhibition of Yield
EyC10 (0 - 72 h): >100 mg/L
EyC20 (0 - 72 h): >100 mg/L
EyC50 (0 - 72 h): >100 mg/L
Where:
EyCx is the test concentration that reduced yield by x%.
Statistical analysis of the yield data was carried out as in Section 6.2.3. There were no statistically significant differences (P0.05), between the control and 100 mg/L test group and therefore the "No Observed Effect Concentration" (NOEC) based on yield was 100 mg/L.

Validation Criteria
The following data show that the cell concentration of the control cultures increased by a factor of 257 after 72 hours. This increase was in line with the OECD Guideline that states the enhancement must be at least by a factor of 16 after 72 hours.
Nominal cell density of control at 0 hours: 5.00 x 10^3 cells per mL
Mean cell density of control at 72 hours: 1.28 x 10^6 cells per mL

The mean coefficient of variation for section by section specific growth rate for the control cultures was 13 % and hence satisfied the validation criterion given in the OECD Guideline which states the mean must not exceed 35 %. The coefficient of variation for average specific growth rate for the control cultures over the test period (0 – 72 h) was 1 % and hence satisfied the validation criterion given in the OECD Guideline which states that this must not exceed 7 %.

Observations on Cultures
All test and control cultures were inspected microscopically at 72 hours. There were no abnormalities detected in any of the control or test cultures.

Water Quality Criteria
Temperature was maintained at 24 ± 1 ºC throughout the test. The pH value of the control cultures was observed to increase from pH 7.3 at 0 hours to pH 8.0 at 72 hours. The pH deviation in the control cultures was less than 1.5 pH units after 72 hours and therefore was within the limits given in the Test Guidelines.

Observations on Test Item Solubility
At the start of the test all control and test cultures were observed to be clear colorless solutions. After the 72-Hour test period all control and test cultures were observed to be green dispersions
Results with reference substance (positive control):
A positive control (Envigo Study Number FP48BQ) used potassium dichromate as the reference item at concentrations of 0.25, 0.50, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 mg/L.

Exposure conditions and data evaluation for the positive control were similar to those in the definitive test. Exposure of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (CCAP 278/4) to the reference item gave the following results:

ErC50 (0 – 72 h): 1.4 mg/L; 95 % confidence limits 1.2 – 1.5 mg/L
EyC50 (0 – 72 h): 0.60 mg/L; 95 % confidence limits 0.52 – 0.69 mg/L

No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) based on growth rate: 0.25 mg/L
No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) based on yield: 0.25 mg/L
Lowest Observed Effect Concentration (LOEC) based on growth rate: 0.50 mg/L
Lowest Observed Effect Concentration (LOEC) based on yield: 0.50 mg/L

The results from the positive control with potassium dichromate were within the normal ranges for this reference item.

Table 1: Inhibition of Growth Rate and Yield in the Definitive Test

Nominal Concentration
(mg/L)

Growth Rate (cells/mL/hour)

Yield (cells/mL)

0 – 72 h

% Inhibition

0 – 72 h

% Inhibition*

Control

R1

0.076

 

1.16E+06

 

R2

0.077

 

1.25E+06

 

R3

0.076

 

1.22E+06

 

R4

0.078

-

1.34E+06

-

R5

0.078

 

1.41E+06

 

R6

0.077

 

1.30E+06

 

Mean

0.077

 

1.28E+06

 

SD

0.001

 

9.05E+04

 

100

R1

0.079

[3]

1.46E+06

 

R2

0.080

[4]

1.59E+06

 

R3

0.077

0

1.28E+06

 

R4

0.081

[5]

1.76E+06

 

R5

0.079

[3]

1.45E+06

 

R6

0.076

1

1.18E+06

 

Mean

0.079

[2]

1.45E+06

[13]

SD

0.002

 

2.08E+05

 


*       In accordance with the OECD test guideline only the mean value for yield is calculated

R1-R6= Replicates 1 to 6

SD= Standard Deviation

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Remarks:
The data satisfied the validation criterion given in the OECD Guideline
Conclusions:
The effect of the test item on the growth of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata has been investigated and gave EC50 values of greater than 100 mg/L. The No Observed Effect Concentration was 100 mg/L.
Executive summary:

A study was perford to assess the effect of the test item on the growth of the green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. The method followed was designed to be compatible with the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals (2006) No 201, "Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test" referenced as Method C.3 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 761/2009.


 


Methods.


Following a preliminary range-finding test, Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata was exposed to an aqueous solution of the test item at a concentration of 100 mg/L (six replicate flasks) for 72 hours, under constant illumination and shaking at a temperature of 24 ± 1 °C. Samples of the algal populations were removed daily and cell concentrations determined for each control and treatment group, using a Coulter®Multisizer Particle Counter.


 


Results.


Analysis of the test preparations at 0 and 72 hours showed measured test concentrations to range from 100 % to 102 % of nominal and so the results are based on nominal test concentrations only.


Exposure of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata to the test item gave EC50 values of greater than 100 mg/L. The No Observed Effect Concentration was 100 mg/L. It was considered unnecessary and unrealistic to test at concentrations in excess of 100 mg/L.

Description of key information

A study was performed to assess the effect of the test item on the growth of the green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata following OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals (2006) No 201, "Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test" referenced as Method C.3 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 761/2009. Exposure of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata to the test item gave EC50 values of greater than 100 mg/L. The No Observed Effect Concentration was 100 mg/L.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

EC50 for freshwater algae:
100 mg/L

Additional information