Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 806-984-5 | CAS number: 1392411-89-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 016
- Report date:
- 2016
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Hexane, 1,6-diisocyanato-, homopolymer, 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate- and propylene glycol monoacrylate-blocked
- EC Number:
- 806-984-5
- Cas Number:
- 1392411-89-0
- IUPAC Name:
- Hexane, 1,6-diisocyanato-, homopolymer, 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate- and propylene glycol monoacrylate-blocked
- Test material form:
- liquid: viscous
- Details on test material:
- Name: Ebecryl 4738, Batch no.: DR0004393
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- other: Bos primigenius Taurus
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Fresh bovine eyes were obtained from the slaughterhouse Müller Fleisch GmbH, Enzstr on the day of the test. The cattle were between 12 and 60 months old. The eyes were transported to the test facility in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (supplemented with 0.01% streptomycin and 0.01% penicillin). Then, the corneas were dissected and incubated in medium at 32 ± 1°C in an incubation chamber for 1 h.
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- The test substance (pure) was given on the epithelium in such a manner that as much as possible of the cornea was covered with the test substance.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 10 min at 32 ± 1°C
- Observation period (in vivo):
- -
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- 2 h at 32 ± 1°C
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- For each treatment group (negative control solution, test substance and positive control), three replicates were used.
- Details on study design:
- - The BCOP (The Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability) test method is an organotypic model that provides short-term maintenance of normal physiological and biochemical function of the bovine cornea in vitro. In this test method, damage by the test substance is assessed by quantitative measurements of changes in corneal opacity and permeability.
- After the initial incubation, the medium was changed and the baseline opacity for each cornea was recorded. None of the corneas showed tissue damage, therefore, all corneas were used. For each treatment group (negative control solution, test substance and positive control), three replicates were used. After removal of the pre-incubation medium, negative control and positive control solution were applied by pipetting 750 μL of the appropriate liquid through the refill hole in the holder on the cornea. In order to apply the test substance, the nut was unscrewed to remove the glass disc. Then, the test substance was applied on the epithelium in such a manner that as much as possible of the cornea was covered with the test substance. Exposure time on the corneas was 10 min at 32 ± 1°C. After thorough rinsing with cMEM with phenol red and final rinsing with cMEM without phenol red, the anterior chamber was filled with cMEM without phenol red, and the corneas were stored for additional 2 h at 32 ± 1°C (post-incubation). After the post-incubation, the cMEM without phenol red was renewed in both chambers. Then, the final opacity value of each cornea was recorded. The cMEM without phenol red was removed from the front chamber, and 1 mL sodium fluorescein solution (concentration: 4 mg/mL) was added to the front chamber. The chambers were closed again and incubated for 85 min at 32 ± 1°C. After incubation, the content of the posterior chamber was thoroughly mixed. Finally, the corneal permeability was measured with the spectral photometer at 492 nm.
Results and discussion
In vitro
Results
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Remarks:
- corneal opacity and permeability
- Run / experiment:
- BCOP test
- Value:
- 4.41
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- In the negative control, no signs of eye irritation were observed. The positive control induced serious eye damage. The test substance showed effects on the cornea of the bovine eye. The calculated IVIS (in vitro irritancy score) was 4.41. The experiment is considered as sufficient for a reliable calculation of the IVIS of the test substance, because all three replicates of the test substance led to the same assessment for the test substance (IVIS for each replicate of the test substance: 5.70; 3.25; 4.28; Mean IVIS: 4.41; Relative Standard Deviation IVIS: 27.98%).
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- study cannot be used for classification
- Conclusions:
- Under the study conditions, no prediction for eye irritation can be made.
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to determine the eye irritation potential of the test substance according to OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability test method), in compliance with GLP. Bovine corneas were collected from cattle. One valid experiment was performed with three replicates each for the negative control, the positive control (dimethyl formamide) and the test substance. The pure, undiluted test substance was applied for 10 min at 32°C in a way that as much as possible of the cornea surface was covered. After removal of the test substance and a 2 h post-incubation, opacity and permeability values were measured to give the in vitro irritation score (IVIS). The IVIS for the test substance was determined to be 4.41 (i.e. between > 3 and ≤ 55). No signs of eye irritation were observed following exposure with the negative control. The positive control induced serious eye damage. Both the controls met the validity criteria. Under the study conditions, the test substance produced a in vitro irritancy score of 4.41 and therefore, according to OECD Guideline 437 criteria, no prediction for eye irritation can be made (Andres, 2017).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.