Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 289-969-0 | CAS number: 90046-02-9 Extractives and their physically modified derivatives such as tinctures, concretes, absolutes, essential oils, oleoresins, terpenes, terpene-free fractions, distillates, residues, etc., obtained from Juniperus oxycedrus, Cupressaceae.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 18 October 2019 – 27 November 2019
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 202 (Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: 0 (control), 2.6, 4.8, 8.6, 15.4, 27.8 and 50.0 mg/L (nominal loading rates)
- Sampling method: During Range finding study and main study, TOC was analyzed on day 0 (fresh) and on day 2 (spent) from samples for each loading rate. - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method:
The test item is a complex mixture (UVCB substance) which was found to be partially miscible (with no precipitation) in test medium (ISO reconstituted water) according to a lab internal method. Therefore, the Daphnia Test was carried out with aqueous extracts (WAF = Water Accommodated Fraction) at various loading rates of the test item in test medium.
In order to determine the optimum mixing duration to be used for WAF preparation, a water accommodated fraction (WAF) equilibration trail was performed prior to exposure: One individual WAF was prepared at each of three loading levels 1.0, 50.0 and 100 mg/L. At 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours after initiation of mixing, mixing was stopped at respective time points and the solutions were allowed to settle for one hour. A sample of WAF was removed from each loading level and mixing was resumed. The concentration of organic carbon that had solubilized into the WAF from the test item was measured using the TOC analyzer described above.
Maximum TOC values of 1.855, 39.58 and 54.250 mg/L was obtained at the nominal loading rate of 1.0, 50.0 and 100.0 mg/L after 4 hours of stirring followed by 1 hour of settling period, hence 4 hours of stirring duration, followed by 1 hour of settling period was selected for test media preparation.
Test media preparation: For every test item concentration, individual WAF was prepared by adding the appropriate amount of test item to the test medium. Each mixing vessel was filled to achieve minimal headspace given the constraints of the vessels and closed with foil-covered stoppers. The mixture was stirred for 4 h (based on equilibration trail) using a magnetic stirrer at minimum of 100 rpm. The mixtures were allowed to settle and equilibrate to test temperature (before removing the test solution). The aqueous portions of WAFs were collected using steri-pipette and transferred to test vessels.
- Controls: ISO reconstituted water only.
- Evidence of undissolved material (e.g. precipitate, surface film, etc.): The test substance was not fully soluble at the tested loading rate. However the method of preparing the WAFs was designed to mimimise exposure to undissolved test material. - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Daphnia magna
Age at study initiation (mean and range, SD): < 24 hours old.
- Source: Environmental and Molecular Toxicology Division, Department of Zoology, Karnataka University, Karnataka, India.
- Feeding during test: No
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: 25 gravid female daphinds were acclimatized in reconstituted water for 48 hours prior to test (similar for range finding and main study). Offsprings produced on the first day were not used. Progenies produced on day two (less than 24 hours old) were transferred into the test containers.
- Acclimation conditions (same as test or not): same as test.
- Type and amount of food: live algal cells (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata) at 2 mL per liter.
- Feeding frequency: at the beginning and on Day 2 of acclimatization.
- Health during acclimation (any mortality observed): Not specified. - Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 48 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- None
- Hardness:
- 220 mg/L as CaCO3
- Test temperature:
- 20.0 - 20.9ºC
- pH:
- 7.52 - 7.98
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 7.32 - 7.99 mg O2/L
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal loading rates: 0 (control), 2.6, 4.8, 8.6, 15.4, 27.8 and 50.0 mg/L WAF
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: rectangular beaker
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: glass, 100 mL (fill volume).
- Aeration: The dilution water was aerated prior to use for the test so that the dissolved oxygen concentration has reached saturation.
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): 24 h
- No. of organisms per vessel: 5
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 4
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 4
- No. of vessels per vehicle control (replicates): Not applicable
- Biomass loading rate: 20 mL of test solution per daphnid.
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: ISO reconstituted water prepared as described in the OECD 202 guideline.
- Intervals of water quality measurement: Total hardness was analyzed prior to its use for exposure. Temperature, pH and dissolved oxygen were recorded at test initiation and at the beginning and at the end of test in the treatments and in the control.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: No
- Photoperiod: 16 hours of light and 08 hours dark cycle.
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) : Each test vessel was observed for immobilized daphnids at 24 and 48 hours after the beginning of the test. Those animals not able to swim within 15 seconds after gentle agitation of the test beaker was considered to be immobile. In addition to immobility, any abnormal behavior or appearance was recorded.
VEHICLE CONTROL PERFORMED: Not applicable
RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Test concentrations: 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 10.0, 50.0 and 100.0 mg/L along with a control group.
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: no immobility was observed in control and at the nominal loading rate of 0.01, 0.1 and 1.0 mg/L; immobility of 20, 100 and 100% was observed at the nominal loading rates of 10.0, 50.0 and 100.0 mg/L during the 48 hours exposure period. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- (Potassium dichromate)
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- 14.95 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks:
- (water-accommodated fraction loading rate)
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% confidence limits: 13.34 - 16.77 mg/L.
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOELR
- Effect conc.:
- 4.8 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks:
- (water-accommodated fraction loading rate)
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LOELR
- Effect conc.:
- 8.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks:
- (water-accommodated fraction loading rate)
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Details on results:
- - Behavioural abnormalities:
- Mortality of control: No mortality was observed over a period of 48 h in the control group.
- Abnormal responses: No clinical signs of toxicity were observed in control and at 2.6 mg/L during the 48-hour observation period. Clinical signs of localized on bottom of container and lethargy were observed at the nominal loading rates of 4.8, 8.6, 15.4 and 27.8 mg/L during the 48-hour observation period. Clinical signs of localized on bottom of container and lethargy were observed at the nominal loading rate of 50.0 mg/L during the 24-hour exposure period. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - Results with reference substance valid? Yes, the 48 hour EC50 of the reference substance was within the acceptance range confirming the suitability of the test system. EC50 of Potassium dichromate on Daphnia magna is periodically determined. The date of the last study at the date of performing this test was 16-10-2019.
- EC50-48 h: 0.57 mg/L - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Data were analyzed by statistical method (Finney’s probit analysis) to calculate the slopes of the curves and the EL50 with confidence limits. One-way ANOVA was performed for 48 hour immobility for the determination of NOELR and LOELR.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (Immobilisation in control < 10% (no immobilisation observed); dissolved oxygen concentration > 3 mg O2/L)
- Conclusions:
- In a short-term toxicity test to Daphnia magna, the 48h-EL50 of the test substance was found to be 14.95 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
An acute aquatic toxicity study with Daphnia magna was conducted on test item according to OECD guideline 202, following GLP. The test item is a UVCB substance which was found to be partially miscible in ISO reconstituted water which was used as test medium. Therefore, the test was carried out with aqueous extracts (WAF = Water Accommodated Fraction) at various loading rates of the test item in the test medium. Based on a preliminary WAF equilibration trail, individual WAF solutions for every test item concentration were prepared in closed vessels with minimal headspace and stirred for 4 h. Then, the mixtures were allowed to settle and equilibrate to test temperature and aqueous portions of WAFs were transferred to the test vessels. A range finding study was conducted for 48 h with nominal loading rates of 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 10.0, 50.0 and 100.0 mg/L along with a control group. The immobilization percentages of 20, 100 and 100 % were observed at 10, 50 and 100 mg/L respectively. No immobilization was observed in control and at 0.01, 0.1 and 1.0 mg/L. Based on these results, the main test was conducted for 48 h at nominal loading rates of 2.6, 4.8, 8.6, 15.4, 27.8 and 50 mg/L along with control group. The test was conducted in semi-static conditions with 4 replicates of 5 daphnids per replicate. Negative control consisted of test medium alone and a solution of potassium dichromate was used as reference substance. No clinical signs of toxicity were observed in control and at 2.6 mg/L. Clinical signs of localized on bottom of container and lethargy were observed at 4.8, 8.6, 15.4 and 27.8 mg/L at 48h and at 50.0 mg/L at 24 h. The immobilization percentages of 10, 20, 50, 80 and 100 % were recorded at the tested nominal loading rates of 4.8, 8.6, 15.4, 27.8 and 50 mg/L during the 48 hour observation period. TOC was analyzed at day 0 (fresh) and on day 2 (spent) sample from all the loading rates. Immobilisation in the control group was 0 % and dissolved oxygen concentration at the end of the test was higher than 7.32 mg/L in the control and treatment groups. Based on these results, the 48 hours No Observed Effect Loading rate (NOELR) and Lowest Observed Effect Loading rate (LOELR) is 4.8 and 8.6 mg/L respectively, and the acute median effective loading rate (EL50) is 14.95 mg/L (95% confidence limits: 13.34 - 16.77 mg/L).
Reference
Table 1. Summary of clinical signs and immobilisation during range finding study
Group |
Nominal Loading Rate |
R |
No. of Daphnids per replicate at start 0 h |
Signs of toxicity and immobility of Daphnids Observed at |
|||
24 h |
48 h |
||||||
Toxic signs |
I |
Toxic signs |
I |
||||
G1 |
0.0 |
R1 |
5 |
N(5) |
0 |
N(5) |
0 |
R2 |
5 |
N(5) |
0 |
N(5) |
0 |
||
G2 |
0.01 |
R1 |
5 |
N(5) |
0 |
N(5) |
0 |
R2 |
5 |
N(5) |
0 |
N(5) |
0 |
||
G3 |
0.10 |
R1 |
5 |
N(5) |
0 |
N(5) |
0 |
R2 |
5 |
N(5) |
0 |
N(5) |
0 |
||
G4 |
1.0 |
R1 |
5 |
N(5) |
0 |
N(5) |
0 |
R2 |
5 |
N(5) |
0 |
N(5) |
0 |
||
G5 |
10.0 |
R1 |
5 |
B(2), L(2) |
1 |
B(2), L(2) |
0 |
R2 |
5 |
L(3), B(1) |
1 |
L(3), B(1) |
0 |
||
G6 |
50.0 |
R1 |
5 |
L(3) |
2 |
- |
3 |
R2 |
5 |
B(2), L(2) |
1 |
- |
4 |
||
G7 |
100.0 |
R1 |
5 |
B(1) |
4 |
- |
1 |
R2 |
5 |
B(1) |
4 |
- |
1 |
I: Immobilization; N: Normal; B: on Bottom (settled on the bottom of test vessel with just small movements); L: Lethargy; Letters outside and values inside the parentheses represent the clinical symptom code and number of Daphnids exhibiting that particular symptom, respectively.
Table 2. Summary of immobilisation at different time points of post exposure during range finding study
Group |
Nominal Loading Rate |
R |
Initial No. of Daphnids |
Immobility (No.) of Daphnids |
Cumulative No. |
% of Immobility |
|||
24 h |
48 h |
24 h |
48 h |
24 h |
48 h |
||||
G1 |
0 |
R1 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
R2 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
G2 |
0.01 |
R1 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
R2 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
G3 |
0.1 |
R1 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
R2 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
G4 |
1.0 |
R1 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
R2 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
G5 |
10.0 |
R1 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
20 |
20 |
R2 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
||||||
G6 |
50.0 |
R1 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
10 |
30 |
100 |
R2 |
5 |
1 |
4 |
||||||
G7 |
100.0 |
R1 |
5 |
4 |
1 |
8 |
10 |
80 |
100 |
R2 |
5 |
4 |
1 |
Table 3. Summary of clinical signs and immobilisation during main study
Group |
Nominal Loading Rate |
R |
No. of Daphnids per replicate at start 0 h |
Signs of toxicity and immobility of Daphnids Observed at |
|||
24 h |
48 h |
||||||
Toxic signs |
I |
Toxic signs |
I |
||||
G1 |
0 |
R1 |
5 |
N(5) |
0 |
N(5) |
0 |
R2 |
5 |
N(5) |
0 |
N(5) |
0 |
||
R3 |
5 |
N(5) |
0 |
N(5) |
0 |
||
R4 |
5 |
N(5) |
0 |
N(5) |
0 |
||
G2 |
2.6 |
R1 |
5 |
N(5) |
0 |
N(5) |
0 |
R2 |
5 |
N(5) |
0 |
N(5) |
0 |
||
R3 |
5 |
N(5) |
0 |
N(5) |
0 |
||
R4 |
5 |
N(5) |
0 |
N(5) |
0 |
||
G3 |
4.8 |
R1 |
5 |
N(4), B(1) |
0 |
N(3), B(1) |
1 |
R2 |
5 |
N(3), B(2) |
0 |
N(3), B(2) |
0 |
||
R3 |
5 |
N(3), B(1), L(1) |
0 |
N(3), B(1), L(1) |
0 |
||
R4 |
5 |
N(3), L(2) |
0 |
N(2), L(2) |
1 |
||
G4 |
8.6 |
R1 |
5 |
N(2), B(1), L(1) |
1 |
N(1), B(1), L(1) |
1 |
R2 |
5 |
N(2), L(2) |
1 |
N(2), L(2) |
0 |
||
R3 |
5 |
N(3), L(2) |
0 |
N(2), L(2) |
1 |
||
R4 |
5 |
N(3), L(2) |
0 |
N(3), L(2) |
0 |
||
G5 |
15.4 |
R1 |
5 |
N(2), L(1) |
2 |
N(2), L(1) |
0 |
R2 |
5 |
N(2), B(1), L(1) |
1 |
B(1), L(1) |
2 |
||
R3 |
5 |
N(1), B(2), L(1) |
1 |
B(2), L(1) |
1 |
||
R4 |
5 |
B(2), L(1) |
2 |
B(1), L(1) |
1 |
||
G6 |
27.8 |
R1 |
5 |
B(2) |
3 |
B(1) |
1 |
R2 |
5 |
B(2), L(1) |
2 |
L(1) |
2 |
||
R3 |
5 |
B(3), L(1) |
1 |
L(1) |
3 |
||
R4 |
5 |
B(2), L(1) |
2 |
L(1) |
2 |
||
G7 |
50.0 |
R1 |
5 |
L(2), B(1) |
2 |
- |
3 |
R2 |
5 |
L(2) |
3 |
- |
2 |
||
R3 |
5 |
B(1), L(1) |
3 |
- |
2 |
||
R4 |
5 |
B(2) |
3 |
- |
2 |
I: Immobilization; N: Normal; B: on Bottom (settled on the bottom of test vessel with just small movements); L: Lethargy; Letters outside and values inside the parentheses represent the clinical symptom code and number of Daphnids exhibiting that particular symptom, respectively.
Table 4. Summary of immobilisation at different time points of post exposure during main study
Group |
Nominal Loading Rate |
R |
Initial No. of Daphnids |
Immobility (No.) of Daphnids |
Cumulative No. |
% of Immobility |
|||
24 h |
48 h |
24 h |
48 h |
24 h |
48 h |
||||
G1 |
0 |
R1 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
R2 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
R3 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
R4 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
G2 |
2.6 |
R1 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
R2 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
R3 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
R4 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
G3 |
4.8 |
R1 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
10 |
R2 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
R3 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
R4 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
||||||
*G4 |
8.6 |
R1 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
10 |
20 |
R2 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
||||||
R3 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
||||||
R4 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
*G5 |
15.4 |
R1 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
6 |
10 |
30 |
50 |
R2 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
||||||
R3 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
||||||
R4 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
||||||
*G6 |
27.8 |
R1 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
8 |
16 |
40 |
80 |
R2 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
||||||
R3 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
||||||
R4 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
||||||
*G7 |
50.0 |
R1 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
11 |
20 |
55 |
100 |
R2 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
||||||
R3 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
||||||
R4 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
*: Statistical significance of >0.05.
Table 5. TOC analysis during exposure
Dose Range Finding Study |
|||
Group |
Nominal loading Rate (mg/L) |
TOC Analysis in Test Media (mg/L) |
|
Day 0 |
Day 2 |
||
G1 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
G2 |
0.01 |
0.2772 |
1.094 |
G3 |
0.1 |
0.845 |
0.761 |
G4 |
1.0 |
1.423 |
1.123 |
G5 |
10.0 |
2.436 |
2.178 |
G6 |
50.0 |
21.680 |
18.800 |
G7 |
100.0 |
48.920 |
43.630 |
Main Study |
|||
Group |
Nominal loading Rate (mg/L) |
TOC Analysis in Test Media (mg/L) |
|
Day 0 |
Day 2 |
||
G1 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
G2 |
2.6 |
1.388 |
0.570 |
G3 |
4.8 |
1.330 |
0.352 |
G4 |
8.6 |
2.729 |
1.740 |
G5 |
15.4 |
5.908 |
4.177 |
G6 |
27.8 |
11.250 |
8.134 |
G7 |
50.0 |
27.370 |
20.670 |
Table 6. Physico-chemical parameters of test medium during range finding study
Group |
Nominal Loading Rate (mg/L) |
R |
Dissolved Oxygen |
Temperature (°C) |
pH |
|||
0 h |
48 h |
0 h |
48 h |
0 h |
48 h |
|||
G1 |
0.0 |
R1 |
7.80 |
7.70 |
20.9 |
20.2 |
7.59 |
7.48 |
R2 |
7.90 |
7.74 |
21.0 |
20.3 |
7.62 |
7.50 |
||
G2 |
0.01 |
R1 |
7.91 |
7.78 |
20.7 |
20.1 |
7.63 |
7.51 |
R2 |
7.90 |
7.75 |
20.9 |
20.0 |
7.65 |
7.54 |
||
G3 |
0.1 |
R1 |
7.85 |
7.71 |
20.6 |
19.9 |
7.62 |
7.54 |
R2 |
7.87 |
7.74 |
20.9 |
20.1 |
7.60 |
7.54 |
||
G4 |
1.0 |
R1 |
7.83 |
7.64 |
21.1 |
19.9 |
7.57 |
7.5 |
R2 |
7.81 |
7.62 |
21.0 |
19.8 |
7.52 |
7.45 |
||
G5 |
10.0 |
R1 |
7.82 |
7.60 |
20.9 |
20.2 |
7.54 |
7.42 |
R2 |
7.84 |
7.63 |
20.8 |
20.3 |
7.56 |
7.41 |
||
G6 |
50.0 |
R1 |
7.80 |
7.54 |
20.7 |
20.1 |
7.50 |
7.43 |
R2 |
7.78 |
7.57 |
20.8 |
20.0 |
7.45 |
7.40 |
||
G7 |
100.0 |
R1 |
7.78 |
7.58 |
20.9 |
20.2 |
7.45 |
7.38 |
R2 |
7.75 |
7.50 |
20.9 |
20.2 |
7.47 |
7.37 |
||
Min |
7.50 |
19.80 |
7.37 |
|||||
Max |
7.91 |
21.10 |
7.65 |
Min: Minimum; Max: Maximum;
Table 7. Physico-chemical parameters of test medium during main study
Group |
Nominal Loading Rate (mg/L) |
R |
Dissolved Oxygen |
Temperature (°C) |
pH |
|||||||||
0 h |
24 h |
24 h |
48 h |
0 h |
24 h |
24 h |
48 h |
0 h |
24 h |
24 h |
48 h |
|||
F |
S |
F |
S |
F |
S |
F |
S |
F |
S |
F |
S |
|||
G1 |
0 |
R1 |
7.95 |
7.81 |
7.82 |
7.80 |
20.9 |
20.4 |
20.5 |
20.2 |
7.87 |
7.79 |
7.81 |
7.77 |
R2 |
7.90 |
7.86 |
7.82 |
7.76 |
20.9 |
20.5 |
20.8 |
20.2 |
7.89 |
7.72 |
7.83 |
7.79 |
||
R3 |
7.96 |
7.91 |
7.84 |
7.81 |
20.8 |
20.9 |
20.7 |
20.0 |
7.98 |
7.84 |
7.80 |
7.75 |
||
R4 |
7.95 |
7.75 |
7.86 |
7.81 |
20.9 |
20.4 |
20.4 |
20.3 |
7.85 |
7.73 |
7.85 |
7.78 |
||
G2 |
2.6 |
R1 |
7.91 |
7.84 |
7.82 |
7.75 |
20.9 |
20.5 |
20.5 |
20.1 |
7.80 |
7.71 |
7.79 |
7.65 |
R2 |
7.92 |
7.83 |
7.75 |
7.70 |
20.7 |
20.6 |
20.6 |
20.4 |
7.85 |
7.76 |
7.90 |
7.69 |
||
R3 |
7.93 |
7.81 |
7.83 |
7.78 |
20.7 |
20.9 |
20.4 |
20.2 |
7.85 |
7.73 |
7.81 |
7.63 |
||
R4 |
7.99 |
7.93 |
7.83 |
7.80 |
20.8 |
20.7 |
20.5 |
20.2 |
7.82 |
7.7 |
7.78 |
7.68 |
||
G3 |
4.8 |
R1 |
7.87 |
7.83 |
7.83 |
7.80 |
20.6 |
20.5 |
20.7 |
20.0 |
7.85 |
7.62 |
7.73 |
7.64 |
R2 |
7.85 |
7.79 |
7.73 |
7.68 |
20.5 |
20.7 |
20.9 |
20.0 |
7.8 |
7.73 |
7.70 |
7.63 |
||
R3 |
7.8 |
7.78 |
7.78 |
7.65 |
20.7 |
20.6 |
20.5 |
20.1 |
7.81 |
7.73 |
7.68 |
7.59 |
||
R4 |
7.87 |
7.82 |
7.80 |
7.67 |
20.8 |
20.4 |
20.4 |
20.0 |
7.85 |
7.74 |
7.72 |
7.6 |
||
G4 |
8.6 |
R1 |
7.85 |
7.79 |
7.73 |
7.63 |
20.8 |
20.9 |
20.7 |
20.4 |
7.76 |
7.68 |
7.69 |
7.62 |
R2 |
7.8 |
7.74 |
7.71 |
7.60 |
20.5 |
20.5 |
20.6 |
20.2 |
7.70 |
7.65 |
7.73 |
7.59 |
||
R3 |
7.75 |
7.74 |
7.78 |
7.62 |
20.9 |
20.4 |
20.5 |
20.1 |
7.75 |
7.69 |
7.72 |
7.63 |
||
R4 |
7.70 |
7.66 |
7.81 |
7.65 |
20.6 |
20.3 |
20.5 |
20.2 |
7.72 |
7.64 |
7.79 |
7.63 |
||
G5 |
15.4 |
R1 |
7.80 |
7.73 |
7.65 |
7.57 |
20.9 |
20.4 |
20.4 |
20.3 |
7.74 |
7.62 |
7.72 |
7.6 |
R2 |
7.81 |
7.72 |
7.73 |
7.68 |
20.6 |
20.4 |
20.8 |
20.1 |
7.75 |
7.71 |
7.98 |
7.96 |
||
R3 |
7.74 |
7.68 |
7.68 |
7.60 |
20.7 |
20.5 |
20.4 |
20.4 |
7.71 |
7.67 |
7.68 |
7.58 |
||
R4 |
7.72 |
7.62 |
7.73 |
7.66 |
20.8 |
20.6 |
20.7 |
20.3 |
7.77 |
7.63 |
7.62 |
7.59 |
||
G6 |
27.8 |
R1 |
7.58 |
7.45 |
7.62 |
7.51 |
20.7 |
20.9 |
20.6 |
20.5 |
7.76 |
7.71 |
7.70 |
7.61 |
R2 |
7.50 |
7.38 |
7.58 |
7.49 |
20.4 |
20.7 |
20.4 |
20.3 |
7.78 |
7.65 |
7.69 |
7.64 |
||
R3 |
7.67 |
7.41 |
7.53 |
7.45 |
20.5 |
20.5 |
20.5 |
20.1 |
7.79 |
7.63 |
7.72 |
7.65 |
||
R4 |
7.65 |
7.52 |
7.55 |
7.47 |
20.9 |
20.7 |
20.7 |
20.7 |
7.77 |
7.71 |
7.79 |
7.7 |
||
G7 |
50.0 |
R1 |
7.55 |
7.46 |
7.62 |
7.50 |
20.7 |
20.5 |
20.5 |
20.4 |
7.62 |
7.59 |
7.62 |
7.55 |
R2 |
7.51 |
7.38 |
7.53 |
7.41 |
20.8 |
20.4 |
20.4 |
20.1 |
7.65 |
7.61 |
7.62 |
7.57 |
||
R3 |
7.48 |
7.32 |
7.43 |
7.38 |
20.7 |
20.6 |
20.5 |
20.0 |
7.58 |
7.52 |
7.67 |
7.55 |
||
R4 |
7.57 |
7.43 |
7.50 |
7.43 |
20.5 |
20.5 |
20.8 |
20.1 |
7.61 |
7.54 |
7.69 |
7.54 |
||
Min |
7.32 |
20.0 |
7.52 |
|||||||||||
Max |
7.99 |
20.9 |
7.98 |
Min: Minimum; Max: Maximum; F: Fresh; S: Spent
Description of key information
Key study. Test method according to OECD 202, GLP study. The 48h-EL50 of the test substance to Daphnia magna was found to be 14.95 mg/L.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 14.95 mg/L
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.