Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2014
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP and OECD guideline compliant study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River UK
- Age at study initiation: 8-9 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 15.9 - 19.3 g
- Housing: all animals in one group were housed in a cage together as a group
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 2°C
- Humidity (%): 45 – 65%
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 2014-03-19 To: 2014-04-04
Vehicle:
dimethylformamide
Concentration:
5, 10 and 25 % (w/w)
No. of animals per dose:
5
Details on study design:
MAIN STUDY
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Name of test method: standard H-Methylthymidine incorporation
- Criteria used to consider a positive response: SI > 3

TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION: Each test group of mice was treated by topical (epidermal) application to the dorsal surface
of each ear. The application volume, 25 μL/ear/day, was spread over the entire dorsal surface (diameter 8 mm) of each ear once daily for three consecutive days. A further group of mice (control animals) was treated with an equivalent volume of the relevant vehicle alone.
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
Positive control results:
SI = 9.3%
The periodic positive control experiment was performed in October 2013
Positive control substance: α-Hexylcinnamaldehyde; Vehicle: acetone:olive oil (4+1 v/v)
Parameter:
SI
Remarks on result:
other: EC3 = 16.9%
Parameter:
other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
Remarks on result:
other: See table

No adverse effects on body weight was noted.

No symptoms of local toxicity at the ears of the animals and no systemic findings were observed during the study period. Due to the colour of the test item, redness of the ear skin could not be observered.

The measured ear weights of all animals treated were recorded after sacrifice. A statistically significant or biologically relevant increase in ear weights was not observed in any test item treated group in comparison to the vehicle control group.

Interpretation of results:
sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The substance is a skin sensitizer of moderate potency.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (sensitising)
Additional information:

Skin sensitization was tested via the LLNA (OECD 429) according to GLP (BASF 2014). The EC3 value was 16.9%.


Migrated from Short description of key information:
EC3 = 16.9%

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification

Dangerous Substance Directive (67/548/EEC)

The available study is considered reliable and suitable for classification purposes under 67/548/EEC. The EC3 is 16.9%. As a result the substance is considered to be classified for skin sensitization (R43) under Directive 67/548/EEC, as amended for the 31st time in Directive2009/2/EG.

 

Classification, Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008

The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation 1272/2008. The EC3 value is above 2. As a result the substance is considered to be classified for skin sensitization (Cat 1B) under Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, as amended for the fifth time in Directive EC944/2013.