Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Appearance / physical state / colour

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
appearance / physical state / colour
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Not specified
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Appearance taken from a reliable acute toxicity to fish study.
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Appearance was taken from a reliable acute toxicity to fish study.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Physical state at 20°C and 1013 hPa:
liquid
Key result
Form:
liquid
Colour:
Colourless to pale yellow transparent liquid .
Substance type:
organometallic
Conclusions:
The test material was examined and determined to be a colourless to pale yellow transparent liquid.
Executive summary:

The test material was examined and determined to be a colourless to pale yellow transparent liquid.

Description of key information

The test material was described as an organometallic substance which was liquid at room temperature. The colour and appearance was reported as colourless to pale yellow transparent liquid. The appearance, physical state and colour were described in the GLP compliant guideline study for short-term toxicity to fish.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Physical state at 20°C and 1013 hPa:
liquid

Additional information

In an acute toxicity to fish study (Migchielsen MHJ, 2004) the appearance, physical state and colour were described.

As the study was well documented, it was considered sufficient for assessment. The information regarding the test material was provided by the sponsor. A reliability rating of 1 was assigned to this study, according to the criteria of Klimisch, 1997