Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
This experiment was specifically carried out to quantify the irritancy of ethyl acetate to assess its potential in transdermal drug delivery patches. The work is well reported and carried out to a protocol closely matching OECD 404. The ethyl acetate was not in direct contact with the skin of the test animals (separated by a 50um membrane) but in contrast exposure time was significantly longer than usual
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
test substance not placed in direct contact (50um semi-permeable membrane separated test solvent from skin) but occlusion should not make this a material difference. Exposure time 24 hours.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Evaluation of cutaneous side effects of transdermal patches delivering the drug levonorgestrel and ethyl acetate as a potential skin penetration enhancer. Test not performed according to OECD protocol but similar methodology used.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Rabbits were individually identified on the right ear using permanent ink marker.

TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Elkhorn Rabbitry (Watsonville, CA, USA).
- Weight at study initiation: 2-3 kg
- Housing: individually
- Diet: Purina rabbit chow ad libitum
- Water: uv purified drinking water ad libitum

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 22±2°C
- Humidity: 40-50%
- Photoperiod: 12 hour light/12hour dark cycle
Type of coverage:
other: un-occlusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not specified
Amount / concentration applied:
0.5ml of a gelled (2% weight of hydroxypropyl cellulose) suspension of the drug Levonorgestrel (1.5%) in ethyl acetate. Effectively therefore 96.5% ethyl acetate test solution.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
3-7 patches were placed on each rabbit on new sites over the course of the experiment. Each patch remained in contact with the rabbits skin for 24 hours.
Observation period:
7 days
Number of animals:
4
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: dorsal area
- Type of wrap if used: non-occlusive Keri-towels secured with cloth surgical tape. Test cells were held in place for 24 hours after which another cell was placed in a different place for a further 24 hours. Collars were used on the rabbits.

SCORING SYSTEM: Each test site was subsequently assessed using the Draize scoring method (0 to 4) for erythema and odema at 0, 24, 48 hours and 7 days. The irritation index was calculated (average sum of ethythema and odema across all 4 animals used) Individual scores are not tabulated but results are presented graphically with an indication of variability for ratings or erythema and odema.

OTHER: Microscopic examinations were performed on skin tissues fixed in neutral buffered 10% formalin. Samples were routinely processed, embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 5 um, and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. Microslides were examined by light microscopy and the results tabulated.
Irritation parameter:
primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24 h
Score:
1.7
Max. score:
8
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 7 days
Remarks on result:
other: tested using membrane polymer formulation 1
Irritation parameter:
primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: calculated from 24, 48, 72 hour observations
Score:
1.3
Max. score:
8
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Remarks on result:
other: tested using membrane polymer formulation 2
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: average of 24, 48, 72 hour readings
Score:
1.33
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 7 days
Remarks on result:
other: tested using membrane polymer formulation 1
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: average of 24, 48, 72 hour readings
Score:
0.4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 7 days
Remarks on result:
other: tested using membrane polymer formulation 2
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Ethyl acetate, when used as a penetration enhancing solvent for drug delivery through a permeable membrane, produced mild erythema and no oedema, hence its scores are expressed only as a primary irritation index (membrane formulation 1, ethylene vinyl acetate , 7.5% vinyl acetate/polybutylmethacrylate copolymer. Across the membrane formulation 2 (ethylene vinyl acetate, 9% vinyl acetate copolymer) produced mild erythema and very slight odema but these did not fully resolve within the 7 day observation window.

Two formulations were tested with differing membrane composition but both based on 100% ethyl acetate.

Formulation 1 (membrane 1)

24 hours

48 hours

72 hours

7 days

Erythema

1.6

1.3

1.1

0.7

Odema

0.7

0.2

0.3

0.2

PII

2.3

1.5

1.4

0.9

Formulation 2 (membrane 2)

24 hours

48 hours

72 hours

7 days

PII

1.5

1.3

1.0

0

Maximum Primary irritation index (PII) possible is 8.

Note that the control using water only produced slight irritation, indicating some contribution to overall irritancy from the test membranes.

Interpretation of results:
slightly irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: criteria of author
Conclusions:
There are no known reports of levonorgestrel causing irritancy. Some residual irritancy may have been caused by adhesive remaining on the skin following test cell removal. There was also evidence for some contribution to mild irritancy from the membranes themselves. The results indicated that using pure ethyl acetate in a transdermal delivery device is mildly to moderately irritating to rabbits.

Histological examination showed increased cellularity in the papillary and reticular dermis mile hyperkeratosis and scale crust formation. The histological changes were reversible and consistent with a very mild subacute irritation as suggested by the visual assessment. The conclusion was that use of ethyl acetate in a transdermal delivery device is mildly to moderately irritating to rabbits and would be expected to be non to mildly irritating to humans.

This study is not ideal but is deemed sufficiently reliable to characterise the skin irritancy properties of ethyl acetate.
Executive summary:

A study to examine ethyl acetate as a permeation enhancer solvent for transdermal drug delivery reported mild to moderate irritation to rabbit skin following application of a transdermal drug delivery device containing the drug levonorgestrel and neat ethyl acetate. Control devices containing only water were also found to be mildly irritating. Some residual irritancy may have been caused by adhesive remaining on the skin following test cell removal or the semi-permeable membrane used in the device. Whilst the solvent was not in direct contact with the skin (separated by the 50um membrane), the duration of exposure was significantly longer than required for a guideline study. This study is deemed sufficiently reliable to characterise ethyl acetate as not significantly irritating to the skin.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
Secondary source but one that is considered highly reliable since data (generated to guideline) has undergone a peer review process before inclusion and detailed experimental results are available per animal and per timepoint. Data used in this source has been subject to a peer review process by a reputable body which mitigates the fact that the original source document for studies presented are not referenced. It should be noted that the publication is intended as a reference work of in vivo results for the development of in vitro methods.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
not specified
Remarks:
Study is reported to be GLP compliant but there is no information on the testing laboratory.
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
undiluted

Amount applied: 0.1 ml
Duration of treatment / exposure:
single instillation, as per guideline
Observation period (in vivo):
no data
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
4
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): no data
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: average at time points 24, 48, 72hrs
Score:
0.41
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 days
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: average at time points 24, 48, 72hrs
Score:
0.08
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 days
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: average at time points 24, 48, 72hrs
Score:
1.25
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: average at time points 24, 48, 72hrs
Score:
0.58
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 3 days
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: average at time points 24, 48, 72hrs
Score:
0.5
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 days
Remarks on result:
other: average of results for 2 worst affected animals.
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: average at time points 24, 48, 72hrs
Score:
0.17
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 days
Remarks on result:
other: average of results for 2 worst affected animals.
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: average at time points 24, 48, 72hrs
Score:
1.33
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 days
Remarks on result:
other: average of results for 2 worst affected animals.
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: average at time points 24, 48, 72hrs
Score:
0.67
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 days
Remarks on result:
other: average of results for 2 worst affected animals.
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: average at time points 24, 48, 72hrs
Score:
15
Max. score:
110
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 7 days
Remarks on result:
other: See notes below
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Overall irritation score = (Corneal Opacity+area)x5 + Irisx5 + (Conjunctival redness + chemosis + discharge)x2. Maximum possible = 110.
Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
On the basis of these results, the substance does not warrant irritation under either the DSD or EU CLP regulation.
Executive summary:

In a reliable secondary source, which reported the results from peer reviewed guideline studies, ethyl acetate was found to be only midly irritating to rabbit eyes, with all effects disappearing within 7 days.

Synopsis

Based on these results, this substance would not be classified as irritating under either the DSD or the EU CLP regulation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Additional information

Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
Only reliable study available

Effects on skin irritation/corrosion: slightly irritating

Justification for classification or non-classification