Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 464-300-7 | CAS number: 141645-16-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2nd November 2004 to 3rd January 2005
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was conducted in compliance with: • OECD guideline No. 406, 17th July 1992, • EC Directive No. 96/54/EEC, B.6, 30th July 1996.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 005
- Report date:
- 2005
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The temperature recorded in the animal room was sometimes outside of the target ranges specified in the Study plan, • the sensitivity positive control test was performed more than 6 months ago.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The temperature recorded in the animal room was sometimes outside of the target ranges specified in the Study plan, • the sensitivity positive control test was performed more than 6 months ago.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- -
- EC Number:
- 464-300-7
- EC Name:
- -
- Cas Number:
- 141645-16-1
- Molecular formula:
- C19H17NO5
- IUPAC Name:
- 4-(2-butyl-5-nitro-1-benzofuran-3-carbonyl)phenol
- Details on test material:
- Beige powder
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Hartley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- Species and sex: male and nulliparous and non-pregnant female guinea pigs.
Strain and sanitary status: Hartley Crl: (HA) BR, Caesarian obtained, Barrier sustained - Virus Antibody Free (COBS - VAF).
Reason for this choice: species generally accepted by regulatory authorities for this type of study. The strain used has been shown to produce a satisfactory sensitization response using known sensitizers.
Breeder: Charles River Laboratories France, L’Arbresle, France.
Number: . two males and two females for the preliminary test,
. 30 animals (15 males and 15 females) for the main test.
Allocation to the groups: on day -1, the animals were weighed and allocated to two groups: a control group of ten animals (five males and five
females) and a treated group of 20 animals (ten males and ten females).
Age/weight: on day 1, the animals of the main test were 1-2 months old and had a mean body weight ± standard deviation of 381 ± 22 g for the
males and 376 ± 14 g for the females.
Acclimation: at least 5 days before the beginning of the study.
Identification: by individual ear-tattoo.
The conditions in the animal room were set as follows:
• temperature: 22 ± 2°C
• relative humidity: 30 to 70%
• light/dark cycle: 12 h/12 h
• ventilation: approximately 12 cycles/hour of filtered, non-recycled air.
The temperature and relative humidity were under continuous control and recording. The records were checked daily and filed. In addition to these
daily checks, the housing conditions and corresponding instrumentation and equipment are verified and calibrated at regular
intervals.
During the acclimation period and throughout the study, the animals were housed individually in polycarbonate cages with stainless steel lid
(48 cm x 27 cm x 20 cm) equipped with a polypropylene bottle.
Each cage contained autoclaved sawdust (SICSA, Alfortville, France).
Sawdust is analyzed by the supplier for composition and contaminant levels.
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Inductionopen allclose all
- Route:
- intradermal
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Concentration / amount:
- By intradermal route (tested concentrations: 1% and 5% (w/w))
Challengeopen allclose all
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Concentration / amount:
- By intradermal route (tested concentrations: 1% and 5% (w/w))
- No. of animals per dose:
- 2 males and 2 females for the preliminary test,
30 animals (15 males and 15 females) for the main test. - Details on study design:
- Thirty guinea pigs were allocated to two groups: a control group of five males and five females and a treated group of ten males and ten females.
On day 1, three pairs of intradermal injections were performed in the interscapular region of all animals:
• Freund's complete adjuvant (FCA) diluted to 50% (v/v) with 0.9% NaCl (both groups),
• test item at the concentration of 5% in corn oil (treated group) or vehicle alone (control group),
• test item at the concentration of 5% in a mixture FCA/0.9% NaCl (50/50, v/v) (treated group) or vehicle at the concentration of 50% (w/v) in a
mixture FCA/0.9% NaCl (50/50, v/v) (control group).
On day 8, the animals of the treated group received a topical application of the test item at the concentration of 10% (w/w) in ethanol/water (80/20, w/w) to the same test site, which was then covered by an occlusive dressing for 48 hours. The animals of the control group received an
application of vehicle under the same experimental conditions.
On day 22, all animals of both groups were challenged by a cutaneous application of the test item at the concentration of 50% (w/w) in acetone to the right flank. The test item was maintained under an occlusive dressing for 24 hours. The vehicle was applied to the left flank
under the same experimental conditions.
Skin reactions were evaluated approximately 24 and 48 hours after removal of the dressing.
At the end of the study, the animals were killed without examination of internal organs.
No skin samples were taken from the challenge application sites.
The interpretation of results was carried out according to the classification criteria laid down in Council Directive 67/548/EEC (and subsequent
adaptations).
Results and discussion
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Reading:
- other: challenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- other: Control group
- Dose level:
- 50% w/w
- No. with + reactions:
- 1
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- Dryness of skin
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: other: challenge. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: other: Control group. Dose level: 50% w/w. No with. + reactions: 1.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: Dryness of skin.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 1
- Total no. in group:
- 19
- Clinical observations:
- Discrete erytheme
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 1.0. Total no. in groups: 19.0. Clinical observations: Discrete erytheme.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 1
- Total no. in group:
- 19
- Clinical observations:
- Dryness of skin
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 1.0. Total no. in groups: 19.0. Clinical observations: Dryness of skin.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Conclusions:
- According to the classification criteria laid down in Council Directive 67/548/EEC (and subsequent adaptations) on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labeling of dangerous substances, the
test item should not be classified as sensitizing to the skin. - Executive summary:
According to the classification criteria laid down in Council Directive 67/548/EEC (and subsequent adaptations) on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labeling of dangerous substances, the test item should not be classified as sensitizing to the skin.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.