Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation
Remarks:
other: Category approach based on 11 OECD-405 and 2 OECD-437 studies.
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Category is coherent for more than 10 endpoints. Eye irritation was assessed using 11 OECD-405 studies and 2 OECD-437 studies.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2014

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Specific category approach based notably on cornea score and reversibility, see report.
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
Not relevant for category approach.

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
-
EC Number:
483-960-7
EC Name:
-
IUPAC Name:
D-pentose and D-glucose, oligomeric, C8 and C10 alkyl glycosides

Results and discussion

In vivo

Results
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
other: 3 days
Score:
ca. 3
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 21 days
Remarks on result:
other: After 21 days, mean cornea score is 0.3.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye)
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Based on 11 OECD-405 and 2 OECD-437 studies, APP with short alkyl chain appear as borderline between eye irritation/damage cat. 2 and 1. Strict application of CLP rules drive a classification 1, as this classification may be very conservative, an SCL is proposed.