Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Skin irritation (Rat, GLP): non-skin irritant [Schering AG, Report No. -draft-, 1994-07-06]


Eye irritation (Rabbit, GLP): non-eye irritant [Schering AG, Report No. -draft-, 1994-11-23]

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
February to April 1994
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study without detailed documentation
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
not specified
Principles of method if other than guideline:
A combined study on acute dermal toxicity and on local tolerance was used to assess skin irritation/corrosion (comparable to OECD TG 402 and 404). The study design and reporting deviates from the current OECD TG 404, however, the study is considered sufficient for assessment of this endpoint. As described in ATP 96/54/EC ANNEX IV A, PART B: METHODS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF TOXICITY AND OTHER HEALTH EFFECTS, a strategy of testing for irritancy allows the non-performance of a test if an acute toxicity study by the dermal route has been conducted at the limit test dose with the substance (method B.3), and no skin irritation was observed, further testing for skin irritation (method B.4) may be unnecessary.
GLP compliance:
yes
Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Type of coverage:
occlusive
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Controls:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 hours
Observation period:
14 days
Number of animals:
3/sex/dose
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4

At 2000 mg/kg (3 male rats exposed) clinical signs such as apathy, lateral position, retarded respiration and eyelid closure were observed. Two male rats died. Only one male rat survived and therefore mean irritation score could not be determined.


No compound-related findings were observed in hematology.


 

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Since the test substance was tolerated without any local skin irritation, classification is not required
Executive summary:

The single dermal administration of Tamip diacetate to male and female rats in the doses of 200 mg/kg and male rats of 2000 mg/kg results at high dose in clinical signs in all male rats. Two male rat died. The female animals were without any clinical signs. The test substance was tolerated without any local skin irritations.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
July 1994
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
1987
GLP compliance:
yes
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Schriever
- Weight at study initiation: 3.5 -4.1 kg
- Housing: individually under conventional conditions in metal cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum: pell. AItromin® K
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum: demineralized water
- Acclimation period: > 14 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21-22
- Humidity (%): 70-74
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: left eye served as control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 100 mg
Duration of treatment / exposure:
test substance remained in eye and was not flushed out
Observation period (in vivo):
72h
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 females
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): no washing

SCORING SYSTEM: According to the score system in the "|llustrated Guide for Grading Eye Irritation by Hazardous Substances", U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Food and Drug Administration, Washington D.C. 20204, USA. The score system can also be found in the Annex to EEC Directive 92/69/EWG, dated 31. Jul. 1992, for the 17th adaption of the EEC Directive 67/548/EWG.

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: not specified
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.22
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 days
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Other effects:
Slight to moderate transient irritation on the rabbit conjuctiva mainly on application day. All animals were without any symptoms from day 2 or 3 onwards

 





























































































































































Animal No. and sex



Location



Finding



Right eye 100 mg test item, hours after application



results



left eye control untreated, hours after application



results



24



48



72



 



24



48



72



 



 



Cornea



 



0



0



0



negative



0



0



0



negative



Iris



 



0



0



0



0



0



0



Conjunctiva



Reddening



1



0



0



0



0



0



 



swelling



0



0



0



0



0



0



 



Cornea



 



0



0



0



negative



0



0



0



negative



Iris



 



0



0



0



0



0



0



Conjunctiva



Reddening



1



0



0



0



0



0



 



swelling



0



0



0



0



0



0



 



Cornea



 



0



0



0



negative



0



0



0



negative



Iris



 



0



0



0



0



0



0



Conjunctiva



Reddening



1



0



0



0



0



0



 



swelling



0



0



0



0



0



0



 


Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test substance is non-eye irritant, classification is not required
Executive summary:

The single administration of Tamip diacetate to the right eye of female rabbits in the doses of 100 mg/kg results in slight to moderate transient irritation on the rabbit conjuctiva mainly on application day. All animals were without any symptoms from day 2 or 3 onwards. The test substance is non-eye irritant.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

The single dermal administration of Tamip diacetate to male and female rats in the doses of 200 mg/kg and male rats of 2000 mg/kg results at high dose in clinical signs in all male rats. Two male rat died. The female animals were without any clinical signs. The test substance was tolerated without any local skin irritations. (Schering AG, Report No. -draft-, 1994-07-06)

The single administration of Tamip diacetate to the right eye of female rabbits in the doses of 100 mg/kg results in slight to moderate transient irritation on the rabbit conjunctiva mainly on application day. All animals were without any symptoms from day 2 or 3 onwards. The test substance is non-eye irritant. (Schering AG, Report No. -draft-, 1994-11-23)

Justification for classification or non-classification

Tamip diacetate was tested in one skin and one eye irritation test and did not show any irritation potential.

Classification according to Directive 67/548/EEC and Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 (CLP) is not required.