Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 300-634-0 | CAS number: 93951-12-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- October 2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 018
- Report date:
- 2018
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 438 (Isolated Chicken Eye Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Version / remarks:
- 2018
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-[2,4-bis(tert-pentyl)phenoxy]-N-(3,5-dichloro-4-ethyl-2-hydroxyphenyl)butyramide
- EC Number:
- 300-634-0
- EC Name:
- 2-[2,4-bis(tert-pentyl)phenoxy]-N-(3,5-dichloro-4-ethyl-2-hydroxyphenyl)butyramide
- Cas Number:
- 93951-12-3
- Molecular formula:
- C28H39Cl2NO3
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-[2,4-bis(tert-pentyl)phenoxy]-N-(3,5-dichloro-4-ethyl-2-hydroxyphenyl)butyramide
- Test material form:
- solid
- Details on test material:
- Batch 44029
colour : White to off-white
retest date : 01/06/2019
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Controlled room temperature (15-25°C, <70% relative humidity), protected from light and humidity (stored in a tightly closed container)
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- The test item was applied in its original form (although it was grounded to fine powder).
the eye was held in horizontal position and 30 mg powdered test item was applied onto the centre of the cornea in such a way that the entire surface of the cornea was covered. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- After an exposure period of 10 seconds, the surface was rinsed with physiological saline.
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- The control eyes and test eyes were evaluated pre-treatment and at approximately 30, 75, 120, 180 and 240 minutes after the post-treatment rinse. Minor variations within approximately ±5 minutes were considered acceptable.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 2 experiments
In each experiment, three test item treated eyes, three positive control treated eyes and one negative control treated eye were examined. - Details on study design:
- Chicken heads were collected after slaughter in a commercial abattoir from chickens (approximately 7 weeks old) which are used for human consumption.
The eye ball was carefully removed from the orbit by holding the nictitating membrane with a surgical forceps, while cutting the eye muscles with bent scissors. Care was taken to remove the eyeball from the orbit without cutting off the optical nerve too short. The procedure avoided pressure on the eye while removing the eyeball from the orbit, in order to prevent distortion of the cornea and subsequent corneal opacity. Once removed from the orbit, the eye was placed onto damp paper and the nictitating membrane was cut away with other connective tissue. The prepared eyes were kept on the wet papers in a closed box so that the appropriate humidity was maintained.
Results and discussion
In vitro
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- percent corneal swelling
- Remarks:
- at up to 75 min
- Run / experiment:
- 1
- Value:
- 0.5
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- percent corneal swelling
- Remarks:
- at up to 240 min
- Run / experiment:
- 1
- Value:
- 0.5
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Run / experiment:
- 1
- Value:
- 0.17
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- other: fluorescein retention
- Run / experiment:
- 1
- Value:
- 0
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- percent corneal swelling
- Remarks:
- at up to 75 min
- Run / experiment:
- 2
- Value:
- 0
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- percent corneal swelling
- Remarks:
- at up to 240 min
- Run / experiment:
- 2
- Value:
- 0
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Run / experiment:
- 2
- Value:
- 0.33
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- other: fluorescein retention
- Run / experiment:
- 2
- Value:
- 0
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- Experiment I : Test item was stuck on one cornea surface after the post-treatment rinse. The cornea surface was cleared at 75 minutes after the post-treatment rinse.
Exepriment II : none
Any other information on results incl. tables
VALIDITY OF THE TEST
The results from all eyes used met the quality control standards. The negative control and positive control results were within the historical data range in each experiment. This study was considered to be valid.
MORPHOLOGICAL EFFECTS
In the first experiment, the test item was stuck on one cornea surface after the post-treatment rinse. The cornea surface was cleared at 75 minutes after the post-treatment rinse.
In each experiment, positive control material was stuck on all cornea surfaces after the post-treatment rinse, the cornea surfaces (3/3) were not cleared at 240 minutes after the post-treatment rinse.
No other morphological effect was observed in the study.
DEVIATIONS TO THE STUDY PLAN
There was no deviation to the Study Plan.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Based on these in vitro eye irritation assays in isolated chicken eyes with the substance, the test item was non-irritant, UN GHS Classification: No Category.
- Executive summary:
An in vitro eye irritation study of the test item was performed in isolated chicken’s eyes. The irritation effects of the test item were evaluated according to the OECD No. 438 guideline (25 June 2018).
In each experiment after the zero reference measurements, the eye was held in horizontal position and 30 mg powdered test item was applied onto the centre of the cornea in such a way that the entire surface of the cornea was covered. After 10 seconds, the surface was rinsed with physiological saline. Positive control eyes were treated with 30 mg powdered Imidazole. The negative control eye was treated with 30 μL of physiological saline (0.9% (w/v) NaCl solution). In each experiment, three test item treated eyes, three positive control treated eyes and one negative control treated eye were examined.
The results from all eyes used in the study met the quality control standards. The negative control and positive control results were within the historical control data range in each experiment. Thus, the study was considered to be valid.
Experiment I: No significant corneal swelling was observed during the four-hour observation period on test item treated eyes. No significant cornea opacity change and no fluorescein retention change was observed on all three eyes. Test item was stuck on one cornea surface after the post-treatment rinse. The cornea surface was cleared at 75 minutes after the post-treatment rinse.
Experiment II: No corneal swelling was observed during the four-hour observation period on test item treated eyes. No significant cornea opacity change was observed on all three eyes. No fluorescein retention change was noted on all three eyes. No other corneal effects were observed.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.