Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: dermal

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
16 August 1999 (study initiation date)
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1999
Report date:
1999

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.1200 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.3 (Acute Toxicity (Dermal))
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Japan MAFF Acute Dermal Toxicity Study, 1985
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1-[3,5-dichloro-2-fluoro-4-(1,1,2,3,3,3-hexafluoropropoxy)phenyl]-3-(2,6-difluorobenzoyl)urea
EC Number:
601-779-5
Cas Number:
121451-02-3
Molecular formula:
C17H7Cl2F9N2O3
IUPAC Name:
1-[3,5-dichloro-2-fluoro-4-(1,1,2,3,3,3-hexafluoropropoxy)phenyl]-3-(2,6-difluorobenzoyl)urea
Test material form:
solid
Details on test material:
- Substance type: white solid

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 2.3-2.5 kg
- Diet: 5 ounces of pelleted rodent feed per day.
- Water: Municipal water was provided ad libitum.
- Acclimation period: Animals were acclimated to the laboratory environment for at least two weeks prior to study start.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 ± 3 °C
- Humidity (%):40 - 60 %
- Air changes (per hr): approximately 12-15 times/hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12- hour light/dark photocycle, lights on at 6:00 a.m. and off at 6:00 p.m.

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 1 May 1999 To: 31 August 1999

Administration / exposure

Type of coverage:
occlusive
Vehicle:
other: 0.5 % methylcellulose
Details on dermal exposure:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: Trunk of each rabbit.
- Site preparation: Clipped free of fur the day prior to application of the test material.
- % coverage: Approximately 10 % of the surface area of the rabbits.
- Type of wrap if used: The site was covered with a gauze/cotton patch (approximately 10 x 14 cm), held in place by an elastic jacket.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: The skin was wiped thoroughly with a water-moistened, soft disposable towel and dried with a soft disposable towel.
- Time after start of exposure: 24 hours.

VEHICLE
- Amount applied: The test material was moistened with 12.0 mL of 0.5 % methylcellulose.
Duration of exposure:
24 hours
Doses:
5000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
Five per sex per dose
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing:
A detailed clinical observation (DCO) was conducted for all rabbits prior to test material administration for comparison with the observations recorded throughout the study. Animals were observed a minimum of 2 times, one of which was a DCO, on the day of treatment. A DCO was done each day (including weekends and holidays) during the study. Hand-held and open-field observations included a careful physical examination.
For scored DCO’s, only observations other than normal were recorded. Observations were dictionary based, and the dictionary contained most of the common physical and neurologic abnormalities seen in toxicity studies. Since not all potential observations were contained in the dictionary, free-field descriptions also were allowed.
The rabbits were weighed pre-study, the day of treatment (day 1) and on test days 2, 8, and 15.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: Yes
At study termination, all animals were euthanized with Beuthanasia solution. A complete necropsy was conducted on all animals by a veterinary pathologist assisted by a team of trained individuals. The eyes were examined in situ using a moistened glass microscope slide applied to the corneal surface. Following inspection of the externum, including the treatment site and body orifices, the nasal, cranial, oral, thoracic, and abdominal cavities were opened and the visceral organs were examined both in situ and following dissection.
Statistics:
Means and standard deviations were calculated for body weights. The data were evaluated for statistical outliers by a sequential test (Grubbs, 1969), however, outliers were not routinely excluded from statistical analysis.

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Key result
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 5 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
No mortality occured during the study.
Clinical signs:
other: There were no clinical signs of systemic toxicity. All rabbits had reddened and thickened skin at the dermal test site on day 2. In addition, one male had perineal faecal soiling on day 2 only. In all animals, the reddening and thickening of the skin reso
Gross pathology:
There were no treatment-related gross pathologic observations.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Individual Body Weights

Dose (mg/kg)

Animal Sex

Animal No.

Day of Test

-4

1

2

8

15

5000

Male

3921

2368.0

2396.0

2305.6

2593.8

2621.1

3922

2381.9

2402.7

2344.5

2665.3

2693.7

3923

2354.8

2386.6

2341.8

2540.9

2542.6

3924

2441.7

2507.3#

2406.6

2760.5

2737.1

3925

2354.1

2401.1

2285.8

2621.9

2586.1

Mean

2380.1

2418.7

2336.9

2636.5

2636.1

SD

36.3

49.9

46.2

82.7

79.0

Female

3926

2409.0

2336.1

2415.3

2516.7

2625.0

3927

2257.0

2255.6

2078.7

2392.8

2449.1

3928

2406.0

2400.9

2302.4

2575.0

2605.6

3929

2382.4

2381.7

2270.2

2670.1

2542.9

3930

2333.1

2334.3

2284.8

2481.0

2508.1

Mean

2357.5

2341.7

2270.3

2527.1

2546.1

SD

63.9

56.1

121.4

103.7

71.8

# statistical outliers inculded

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Remarks:
Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the test, the acute dermal LD50 of the test material for male and female New Zealand White rabbits was greater than 5000 mg/kg.
Executive summary:

The acute dermal toxicity of the test material was determined in a study performed under GLP conditions and in line with the standardised guidelines OECD 402, EPA OPPTS 870.1200, EU Method B.3 and Japan MAFF Acute Dermal Toxicity Study, 1985.

Five male and five female New Zealand White rabbits received a single 24 hour exposure to 5000 mg/kg body weight applied to shaved intact skin. The test material was moistened with 12.0 mL of 0.5 % methylcellulose. Parameters evaluated included body weights, detailed clinical observations, and gross pathologic evaluations.

All rabbits survived the 5000 mg/kg dose level. There were no clinical signs of systemic toxicity. All rabbits had reddened and thickened skin at the dermal test site on day 2. In addition, one male had perineal faecal soiling on day 2 only. In all animals, the reddening and thickening of the skin resolved by day 4. All rabbits lost body weight on days 1 or 2, and then surpassed their pre-study weights by study termination. There were no treatment-related gross pathologic observations.

Under the conditions of the test, the acute dermal LD50 of the test material for male and female New Zealand White rabbits was greater than 5000 mg/kg.