Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Partition coefficient

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
12 Jun 2015 - 16 Jun 2015
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study conducted to OECD and EC guidelines and in compliance with GLP
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 117 (Partition Coefficient (n-octanol / water), HPLC Method)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.8 (Partition Coefficient)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
HPLC method
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Analytical method:
high-performance liquid chromatography
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
6
Temp.:
25 °C
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Remarks:
pH not reported but not relevant for non ionising substance
Details on results:
Under the conditions of the analysis, the components of the test substance eluted after all reference standards, indicating a log10Pow value of greater than 6. The final reference standard, DDT, eluted after 14 minutes, while the components of the test substance eluted between 22 and 23 minutes after an increase in mobile phase strength.
Conclusions:
The test substance, Unjecol 85AN, was found to have a log10Pow value of greater than 6.

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Log Kow (Log Pow):
6
at the temperature of:
25 °C

Additional information

The result above is based on a llimit test and not an actual value.