Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Justification for type of information:
Data is from peer reviewed journal.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Contact dermatitis to lauryl pyridinium chloride and benzoxonium chloride.
Author:
DERK P. BRUYNZEEL, ANTON C. DE GROOT AND J. WILLEM WEYLAND
Year:
1987
Bibliographic source:
Contact Dermatitis 1987 vol. 17 pages- 41—60

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Patch tests with the European standard series (ICDRG)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Patch test was conducted to study skin sensitization of chemical.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of study:
patch test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Study was based on the effects observed in human volunteer after exposure of the substance.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1-dodecylpyridinium chloride
EC Number:
203-232-2
EC Name:
1-dodecylpyridinium chloride
Cas Number:
104-74-5
Molecular formula:
C17H30N.Cl
IUPAC Name:
1-dodecylpyridin-1-ium chloride
Test material form:
solid
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Laurylpyridinium chloride (1-dodecylpyridinium chloride)
- Molecular formula : C17H30NCl
- Molecular weight: 283.884 g/mol
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: solid
- Purity: No data
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): No data

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
other: Human
Strain:
other: not applicable
Sex:
male
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
Details on test animal
TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation:28 year old

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
0.1 %, .01%
Day(s)/duration:
no data
Adequacy of induction:
not specified
Challenge
No.:
#1
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
0.1%
Adequacy of challenge:
not specified
No. of animals per dose:
23
Details on study design:
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: Single
- Exposure period: 48 and 72-hrs
- Test groups: Yes
- Control group: 23 controls were tested
- Site: the left side of the chest and adjacent area of the arm
- Frequency of applications: No data
- Duration: No data
- Concentrations: 0.01 and 0.1%


B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE: no data
Challenge controls:
Yes,
23 controls were tested
Positive control substance(s):
not specified

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0.1%
No. with + reactions:
1
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
Positive reacrtion were observed
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
other: Control group
Dose level:
0.1 %
Total no. in group:
23
Clinical observations:
Stong positive reaction were observed
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation

Any other information on results incl. tables

Of 23 controls tested with 0.1% aq test chemical ., 16 were negative, 6 had a ? +, and 1 a + reaction.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (skin sensitising) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
0.1% aqueous test chemical was sensitizing to human skin.
Hence, the test chemical can be considered to be sensitizing to skin.
Executive summary:

Patch tests were performed to determine the irritation and allergenic potential of the test chemical.

A 28-year-old male had recurrent itchy dermatitis on the left side of the chest and adjacent area of the arm, where his wife usually rested her head when sleeping. He had noted that the eruption always developed after his wife had used a hair conditioner.

Patch tests with the European standard sense (ICDRG) and the conditioner (tested undiluted) showed a positive reaction only to the conditioner. Later its ingredients and additional quaternary ammonium salts were also tested separately.

Of 23 controls tested with 0.1% aq test chemical, 16 were negative, 6 had a ? +, and 1 a + reaction.

0.1% aqueous test chemical was sensitizing to human skin.

Hence, the test chemical can be considered to be sensitizing to skin.