Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 812-621-1 | CAS number: 1910113-99-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation:
Two studies are available:
1) An acute dermal irritation study (Latour J.E.H.M., MSc., 2016) is available which is key study. This study showed that the test substance is not irritating.
2) An in vitro skin corrosion study (Eurlings I.M.J., PhD., 2016) is available which is supporting study. This study showed that the test substance is not corrosive.
Eye irritation:
One in vitro study is available (Eurlings I.M.J., PhD., 2016) which is key study. This study showed that the test substance is not corrosive and not irritating to bovine eyes.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 29 Mar to 08 Apr 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study run to a method comparable with current guidelines and to GLP
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River France, L’Arbresle, France
- Age at study initiation: between 12 and 24 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: at least 1.5 kg
- Housing: Animals were individually housed in labeled cages with perforated floors and shelters.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Pelleted diet for rabbits approximately 100 grams per day. Hay and wooden sticks were available during the study period.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Free access to tap water.
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days before start of treatment
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18 to 24
- Humidity (%): 40 to 70
- Air changes (per hr): at least 10 air changes/hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): a 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- other: watery ethanol (50% v/v)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 grams of the test substance
VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 1 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 h
- Observation period:
- 72 h
- Number of animals:
- 3 males
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: approximately 150 square centimeters (10x15 cm)
- Type of wrap if used: metalline patch mounted on Micropore tape, which was wrapped around the abdomen and secured with Coban elastic bandage.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): tap water
- Time after start of exposure: Four hours
OBSERVATION:
-Mortality/Viability: Twice daily.
-Toxicity: At least once daily.
-Body Weight: Day of treatment (prior to application) and on the day of the final observation
-Irritation: The skin reactions were assessed at approximately 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the removal of the dressings and test substance. The irritation scores and a description of all other (local) effects were recorded. Adjacent areas of the untreated skin of each animal served as controls.
-Necropsy: No necropsy was performed according to study plan.
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: Mean of 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: Mean of 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- No skin irritation was caused by 4 hours exposure to test substance.
There was no evidence of a corrosive effect on the skin. - Other effects:
- No staining of the treated skin by the test substance was observed and no test substance remnants were seen.
No signs of systemic toxicity were observed in the animals during the test period and no mortality occurred. - Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Based on these results the test substance does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labelling requirement for skin irritation according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations (2015) (including all amendments) and Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of items and mixtures (including all amendments).
Reference
Individual skin irritation scores
Animal |
41 |
45 |
48 |
|||
Time after exposure |
Erythema (0-4) |
Oedema (0-4) |
Erythema (0-4) |
Oedema (0-4) |
Erythema (0-4) |
Oedema (0-4) |
1 hour |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 hours |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
48 hours |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
72 hours |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 18 to 19 Jan 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study run to a method comparable with current guidelines and to GLP
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- other: cattle
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Bovine eyes from young cattle were obtained from the slaughterhouse (Vitelco, -'s Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands), where the eyes were excised by a slaughterhouse employee as soon as possible after slaughter.
-Transport: Eyes were collected and transported in physiological saline in a suitable container under cooled conditions. - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 311.9 to 340.6 mg - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 240±10 minutes
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Three eyes each group
- Details on study design:
- Removal of test substance
- Washing (if done): After the incubation the solutions and the test compound were removed and the epithelium was washed at least three times with MEM with phenol red.
- Time after start of exposure: 240±10 minutes
Reference items
- Negative control: A negative control, physiological saline was included to detect non-specific changes in the test system and to provide a baseline for the assay endpoints.
- Positive control: 20% (w/v) Imidazole solution prepared in physiological saline.
Opacity measurement
The opacity of a cornea was measured by the diminution of light passing through the cornea. The light was measured as illuminance (I = luminous flux per area, unit: lux) by a light meter.
The change in opacity for each individual cornea (including the negative control) was calculated by subtracting the initial opacity reading from the final post-treatment reading. The corrected opacity for each treated cornea with the test item or positive control was calculated by subtracting the average change in opacity of the negative control corneas from the change in opacity of each test item or positive control treated cornea.
The mean opacity value of each treatment group was calculated by averaging the corrected opacity values of the treated corneas for each treatment group.
Application of sodium fluorescein
Following the final opacity measurement, permeability of the cornea to Na-fluorescein was evaluated.
The medium of both compartments (anterior compartment first) was removed. The posterior compartment was refilled with fresh cMEM. The anterior compartment was filled with 1 mL of 5 mg Na-fluorescein/mL cMEM solution. The holders were slightly rotated, with the corneas maintained in a horizontal position, to ensure uniform distribution of the sodium-fluorescein solution over the entire cornea. Corneas were incubated in a horizontal position for 90 ± 5 minutes at 32 ± 1°C.
Permeability determinations
After the incubation period, the medium in the posterior compartment of each holder was removed and placed into a sampling tube labelled according to holder number. 360 μL of the medium from each sampling tube was transferred to a 96-well plate. The optical density at 490 nm (OD490) of each sampling tube was measured in triplicate using a microplate reader. Any OD490 that was 1.500 or higher was diluted to bring the OD490 into the acceptable range (linearity up to OD490 of 1.500 was verified before the start of the experiment). OD490 values of less than 1.500 were used in the permeability calculation.
The mean OD490 for each treatment was calculated using cMEM corrected OD490 values. If a dilution has been performed, the OD490 of each reading of the positive control and the test item was corrected for the mean negative control OD490 before the dilution factor was applied to the reading. - Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 240 minutes
- Score:
- 1.9
- Max. score:
- 2.6
- Remarks on result:
- other: Scoring based upon IVIS value
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The individual in vitro irritancy scores for the negative controls ranged from -0.1 to 0.9. The individual positive control in vitro irritancy scores ranged from 101 to 154. The corneas treated with the positive control were turbid after the 240 minutes of treatment.
The corneas treated with the test substance showed opacity values ranging from 1.3 to 2.1 and permeability values ranging from 0.009 to 0.031. The corneas were clear after the 240 minutes of treatment with test substance. Hence, the in vitro irritancy scores ranged from 1.4 to 2.6 after 240 minutes of treatment with test substance. - Other effects:
- No pH effect of the test item was observed on the rinsing medium.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- The test substance did not induce ocular irritation through both endpoints, resulting in a mean in vitro irritancy score of 1.9 after 240 minutes of treatment.
Since test substance induced an IVIS ≤ 3, no classification is required for eye irritation or serious eye damage.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Additional information
Skin irritation/corrosion
Two studies are available:
1) An acute dermal irritation study was conducted according to OECD 404 using rabbits (Latour J.E.H.M., MSc., 2016). Key study.
This study showed that the test substance is not irritating.
2) An in vitro skin corrosion study was conducted according to OECD 431 using a human skin model (Eurlings I.M.J., PhD., 2016). Supporting study.
This study showed that the test substance is not corrosive.
Eye irritation:
One in vitro study is available which was conducted according to OECD Guideline 431 under GLP (Eurlings I.M.J., PhD., 2016). Key study.
This study showed that the test substance is not corrosive and not irritating to bovine eyes.
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
Study run to a method comparable with current guidelines and to GLP
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
Study run to a method comparable with current guidelines and to GLP
Justification for classification or non-classification
Skin irritation/corrosion: Mean scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours for erythema were < 2.3 (actual value 0) and for edema were < 2.3 (actual value 0).
Serious eye damage/eye irritation: An in vitro study data is available with IVIS <3 (actual value 1.9).
Therefore in accordance with Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 Table 3.2.2 and section 3.3.2, this substance should not be classified for skin irritation/corrosion and serious eye damage endpoint. In the absence of in-vivo data no definitive conclusion can be drawn on eye irritation endpoint.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.