Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
5 November 2012 - 21 November 2012
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study was performed to standardised guidelines OECD 405 and EU Method B.5 and in line with GLP. The study was reported to a high standard, sufficient to assess the quality of the data presented.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2012

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Dioctyltin oxide
EC Number:
212-791-1
EC Name:
Dioctyltin oxide
Cas Number:
870-08-6
Molecular formula:
C16H34OSn
IUPAC Name:
dioctylstannanone
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
migrated information: powder
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Di-n-octyltin oxide
- Physical state: white solid
- Storage conditions: room temperature in the dark

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 12 - 20 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.23 - 2.88 kg
- Housing: individually in suspended cages
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17 - 23 °C
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70 %
- Air changes (per hr): at least 15 air changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours dark / 12 hours light

IN-LIFE DATES: From 5 November 2012 - 21 November 2012

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL (equivalent to approximately 78 mg)
Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Dose administration: 0.1 mL of the test material was placed into the conjunctival sac of the right eye of one rabbit, by gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The upper and lower eyelids were then held together for about 1 second immediately after treatment, to prevent loss of the test material, and then released. The left eye remained untreated and was used for control purposes. After consideration of the ocular responses in the first treated animal, a second animal was treated.
Observation period (in vivo):
Animals were observed up to 7 days post administration
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
One male initially, followed by a further male once the irritation potential was fully assessed in the first animal.
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Irrigation was not performed

SCORING SYSTEM:
The reactions observed were scored in accordance with the criteria of Draize (1977).

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE:
Examination of the eye was facilitated by the use of the light source from a standard ophthalmoscope.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 hours
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1.67
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1.3
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.2
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 hours
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1.3
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1.2
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritant / corrosive response data:
No corneal effects were noted during the study. Iridial inflammation was noted in one treated eye at the 24 hour observation. Moderate conjunctival irritation was noted in both treated eyes one hour after treatment. Moderate conjunctival irritation was noted in one treated eye at 24 hours while minimal conjunctival irritation was noted in the other treated eye at 24 hours. Minimal conjunctival irritation persisted in both treated eyes to the 48 and 72 hour observations. Both treated eyes appeared normal at the 7 day observation.
Other effects:
Both animals showed expected gain in bodyweight during the study.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 2: Ocular Irritation Results

Animal

1

2

Time after treatment

1 h

24 h

48 h

72 h

7 d

1 h

24 h

48 h

72 h

7 d

Cornea

 

Degree of opacity

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Area of cornea involved

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Iris

 

Iris

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Conjunctivae

 

Redness

2

2

2

1

0

2

1

1

1

0

Chemosis

2

2

1

1

0

2

1

1

1

0

Discharge

1

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

 

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
As there was no corneal involvement in any of the two treated eyes, and mean values for the 24 to 72-Hour time points were 0.2, 1.3 and 1.2 for iritis, conjunctival redness and conjunctival chemosis, respectively, the test material is not irritating in rabbit eyes. The test material does not require classification for eye irritation in line with Regulation No. 1272/2008
Executive summary:

The eye irritation of the test material was determined in accordance with standardised guidelines OECD 405 and EU Method B.5. During the study, 0.1 mL of test material was placed into one eye of each of two rabbits and were assessed for up to 7 days to determine the grade of ocular reaction. No corneal effects were noted during the study. Iridial inflammation was noted in one treated eye at the 24 hour observation. Moderate conjunctival irritation was noted in both treated eyes one hour after treatment. Moderate conjunctival irritation was noted in one treated eye at 24 hours while minimal conjunctival irritation was noted in the other treated eye at 24 hours. Minimal conjunctival irritation persisted in both treated eyes to the 48 and 72 hour observations. All signs of irritation had completely resolved within 7 days of application.

Under the conditions of the study, the test material is not irritating in rabbit eyes. The test material does not require classification for eye irritation in line with Regulation No. 1272/2008.