Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
1 469.298 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
effect on fertility
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
60
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Value:
88 157.895 mg/m³
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
833.333 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
effect on fertility
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
60
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
50 000 mg/kg bw/day
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - workers

Acute toxicity

Based upon the study results and available information, the substance aluminium,4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfop henyl)azo]-1H-pyr azole-3-carboxylic acid complex (tartrazine) is not expected to show acute toxicity effect by the oral, inhalation and dermal route and thus will not be considered for further classification.

 

Irritation / corrosion

Skin Irritation: Administration of aluminium, 4, 5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl) azo]-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid complex to rabbit resulted in a mild skin irritation effect which is not adequate for classification as a skin irritant. Therefore, it can be concluded that aluminium, 4, 5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl) azo]-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid complex is not irritating to skin of rabbit.

 

Eye irritation: The modified maximum average score (MMAS) from QSAR eye irritation score of aluminium, 4, 5-dihydro-5-oxo-1- (4-sulfophenyl) -4-[(4-sulfophenyl) azo]-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid complex is estimated as 20.2. This score indicates that aluminium, 4, 5-dihydro-5-oxo-1- (4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl) azo]-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid complex is not irritating to the eye of rabbit.(as the criteria MMAS <25 is not irritating).

 

Sensitisation

 The substance aluminium,4, 5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl) azo]-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid complex(Tartrazine Lake) was found to be a not sensitising to rabbit skin.

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
362.319 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
effect on fertility
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
120
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Value:
43 478.261 mg/m³
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
416.667 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
effect on fertility
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
80
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
50 000 mg/kg bw/day
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
208.333 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
effect on fertility
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
120
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
25 000 mg/kg bw/day
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - General Population

Aluminium, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid complex (Tartrazine yellow, aluminium lake)does not exhibit acute toxicity by oral, dermal and inhalation route. It is assumed to be non-irritating to the skin of humans and eye of rabbits, is not genotoxic and is not a developmental or reproductive toxin.  In the absence of local effects following short-term or long-term exposure, no dose-response data are available and a quantitative dose descriptor is not derived. DNEL values for local exposure are therefore not calculated.

 

In the absence of acute systemic toxicity, no dose-response data are available and a quantitative dose descriptor is not derived. DNEL values for acute systemic effects are therefore not calculated.

 

A standard approach to deriving DNEL values would be to use the reproductive toxicity dataset and apply assessment factors as described in ECHA guidance documents. The critical endpoint is considered to be the NOAEL of 100000 mg/kg body weight by oral route.