Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 207-330-6 | CAS number: 462-95-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
Based on the results of a reproduction/developmental toxicity screening study performed with ethylal and following OECD TG 421 and GLP, the NOAEL was 1000 mg/kg/day, corresponding to the highest tested concentration.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 14 November 2017 - 07 September 2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 421 (Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- yes
- Justification for study design:
- The purpose of this study was a screening test for reproductive/developmental effects, with administration of the test item, Ethylal, by oral gavage administration to Sprague Dawley Rats for at least four weeks.
The doses used in this study (0, 300, 600 and 1000 mg/kg/day) were selected in conjunction with the Sponsor. Dose levels were selected following the completion of the preliminary toxicity study (Envigo Study number: WG36YM).
In that study, dose levels of 300, 600 and 1000 mg/kg/day were well tolerated with no clinical signs or abnormal macroscopic findings and there were no adverse effects on food intake or body weight gain. There were initial post dosed signs of decreased activity in all animals receiving 1000 mg/kg/day, and unsteady gait in all males and 2/3 females at this dose level. Decreased activity, unsteady gait and piloerection was observed in one male receiving 1000 mg/kg/day on Day 2, after which no post dose signs were observed.
Based on the data generated on WG36YM and as the LD50 had been reported as 3536 mg/kg bw, a high dose level of 1000 mg/kg/day was selected for use on this study. The intermediate and low dose remained at 600 and 300 mg/kg/day to allow for assessment of a dose response. - Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Colourless liquid.
Batch number: 1709141400R - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on species / strain selection:
- The rat was chosen as the test species because of the requirement for a rodent species by regulatory agencies. The Sprague Dawley [Crl:CD(SD)] strain was used because of the historical control data available at this laboratory.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River (UK) Ltd
- Age at study initiation: Males 71 to 77 days old. Females 85 to 91 days old.
- Weight at study initiation: Males 336 to 418 g. Females 264 to 321 g.
- Housing: On arrival and non-selective allocation to cages.
- Diet: SDS VRF1 Certified pelleted diet. ad libitum
- Water: Potable water from the public supply via polycarbonate bottles with sipper tubes; ad libitum
- Acclimation period: Males: eight days prior to the commencement of treatment. Females: 22 days prior to the commencement of treatment.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): and Humidity (%): Monitored and maintained within the range of 20-24ºC and 40-70%.
- Air changes (per hr): Filtered fresh air which was passed to atmosphere and not recirculated.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): Artificial lighting, 12 hours light : 12 hours dark. - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: The required amount of test item was mixed with a small quantity of the vehicle. Approximately 20% of the final volume of vehicle was gradually added. The formulation was quantitatively transferred and diluted to final volume and magnetically stirred in a sealed container of appropriate size ensuring there is no head space.
Frequency of preparation: Weekly.
Storage of formulation Refrigerated: (2-8°C) in amber glass. - Details on mating procedure:
- Pairing commenced - After a minimum of two weeks of treatment.
Male/female ratio - 1:1 from within the same treatment groups.
Duration of pairing - Up to two weeks.
Daily checks for evidence of mating - Ejected copulation plugs in cage tray and sperm in the vaginal smear.
Day 0 of gestation - When positive evidence of mating was detected.
Male/female separation Day - when mating evidence was detected.
Pre-coital interval - Calculated for each female as the time between first pairing and evidence of mating. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The analytical procedure was successfully validated for Ethylal in corn oil with respect to the specificity of chromatographic analysis, limit of detection and quantification, the linearity of detector response, precision of injection, method accuracy and precision, standard solution stability and extracted sample solution stability.
The mean concentrations of Ethylal in test formulations analyzed for the study were within +10/-15% of nominal concentrations, confirming accurate formulation. With the exception of Week 4 Group 2, which was confirmed at -20.8%. The difference from mean and coefficient of variation remained within 5%, confirming precise analysis.
(Table 2) - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Males: Two weeks pre-pairing up to necropsy after minimum of four weeks.
Females: Two weeks before pairing, then throughout pairing and gestation until Day 12 of lactation.
Animals of the F1 generation were not dosed. - Frequency of treatment:
- Once daily at approximately the same time each day.
- Details on study schedule:
- - parental animals not mated until 2 weeks after selection
- Age at mating of the mated animals in the study: Males 78 to 84 days old. Females 92 to 98 days old. - Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Control - corn oil
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 600 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale:
based on preliminary toxicity study.
- Animal allocation: On arrival and non-selective allocation to cages. Estrous cycles were evaluated pre-treatment. After 14 days evaluation, animals that failed to exhibit typical 4-5 days cycles were not allocated to the study. On Day 1 of study all animals were weighed and body weights were reviewed by Study Management before dosing commenced to ensure variations in body weight of animals did not exceed ±20% of the mean for each sex. - Positive control:
- none
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: A viability check was performed near the start and end of each working day. Animals were killed for reasons of animal welfare where necessary. A complete necropsy was performed in all cases.
CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Animals were inspected visually at least twice daily for evidence of ill-health or reaction to treatment. Cages were inspected daily for evidence of animal ill-health amongst the occupant(s). Any deviation from normal was recorded at the time in respect of nature and severity, date and time of onset, duration and progress of the observed condition, as appropriate. During the acclimatization period, observations of the animals and their cages were recorded at least once per day.
A detailed physical examination was performed on each animal to monitor general health according to the following schedule:
F0 - males Weekly
F0 - females Week 1 and 2 - weekly
Gestation phase - Days 0, 7, 14 and 20
Lactation phase - Days 1, 6 and 13
BODY WEIGHT:
The weight of animals was recorded as follows:
F0 males - Weekly during acclimatization (not reported)
Before dosing on the day that treatment commenced (Day 1), and weekly thereafter.
On the day of necropsy.
F0 females - Weekly during acclimatization (not reported)
Before dosing on the day that treatment commenced (Day 1) and weekly before pairing.
Days 0, 7, 14 and 20 after mating.
Day 1, 4, 7 and 13 of lactation.
On the day of necropsy.
FOOD CONSUMPTION:
The weight of food supplied to each cage, that remaining and an estimate of any spilled was recorded as follows:
F0 animals: Weekly before pairing, from the day that treatment commenced.
Food consumption was not recorded for males and females during the period when paired for mating (Days 15 to 22), but recommenced for males in Week 4.
For females after mating food consumption was recorded as follows:
Days 0-6, 7-13 and 14-19 after mating
Days 1-3, 4-6 and 7-12 of lactation.
From these records the mean daily consumption per animal (g/animal/day) was calculated for each phase.
SIGNS ASSOCIATED WITH DOSING
Detailed observations were recorded at the following times in relation to dose administration and according to the following schedule:
F0 males: Week 1 - daily
Week 2 onwards - twice each week
F0 females: Week 1 - daily
Week 2 - twice
Gestation phase - Days 0, 7, 14 and 20
Lactation phase - Days 1, 6 and 12
Detailed observations were recorded at the following times in relation to dose administration:
Pre-dose observation
One to two hours after completion of dosing all groups
As late as possible in the working day. - Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- Dry and wet smears were taken as follows:
Dry smears: For 15 days before pairing using cotton swabs.
Wet smears: Using pipette lavage during the following phases:
For 14 days before treatment (all females including spares); animals that failed to exhibit 4-5 day cycles were not allocated to study.
After pairing until mating.
For four days before scheduled termination. - Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- Parameters examined in male parental generations: testis weight, epididymis weight, sperm morphology
- Litter observations:
- From Day 20 after mating, females were inspected three times daily for evidence of parturition. The progress and completion of parturition was monitored, numbers of live and dead offspring were recorded and any difficulties observed were recorded.
Records Made During Littering Phase:
Clinical observations - Examined at approximately 24 hours after birth (Day 1 of age) and then daily thereafter for evidence of ill health or reaction to maternal treatment; these were on an individual offspring basis or for the litter as a whole, as appropriate.
Litter size - Daily records were maintained of mortality and consequent changes in litter size from Days 1-13 of age.
Sex ratio of each litter - Recorded on Days 1, 4, 7 and 13 of age.
Individual offspring body weights - Days 1, 4, 7, 11 and 13 of age.
Ano-genital distance - Day 1 - all F1 offspring.
Nipple/areolae count - Day 13 of age - male offspring. - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- Abnormalities, Epididymides (caput, corpus and cauda), Ovaries, pituitary, prostate, seminal vesicles, testes, thyroids, uterus with cervix and oviducts.
For females the following were recorded:
Each uterine horn, number of implantation sites was counted and confirmed if none were visible at visual inspection.
The organs weighed, tissue samples fixed and sections examined microscopically are detailed below in table 1 for F0 animals: - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- Premature deaths: Where possible, a fresh external macroscopic examination with an assessment of stomach for milk content. Abnormal pups were retained.
F1 offspring on Day 4 of age: Blood sampling required.
All animals were subject to an external macroscopic examination; particular attention was paid to the external genitalia.
F1 offspring on Day 13 of age: Blood sampling required.
All animals were subject to an external macroscopic examination; particular attention was paid to the external genitalia.
Thyroid glands were preserved from two offspring per litter, one male and one female in each litter, where possible. - Statistics:
- A parametric analysis was performed if Bartlett's test for variance homogeneity was not significant at the 1% level.
If the F1 approximate test was significant, suggesting that the dose response was not monotone, Dunnett's test was performed instead.
A non-parametric analysis was performed if Bartlett's test was still significant at the 1% level following both logarithmic and square-root transformations. For pretreatment data, Kruskal-Wallis’ test was used to test for any group differences. Where this was significant (p<0.05) inter group comparisons using Wilcoxon rank sum tests were made.
If the H1 approximate test was significant, suggesting that the dose-response was not monotone, Steel's test was performed instead.
For live birth and viability indices dichotomized to 1 when 100% and 0 otherwise, if the Cochran-Armitage test was significant at the 5% level, then the direction of the trend was established and one-tailed step-down testing in this direction was performed. If the Cochran-Armitage test was not significant at the 5% level, then a Chi-square test was applied. If the Chi-square test was significant at the 5% level, the treatment groups were compared using pairwise comparisons of each dose group against the Control using Fisher’s exact tests; otherwise, no further comparisons were made.
For gestation length an exact two-tailed Linear-by-linear test, with equally spaced scores, was applied to all groups.
For estrous cycles an exact one-tailed (upper-tail) Linear-by-linear test was applied to all groups, using scores appropriate to the severity of the observation assuming 4 day cycles to be normal.
For organ weight data, analysis of covariance was performed using terminal body weight as covariate, unless non-parametric methods were applied. - Reproductive indices:
- Estrous Cycle, Pre-Coital Interval, Mating Performance and Fertility, Gestation Length and Index,
- Offspring viability indices:
- Litter Size, Survival Indices, sex ratio
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- See tables 1-3
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- One group 2 female (Animal No. 134) was found dead on Day 23 of gestation. The animal did not have any adverse clinical signs prior to death, and there were no findings at macroscopic examination, but the female gave birth to 6 pups which were killed for welfare reasons.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The overall bodyweight gain (Day 1-29) and bodyweight change during treatment was statistically significantly lower in males that received 1000 mg/kg/day when compared with Controls, this was predominantly due to statistically significantly reduced weight gain in the first week of treatment.
The overall body weight gain during lactation (Days 1-13) in all females treated with Ethylal, was statistically significantly lower when compared with the Controls this was predominantly due to minor weight loss on Days 1-4 at 300 or 1000 mg/kg/day and statistically significantly reduced weight gain on Days 7-13 of lactation at all doses. However, there was no dose response.
See tables 4-6 - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Food intake was marginally but statistically significantly reduced during Days 1-8 prior to pairing for females receiving 1000 mg/kg/day when compared with Controls. However, food intake was statistically significantly higher for females receiving Ethylal during Day 14-20 of gestation and lower for females receiving 600 or 1000 mg/kg/day during Days 7-13 of lactation, but a dose response was not apparent.
See tables 7-9 - Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Tables 24-25
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- See tables 10-11
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- mortality
- body weight and weight gain
- food consumption and compound intake
- clinical biochemistry
- organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
- gross pathology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- reproductive function (oestrous cycle)
- reproductive performance
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- System:
- male reproductive system
- Organ:
- testes
- other: epididymides
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- System:
- female reproductive system
- Organ:
- ovary
- uterus
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- See table 19
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Sexual maturation:
- no effects observed
- Anogenital distance (AGD):
- no effects observed
- Nipple retention in male pups:
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- See table 26 for thyroid hormone (T4) results.
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- viability
- clinical signs
- mortality
- body weight and weight gain
- haematology
- gross pathology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- System:
- endocrine system
- Organ:
- thyroid gland
- Key result
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Treatment related:
- no
- Conclusions:
- It was concluded that in the absence of any evidence for general systemic toxicity or effects on reproductive performance/offspring development that the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for Ethylal was 1000 mg/kg/day.
Reference
See table 26 for thyroid hormone (T4) results.
|
Control |
Ethylal |
||
Dose Group |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Dose (mg/kg/day) |
0 |
300 |
600 |
1000 |
Table 1: Clinical signs – group distribution of observations for males and for females before pairing (F0)
|
|
|
Number of animals affected |
|||||||
Category |
Observation |
Group/Sex : Initial no : |
1M 10 |
2M 10 |
3M 10 |
4M 10 |
1F 10 |
2F 10 |
3F 10 |
4F 10 |
Behavior |
Aggressive |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Grinding teeth |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Vocalization |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Body Temperature |
Abnormally cold to touch |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Breathing |
Irregular |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Coat |
Hair loss, Dorsal surface |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Hair loss, Forelimbs |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Ungroomed |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Eyes |
Pale, Bilateral |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Muscle reaction |
Abnormal gait, Uncoordinated |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Impaired locomotion, Other |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Table 1 (cont): Clinical signs – group distribution of observations for males and for females before pairing (F0)
|
|
|
Number of animals affected |
|||||||
Category |
Observation |
Group/Sex : Initial no : |
1M 10 |
2M 10 |
3M 10 |
4M 10 |
1F 10 |
2F 10 |
3F 10 |
4F 10 |
Reason for dispatch |
Loss of or limited locomotion |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Skin |
Cut, Lower ventral surface |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Encrustation, Dorsal surface |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
Encrustation, Forelimb - left |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Encrustation, Lower ventral surface |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Encrustation, Upper dorsal surface |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Skin color |
Reddening, Hindlimbs |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Staining |
Abnormal color, Brown, Eye - left |
|
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Abnormal color, Brown, Head |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Abnormal color, Brown, Muzzle |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Abnormal color, Red, Muzzle |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Staining |
Chromodacryorrhea |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Table 2: Clinical signs – group distribution of observations for females during gestation (F0)
|
|
|
Number of animals affected |
|||
Category |
Observation |
Group/Sex : Initial no : |
1F 10 |
2F 9 |
3F 10 |
4F 10 |
Behavior |
Decreased activity |
|
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
Breathing |
Irregular |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Slow |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Build (Deformity) |
Prominent area, Ventral surface |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Coat |
Hair loss, Dorsal surface |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Hair loss, Forelimbs |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
|
Hair loss, Ventral surface |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Piloerection |
|
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
Eyes |
Dark, Bilateral |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Dull, Bilateral |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Reason for dispatch |
General poor clinical condition |
|
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
Table 2 (cont): Clinical signs – group distribution of observations for females during gestation (F0)
|
|
|
Number of animals affected |
|||
Category |
Observation |
Group/Sex : Initial no : |
1F 10 |
2F 9 |
3F |
4F 10 |
Skin |
Encrustation, Dorsal surface |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Encrustation, Ears |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Encrustation, Forelimb digit(s) |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Encrustation, Upper dorsal surface |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
Skin color |
Pallor, Whole body |
|
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
Staining |
Abnormal color, Brown, Ears |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Abnormal color, Brown, Head |
|
2 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
|
Abnormal color, Brown, Upper dorsal surface |
|
6 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
|
Chromodacryorrhea |
|
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
Table 3: Clinical signs – group distribution of observations for females during lactation (F0)
|
|
|
Number of animals affected |
|||
Category |
Observation |
Group/Sex : Initial no : |
1F 10 |
2F 8 |
3F 8 |
4F |
Behavior |
Vocalization |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Build (Deformity) |
Partially absent appendage, Ear - right |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Prominent area, Ventral surface |
|
7 |
6 |
8 |
8 |
Coat |
Hair loss, Dorsal surface |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Hair loss, Forelimbs |
|
0 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
|
Hair loss, Hindlimbs |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
|
Hair loss, Ventral surface |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Staining |
Abnormal color, Brown, Ears |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Abnormal color, Brown, Head |
|
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
Abnormal color, Brown, Upper dorsal surface |
|
8 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
Table 4: Body weight and body weight change – group mean values (g) for males and for females before pairing (F0)
Group /Sex |
|
Day 1 |
8 |
15 |
22 |
29 |
Change 1-8 |
Change 8-15 |
Change 15-22 |
Change 22-29 |
Change 1-29 |
Statistics test |
|
Av |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
1M |
Mean |
373 |
399 |
422 |
434 |
461 |
26 |
22 |
13 |
26 |
87 |
|
SD |
24.5 |
32.7 |
36.6 |
40.5 |
43.4 |
9.8 |
6.0 |
6.9 |
5.0 |
20.9 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
2M |
Mean |
378 |
405 |
430 |
446 |
473 |
28 |
25 |
16 |
27 |
96 |
|
SD |
17.3 |
22.1 |
23.3 |
26.7 |
30.4 |
5.6 |
4.6 |
5.6 |
5.2 |
15.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
3M |
Mean |
370 |
394 |
416 |
428 |
453 |
24 |
22 |
12 |
25 |
82 |
|
SD |
17.0 |
21.1 |
26.2 |
25.2 |
26.4 |
8.0 |
6.6 |
4.5 |
5.2 |
13.8 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
4M |
Mean |
373 |
390 |
409 |
418 |
438 |
16** |
19 |
9 |
20* |
65** |
|
SD |
19.2 |
19.2 |
21.0 |
21.0 |
20.7 |
6.3 |
8.4 |
4.8 |
6.5 |
12.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Table 4 (cont): Body weight and body weight change – group mean values (g) for males and for females before pairing (F0)
Group /Sex |
|
Day 1 |
8 |
15 |
Change 1-8 |
Change 8-15 |
Change 1-15 |
Statistics test |
|
Av |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
1F |
Mean |
290 |
293 |
294 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
|
SD |
16.7 |
16.5 |
18.5 |
3.6 |
8.1 |
9.3 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
2F |
Mean |
291 |
292 |
301 |
1 |
9 |
11 |
|
SD |
10.0 |
9.9 |
9.4 |
7.5 |
6.8 |
8.4 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
3F |
Mean |
294 |
296 |
305 |
2 |
9 |
11 |
|
SD |
16.3 |
16.7 |
17.8 |
4.2 |
6.1 |
5.8 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
4F |
Mean |
296 |
296 |
301 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
|
SD |
12.3 |
11.4 |
10.4 |
4.0 |
7.3 |
8.5 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Table 5: Body weight and body weight change – group mean values (g) for females during gestation (F0)
Group /Sex |
|
Day 0 |
7 |
14 |
20 |
Change 0-7 |
Change 7-14 |
Change 14-20 |
Change 0-20 |
Statistics test |
|
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
1F |
Mean |
304 |
328 |
360 |
441 |
24 |
33 |
80 |
137 |
|
SD |
16.3 |
15.0 |
12.0 |
12.8 |
8.0 |
6.9 |
12.4 |
15.5 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
2F |
Mean |
305 |
334 |
369 |
456 |
29 |
36 |
87 |
151 |
|
SD |
13.6 |
7.6 |
11.1 |
14.0 |
9.1 |
8.5 |
9.4 |
14.3 |
|
N |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
3F |
Mean |
308 |
334 |
366 |
448 |
26 |
32 |
82 |
140 |
|
SD |
17.5 |
21.0 |
20.5 |
26.7 |
9.4 |
7.8 |
11.5 |
18.8 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
4F |
Mean |
300 |
328 |
367 |
448 |
28 |
39 |
81 |
148 |
|
SD |
13.5 |
8.7 |
13.6 |
20.9 |
9.7 |
8.3 |
10.8 |
16.5 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Table 6: Body weight and body weight change – group mean values (g) for females during lactation (F0)
Group /Sex |
|
Day 1 |
4 |
7 |
13 |
Change 1-4 |
Change 4-7 |
Change 7-13 |
Change 1-13 |
Statistics test |
|
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Sh |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
1F |
Mean |
339 |
341 |
358 |
382 |
2 |
17 |
25 |
44 |
|
SD |
14.3 |
16.6 |
15.8 |
16.0 |
6.9 |
9.3 |
8.2 |
13.3 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
2F |
Mean |
346 |
344 |
360 |
369 |
-2 |
15 |
9* |
23* |
|
SD |
12.4 |
5.7 |
8.4 |
8.0 |
11.3 |
4.3 |
8.9 |
14.8 |
|
N |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
3F |
Mean |
345 |
351 |
360 |
374 |
6 |
9 |
14* |
29* |
|
SD |
22.1 |
22.8 |
21.9 |
15.8 |
8.9 |
7.5 |
9.8 |
12.1 |
|
N |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
4F |
Mean |
347 |
345 |
358 |
376 |
-2 |
13 |
18** |
29* |
|
SD |
18.8 |
18.3 |
15.8 |
13.7 |
24.4 |
8.9 |
6.3 |
18.4 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Table 7: Food consumption – group mean values (g/animal/day) for males and for females before pairing (F0)
Group /Sex |
|
Day 1-8 |
8-15 |
15-22 |
22-29 |
Statistics test |
|
Wi |
Wi |
|
Wi |
1M |
Mean |
22 |
20 |
# |
20 |
|
SD |
1.3 |
1.3 |
|
1.0 |
|
N |
3 |
3 |
|
3 |
2M |
Mean |
23 |
21 |
# |
22 |
|
SD |
1.2 |
0.9 |
|
1.1 |
|
N |
3 |
3 |
|
3 |
3M |
Mean |
22 |
20 |
# |
21 |
|
SD |
1.2 |
1.1 |
|
1.2 |
|
N |
3 |
3 |
|
3 |
4M |
Mean |
20 |
20 |
# |
21 |
|
SD |
1.2 |
0.9 |
|
1.0 |
|
N |
3 |
3 |
|
3 |
# - Food consumption not recorded whilst paired for mating
Table 7 (cont): Food consumption – group mean values (g/animal/day) for males and for females before pairing (F0)
Group /Sex |
|
Day 1-8 |
8-15 |
Statistics test |
|
Wi |
Wi |
1F |
Mean |
15 |
14 |
|
SD |
0.7 |
1.0 |
|
N |
3 |
3 |
2F |
Mean |
14 |
15 |
|
SD |
0.7 |
0.7 |
|
N |
3 |
3 |
3F |
Mean |
15 |
15 |
|
SD |
0.6 |
0.1 |
|
N |
3 |
3 |
4F |
Mean |
14* |
14 |
|
SD |
0.4 |
0.6 |
|
N |
3 |
3 |
Table 8: Food consumption – group mean values (g/animal/day) for females during gestation (F0)
Group /Sex |
|
Day 1-7 |
7-14 |
14-20 |
Statistics test |
|
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
1F |
Mean |
19 |
21 |
22 |
|
SD |
1.7 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
2F |
Mean |
19 |
20 |
25* |
|
SD |
1.1 |
4.8 |
2.0 |
|
N |
9 |
8 |
9 |
3F |
Mean |
19 |
21 |
24* |
|
SD |
1.9 |
2.1 |
1.5 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
4F |
Mean |
19 |
22 |
26** |
|
SD |
1.7 |
1.7 |
2.5 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Table 9: Food consumption – group mean values (g/animal/day) for females during lactation (F0)
Group /Sex |
|
Day 1-4 |
4-7 |
7-13 |
Statistics test |
|
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
1F |
Mean |
30 |
51 |
70 |
|
SD |
5.0 |
4.3 |
4.1 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
2F |
Mean |
35 |
50 |
66 |
|
SD |
3.7 |
5.0 |
3.1 |
|
N |
8 |
8 |
8 |
3F |
Mean |
32 |
48 |
64* |
|
SD |
6.1 |
5.7 |
8.5 |
|
N |
8 |
8 |
8 |
4F |
Mean |
30 |
46 |
63* |
|
SD |
9.4 |
7.1 |
5.4 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Table 10: Estrous cycles – group values before treatment (F0)
Group |
Number of Animals |
|
4 day |
Regular cycles
4/5 days |
5 day |
Irregular cycle* |
Extended estrus** |
Acyclicy*** |
1 |
10 |
N (%) |
9 (90) |
1 (10) |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2 |
10 |
N (%) |
8 (80) |
1 (10) |
1 (10) |
0
|
0
|
0
|
3 |
10 |
N (%) |
7 (70) |
1 (10) |
2 (20) |
0
|
0
|
0
|
4 |
10 |
N (%) |
9 (90) |
1 (10) |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
* At least one cycle of two, three or six to ten days
** At least four consecutive days of estrus
*** At least ten days without estrus
Table 11: Estrous cycles – group values during treatment (F0)
Group |
Number of Animals |
|
4 day |
Regular cycles
4/5 days |
5 day |
Irregular cycle* |
Extended estrus** |
Acyclic*** |
Statistics test |
Lt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
10 |
N (%) |
9 (90) |
1 (10) |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2 |
10 |
N (%) |
8 (80) |
1 (10) |
0
|
1 (10) |
0
|
0
|
3 |
10 |
N (%) |
8 (80) |
0
|
1 (10) |
1 (10) |
0
|
0
|
4 |
10 |
N (%) |
6 (60) |
2 (20) |
0
|
1 (10) |
1 (10) |
0
|
Table 12: Pre-coital interval – group values (F0)
|
Pre-coital interval (days) |
|||||
Group |
Number of animals |
|
1-4 |
5-8 |
9-12 |
13-14 |
1 |
10 |
N (%) |
10 (100) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
N (%) |
9 (100) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
10 |
N (%) |
10 (100) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
10 |
N (%) |
10 (100) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Table 13: Mating performance and fertility – group values (F0)
Group and sex |
Number paired |
Number mating |
Number achieving pregnancy |
Percentage mating |
Conception rate (%) |
Fertility index (%) |
1M |
10 |
10 |
10 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
2M |
9 |
9 |
9 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
3M |
10 |
10 |
10 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
4M |
10 |
10 |
10 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1F |
10 |
10 |
10 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
2F |
9 |
9 |
9 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
3F |
10 |
10 |
10 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
4F |
10 |
10 |
10 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Table 14: Gestation length and gestation index – group values (F0)
|
Gestation length (days) |
|
||||||
Group |
Number of pregnant animals |
|
22 |
22.5 |
23 |
23.5 |
Number of liver litters born |
Gestation index (%) |
Statistics test |
|
|
Lt |
|
CA |
|||
1 |
10 |
N (%) |
1 (10) |
6 (60) |
3 (30) |
0
|
10
|
100
|
2 |
9 |
N (%) |
0
|
2 (22) |
7 (78) |
0
|
8A
|
89
|
3 |
10B |
N (%) |
2 (22) |
4 (44) |
2 (22) |
1 (11) |
8A
|
80
|
4 |
10 |
N (%) |
0
|
5 (50) |
4 (40) |
1 (10) |
10
|
100
|
A Excludes one female which did not produce a complete live litter
B Percentage distribution of gestation lengths calculated from nine animals - one pregnant female failed to litter, killed for welfare reasons on Day 24 of gestation
Table 15: Litter size – group mean values (F1)
Group /Sex |
|
Implantations |
Total @ |
Live on Day Before bleed 1 |
4 |
After bleed 4 |
13 |
Statistics test |
|
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
|
|
1F |
Mean |
15.6 |
14.4 |
14.0 |
13.9 |
12.5 |
12.5 |
|
SD |
2.55 |
2.41 |
2.21 |
2.18 |
1.78 |
1.78 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
2F |
Mean |
17.0 |
15.8 |
15.0 |
15.0 |
13.3 |
13.3 |
|
SD |
1.41 |
1.28 |
1.60 |
1.60 |
1.91 |
1.91 |
|
N |
9 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
3F |
Mean |
15.5 |
14.9 |
13.5 |
13.3 |
11.9 |
11.9 |
|
SD |
3.03 |
3.48 |
3.21 |
3.15 |
2.42 |
2.42 |
|
N |
10 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
4F |
Mean |
16.2 |
14.8 |
13.4 |
13.1 |
11.6 |
11.6 |
|
SD |
2.35 |
2.74 |
2.50 |
2.64 |
2.07 |
2.07 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
@ - Includes offspring that died prior to the designated Day 1 of age
Table 16: Offspring survival indices – group mean values (F1)
Group /Sex |
|
Post implantation survival index (%) |
Live birth index (%) |
Viability index (%) Day 4 |
Lactation index (%) Day 13 |
Statistics test |
|
Wi |
Ch |
Ch |
|
1F |
Mean |
92.2 |
97.5 |
99.3 |
100.0 |
|
SD |
8.04 |
4.30 |
2.11 |
0.00 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
N<100% |
6 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
2F |
Mean |
94.1 |
95.1 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
SD |
4.55 |
4.42 |
0.00 |
0.0 |
|
N |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
|
N<100% |
6 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
3F |
Mean |
93.8 |
91.1 |
98.3 |
100.0 |
|
SD |
8.89 |
11.31 |
3.20 |
0.00 |
|
N |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
|
N<100% |
3 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
4F |
Mean |
91.1 |
91.2 |
97.5 |
100.0 |
|
SD |
9.41 |
10.25 |
4.17 |
0.00 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
N<100% |
7 |
6 |
3 |
0 |
The following data were used for the statistics tests, animal indices for post implantation survival index and animal indices dichotomized to 1 when 100% and 0 otherwise for live birth and viability indices.
Table 17: Offspring sex ratio – group mean values
Group /Sex |
|
Total @ |
Live (before bleed) on Day |
Live (after bleed) on Day |
||||||||||||
M |
F |
%M |
1 M |
F |
%M |
4 M |
F |
%M |
4 M |
F |
%M |
13 M |
F |
%M |
||
Statistic test |
|
|
Wi |
|
|
Wi |
|
|
Wi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1F |
Mean |
8.5 |
5.7 |
59.7 |
8.3 |
5.7 |
59.1 |
8.2 |
5.7 |
58.8 |
8.2 |
4.3 |
64.9 |
8.2 |
4.3 |
64.9 |
|
SD |
2.32 |
1.95 |
12.33 |
2.26 |
1.95 |
12.27 |
2.30 |
1.95 |
12.49 |
2.30 |
1.42 |
12.17 |
2.30 |
1.42 |
12.16 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
2F |
Mean |
7.6 |
8.0 |
48.3 |
7.3 |
7.8 |
47.6 |
7.3 |
7.8 |
47.6 |
7.3 |
6.0 |
53.5 |
7.3 |
6.0 |
53.5 |
|
SD |
2.72 |
2.20 |
15.05 |
2.87 |
2.12 |
15.43 |
2.87 |
2.12 |
15.43 |
2.87 |
1.51 |
13.78 |
2.87 |
1.51 |
13.78 |
|
N |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
3F |
Mean |
6.8 |
8.0 |
46.4 |
6.5 |
7.0 |
47.9 |
6.4 |
6.9 |
47.7 |
6.4 |
5.5 |
52.8 |
6.4 |
5.5 |
52.8 |
|
SD |
1.91 |
3.07 |
12.89 |
2.07 |
2.07 |
10.31 |
2.07 |
1.96 |
10.06 |
2.07 |
1.31 |
11.00 |
2.07 |
1.31 |
11.00 |
|
N |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
4F |
Mean |
7.2 |
6.9 |
51.7 |
7.0 |
6.4 |
52.7 |
6.8 |
6.3 |
52.5 |
6.8 |
4.8 |
58.8 |
6.8 |
4.8 |
58.8 |
|
SD |
1.99 |
2.56 |
13.62 |
2.05 |
2.41 |
13.42 |
1.93 |
2.41 |
12.65 |
1.93 |
1.99 |
13.65 |
1.93 |
1.99 |
13.65 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
@- Includes offspring that died prior to the designated Day 1 of age and excludes unsexed offspring
Table 18: Ano-genital distance – group mean absolute and adjusted values for offspring (F1)
Group /Sex |
|
Body weight (g) Day 1 |
Ano-genital distance (mm) |
Statistics test |
|
Wi |
|
1M |
Mean |
7.3 |
4.2 |
|
SD |
0.75 |
0.27 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
2M |
Mean |
7.6 |
4.5 |
|
SD |
0.38 |
0.16 |
|
N |
8 |
8 |
3M |
Mean |
6.9 |
4.3 |
|
SD |
0.65 |
0.30 |
|
N |
8 |
8 |
4M |
Mean |
7.0 |
4.3 |
|
SD |
0.38 |
0.34 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
Adjusted means |
|
|
Statistics test |
Wi |
|
1M |
Mean |
4.2 |
2M |
Mean |
4.4 |
3M |
Mean |
4.3 |
4M |
Mean |
4.4 |
Table 18 (cont): Ano-genital distance – group mean absolute and adjusted values for offspring (F1)
Group /Sex |
|
Body weight (g) Day 1 |
Ano-genital distance (mm) |
Statistics test |
|
Wi |
|
1F |
Mean |
6.9 |
2.2 |
|
SD |
0.73 |
0.16 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
2F |
Mean |
7.2 |
2.2 |
|
SD |
0.51 |
0.08 |
|
N |
8 |
8 |
3F |
Mean |
6.5 |
2.1 |
|
SD |
0.72 |
0.15 |
|
N |
8 |
8 |
4F |
Mean |
6.6 |
2.1 |
|
SD |
0.54 |
0.13 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
Adjusted means |
|
|
Statistics test |
Wi |
|
1F |
Mean |
2.2 |
2F |
Mean |
2.2 |
3F |
Mean |
2.1 |
4F |
Mean |
2.1 |
Table 19: Bodyweight – group mean values (g) for offspring (F1)
Group /Sex |
|
Day of age (before bleed) |
Day of age (after bleed) |
Change 1-4 |
Change 4-7 |
Change 7-11 |
Change 11-13 |
Change 1-13 |
|||||
1 |
1@ |
4 |
4 |
7 |
11 |
13 |
|||||||
Statistics test |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
|
1M |
Mean |
7.3 |
7.3 |
10.2 |
10.2 |
15.4 |
24.3 |
28.8 |
3.0 |
5.2 |
8.9 |
4.5 |
21.5 |
|
SD |
0.75 |
0.74 |
1.34 |
1.34 |
2.18 |
2.94 |
3.32 |
0.72 |
1.01 |
0.90 |
0.49 |
2.75 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
2M |
Mean |
7.6 |
7.6 |
10.7 |
10.7 |
15.8 |
24.0 |
27.9 |
3.1 |
5.0 |
8.2 |
3.9 |
20.3 |
|
SD |
0.38 |
0.38 |
1.11 |
1.11 |
1.66 |
3.14 |
3.86 |
0.78 |
0.71 |
1.51 |
0.82 |
3.55 |
|
N |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
3M |
Mean |
6.9 |
6.9 |
10.2 |
10.2 |
15.6 |
24.1 |
28.4 |
3.3 |
5.4 |
8.6 |
4.3 |
21.6 |
|
SD |
0.65 |
0.65 |
1.18 |
1.18 |
1.87 |
2.77 |
3.39 |
0.83 |
0.81 |
1.03 |
0.76 |
3.13 |
|
N |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
4M |
Mean |
7.0 |
7.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
15.1 |
23.6 |
27.9 |
2.9 |
5.2 |
8.5 |
4.3 |
20.9 |
|
SD |
0.38 |
0.46 |
1.13 |
1.13 |
1.68 |
2.25 |
2.74 |
0.8 |
0.85 |
0.95 |
0.78 |
2.47 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
@ - Includes only those pups surviving after the bleed
Table 19 (cont): Bodyweight – group mean values (g) for offspring (F1)
Group /Sex |
|
Day of age (before bleed) |
Day of age (after bleed) |
Change 1-4 |
Change 4-7 |
Change 7-11 |
Change 11-13 |
Change 1-13 |
|||||
1 |
1@ |
4 |
4 |
7 |
11 |
13 |
|||||||
Statistics test |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
|
1F |
Mean |
6.9 |
6.9 |
9.7 |
9.7 |
14.7 |
23.6 |
27.8 |
2.8 |
5.0 |
8.9 |
4.3 |
21.0 |
|
SD |
0.73 |
0.75 |
1.31 |
1.31 |
2.17 |
3.10 |
3.52 |
0.70 |
0.97 |
1.00 |
0.49 |
2.93 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
2F |
Mean |
7.2 |
7.2 |
10.2 |
10.1 |
15.0 |
23.0 |
26.8 |
2.9 |
4.9 |
8.0 |
3.8 |
19.6 |
|
SD |
0.51 |
0.50 |
1.10 |
1.15 |
1.86 |
3.11 |
4.02 |
0.77 |
0.96 |
1.31 |
0.95 |
3.56 |
|
N |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
3F |
Mean |
6.5 |
6.5 |
9.7 |
9.7 |
14.9 |
23.4 |
27.6 |
3.2 |
5.2 |
8.5 |
4.2 |
21.1 |
|
SD |
0.72 |
0.74 |
1.36 |
1.40 |
2.03 |
3.39 |
3.91 |
0.99 |
0.80 |
1.52 |
0.63 |
3.52 |
|
N |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
4F |
Mean |
6.6 |
6.6 |
9.5 |
9.5 |
14.5 |
22.6 |
26.7 |
2.9 |
4.9 |
8.1 |
4.0 |
20.0 |
|
SD |
0.54 |
0.52 |
1.32 |
1.31 |
1.83 |
2.68 |
3.04 |
0.87 |
0.70 |
1.10 |
0.79 |
2.72 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
@ - Includes only those pups surviving after the bleed
Table 20: Organ weights – group mean absolute and adjusted values (g) for males killed at scheduled termination (F0)
Group /Sex |
|
Terminal Body weight |
Epididymides |
Prostate |
Seminal vesicles with coagulating gland |
Testes |
Statistics test |
Wi |
|
|
|
|
|
1M |
Mean |
459 |
1.245 |
1.120 |
2.129 |
3.542 |
|
SD |
43 |
0.110 |
0.231 |
0.253 |
0.232 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
2M |
Mean |
471 |
1.253 |
1.047 |
2.208 |
3.550 |
|
SD |
30 |
0.078 |
0.180 |
0.247 |
0.197 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
3M |
Mean |
450 |
1.249 |
1.040 |
2.109 |
3.708 |
|
SD |
27 |
0.109 |
0.213 |
0.255 |
0.379 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
3M |
Mean |
436 |
1.222 |
0.961 |
2.127 |
3.482 |
|
SD |
21 |
0.091 |
0.147 |
0.382 |
0.300 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Statistics test |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
|
1M |
Adjusted mean |
1.237 |
1.107 |
2.111 |
3.523 |
2M |
Adjusted mean |
1.225 |
1.003 |
2.146 |
3.488 |
3M |
Adjusted mean |
1.255 |
1.050 |
2.123 |
3.722 |
4M |
Adjusted mean |
1.252 |
1.008 |
2.193 |
3.549 |
Table 21: Organ weights – group mean absolute and adjusted values (g) for females killed on Day 13 of lactation (F0)
Group /Sex |
|
Terminal Body weight |
Ovaries |
Uterus and Cervix and Oviducts |
Statistics test |
Wi |
|
|
|
1F |
Mean |
382 |
0.097 |
0.503 |
|
SD |
16 |
0.007 |
0.129 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
2F |
Mean |
371 |
0.088 |
0.423 |
|
SD |
8 |
0.010 |
0.044 |
|
N |
8 |
8 |
8 |
3F |
Mean |
375 |
0.090 |
0.434 |
|
SD |
17 |
0.008 |
0.050 |
|
N |
8 |
8 |
8 |
4F |
Mean |
376 |
0.086 |
0.480 |
|
SD |
15 |
0.018 |
0.061 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Statistics test |
Wi |
Wi |
|
1F |
Adjusted mean |
0.096 |
0.484 |
2F |
Adjusted mean |
0.088 |
0.426 |
3F |
Adjusted mean |
0.090 |
0.432 |
4F |
Adjusted mean |
0.086 |
0.477 |
Table 22: Macropathology – group distribution of findings for males killed at scheduled termination (F0)
|
|
Number of animals affected |
|||
Tissue/Organ and Findings |
Group/Sex: No of animals: |
1M 10 |
2M 10 |
3M 10 |
4M 10 |
Number of animals within normal limits |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Table 23: Macropathology – group distribution of findings for females killed on Day 13 of lactation (F0)
|
|
Number of animals affected |
|||
Tissue/Organ and Findings |
Group/Sex: No of animals: |
1F 10 |
2F 8 |
3F 8 |
4F 10 |
Number of animals within normal limits |
9 |
8 |
8 |
9 |
|
Skin and Subcutis Hair Loss |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Uterus Abnormal contents Mass(es) |
1 1 |
0 0 |
0 0 |
0 0 |
Table 24: Histopathology – group distribution of findings for males killed at scheduled termination (F0)
|
|
Number of animals affected |
|||
Tissue/Organ and Findings |
Group/Sex: No of animals: |
1M 10 |
2M 10 |
3M 10 |
4M 10 |
Epididymides Infiltrate, Inflammatory Cell |
No. examined Minimal Total |
10 2 2 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
10 3 3 |
Testes |
No. examined |
10 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
Table 25: Histopathology – group distribution of findings for females killed on Day 13 of lactation (F0)
|
|
Number of animals affected |
|||
Tissue/Organ and Findings |
Group/Sex: No of animals: |
1F 10 |
2F 8 |
3F 8 |
4F 10 |
Ovaries |
No. examined
|
10
|
0
|
0
|
10
|
Uterus Implantation site(s)
Dilatation, Luminal |
No. examined Total Minimal Total |
1 1 1 1 |
0 0 0 0 |
0 0 0 0 |
0 0 0 0 |
Table 26: Mean serum T4 concentrations (pg/mL)
Group |
Treatment |
Dose (mg/kg/day) |
|
Adult terminal males |
Male offspring on Day 13 of age |
Female offspring on Day 13 of age |
1 |
Control (Corn Oil) |
0 |
Mean |
43300 |
50700 |
59200 |
SD |
7610 |
10800 |
14400 |
|||
CV % |
17.6 |
21.3 |
24.3 |
|||
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|||
2 |
Ethylal |
300 |
Mean |
46000 |
56500 |
51500 |
SD |
7590 |
18300 |
6230 |
|||
CV % |
16.5 |
32.4 |
12.1 |
|||
N |
10 |
8 |
8 |
|||
3 |
Ethylal |
600 |
Mean |
47100 |
55700 |
63200 |
SD |
7000 |
15800 |
14800 |
|||
CV % |
14.9 |
28.4 |
23.4 |
|||
N |
10 |
8 |
8 |
|||
4 |
Ethylal |
1000 |
Mean |
44300 |
59300 |
46400 |
SD |
5960 |
10600 |
12400 |
|||
CV % |
13.5 |
17.9 |
26.7 |
|||
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Endpoint derived from an OECD TG 421 (GLP) study with ethylal. RSS of the test report is provided.
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
Based on the results of a prenatal developmental toxicity study performed with ethylal and following OECD TG 414 and GLP, the maternal and the embryo-fetal NOAEL was 1000 mg/kg/day, corresponding to the highest tested concentration.
Based on the results of a reproduction/developmental toxicity screening study performed with ethylal and following OECD TG 421 and GLP, the NOAEL was 1000 mg/kg/day, corresponding to the highest tested concentration.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 14 NOVEMBER 2018 to 22 FEBRUARY 2019
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- 03 September 2018
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch number of test material: Lambiotte & Cie - 1808061400R
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 06 August 2020 - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River (UK) Ltd
- Age at study initiation: Approximately 71 days old
- Weight at study initiation: 228 to 290 g
- Housing: Acclimatization: up to four animals per cage; During pairing: one (stock) male and one female per cage; Gestation: one female per cage
- Diet: SDS VRF1 Certified pelleted diet. Non-restricted
- Water: Potable water from the public supply via polycarbonate bottles with sipper tubes. Bottles were changed at appropriate intervals. Non-restricted
- Acclimation period: Five days before commencement of pairing
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-24°C
- Humidity (%): 40-70%
- Air changes: Filtered fresh air which was passed to atmosphere and not recirculated
- Photoperiod: 12 hours light: 12 hours dark
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 14 November 2018 To:10 to 15 December 2018 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: Starting with the lowest concentration, the required amount of test item was weighed into a suitable container and immediately transferred to a measuring cylinder. Vehicle was added to make up to about 20% of the final volume. The weighing container was rinsed out and formulation made up to the required volume with vehicle.
The formulation was then magnetically stirred in a sealed container of the appropriate size with no head space.
A series of formulations at the required concentrations were prepared by dilution of individual weighings of the test item.
Frequency of preparation: Weekly.
Storage of formulation: Refrigerated (2 to 8 ºC) for up to 10 days.
VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 20, 66 and 200 mg/mL
- Amount of vehicle: 5 mL/kg - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The analytical method involved extraction and dilution in acetone followed by gas chromatographic analysis with flame ionization detection. Sample concentrations were determined with reference to external standards prepared in the concentration range 10 μg/mL to 100 μg/mL.
The mean concentrations were within +10/-15% of the nominal concentration, confirming accurate formulation. The percentage difference from mean values remained within 1%, confirming precise analysis, with the exception of the last formulation occasion of Group 4. Initial results from the last sample occasion of Group 4 were low; however, extracted samples were reanalyzed, in accordance with standard operating procedures, confirming the mean concentrations were within acceptance criteria. As a result, the percentage difference for this group was expectedly high (±10.49%). - Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- M/F ratio per cage: 1:1 with identified stock males
- Daily checks for evidence of mating: Ejected copulation plugs in cage tray and vaginal smears were checked for the presence of sperm.
- Day 0 of gestation: When positive evidence of mating was detected.
A colony of stud males was maintained specifically for the purpose of mating; these animals were not part of the study and were maintained as stock animals. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Females: Day 6 to 19 after mating
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once daily at approximately the same time each day
- Duration of test:
- 20 days
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 330 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Control - corn oil
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 20
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale: Dose levels have been selected, in conjunction with the Sponsor, based on the effects seen in a preliminary embryo-fetal study conducted at this laboratory which investigated dose levels of 330, 660 and 1000 mg/kg/day. Initial treatment from Gestation day 6 to 7 resulted in overall group mean body weight stasis at 330 or 1000 mg/kg/day; however overall body weight gains over the whole treatment period were unaffected. There was no conclusive effect of treatment on embryo-fetal development, survival, litter size or sex ratio at any dose level.
Dose levels of 100, 330 and 1000 mg/kg/day were therefore considered appropriate for this study. - Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Animals were inspected visually at least twice daily for evidence of ill-health or reaction to treatment. Cages were inspected daily for evidence of animal ill-health amongst the occupant(s). Any deviation from normal was recorded at the time in respect of nature and severity, date and time of onset, duration and progress of the observed condition, as appropriate.
During the acclimatization period, observations of the animals and their cages were recorded at least once per day.
A detailed physical examination was performed on each animal on Days 0, 5, 12, 18 and 20 after mating to monitor general health.
BODY WEIGHT: The weight of each adult was recorded on Days 0, 3, 6-20 after mating.
FOOD CONSUMPTION: The weight of food supplied to each adult, that remaining and an estimate of any spilled was recorded for the periods Days 0-2, 3-5, 6-9, 10-13, 14-17 and 18-19 inclusive after mating.
SIGNS ASSOCIATED WITH DOSING: Detailed observations were recorded daily during the treatment period at the following times in relation to dose administration:
Pre-dose observation.
Immediately after completion of dosing each Group.
One to two hours after completion of dosing.
As late as possible in the working day.
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: All adult animals were subject to a detailed necropsy. After a review of the history of each animal, a full macroscopic examination of the tissues was performed. All external features and orifices were examined visually. Any abnormality in the appearance or size of any organ and tissue (external and cut surface) was recorded and the required tissue samples preserved in appropriate fixative. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes
- Skeletal examinations: Yes
- Head examinations: Yes
- Fetal weight: Yes
- Ano-genital distance: Yes - Statistics:
- A parametric analysis was performed if Bartlett's test for variance homogeneity was not significant at the 1% level. If the F1 approximate test was significant, suggesting that the dose response was not monotone, Dunnett's test was performed instead.
A non-parametric analysis was performed if Bartlett's test was still significant at the 1% level following both logarithmic and square-root transformations. For pre treatment data, Kruskal-Wallis’ test was used to test for any group differences. Where this was significant (p<0.05) inter group comparisons using Wilcoxon rank sum tests were made.
If the H1 approximate test was significant, suggesting that the dose-response was not monotone, Steel's test was performed instead.
For live birth and viability indices dichotomized to 1 when 100% and 0 otherwise, if the Cochran Armitage test was significant at the 5% level, then the direction of the trend was established and one-tailed step-down testing in this direction was performed. If the Cochran-Armitage test was not significant at the 5% level, then a Chi-square test was applied. If the Chi-square test was significant at the 5% level, the treatment groups were compared using pairwise comparisons of each dose group against the Control using Fisher’s exact tests; otherwise, no further comparisons were made.
For organ weight data, analysis of covariance was performed using terminal body weight as covariate, unless non-parametric methods were applied. - Indices:
- Reproductive assessment:
The following were recorded for all animals:
For each ovary/uterine horn - Number of:
Corpora lutea.
Implantation sites.
Resorption sites (classified as early or late).
Fetuses (live and dead). - Historical control data:
- Historical control data on :
- Fetal examinations - Major abnormalities (Table 16)
- Fetal examinations - Skeletal (Table 18)
- Fetal examinations - Visceral (Table 20)
- Thyroid hormone data (Table 22) - Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At routine physical examination, there was an increased incidence of hair loss of the forelimbs in females treated with Ethylal, although it is unclear if this is treatment related since this finding occurs commonly.
One female (2F 28) was seen with two swollen areas of the upper ventral surface on Day 16, one of which apparently increased in size to 20 x 20 mm.
Following initial treatment (gestation day 6), signs associated with dosing Ethylal at 1000 mg/kg/day included unsteady gait in 11 animals, decreased activity in 5 animals, flattened posture, or gait, in 4 animals and partially closed eye lids in 3 animals.
The type of observation seen was associated with specific signs (i.e. unsteady gait at the start of treatment and chin rubbing towards the end) and although treatment related, the signs were either recoverable or transient and, therefore, considered non-adverse. Signs associated with dosing in Group 3 were confined to salivation which is not viewed as adverse.
Tables 1 and 2 - Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There was no clear difference in the overall (gestation day 6 to 20) body weight change for females treated with Ethylal at any dose level.
Body weight loss/stasis was seen in females receiving 330 or 1000 mg/kg/day following initial treatment gestation day 6 to 7, however the body weight performance improved and daily gains were generally similar to Control thereafter.
It is noted that body weight gains from gestation day 0 to 6 (prior to treatment) were statistically significantly low in females allocated to the 1000 mg/kg/day group and consequently not due to treatment.
Body weight gains (gestation days 6 to 20), adjusted for gravid uterine weights were slightly low at 1000 mg/kg/day when compared to Control and, also, achieved statistical significance. However
the overall performance was unaffected by treatment.
Tables 3 and 4 - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Food consumption of females treated at 1000 mg/kg/day was statistically significantly low prior to the start of treatment and remained low throughout treatment, although statistical significance was not attained on the last recording occasion.
Table 5 - Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Thyroid and parathyroid weights were unaffected by treatment.
There was no effect of treatment on gravid uterine weight
Table 6 - Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Table 7
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The microscopic examination of the thyroids revealed no test item-related lesions.
The incidence and distribution of all findings were considered to be unrelated to treatment. Such findings included the follicular cysts in the thyroid tissue, since there was a low incidence and the distribution of cyst findings was unrelated to treatment.
Table 8 - Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Thyroid hormone analysis:
The group mean values of T3 and T4 concentrations in serum for females receiving 330 or 1000 mg/kg/day were slightly low, when compared to Control, with the difference attaining statistical significance.
The group mean values of serum TSH concentrations in females receiving 1000 mg/kg/day (Group 4) was slightly higher, when compared to Control, with the difference attaining statistical significance. - Details on results:
- These minor variations in the circulating levels of T3, T4 and TSH (that were within the normal historical control range) were not associated with changes in ano-genital distances and no macroscopic or microscopic changes to the thyroid gland were observed. In the absence of any histopathological correlate and with no evidence of disturbance to the growth or development of fetuses, the small differences in the circulating levels of thyroid hormones in the females receiving 330 or 1000 mg/kg/day, although statistically significant, were considered nonadverse
Tables 9, 10, 11 and 22 - Number of abortions:
- no effects observed
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Tables 12 and 13
- Total litter losses by resorption:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Tables 12 and 13
- Early or late resorptions:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Tables 12 and 13
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Tables 12 and 13
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- no effects observed
- Changes in number of pregnant:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: absence of effects
- Remarks on result:
- other: absence of effects
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
- Fetal body weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Table 14
- Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Tables 12 and 13
- Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Table 13
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Table 14
- External malformations:
- no effects observed
- Skeletal malformations:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Tables 17 and 18
- Visceral malformations:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Tables 19 and 20
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There was no effect of treatment on ano-genital distances.
Table 21 - Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: absence of effects
- Remarks on result:
- other: absence of effects
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
- Conclusions:
- Based on the results of this study, the maternal and embryo-fetal No-Observed-Adverse-Effect-Level (NOAEL) was 1000 mg/kg/day.
- Executive summary:
Introduction
The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of Ethylal (an industrial chemical) on embryo-fetal survival and development when administered during the organogenesis and fetal growth phases of pregnancy in the Sprague Dawley rat.
Four groups of 20 females received Ethylal at doses of 100, 330 or 1000 mg/kg/day by oral gavage administration, from Day 6 to 19 after mating. A similarly constituted Control group received the vehicle, corn oil at the same volume dose as treated groups. Animals were killed on Day 20 after mating for reproductive assessment and fetal examination.
Clinical observations, body weight and food consumption were recorded. Adult females were examined; macroscopic and microscopic pathology investigation were undertaken on Day 20 after mating and the gravid uterus weight and thyroid weight were recorded. Ano‑genital distance were measured for all fetuses and were examined macroscopically at necropsy and subsequently by detailed internal visceral examination or skeletal examination.
Results
Following initial treatment (gestation day 6), signs associated with dosing Ethylal at 1000 mg/kg/day included unsteady gait in 11 animals, decreased activity in 5 animals, flattened posture, or gait, in 4 animals and partially closed eye lids in 3 animals. At 1000 mg/kg/day, chin rubbing was seen towards the end of treatment and at 330 mg/kg/day, or above, salivation was seen throughout the treatment period.
There was no clear difference in the overall (gestation day 6 to 20) body weight change for females treated with Ethylal at any dose level. Although body weight loss/stasis was seen in females receiving 330 or 1000 mg/kg/day following initial treatment gestation Day 6 to 7.
There was no effect of treatment on gravid uterine weight.
Food consumption of females treated at 1000 mg/kg/day was statistically significantly low prior to the start of treatment and remained low throughout treatment, although statistical significance was not attained on the last recording occasion.
There was no effect of treatment on the macroscopic appearance of organs in the adults or the external appearance of fetuses at necropsy.
The microscopic examination of the thyroid and parathyroid revealed no test item-related lesions.
There were no clear effects of treatment on early or late resorptions, numbers of live young, sex ratio or pre/post implantation losses.
There were no effects of treatment on placental, litter or fetal weights.
There was no effect of treatment on ano-genital distances. There was a slight dose related decrease in levels of T3 at 330 or 1000 mg/kg/day, a slight increase in T4 levels at 330 or 1000 mg/kg/day and a slight increase in TSH levels at 1000 mg/kg/day.
The incidence of major and minor abnormalities and skeletal variants in fetuses show no relationship to treatment.
Conclusion
Based on the results of this study, the maternal and the embryo-fetal No-Observed-Adverse-Effect-Level (NOAEL) was 1000 mg/kg/day.
Reference
|
Control |
Ethylal |
||
Dose Group |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Dose (mg/kg/day) |
0 |
100 |
330 |
1000 |
Table 1: Signs associated with dosing – group distribution of observations after mating
|
|
|
Number of animals affected |
|||
Category |
Observation |
Group/Sex: Initial no.: |
1F 20 |
2F 20 |
3F 20 |
4F 20 |
Abnormal gait |
Flattened |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Unsteady |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
Behavior |
Chin rubbing |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
|
Decreased activity |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
|
Salivation |
|
0 |
0 |
4 |
19 |
Eyelids |
Partially closed, Bilateral |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
Posture |
Flattened |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
Table 2: Clinical signs - group distribution of observations after mating
|
|
|
Number of animals affected |
|||
Category |
Observation |
Group/Sex: Initial no.: |
1F 20 |
2F 20 |
3F 20 |
4F 20 |
Build (Deformity) |
Swollen area, Upper ventral surface |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Coat |
Hair loss, Forelimbs |
|
0 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
Skin |
Encrustation, Ear - left |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Encrustation, Forelimb - left |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Staining |
Abnormal color, Red, Forelimb - left |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Table 3: Body weight and body weight change - group mean values (g) during gestation
Group /Sex |
|
Day 0 |
3 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
Statistics test |
Av |
Av |
Av |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
|
1F |
Mean |
251 |
271 |
283 |
285 |
291 |
295 |
301 |
307 |
314 |
320 |
327 |
335 |
348 |
|
SD |
12.2 |
13.4 |
12.3 |
14.3 |
13.4 |
13.7 |
12.9 |
13.4 |
14.1 |
13.7 |
13.6 |
15.5 |
15.6 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
2F |
Mean |
252 |
268 |
279 |
282 |
285 |
290 |
296 |
303 |
310 |
316 |
322 |
330 |
342 |
|
SD |
13.5 |
13.6 |
14.2 |
15.6 |
14.9 |
15.3 |
16.0 |
17.5 |
15.5 |
17.1 |
18.5 |
19.5 |
19.6 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
3F |
Mean |
250 |
268 |
280 |
280 |
285 |
290 |
297 |
303 |
308 |
316 |
323 |
332 |
344 |
|
SD |
10.0 |
10.9 |
12.4 |
13.5 |
12.7 |
12.2 |
12.7 |
14.7 |
13.5 |
15.1 |
16.1 |
15.5 |
16.4 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
4F |
Mean |
253 |
267 |
278 |
277 |
281 |
285* |
291 |
297 |
304* |
309* |
315* |
324 |
336 |
|
SD |
15.2 |
14.3 |
17.4 |
18.1 |
18.3 |
18.2 |
19.5 |
19.4 |
17.6 |
19.1 |
19.3 |
19.9 |
22.4 |
|
N |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
Table 3 (cont): Body weight and body weight change - group mean values (g) during gestation
Group /Sex |
|
Day 17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
Change 0-6 |
Change 6-20 |
Statistics test |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Av |
Wi |
|
1F |
Mean |
362 |
379 |
395 |
413 |
32 |
130 |
|
SD |
15.5 |
17.8 |
18.4 |
20.6 |
6.9 |
10.9 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
2F |
Mean |
356 |
373 |
388 |
405 |
27* |
125 |
|
SD |
21.0 |
22.1 |
22.6 |
26.2 |
7.3 |
16.2 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
3F |
Mean |
359 |
375 |
389 |
404 |
30 |
124 |
|
SD |
18.7 |
21.7 |
24.0 |
26.5 |
6.0 |
18.3 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
4F |
Mean |
351 |
366 |
381 |
398 |
26** |
120 |
|
SD |
23.6 |
24.3 |
27.9 |
29.8 |
5.3 |
17.9 |
|
N |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
Table 4: Gravid uterine weight, adjusted body weight and adjusted body weight change - group mean values (g) on Day 20 of gestation
Group /Sex |
|
Body weight Day 6 |
Terminal body weight Day 20 |
Body weight change 6-20 |
Gravid uterine weight |
Adjusted body weight Day 20 |
Adjusted body weight change 6-20 |
Statistics test |
Av |
Wi |
Wi |
Sh |
Wi |
Wi |
|
1F |
Mean |
283 |
412 |
130 |
92.9 |
319 |
37 |
|
SD |
12.3 |
20.2 |
10.8 |
7.31 |
17.7 |
8.9 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
2F |
Mean |
279 |
405 |
125 |
91.2 |
313 |
34 |
|
SD |
14.2 |
26.0 |
16.3 |
11.99 |
21.2 |
10.0 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
3F |
Mean |
280 |
405 |
125 |
87.7 |
317 |
37 |
|
SD |
12.4 |
26.3 |
18.2 |
16.68 |
15.4 |
9.3 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
4F |
Mean |
278 |
398 |
120 |
89.5 |
308 |
30* |
|
SD |
17.4 |
29.7 |
18.0 |
13.41 |
20.0 |
8.7 |
|
N |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
Table 5: Food consumption - group mean values (g/animal/day) during gestation
Group /Sex |
|
Day 0-3 |
3-6 |
6-10 |
10-14 |
14-18 |
18-20 |
Statistics test |
Av |
Av |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
|
1F |
Mean |
21 |
23 |
20 |
22 |
25 |
24 |
|
SD |
1.7 |
1.7 |
1.7 |
2.0 |
2.2 |
2.3 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
2F |
Mean |
20* |
22 |
19 |
21 |
23 |
23 |
|
SD |
1.9 |
1.8 |
1.7 |
1.9 |
2.2 |
2.2 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
3F |
Mean |
21 |
23 |
20 |
22 |
25 |
23 |
|
SD |
1.9 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
1.4 |
2.0 |
2.2 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
4F |
Mean |
19** |
22* |
18** |
20** |
23** |
22 |
|
SD |
1.4 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
1.7 |
2.5 |
3.7 |
|
N |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
Table 6: Organ weights - group mean absolute and adjusted values (g) on Day 20 of gestation
Group /Sex |
|
Terminal Body weight |
Thyroids and Parathyroids |
Statistics test |
Wi |
|
|
1F |
Mean |
412 |
0.012 |
|
SD |
20 |
0.002 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
2F |
Mean |
405 |
0.012 |
|
SD |
26 |
0.002 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
3F |
Mean |
405 |
0.013 |
|
SD |
26 |
0.003 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
4F |
Mean |
398 |
0.012 |
|
SD |
30 |
0.003 |
|
N |
19 |
19 |
|
|
Thyroids and Parathyroids |
Statistics test |
|
Wi |
1F |
Adjusted Mean |
0.012 |
2F |
Adjusted Mean |
0.011 |
3F |
Adjusted Mean |
0.013 |
4F |
Adjusted Mean |
0.012 |
Table 7: Macropathology – group distribution of findings on Day 20 of gestation
|
|
Number of animals affected |
|||
Tissue/Organ and Findings |
Group/Sex No. of animals |
1F 20 |
2F 20 |
3F 20 |
4F 19 |
Liver Mass(es) Pale area(s) |
|
1 0 |
0 1 |
0 0 |
0 0 |
Palpable Mass Found at necropsy |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Placenta Enlarged |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Table 8: Histopathology – group distribution of findings on Day 20 of gestation
|
|
Number of animals affected |
|||
Tissue/Organ and Findings |
Group/Sex No. of animals |
1F 20 |
2F 20 |
3F 20 |
4F 19 |
Thyroids Cyst(s), Ultimobranchial, Prominent
Cyst(s), Follicular |
No. examined Total
Total |
20 4
0 |
20 5
0 |
19 3
0 |
19 5
2 |
Table 9: Group mean values for T3
Group |
Treatment |
mg/kg/day |
|
Value |
Statistical test |
Wi |
|||
1 |
Control |
0 |
Mean (pg/mL) |
448 |
|
|
|
SD |
111 |
|
|
|
N |
20 |
2 |
Ethylal |
100 |
Mean (pg/mL) |
456 |
|
|
|
SD |
97 |
|
|
|
N |
19 |
3 |
Ethylal |
330 |
Mean (pg/mL) |
378* |
|
|
|
SD |
96 |
|
|
|
N |
19 |
4 |
Ethylal |
1000 |
Mean (pg/mL) |
363* |
|
|
|
SD |
107 |
|
|
|
N |
19 |
Excluding non-pregnant animals.
Table 10: Group mean values for T4
Group |
Treatment |
mg/kg/day |
|
Value |
Statistical test |
Wi |
|||
1 |
Control |
0 |
Mean (pg/mL) |
15545 |
|
|
|
SD |
3122 |
|
|
|
N |
20 |
2 |
Ethylal |
100 |
Mean (pg/mL) |
17058 |
|
|
|
SD |
3658 |
|
|
|
N |
19 |
3 |
Ethylal |
330 |
Mean (pg/mL) |
19221** |
|
|
|
SD |
4295 |
|
|
|
N |
19 |
4 |
Ethylal |
1000 |
Mean (pg/mL) |
19879** |
|
|
|
SD |
3982 |
|
|
|
N |
19 |
Excluding non-pregnant animals.
Table 11: Group mean values for TSH
Group |
Treatment |
mg/kg/day |
|
Value |
Statistical test |
lWi |
|||
1 |
Control |
0 |
Mean (pg/mL) |
1342 |
|
|
|
SD |
479 |
|
|
|
N |
20 |
2 |
Ethylal |
100 |
Mean (pg/mL) |
1512 |
|
|
|
SD |
602 |
|
|
|
N |
20 |
3 |
Ethylal |
330 |
Mean (pg/mL) |
1294 |
|
|
|
SD |
432 |
|
|
|
N |
20 |
4 |
Ethylal |
1000 |
Mean (pg/mL) |
1945* |
|
|
|
SD |
1087 |
|
|
|
N |
19 |
Excluding non-pregnant animals.
Table 12: Summary of litter data
Group |
No. of pregnant females |
No. of females with live young on Day 20 |
Pre-implantation loss (a) |
Post-implantation (b) |
Percent of live offspring to implantations (c) |
1 |
20 |
20 |
46 |
15 |
95.4 |
2 |
20 |
20 |
33 |
11 |
96.6 |
3 |
20 |
20 |
47 |
23 |
92.2 |
4 |
20 |
19 |
31 |
21 |
95.5 |
a – Total pre-implantation loss considered to be, total number of corpora lutea – total number of implantations. Where implantations exceed corpora lutea, number of implantations will be considered to be equal to corpora lutea.
b – Total post-implantation loss is considered to be, total number of implantations – total number of live young.
c - Percentage of live young is considered to be = (100 – ‘post-implantation loss’)
Table 13: Litter data - group mean values on Day 20 of gestation
Group /Sex |
|
Corpora lutea |
Implantations |
Resorptions |
Implantation loss (%) |
Live young |
Sex ratio (%M) |
|||||
Early |
Late |
Total |
Pre- |
Post- |
Male |
Female |
Total |
|||||
Statistics test |
Wi |
Sh |
|
|
|
Wi |
Wi |
|
|
Sh |
Wi |
|
1F |
Mean |
18.7 |
16.5 |
0.8 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
11.0 |
4.6 |
8.1 |
7.6 |
15.7 |
51.8 |
|
SD |
2.87 |
1.00 |
0.85 |
0.00 |
0.85 |
9.99 |
5.23 |
1.92 |
2.09 |
1.42 |
12.56 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
2F |
Mean |
17.4 |
15.8 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
0.6 |
9.4 |
3.4 |
7.1 |
8.2 |
15.3 |
46.4 |
|
SD |
1.53 |
2.17 |
0.83 |
0.22 |
0.83 |
11.26 |
5.25 |
2.47 |
2.28 |
2.17 |
13.47 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
3F |
Mean |
18.2 |
15.9 |
1.2 |
0.0 |
1.2 |
12.0 |
7.8 |
7.3 |
7.4 |
14.7 |
49.1 |
|
SD |
2.84 |
2.68 |
1.27 |
0.00 |
1.27 |
13.97 |
8.92 |
3.06 |
2.58 |
3.26 |
16.20 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
4F |
Mean |
17.1 |
16.1 |
0.6 |
0.1 |
0.7 |
7.4 |
4.5 |
7.9 |
7.4 |
15.4 |
50.2 |
|
SD |
2.61 |
1.96 |
1.02 |
0.32 |
1.06 |
7.14 |
7.25 |
3.21 |
1.80 |
2.43 |
16.07 |
|
N |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
Table 14: Placental, litter and fetal weights – group mean values (g) on Day 20 of gestation
Group /Sex |
|
Placental weight |
Total litter weight |
Male fetal weight |
Female fetal weight |
Overall fetal weight |
Statistics test |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
Wi |
|
1F |
Mean |
0.53 |
58.66 |
3.86 |
3.63 |
3.74 |
|
SD |
0.085 |
5.922 |
0.221 |
0.204 |
0.212 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
2F |
Mean |
0.54 |
57.32 |
3.88 |
3.67 |
3.77 |
|
SD |
0.065 |
8.618 |
0.273 |
0.302 |
0.285 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
3F |
Mean |
0.54 |
55.37 |
3.86 |
3.67 |
3.78 |
|
SD |
0.060 |
12.055 |
0.281 |
0.223 |
0.220 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
4F |
Mean |
0.52 |
56.40 |
3.78 |
3.58 |
3.67 |
|
SD |
0.067 |
8.924 |
0.212 |
0.207 |
0.196 |
|
N |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
Table 15: Fetal examinations - major abnormality findings - group incidences
|
|
Fetuses |
Litters |
||||||
Group |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Number Examined |
|
314 |
305 |
294 |
292 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
19 |
Total Number Affected |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Cervical/Thoracic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visceral |
Retroesophageal right subclavian artery Dorsally displaced pulmonary trunk Muscular ventricular septal defect Malrotated heart |
0 0 0 0 |
1 1 1 1 |
0 0 0 0 |
0 0 0 0 |
0 0 0 0 |
1 1 1 1 |
0 0 0 0 |
0 0 0 0 |
Appendicular |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skeletal |
Thickened/misshapen long bones Polydactyly forepaw(s) |
1 1 |
0 0 |
0 0 |
0 0 |
1 1 |
0 0 |
0 0 |
0 0 |
Note: individual fetuses/litters may occur in more than one category
Table 16: Fetal examinations – Major Historical Control Data
Species/strain/source: Rat/ Sprague Dawley/ Charles River UK
Necropsy date range: May 2018– February 2019
Number of studies: 8
Study types: Main
|
|
TR83VY |
HCD Range |
||||||||
|
|
Fetuses |
Litters |
||||||||
Group |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||
Number Examined |
|
314 |
305 |
294 |
292 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
19 |
2087 |
143 |
Cervical/Thoracic Visceral |
Retroesophageal right subclavian artery Dorsally displaced pulmonary trunk Muscular ventricular septal defect Malrotated heart |
0 0 0 0 |
1 1 1 1 |
0 0 0 0 |
0 0 0 0 |
0 0 0 0 |
1 1 1 1 |
0 0 0 0 |
0 0 0 0 |
0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 |
0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 |
Table 17: Fetal examinations – minor skeletal abnormality and variants findings – group incidences
|
|
Fetuses |
Litters |
||||||
Group |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Number Examined |
|
158 |
153 |
146 |
146 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
19 |
Minor skeletal abnormalities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cranial |
sutural bone(s) interparietal fissure(s) |
0 1 |
1 1 |
1 0 |
0 0 |
0 1 |
1 1 |
1 0 |
0 0 |
Vertebral element abnormality |
thoracic |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
Ribs |
medially thickened/kinked |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Sternebrae |
misaligned hemicentres |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Costal cartilage |
misaligned |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Appendicular |
misshapen cranial margin scapula(e) |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
Total affected by one or more of the above |
|
2 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
Rib and vertebral configuration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cervical rib |
short supernumerary |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
13th rib |
short without costal cartilage |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
Number of 14th ribs |
short supernumerary full supernumerary total |
5 0 5 |
5 0 5 |
6 0 6 |
11 2 13 |
5 0 5 |
3 0 3 |
4 0 4 |
5 1 5 |
Thoracolumbar vertebrae |
18 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Pelvic girdle |
unilateral cranial shift |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Note: individual fetuses/litters may occur in more than one category
Table 17 (cont): Fetal examinations – minor skeletal abnormality and variants findings – group incidences
|
|
Fetuses |
Litters |
||||||
Group |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Number Examined |
|
158 |
153 |
146 |
146 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
19 |
Delayed/Incomplete ossification/unossified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cranial |
large nasofrontal suture cranial centres presphenoid hyoid |
0 8 1 26 |
0 12 0 16 |
2 9 0 31 |
0 1 0 6 |
0 4 1 11 |
0 7 0 7 |
2 4 0 15 |
0 1 0 5 |
Sternebrae |
5th and/or 6th other total |
98 10 99 |
76 3 78 |
60 5 61 |
70 7 73 |
18 9 18 |
18 1 18 |
19 3 19 |
18 3 18 |
Vertebrae |
cervical thoracic sacrocaudal caudal |
3 8 13 1 |
3 10 8 0 |
4 10 7 1 |
1 9 4 0 |
3 6 6 1 |
1 6 6 0 |
2 7 6 1 |
1 6 3 0 |
Ribs |
any |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Appendicular |
pelvic bones metacarpals metatarsals |
11 1 1 |
9 0 0 |
7 2 1 |
0 0 0 |
5 1 1 |
4 0 0 |
6 2 1 |
0 0 0 |
Increased ossification |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cervical vertebral centra |
all ossified |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
Note: individual fetuses/litters may occur in more than one category
Table 18: Fetal examinations - Skeletal Historical Control Data
Species/strain/source: Rat/ Sprague Dawley/ Charles River UK
Necropsy date range: May 2018– February 2019
Number of studies: 8
Study types: Main
|
|
TR83VY |
HCD Range |
||||||||
|
|
Fetuses |
Litters |
||||||||
Group |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||
Number Examined |
|
158 |
153 |
146 |
146 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
19 |
1097 |
143 |
Minor skeletal abnormalities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cranial Vertebral element abnormality Sternebrae Costal cartilage Appendicular |
sutural bone(s) thoracic misaligned hemicentres misaligned misshapen cranial margin scapula(e) |
0 0 0 0 0 |
1 0 0 0 0 |
1 1 0 0 1 |
0 1 1 1 3 |
0 0 0 0 0 |
1 0 0 0 0 |
1 1 0 0 1 |
0 1 1 1 1 |
0-2 0-3 0-2 0-2 0-1 |
0-1 0-2 0-2 0-2 0-1 |
Rib and vertebral configuration Number of 14th ribs Thoracolumbar vertebrae |
full supernumerary 18 |
0 0 |
0 0 |
0 1 |
2 0 |
0 0 |
0 0 |
0 1 |
1 0 |
0-1 0-2 |
0-1 0-1 |
Delayed/Incomplete ossification/unossified Cranial Ribs Increased ossification Cervical vertebral centra |
large nasofrontal suture any
all ossified |
0 0
0 |
0 0
0 |
2 1
1 |
0 0
1 |
0 0
0 |
0 0
0 |
2 1
1 |
0 0
1 |
0-2 0-1
0-1 |
0-2 0-1
0-1 |
Table 19: Fetal examinations - minor visceral abnormality and necropsy findings - group incidences
|
|
Fetuses |
Litters |
||||||
Group |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Number Examined |
|
156 |
152 |
148 |
146 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
19 |
Total Number Affected |
|
25 |
23 |
21 |
11 |
15 |
16 |
13 |
9 |
Visceral abnormalities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thymus |
partially undescended lobe thymic remnant |
3 1 |
2 0 |
4 0 |
1 0 |
3 1 |
1 0 |
4 0 |
1 0 |
Lungs |
absent accessory lobe |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Diaphragm |
thinning with liver protrusion |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Liver |
fissured posterior caudate lobe folded posterior caudate lobe |
1 0 |
0 0 |
0 1 |
1 0 |
1 0 |
0 0 |
0 1 |
1 0 |
Spleen |
small |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Testis(es) |
malpositioned |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Umbilical artery |
left |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
Haemorrhages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head |
brain vitreous humour eye |
1 2 |
2 0 |
2 0 |
2 0 |
1 2 |
2 0 |
2 0 |
2 0 |
Neck/Thorax |
dorsal fat pad thoracic cavity |
1 0 |
1 0 |
0 1 |
1 0 |
1 0 |
1 0 |
0 1 |
1 0 |
Abdomen |
abdominal cavity liver lobes |
10 2 |
9 3 |
10 1 |
5 2 |
7 2 |
6 3 |
8 1 |
4 2 |
General |
subcutaneous |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Necropsy observations (external) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skin |
shiny subcutaneous edema |
0 0 |
2 1 |
2 0 |
0 0 |
0 0 |
2 1 |
2 0 |
0 0 |
Note: individual fetuses/litters may occur in more than one category
Table 20: Fetal examinations – Visceral Historical Control Data
Species/strain/source: Rat/ Sprague Dawley/ Charles River UK
Necropsy date range: May 2018– February 2019
Number of studies: 8
Study types: Main
|
|
Fetuses |
Litters |
HCD Range |
|||||||
Group |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||
Number Examined |
|
156 |
152 |
148 |
146 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
19 |
||
Total Number Affected |
|
25 |
23 |
21 |
11 |
15 |
16 |
13 |
9 |
1091 |
19 |
Visceral abnormalities Lungs
Spleen |
absent accessory lobe folded posterior caudate lobe small |
0 0 0 |
1 0 1 |
0 1 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
1 0 1 |
0 1 0 |
0 0 0 |
0-0 0-3 0-0 |
0-0 0-3 0-0 |
Haemorrhages |
thoracic cavity |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0-1 |
0-1 |
Necropsy observations (external) Skin |
shiny subcutaneous edema |
0 0 |
2 1 |
2 0 |
0 0 |
0 0 |
2 1 |
2 0 |
0 0 |
0-1 0-1 |
0-1 0-1 |
Table 21: Ano-genital distance - group mean absolute and adjusted values for fetuses
Group /Sex |
|
Fetal weight (g) |
Ano-genital distance (mm) |
Statistics test |
Wi |
|
|
1M |
Mean |
3.9 |
4.1 |
|
SD |
0.22 |
0.19 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
2M |
Mean |
3.9 |
4.0 |
|
SD |
0.28 |
0.21 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
3M |
Mean |
3.9 |
4.1 |
|
SD |
0.28 |
0.20 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
4M |
Mean |
3.8 |
4.1 |
|
SD |
0.21 |
0.14 |
|
N |
19 |
19 |
|
Ano-genital distance (mm) |
|
Statistics test |
Wi |
|
1M |
Adjusted Mean |
4.1 |
2M |
Adjusted Mean |
4.0 |
3M |
Adjusted Mean |
4.1 |
4M |
Adjusted Mean |
4.1 |
Table 21 (cont): Ano-genital distance - group mean absolute and adjusted values for fetuses
Group /Sex |
|
Fetal weight (g) |
Ano-genital distance (mm) |
Statistics test |
Wi |
|
|
1F |
Mean |
3.6 |
2.5 |
|
SD |
0.20 |
0.13 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
2F |
Mean |
3.7 |
2.5 |
|
SD |
0.26 |
0.18 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
3F |
Mean |
3.7 |
2.5 |
|
SD |
0.23 |
0.20 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
4F |
Mean |
3.6 |
2.6 |
|
SD |
0.21 |
0.21 |
|
N |
19 |
19 |
|
Ano-genital distance (mm) |
|
Statistics test |
Wi |
|
1F |
Adjusted Mean |
2.5 |
2F |
Adjusted Mean |
2.5 |
3F |
Adjusted Mean |
2.5 |
4F |
Adjusted Mean |
2.6 |
Table 22: Thyroid hormone data
Species/strain/source: Rat/ Sprague Dawley/ Charles River UK
Necropsy date range: Sept 2019– December 2019
Number of studies: 4
Study types: Main
|
T3 (pg/mL) |
T4 (pg/mL) |
TSH (pg/mL) |
N |
80 |
80 |
80 |
1% |
287 |
8204 |
303 |
5% |
326 |
9916 |
419 |
50% |
473 |
16950 |
1030 |
95% |
625 |
26275 |
2476 |
99% |
701 |
50765 |
2974 |
Mean |
483 |
18730 |
1250 |
SD |
97.8 |
13191.3 |
702.3 |
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Endpoint derived from an OECD TG 414 (GLP) study with ethylal. RSS of the test report is provided.
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Ethylal is not classified in absence of adverse effects observed in 2 OECD 421 and OECD 414 (and both GLP) studies where NOAEL was 1000 mg/kg/day, corresponding to the highest tested concentration.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.