Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Toxicity to reproduction: other studies

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
toxicity to reproduction: other studies
Type of information:
other: published data
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1975
Reference Type:
review article or handbook
Title:
Benzenesulfonic acid, C10-13-alkyl derivs., sodium salts.
Author:
European Commission.
Year:
2000
Bibliographic source:
Year 2000 CD-ROM edition

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Method: LAS was injected at doses of 20 mL/kg/day from day 0 to 3 or day 8 to 11 of pregnancy. There were 12 - 19 mice in each treatment group.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
in vivo

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Benzenesulfonic acid, C10-13-alkyl derivs., sodium salts
EC Number:
270-115-0
EC Name:
Benzenesulfonic acid, C10-13-alkyl derivs., sodium salts
Cas Number:
68411-30-3
IUPAC Name:
sodium 4-undecylbenzenesulfonate
Details on test material:
Benzenesulfonic acid, C10-13-alkyl derivs., sodium salts.
LAS, activity: 99.5%

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
ICR
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Species/strain: mouse/ICR Sex: Female

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
subcutaneous
Vehicle:
water
Details on exposure:
Subcutaneous injection,Doses: 0.35, 1% in water (20, 200 mg/kg bw d).
LAS was injected at doses of 20 mL/kg/day from day 0 to 3 or day 8 to 11 of pregnancy. There were 12 - 19 mice in each treatment group.
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
not specified
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Day 0 to 3 or day 8 to 11 of pregnancy
Frequency of treatment:
daily
Duration of test:
Day 0 to 3 or day 8 to 11 of pregnancy
Doses / concentrations
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
0.35, 1% in water (20, 200 mg/kg bw d)
Basis:
nominal conc.
No. of animals per sex per dose:
12 - 19 mice in each treatment group.
Control animals:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Details on study design:
LAS was injected at doses of 20 mL/kg/day from day 0 to 3 or day 8 to 11 of pregnancy.

Results and discussion

Effect levels

open allclose all
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Remarks:
Maternal
Effect level:
20 mg/kg bw/day
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
female
Basis for effect level:
other: NOAEL Maternal: 0.35% (20 mg/kg bw d)
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Remarks:
teratogenicity
Effect level:
200 mg/kg bw/day
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
female
Basis for effect level:
other: NOAEL teratogenicity : 1% (200 mg/kg bw d)

Observed effects

When dams were administered the 1% solution from day 0 to 3 of pregnancy, there was an initial decrease in body weight and necrosis at the injection sites. The number of pregnancies decreased in the mice given the 1% solution compared to the controls (61.5% vs. 93.3%) There were no significant changes with respect to litter parameters, major malformations or minor abnormalities.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
NOAEL Maternal: 0.35% (20 mg/kg bw d)
NOAEL teratogenicity : 1% (200 mg/kg bw d)
When dams were administered the 1% solution from day 0 to 3 of pregnancy, there was an initial decrease in body weight and necrosis at the injection sites. The number of pregnancies decreased in the mice given the 1% solution compared to the controls (61.5% vs. 93.3%) There were no significant changes with respect to litter parameters, major malformations or minor abnormalities.