Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
70 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
25
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Value:
100 mg/kg bw/day
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Value:
1 763 mg/m³
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

route to route extrapolation based on 100% absorption via the oral route and 10% via the inhalation route. NOAEC= 100 mg/kg bw*10/ 0.38 m3 /kg bw= 2631 mg/m3 This value is corrected for the inhalative volumes in 8 hours under the respective conditions (6.7 m3 for base level, 10 m3 for light activity) --> 1763 mg/m3

AF for dose response relationship:
1
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
2
Justification:
based on subchronic study
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
inhalation DNEL
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
default factor
AF for intraspecies differences:
5
Justification:
worker assessment
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
starting point guideline study under GLP
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
NA
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
10 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
100
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
100 mg/kg bw/day
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

The toxicokinetic assessment concludes that due to effects on the GI tract the uptake via the oral route may be 100%, while the uptake via the dermal route is 10% (see toxicokinetic assessment). Route to route extrapolation therefore needs a correction for the internal dose based on this difference in expected absorption

AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
90-day study shows dose response
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
2
Justification:
extrapolation from sub-chronic to chronic
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
default value from rat to human
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
default value
AF for intraspecies differences:
5
Justification:
worker exposure
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
GLP study performed according to the guidelines as starting point
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)

Additional information - workers

Calcium bis( di C8-C10, branched, C9 rich, alkylnaphthalene sulphonate) has a low vapour pressure and is not expect to volatilize.

A worst case scenario is assumed in which the absorption rate from the oral route is 100%, while for the dermal and inhalation route 10% is considered.

A 90 -day study was performed with CaDNNSA. In this study in the highest dose group 6/10 females died showing alterations in the gastro-intestinal tract, a small thymus and bone marrow atrophy. The surviving females at 1000 mg/kg bw showed similar effects and a reduced body weight (gain). The effects on the gastro-intestinal tract also became apparent in males at 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw. These animals also had a reduced body weight (gain). Other effects included changes in numbers of white blood cells, lymphocytes, platelets as well as effects on several biochemical parameters. Macroscopy and histopathology indicated that next to the GI-tract mainly the thymus and bone marrow could be considered as potentially affected in males at 300 mg/kg bw and above and in females at 1000 mg/kg bw.

The NOAEL as derived from this study is 100 mg/kg bw.

In addition OECD 422 studies were conducted with 2 analogues: DNNSA (di C8-C10, branched, C9 rich, alkylnaphthalene sulphonic acid) and Barium DNNSA (Barium bis( di C8-C10, branched, C9 rich, alkylnaphthalene sulphonate). The NOAEL for DNNSA is 95 mg/kg/day and the NOAEL for Barium DNNSA is 55 mg/kg/day (correction for purity applied). .

Therefore, the NOAEL of 100 mg/kg/day was used as the starting point for DNEL, and NOAELcorr for the dermal route is 1000 mg/kg bw/day (based on the same internal dose). For inhalation exposure the NOAEC corr based on route to route extrapolation based on 100% absorption via the oral route and 10% via the inhalation route is 176 mg/m3.

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)

Additional information - General Population

No consumer exposure anticipated