Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2011
Report date:
2011

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
- modification: in addition, measurements of ear swelling and ear weight were done to discriminate the irritating potential from the sensitizing potential of the test substance (Integrated Model for the Differentiation of Skin reactions (IMDS))
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Modified LLNA (IMDS; Integrated Model for the Differentiation of Skin Reactions). Modifications are authorised in the OECD TG 429 and in the Note for Guidance SWP/2145/00 of the CPMP (2001). Information on validation of IMDS and scientific justification is given in: Vohr HW et al., Arch. Toxicol., 73, 501-509 (2000); Ehling G et al., Toxicology 212, 60-68 and 69-79 (2005).
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
(2,4,6-trioxotriazine-1,3,5(2H,4H,6H)-triyl)tris(methyl-m-phenylene) isocyanate
EC Number:
247-840-6
EC Name:
(2,4,6-trioxotriazine-1,3,5(2H,4H,6H)-triyl)tris(methyl-m-phenylene) isocyanate
Cas Number:
26603-40-7
Molecular formula:
C27H18N6O6
IUPAC Name:
1,3,5-tris(3-isocyanato-4-methylphenyl)-1,3,5-triazinane-2,4,6-trione
Constituent 2
Reference substance name:
TDI Trimer
IUPAC Name:
TDI Trimer

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
NMRI
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany
- Strain: Crl:NMRI BR
- Age at study initiation: 7 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 26 - 31 g
- Housing: individual
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 6 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 2
- Humidity (%): 40 - 70
- Air changes (per hr): about 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
methyl ethyl ketone
Concentration:
0, 2, 10, 50 %
No. of animals per dose:
6
Details on study design:
TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:
The test item in the formulation, the positive control or the vehicle were applied epicutaneously onto the dorsal part of both ears of the animals. This  treatment was repeated on three consecutive days (d1, d2 and d3). The volume administered was 25µl/ear. The used concentrations were based on the experiences with the test system and the toxic properties of the test substance.
The animals were anaesthetized by inhalation of carbon dioxide and sacrificed one day after the last application (d4). The appropriate organs were then removed. Lymphatic organs (the auricular lymph nodes) were transferred into physiological saline (PBS).
Investigations:
- weight of draining lymph nodes (given as weight index compared to vehicle controls)
- cell counts in draining lymph nodes (given as cell count index compared to vehicle controls)
Stimulation indices were calculated by dividing the absolute weight or number of cell counts of the substance treated lymph nodes by the vehicle treated ones.
- ear swelling (given in 0.01 mm and as index)
- ear weight (given in mg/8 mm diameter punch and as index)
- body weights
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
Statistics:
When it was statistically reasonable, the values from treated groups were compared with those from the control group by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) when the variances are considered homogeneous according to a homogeneity testing like Cochran's test. Alternatively, if the variances are considered to be heterogenous (p<=0.05), a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test has been used (Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA) at significance levels of 5% . Two sided multiple test procedures were done according to Dunnett or Bonferroni-Holm, respectively. Outlying values in the LN weights were eliminated at a probability level of 99% by Nalimov's method. In addition, for the LLNA/IMDS the smallest significant differentes in the means were calculated by Scheffels method, which according to Sachs can be used for both equal and unequal sample sizes.

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
Alpha hexyl cinnamic aldehyde showed a clear sensitizing potential in the local lymph node assay (IMDS).

In vivo (LLNA)

Results
Parameter:
SI
Remarks on result:
other: see Remark
Remarks:
The results show  that Desmodur RC/100 has a sensitising potential in mice after dermal application. Compared to vehicle treated animals there were clear increases regarding the weights of the draining lymph nodes (indices of 1.06, 1.38 and 1.16 %, resp.) and in the cell counts (indices of 1.13, 1.62 and 1.51 %, resp.), which are of statistical significance in the mid dose group. The "positive level" of index 1.4 for the cell counts, has been exceeded in the mid and high dose group. The EC 1.4 value calculated for this test item is 6.41 %. In accordance with the classification proposed in the Technical Report No. 78 of the ECETOC (2003) this value corresponds to a moderate skin sensitiser.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Summary of the LLNA/IMDS results with Desmodur RC/100 (means of 6 animals per group)


Parameter investigated

Vehicle

control

Dose 

  2 %

Dose

10 %

Dose

50 %

Positive

control

Stimulation index:

weight of draining lymph nodes

1.00

1.06

1.38 *

1.16

1.62 *

Stimulation index:

cell count in draining lymph nodes

1.00

1.13

1.62 *

1.51

2.10 *

Ear swelling in 0.01 mm on day 4 (index)

18.33(1.00)

18.75

(1.02)

 19.83 *

(1.08)

 22.75 *

(1.24)

27.33 *

(1.49)

Ear weight in mg / 8 mm diameter punch on day 4 (index)

11.66

(1.00)

12.42

(1.07)

 12.93 *

(1.11)

 15.20 *

(1.30)

16.98 *

(1.46)

 

* statistically significant increase (p ≤ 0.05)

The "positive level" of ear swelling, which is 2 x l0-2 mm increase, has been exceeded in the high dose group. Significant increases compared to vehicle treated animals regarding ear swelling and ear weights were detected in the mid and the high dose group. An increase in this parameter would point to an acute irritating (inflammatory) response. However, such an irritant property could also be combined with a skin sensitizing potential of a test compound.

The body weights of the animals were not affected by any treatment.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Executive summary:

Desmodur RC/100 was investigated in the modified local lymph node assay (LLNA-IMDS) on female mice according to OECD TG 429. Concentrations of 0 (vehicle control), 2, 10 and 50 % formulated in methyl ethyl ketone were tested. Compared to vehicle treated animals there were clear increases regarding the weights of the draining lymph nodes (indices of 1.06, 1.38 and 1.16 %, resp.) and in the cell counts (indices of 1.13, 1.62 and 1.51 %, resp.), which are of statistical significance in the mid dose group. The "positive level" of index 1.4 for the cell counts, has been exceeded in the mid and high dose group. The EC 1.4 value calculated for this test item is 6.41 %. In accordance with the classification proposed in the Technical Report No. 78 of the ECETOC (2003) this value corresponds to a moderate skin sensitiser.

In summary, these results show that Desmodur RC/100 has a moderate sensitising potential in mice after dermal application of a 10 % concentration. The low test concentration of 2 % turned out to be the NOEL for the parameters investigated with respect to skin sensitisation.