Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vivo

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vivo mammalian germ cell study: gene mutation
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Acceptable, well-documented publication which meets basic scientific principles.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1994

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Method: other: Woodruff, RC et al., Env. Mutagen., 6, 189-202.
Adult Canton-S males were subjected to a 3 day feeding exposure. They were mated to Basc females using a 2 to 3 day brooding pattern for a total of
three broods spanning 7 days. If the feeding SLRL test were negative, an injection exposure was performed. As in the feeding exposure, a 2 to 3 day brooding pattern for three broods was used.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of assay:
Drosophila SLRL assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1-aminopropan-2-ol
EC Number:
201-162-7
EC Name:
1-aminopropan-2-ol
Cas Number:
78-96-6
Molecular formula:
C3H9NO
IUPAC Name:
1-aminopropan-2-ol
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Mono-isopropanolamine
- Analytical purity: 96.4 %

Test animals

Species:
Drosophila melanogaster
Strain:
other: Canton S
Sex:
male

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
other: In feed. If the results of the feeding SLRL test were negative, an injection exposure was performed.
Vehicle:
no data
Duration of treatment / exposure:
feeding study: 3 days; If the results of the feeding SLRL test were negative, a single injection exposure was performed.
Frequency of treatment:
continuously in feed.
Doses / concentrations
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
feeding study: 24250 ppm, injection: 1940 ppm.
Basis:

No. of animals per sex per dose:
no data
Control animals:
yes, concurrent no treatment

Results and discussion

Test results
Sex:
male
Genotoxicity:
negative
Toxicity:
not specified
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
not specified

Any other information on results incl. tables

The test substance was negative in the SLRL-assay.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
Under the conditions tested TEA was not mutagenic in a Drosophila SLRL assay.