Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 482-150-0 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- The study was conducted between 24 January 2007 and 08 February 2007.
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 007
- Report date:
- 2007
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Magenta T-43
- IUPAC Name:
- Magenta T-43
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Details on test material:
- Sponsor's identification: JPD Magenta T-43
Description: dark red solid
Storage conditions: room temperature in the dark
Batch number: H186-5
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Animals and Animal Husbandry
Three New Zealand White rabbits were supplied by an accredited supplier. At the start of the study the animals were in the weight range of 2.0 to 3.5 kg and were twelve to twenty weeks old. After an acclimatisation period of at least five days each animal was given a number unique within the study which was written with a black indelible marker-pen on the inner surface of the ear and on the cage label.
The animals were individually housed in suspended cages. Free access to mains drinking water and food (Certified Rabbit Diet) was allowed throughout the study. The diet and drinking water were considered not to contain any contaminant of a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study.
The temperature and relative humidity were set to achieve limits of 17 to 23°C and 30 to 70% respectively. Any occasional deviations from these targets were considered not to have affected the purpose or integrity of the study. The rate of air exchange was at least fifteen changes per hour and the lighting was controlled by a time switch to give twelve hours continuous light (06:00 to 18:00) and twelve hours darkness.
The animals were provided with environmental enrichment items which were considered not to contain any contaminant of a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study.
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- A volume of 0.1 ml of the test material, which was found to weigh approximately 95 mg (as measured by gently compacting the required volume into an adapted syringe) was placed into the conjunctival sac of the right eye.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The upper and lower eyelids were held together for about one second immediately after treatment, to prevent loss of the test material.
- Observation period (in vivo):
- Assessment of ocular damage/irritation was made approximately 1 hour and 24, 48 and 72 hours.
An additional observation was made in one treated eye on Day 7 to assess the reversibility of the ocular effects - Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 male rabbits
- Details on study design:
- Preparation of Test Material:
For the purpose of the study the test material was used as supplied.
The absorption of the test material was not determined.
Measurement of pH:
The pH of the test material was determined prior to commencement of the study. The results were tabulated.
Procedure:
Immediately before the start of the test, both eyes of the provisionally selected test rabbits were examined for evidence of ocular irritation or defect with the aid of a light source from a standard ophthalmoscope. Only animals free of ocular damage were used.
Initially, a single rabbit was treated. A volume of 0.1 ml of the test material, which was found to weigh approximately 95 mg (as measured by gently compacting the required volume into an adapted syringe) was placed into the conjunctival sac of the right eye, formed by gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The upper and lower eyelids were held together for about one second immediately after treatment, to prevent loss of the test material, and then released. The left eye remained untreated and was used for control purposes. Immediately after administration of the test material, an assessment of the initial pain reaction was made.
After consideration of the ocular responses produced in the first treated animal, two additional animals were treated.
Assessment of ocular damage/irritation was made approximately 1 hour and 24, 48 and 72 hours following treatment, according to the numerical evaluation 'Draize Scale for Scoring Ocular Irritation.'
Due to a technical error the 72-hour observation was missed in one treated eye but an observation was performed on Day 5. This deviation was considered not to affect the purpose or integrity of the study as reactions were still present in this treated eye at Day 5. Full recovery followed by redevelopment of reactions between the 48-hour observation and the Day 5 observation was considered unlikely.
Any other ocular effects were also noted. Examination of the eye was facilitated by the use of the light source from a standard ophthalmoscope.
An additional observation was made in one treated eye on Day 7 to assess the reversibility of the ocular effects
Interpretation of Results:
The numerical values corresponding to each animal, tissue and observation time were recorded.
The data relating to the conjunctivae were designated by the letters A (redness), B (chemosis) and C (discharge), those relating to the iris designated by the letter D and those relating to the cornea by the letters E (degree of opacity) and F (area of cornea involved). For each tissue the score was calculated as follows:
Score for conjunctivae = (A + B + C) x 2
Score for iris = D x 5
Score for cornea = (E x F) x 5
Using the numerical data obtained a modified version of the system described by Kay J H and Calandra J C (1962), J. Soc. Cosmet. Chern. 13, 281-289 was used to classify the ocular irritancy potential of the test material. This was achieved by adding together the scores for the cornea, iris and conjunctivae for each time point for each rabbit. The group means of the total scores for each observation were calculated. The highest of these group means (the maximum group mean score) together with the persistence of the reactions enabled classification of the eye irritancy potential of the test material.
If evidence of irreversible ocular damage is noted, the test material will be classified as corrosive to the eye.
The results were also evaluated according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 (CLP).
Results and discussion
In vivo
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- (redness)
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: mean of scores at 24, 48 h and 5 day
- Score:
- 1.67
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Due to a technical error the 72-hour observation was missed in one treated eye but an observation was performed on Day 5.
- Remarks:
- This deviation was considered not to affect the purpose or integrity of the study as reactions were still present in this treated eye at Day 5. Full recovery followed by redevelopment of reactions between the 48-hour observation and the Day 5 observation was considered unlikely.
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- (redness)
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.67
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- (redness)
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.67
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: mean of scores at 24, 48 h and 5 day
- Score:
- 1.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Due to a technical error the 72-hour observation was missed in one treated eye but an observation was performed on Day 5.
- Remarks:
- This deviation was considered not to affect the purpose or integrity of the study as reactions were still present in this treated eye at Day 5. Full recovery followed by redevelopment of reactions between the 48-hour observation and the Day 5 observation was considered unlikely.
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.67
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.67
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: mean of scores at 24, 48 h and 5 day
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Due to a technical error the 72-hour observation was missed in one treated eye but an observation was performed on Day 5.
- Remarks:
- This deviation was considered not to affect the purpose or integrity of the study as reactions were still present in this treated eye at Day 5. Full recovery followed by redevelopment of reactions between the 48-hour observation and the Day 5 observation was considered unlikely.
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: mean of scores at 24, 48 h and 5 day
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Remarks on result:
- other: Due to a technical error the 72-hour observation was missed in one treated eye but an observation was performed on Day 5.
- Remarks:
- This deviation was considered not to affect the purpose or integrity of the study as reactions were still present in this treated eye at Day 5. Full recovery followed by redevelopment of reactions between the 48-hour observation and the Day 5 observation was considered unlikely.
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 24 h
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 24 h
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Reversibility of any observed effect: Changes were fully reversible within 7 days.
- Other effects:
- Due to a technical error, the 72 hour observation of one
animal was not conducted until Day 5. This deviation was
considered not to affect the purpose or integrity of the
study as reactions were still present in this treated eye at
Day 5. Full recovery followed by redevelopment of reactions
between the 48-hour observation and the Day 5 observation
was considered unlikely.
The mean scores for animal 1 were based upon the values from the 24 hour, 48 hour and 5 day observations.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Results
Individual and group mean scores for ocular irritation were tabulated. Red-coloured staining of the fur was noted around all treated eyes throughout the study.
Scattered or diffuse corneal opacity was noted in all treated eyes at the 24-hour observation and in one treated eye at the 48-hour and 5-day observations. Staining of the cornea was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment and at the 24 and 48-hour observations and in one treated eye at the 5-day observation.
Iridial inflammation was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment and in one treated eye at the 24-hour observation.
Moderate conjunctival irritation was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment with minimal to moderate conjunctival irritation notedinall treated eyes at the 24 and 48-hour observations and minimal conjunctival irritation noted in one treated eye at the 5-day observation.
Two treated eyes appeared normal at the 72-hour observation and the remaining treated eye appeared normal at the 7-day observation.
Individual Score and Individual Total Scores for Ocular Irritation
Rabbit No. & Sex |
65649 Male |
65755 Male |
65756 Male |
||||||||||
IPR = 2 |
IPR = 2 |
IPR = 2 |
|||||||||||
Time After Treatment |
1 Hour |
24 Hours |
48 Hours |
5 Days |
7 Days |
1 Hour |
24 Hours |
48 Hours |
72 Hours |
1 Hour |
24 Hours |
48 Hours |
72 Hours |
CORNEA E= degree of opacity F = Area of Cornea Involved |
0S 1S 1S 1S 0 0S 1S 0S 0 0S 1S 0S 0 |
||||||||||||
0 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 |
|||||||||||||
Score (E x F) x 5 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
IRIS D |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Score (D x 5) |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
CONJUNCTIVAE A= Redness B = Chemosis C = Discharge |
|
||||||||||||
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
3Sf |
2Sf |
1Sf |
0Sf |
0Sf |
2Sf |
1Sf |
0Sf |
0Sf |
2Sf |
1Sf |
0Sf |
0Sf |
|
Score (A + B + C) x 2 |
14 |
12 |
8 |
4 |
0 |
12 |
6 |
4 |
0 |
12 |
6 |
4 |
0 |
Total Score |
19 |
27 |
13 |
9 |
0 |
17 |
11 |
4 |
0 |
17 |
11 |
4 |
0 |
IPR = Initial pain reaction
S = Staining of the cornea
Sf = Red coloured staining of the fur around the treated eye
Individual Total Scores and Group Mean Scores for Ocular Irritation
Rabbit No. and Sex |
Individual Total Scores At: |
||||
1 Hour |
24 Hours |
48 Hours |
72 Hours |
7 Days |
|
65649 Male |
19 |
27 |
13 |
9* |
0 |
65755 Male |
17 |
11 |
4 |
0 |
- |
65756 Male |
17 |
11 |
4 |
0 |
- |
Group Total |
53 |
49 |
21 |
+ |
0 |
Group Mean Total |
17.7 |
16.3 |
7.0 |
+ |
0.0 |
*= Observation performed on Day 5 due to a technical error
+ = As the 72-hour observation was not performed on one treated eye, it was impossible to calculate the true Group Total and Group Mean Score at the 72-hour observation, however, as reactions were still present in this treated eye at the Day 5 observation, it was considered unlikely that the Group Mean Score at the 72-hour observation would 0.0
- = Observation not required
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- other: Not classified according to EU criteria.
- Conclusions:
- The test material produced a maximum group mean score of 17.7 and was classified as a moderate irritant (class 5 on a 1 to 8 scale) to the rabbit eye according to a modified Kay and Calandra classification system.
The test item is not classified as an eye irritant according to the Classification, Labelling and Packaging Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 (CLP). - Executive summary:
Introduction
The study was performed to assess the irritancy potential of the test material to the eye of the New Zealand White rabbit. The method was designed to meet the requirements of the following:
• OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No. 405 "Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion" (adopted 24 April 2002)
• Method B5 Acute Toxicity (Eye Irritation) of Commission Directive 2004/73/EC
Result
A single application of the test material to the non-irrigated eye of three rabbits produced scattered or diffuse corneal opacity, iridial inflammation and moderate conjunctival irritation. Two treated eyes appeared normal at the 72-hour observation and the remaining treated eye appeared normal at the 7-day observation.
Conclusion
The test material produced a maximum group mean score of 17.7 and was classified as a moderate irritant (Class 5 on a 1 to 8 scale) to the rabbit eye according to a modified Kay and Calandra classification system.
The test item is not classified as an eye irritant according to the Classification, Labelling and Packaging Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 (CLP).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.