Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 951-962-1 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Water solubility
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- transformation / dissolution of metals and inorganic metal compounds
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 29 Nov 2019 - 10 Feb 2020
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 29 (23-Jul-2001): Guidance document on transformation/dissolution of metals and metal compounds in aqueous media
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of method:
- other: This study was performed in order to determine the transformation and/or dissolution of Sulphide Precipitate via measurement of Zink (Zn) per ICP-OES in aqueous media.
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name Lead Sulphate
Batch no. 20170505
Appearance grey granules of different sizes
Composition 1.2 % Cu; 4.2 % Zn; 0.8 % Fe; 59.5 % Pb; 0.1 % Cd; 1.7 % As; 0.2 % Sb; 4.0 % Sn; 0.5 % Bi; 0.1 % Br; 0.7 % Cl; 0.3 % F
CAS No. unknown
EC-No. 951-962-1
Molecular formula not stated
Molecular weight not stated
Purity 100 % (UVCB)
Homogeneity homogeneous
Vapour pressure not stated
Stability in solvents H2O: not stated; EtOH: not stated; acetone: not stated; CH3CN: not stated; DMSO: not stated
Solubility in solvents H2O: not stated; EtOH: not stated; acetone: not stated; CH3CN: not stated; DMSO: not stated
Production date not stated
Expiry date 31. Dec. 2025
Storage room temperature (20 ± 5 °C)
Stability stable under storage conditions - Key result
- Type of test:
- full transformation/dissolution test - metals and sparingly soluble metal compounds
- Mean dissolved conc.:
- 492 µg/L
- Element analysed:
- Pb
- Loading of aqueous phase:
- 1 mg/L
- Incubation duration:
- 4 d
- Key result
- Type of test:
- full transformation/dissolution test - metals and sparingly soluble metal compounds
- Mean dissolved conc.:
- 5 090 µg/L
- Element analysed:
- Pb
- Loading of aqueous phase:
- 10 mg/L
- Incubation duration:
- 7 d
- Key result
- Type of test:
- full transformation/dissolution test - metals and sparingly soluble metal compounds
- Mean dissolved conc.:
- 20 700 µg/L
- Element analysed:
- Pb
- Loading of aqueous phase:
- 100 mg/L
- Incubation duration:
- 7 d
- Details on results:
- The following mean vales and RSD were calculated:
Analysis Data for Zn (Flasks 3 – 5, 1 mg/L)
Analysis Data for Pb (Flasks 3 – 5, 1 mg/L)
Flask # Conc. after 2 h [µg/L] Conc. after 6 h [µg/L] Conc. after 1 d [µg/L] Conc. after 4 d [µg/L] Conc. after 7 d [µg/L]
3 161.6 211.5 281.5 441.7 371.6
4 215.2 293.9 366.4 485.0 423.8
5 243.9 319.0 391.7 548.1 479.0
Mean 206.9 274.8 346.5 491.6 424.8
RSD [%] 20.2 20.5 16.7 10.9 12.6
Analysis Data for Pb (Flasks 6 – 8, 10 mg/L)
Flask # Conc. after 2 h [µg/L] Conc. after 6 h [µg/L] Conc. after 1 d [µg/L] Conc. after 4 d [µg/L] Conc. after 7 d [µg/L]
6 1499 1976 2753 3890 4552
7 1835 2384 3246 4394 5243
8 1892 2415 3485 4936 5475
Mean 1742 2258 3162 4409 5090
RSD [%] 12.2 10.9 11.8 11.9 9.4
Analysis Data for Pb (Flasks 9 – 11, 100 mg/L)
Flask # Conc. after 2 h [µg/L] Conc. after 6 h [µg/L] Conc. after 1 d [µg/L] Conc. after 4 d [µg/L] Conc. after 7 d [µg/L]
9 8390 10648 15313 18956 21642
10 8427 9950 13653 17291 20580
11 9186 10539 13862 18310 19878
Mean 8668 10379 14276 18186 20700
RSD [%] 5.2 3.6 6.3 4.6 4.3 - Conclusions:
- The following concentrations of Pb were stated on day 4 (1 mg/L) and 7 (10 and 100 mg/L):
1 mg/L nominal: 491.6 µg/L Pb;
10 mg/L nominal: 5090 µg/L Pb;
100 mg/L nominal: 20700 µg/L Pb. - Executive summary:
In this study, the maximum concentration of total dissolved Lead was determined in order to identify compounds of Lead Sulphate which undergo either dissolution or rapid transformation.
The calibration was performed using a certified Pb stock solution (1000 mg/L nominal each). All validation conditions for the range of 10 – 100 µg/L Pb in pH 5.5 buffer solution were fulfilled.During the study the calibration was performed four times as the recovery rate of QC sample lay outside the range of 100±15% %.
The correlation coefficient r was > 0.99 of each calibration.The back calculated concentrations of the calibration standards layin the demanded ranges 100 ± 15 % and 100±20 % (low concentration) of the nominal values of each calibration. The accuracy in pH 7.0 buffer solution was given (value lay in the range of 100±5 %). For the determination of Pb in pH 8.5 buffer solution the recovery rate 87.7 % was taken into account in the calculation of Pb concentration in the screening test.
After the screening test, pH 5.5 was chosen for the reproducibility and full test based on the highest measured concentrations of Pb.
The reproducibility test was performed with 100 mg/L test item (nominal) in pH 5.5 buffer solution over a period of 24 hours. Five vessels were prepared; each flask was measured in triplicate. A within-vessel variation of max. 10% and a between-vessel variation of max. 20% is demanded. These conditions were fulfilled. Therefore, for the full test three flasks per concentration with double determination were used.
The full test was performed with three different concentrations of the test item (nominal loads 1, 10 and 100 mg/L, three replicates each) over a period of 7 days with samplings after 2 h, 6 h, 1 d, 4 d and 7 d. Two flasks were prepared as blanks without addition of test item.
No linear dependency of measured concentrations on time was observed for each nominal load. Furthermore, the concentration of Pb on day 7 in the flasks 3 – 5 (1 mg/L nominal load) was lower than on day 4. Either an error during the sample preparation or precipitation of Pb on day 7 are the possible reasons for this behaviour. Therefore, the values on day 7 were not used for evaluation. The conditions RSD < 10 % (within-vessel)and < 20 % (between-vessel) were fulfilled in all flasks at each sampling point of full test except the RSD between 3 – 5 flasks after 2 and 6 h. This was considered as uncritical as the result of dissolution of Pb with 1 mg/L nominal load was stated from day 4 with RSD of 10.9 %.
As no linear dependency of measured concentrations on time was observed, the first order model was used for the determination of kinetic. The first order constant “k” (slope of linear function) was calculated as 0.379 1/d (mean value of all flasks).
The mass balance lay in the range of 92.6 – 99.8 %.
Reference
A duplicate determination was performed from each flask. Measurement data for Pb are presented in the following table
Fl. |
Content |
Conc. Pb in µg/L at following sampling points |
|||||
0 h1 |
2 h |
6 h |
1 d |
4 d |
7 d |
||
1 |
blank |
< 10 |
< 10 |
< 10 |
< 10 |
12.27 |
13.03 |
< 10 |
< 10 |
16.872 |
< 10 |
14.21 |
< 10 |
||
2 |
blank |
< 10 |
< 10 |
< 10 |
< 10 |
14.40 |
13.17 |
< 10 |
< 10 |
< 10 |
< 10 |
12.28 |
13.20 |
||
3 |
1.0 mg/L |
< 10 |
165.4 |
207.6 |
299.9 |
419.1 |
363.13 |
< 10 |
157.7 |
215.4 |
263.2 |
464.2 |
380.13 |
||
4 |
1.0 mg/L |
< 10 |
215.8 |
290.4 |
377.9 |
488.4 |
424.93 |
< 10 |
214.5 |
297.4 |
355.0 |
481.7 |
422.83 |
||
5 |
1.0 mg/L |
< 10 |
247.2 |
315.4 |
394.6 |
558.9 |
476.83 |
< 10 |
240.6 |
322.6 |
388.7 |
537.3 |
481.13 |
||
6 |
10 mg/L |
< 10 |
1467 |
1998 |
2708 |
3840 |
4409 |
< 10 |
1532 |
1953 |
2798 |
3939 |
4695 |
||
7 |
10 mg/L |
< 10 |
1854 |
2442 |
3173 |
4305 |
5136 |
< 10 |
1815 |
2327 |
3320 |
4483 |
5350 |
||
8 |
10 mg/L |
< 10 |
1882 |
2394 |
3450 |
4948 |
5591 |
< 10 |
1902 |
2436 |
3521 |
4925 |
5359 |
||
9 |
100 mg/L |
< 10 |
8280 |
10459 |
15321 |
19477 |
22888 |
< 10 |
8500 |
10837 |
15304 |
18436 |
20395 |
||
10 |
100 mg/L |
< 10 |
8225 |
9962 |
13918 |
17150 |
20411 |
< 10 |
8630 |
9937 |
13388 |
17432 |
20749 |
||
11 |
100 mg/L |
< 10 |
8994 |
10320 |
14000 |
19310 |
20491 |
< 10 |
9378 |
10758 |
13723 |
17310 |
19264 |
1the LOQ of Pb is 10 µg/L
2possible contamination, the repetition of the measurement showed the value 17.16
3repetition of determination as an error was assumed during the first sample preparation
Description of key information
The following concentrations of Pb were stated on day 4 (1 mg/L) and 7 (10 and 100 mg/L):
1 mg/L nominal: 491.6 µg/L Pb;
10 mg/L nominal: 5090 µg/L Pb;
100 mg/L nominal: 20700 µg/L Pb.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Water solubility:
- 491 µg/L
- at the temperature of:
- 21 °C
Additional information
In this study, the maximum concentration of total dissolved Lead was determined in order to identify compounds of Lead Sulphate which undergo either dissolution or rapid transformation.
The calibration was performed using a certified Pb stock solution (1000 mg/L nominal each). All validation conditions for the range of 10 – 100 µg/L Pb in pH 5.5 buffer solution were fulfilled.During the study the calibration was performed four times as the recovery rate of QC sample lay outside the range of 100±15% %.
The correlation coefficient r was > 0.99 of each calibration.The back calculated concentrations of the calibration standards layin the demanded ranges 100 ± 15 % and 100±20 % (low concentration) of the nominal values of each calibration. The accuracy in pH 7.0 buffer solution was given (value lay in the range of 100±5 %). For the determination of Pb in pH 8.5 buffer solution the recovery rate 87.7 % was taken into account in the calculation of Pb concentration in the screening test.
After the screening test, pH 5.5 was chosen for the reproducibility and full test based on the highest measured concentrations of Pb.
The reproducibility test was performed with 100 mg/L test item (nominal) in pH 5.5 buffer solution over a period of 24 hours. Five vessels were prepared; each flask was measured in triplicate. A within-vessel variation of max. 10% and a between-vessel variation of max. 20% is demanded. These conditions were fulfilled. Therefore, for the full test three flasks per concentration with double determination were used.
The full test was performed with three different concentrations of the test item (nominal loads 1, 10 and 100 mg/L, three replicates each) over a period of 7 days with samplings after 2 h, 6 h, 1 d, 4 d and 7 d. Two flasks were prepared as blanks without addition of test item.
No linear dependency of measured concentrations on time was observed for each nominal load. Furthermore, the concentration of Pb on day 7 in the flasks 3 – 5 (1 mg/L nominal load) was lower than on day 4. Either an error during the sample preparation or precipitation of Pb on day 7 are the possible reasons for this behaviour. Therefore, the values on day 7 were not used for evaluation. The conditions RSD < 10 % (within-vessel)and < 20 % (between-vessel) were fulfilled in all flasks at each sampling point of full test except the RSD between 3 – 5 flasks after 2 and 6 h. This was considered as uncritical as the result of dissolution of Pb with 1 mg/L nominal load was stated from day 4 with RSD of 10.9 %.
As no linear dependency of measured concentrations on time was observed, the first order model was used for the determination of kinetic. The first order constant “k” (slope of linear function) was calculated as 0.379 1/d (mean value of all flasks).
The mass balance lay in the range of 92.6 – 99.8 %.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.