Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Environmental fate & pathways

Hydrolysis

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
hydrolysis
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
02 Nov 2016 - 13 Jun 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The hydrolysis test was conducted as a preliminary test within the purposes of an adsorption study according to OECD 106 (see cross reference). Soil samples from 5 different soil types (neutral pH) were weighed into test vessels with 0.01 M CaCl2-solution. After agitation overnight the aqueous phase was filtrated and fortified with the test item. Samples were shaken and at defined sampling points, samples were analyzed to determine hydrolysis of the test item.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Staatliches Gewerbeaufsichtsamt Hildesheim, Germany
Radiolabelling:
no
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Remarks:
LC-MS/MS
Details on sampling:
- Determination timepoints of hydrolysis in aqueous phase: 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 24 h (except of LUFA soil 2.4 the 24 h measurement did not take place)
- Sampling method: soil samples from 5 different soil types were weighed into the test vessels and an appropriate volume of 0.01 M CaCl2-solution was added. After agitation overnight (12 h minimum) the aqueous phase was filtrated and fortified with the test item. Samples were shaken on an overhead shaker. At defined sampling points, samples were stabilized with acetonitrile (factor 1.1). Samples were analyzed to determine hydrolysis of the test item.
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: no storage
Buffers:
- Type and final molarity of buffer: 0.01 M CaCl2-solution
Estimation method (if used):
The response of the test item was determined as a function of time. The ln responses were plotted against time and the slope of the resulting regression graph gives the rate constant k [1/unit of time]:
K = - slope

The half-life (T½) [unit of time] of the reaction is given by:
T1/2= (0.693/kobs)
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Type of test flasks: 20 mL headspace vials
- Sterilisation method: none
- Lighting: not specified
- Details on test procedure for unstable compounds: see details on sampling
- If no traps were used, is the test system closed/open: closed
- Is there any indication of the test material adsorbing to the walls of the test apparatus: no
- other: soil samples from 5 different soil types were weighed into the test vessels and an appropriate volume of 0.01 M CaCl2-solution was added

OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: no
Duration:
24 h
Temp.:
20 °C
Initial conc. measured:
1 mg/L
Remarks:
Hydrolysis was measured in 5 different soils with pH between 5.5 and 7.2
Number of replicates:
two per soil
Transformation products:
not measured
pH:
7.1
Temp.:
20 °C
Hydrolysis rate constant:
0 s-1
DT50:
1.8 h
Remarks on result:
other: Eurosoil 2
pH:
5.5
Temp.:
20 °C
Hydrolysis rate constant:
0 s-1
DT50:
5.6 h
Remarks on result:
other: Eurosoil 3
pH:
6.7
Temp.:
20 °C
Hydrolysis rate constant:
0 s-1
DT50:
1.9 h
Remarks on result:
other: Eurosoil 4
pH:
7.1
Temp.:
20 °C
Hydrolysis rate constant:
0 s-1
DT50:
1 h
Remarks on result:
other: LUFA 2.4
pH:
7.2
Temp.:
20 °C
Hydrolysis rate constant:
0 s-1
DT50:
1.9 h
Remarks on result:
other: LUFA 5M

Table 1: Characteristics of soils used.

 

Soils

 

Eurosoil 2

Eurosoil 3

Eurosoil 4

LUFA soil 2.4

LUFA soil 5M

FAO soil unit (Eurosoils)

Soil Type (LUFA Soils)

Rendzina

Dystric Cambisol

Orthic Luvizol


loam


sandy loam

pH (0.01 M CaCl2)

7.1

5.5

6.7

7.1

7.2

Organic Carbon [%]

3.72

3.01

1.31

1.74

0.92

Clay (<0.002 mm) [%]

22.6

17.0

20.3

25.2

10.2

Silt (0.002-0.063 mm) [%]

64.1

36.8

75.7

42.3

31.1

Sand (0.063-2 mm) [%]

13.4

46.4

4.1

32.6

58.7

Cation Exchange Capacity [mval/100g]

28.9

16.6

17.3

22

10

Table 2: Analytical determination of Hydrolysis in Aqueous Phase (initial nominal concentration of parent substance 1 mg/L)

Time [h] Eurosoil 2 Eurosoil 3 Eurosoil 4 LUFA 2.4 LUFA 5M
Mean c [mg/L] % Mean c [mg/L] % Mean c [mg/L] % Mean c [mg/L] % Mean c [mg/L] %
0 0.99 - 0.99 - 0.983 - 0.99 - 0.99 -
0.25 0.893 90 0.944 95 0.891 91 0.887 90 0.873 88
0.5 0.797 81 0.901 91 0.838 85 0.722 73 0.78 79
1 0.695 70 0.856 86 0.746 76 0.573 58 0.666 67
2 0.508 51 0.76 77 0.562 57 0.318 32 0.501 51
4 0.31 31 0.675 68 0.384 39 0.0904 9 0.288 29
6 0.153 15 0.535 54 0.208 21 0.0144 1 0.135 14
24 0.000111 0.011 0.0501 5 0.000147 0.015  -   -  0.000125 0.013

Mean c = mean concentration of two test item replicates, internal standard taken into account

Validity criteria fulfilled:
not applicable
Conclusions:
The test item is prone to fast hydrolysis therefore a Tier 1 test (preliminary study) in order to determine the hydrolysis half-lives of the substance in soil eluates was performed within the purposes of an adsorption study according to OECD guidance 106. The hydrolysis rate and a hydrolytic half-life were determined in soil-conditioned 0.01 M CaCl2 solution for each soil and spiked with the test item. Half-lives between 1 - 5.6 h were determined for the substance depending on the soil.
Endpoint:
hydrolysis
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
08 Aug - 05 Sep 2013
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The test item is prone to hydrolysis. Therefore in the frame of the biodegradation test (see cross reference) according to OECD guideline 301, a preliminary test on the hydrolysis of the substance was performed. The hydrolysis test was performed in purified water for 2 h duration. The test item hydrolyses to ethanol and a silanol hydrolysis product. Ethanol was analytically monitored at several timepoints in order to gather information on the hydrolysis rate of the test item.
GLP compliance:
yes
Radiolabelling:
no
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
- Sampling intervals for the parent/transformation products: right after preparation of the test solution and after 0.5, 1 and 2 h
- Sampling method: 1 mL of test solution was taken out of the vessel at sampling points
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: no storage
Details on test conditions:
TEST MEDIUM
- Test solution: water + test item (31 µL (corresp. to 30 mg) test item in 300 mL purified water)
- Kind and purity of water: purified water

OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Temperature: RT
- Other: each test solution was stirred by a stirrer
Duration:
2 h
pH:
9.5
Initial conc. measured:
100 mg/L
Remarks:
Temperature: room temperature mentioned in report
Number of replicates:
2
Positive controls:
no
Negative controls:
no
Transformation products:
yes
No.:
#1
Details on hydrolysis and appearance of transformation product(s):
- Formation of transformation product during test: the produced amount of ethanol reached to the theoretical amount after 0.5 h from preparation of the test solutions, showing that the test item was completely hydrolyzed after 0.5 h.
Remarks on result:
other: see field "details on results"
Details on results:
Half of the test material was hydrolyzed right after the preparation of the solution at timepoint 0. 97-99% of the test material was hydrolyzed after 0.5 h.

Table 5: Produced amount of ethanol over 2 h.

Sampling point

Production of ethanol (GC)

Right after preparation

0.5 h

1 h

2 h

Water + test item

1

mg

10

19.3

19.2

19.7

%

51

99

98

101

2

mg

12

18.9

19.1

19.2

%

62

97

98

99

Theoretical amount (mg)

19.5

Validity criteria fulfilled:
not applicable
Conclusions:
The test item is prone to hydrolysis. Therefore in the frame of the biodegradation test according to OECD guideline 301, a preliminary test on the hydrolysis of the substance was performed. Since the test item hydrolyses to ethanol and a silanol hydrolysis product, ethanol was analytically monitored at several timepoints in order to gather information on the hydrolysis rate of the test item. Half of the test material was hydrolzed right after the preparation of the solution at timepoint 0. 97-99% of the test material was hydrolyzed after 0.5 h.
Endpoint:
hydrolysis
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
11 Aug - 02 Sep 2021
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 111 (Hydrolysis as a Function of pH)
Version / remarks:
2004
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.7 (Degradation: Abiotic Degradation: Hydrolysis as a Function of pH)
Version / remarks:
2008
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Staatliches Gewerbeaufsichtsamt Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany (2020-08-27)
Radiolabelling:
no
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
- Sampling intervals for the parent/transformation products: Samples were taken at test start (0 h) and at a minimum of 12 spaced points, normally between 10 and 90% of hydrolysis, if possible. If, after an incubation time of 10 min, hydrolysis of at least 75% was determined, the number of spaced points was reduced. For the transformation product ethanol the remaining 10 mL of the sample were prepared.
- Temperature check: every 10 minutes automatically (pH 4 and pH 9), once per hour (pH 7), and at least once per day manually
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: The time between test item application and transfer to thermostat / analysis did not exceed 10 min if possible, but at least not more than 2.5% of the total study time.
Buffers:
- pH: 4, 7, 9
- Type and composition of buffer pH 4: 0.36 g of sodium hydroxide and 11.511 g of mono potassium citrate were dissolved in 1000 mL purified water.
- Type and composition of buffer pH 7: 7.708 g of ammonium acetate were dissolved in 1000 mL purified water.
- Type and composition of buffer pH 9: 0.852 g sodium hydroxide, 3.7276 g potassium chloride and 3.0916 g boric acid were dissolved in 1000 mL purified water.
- other: Buffers were purged with nitrogen for 5 min and then the pH was checked to a precision of at least 0.1 at the test temperatures. Buffers were sterilized by filtration through 0.2 µm.
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Type, material and volume of test flasks, other equipment used: 15 mL Centrifuge tubes (pH 4 and pH 9), 15 mL sterile centrifuge tubes (pH 7)
- Test concentration: 30 mg/L in buffer solution at pH 4, 7, 9 with 10% acetonitrile dried as co-solvent
- Sterilisation method: buffers were sterilized by filtration (see section "Buffers"), due to the fast hydrolysis at pH 4 and 9, no sterility is deemed necessary at these test conditions. At pH 7, the study was performed under sterile test conditions.
- Temperature: 10, 20, 30 ± 0.5 °C.
- Measures taken to avoid photolytic effects: Photolytic effects were avoided by using an opaque water bath. The study was conducted protected from direct sunlight.
- If no traps were used, is the test system closed/open: closed

TEST MEDIUM
- Volume used/treatment: 10.33 mL
- Kind and purity of water: Purified water, MERCK, In-house device Milli-Q Advantage A10, ≥ 18.2 MΩ/cm ≤ 50 ppb TOC
- Preparation of test medium: 9.297 mL of the respective buffer solution pH 4, 7 or 9 were given into the test vessels. 1.033 mL of the test item solution (300 mg/L in acetonitrile, dried) was spiked into the vessels and the vessels were closed. For control samples, 9 mL of the respective buffer solution was spiked with 1 mL acetonitrile, dried without test item. Prior to application the buffers pH 4 and 9 were tempered to test temperature.
- Identity and concentration of co-solvent: Acetonitrile, 10% (v/v)
Remarks:
The test was conducted until 90% decomposition was reached.
Number of replicates:
One replicate per sampling date, single injected
Negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
buffer solution at the respective pH value with 10% acetonitrile, dried as co-solvent
Preliminary study:
Due to the fast hydrolysis of the test item, no preliminary test was deemed to be necessary.
Transformation products:
yes
Remarks:
Ethanol was identified as major transformation product and quantified. Additional transformation products were postulated on basis of the expected de-ethoxylation processes and monitored on their masses traces of m/z 258, 286, 314, 342, 370, and 398 Da.
No.:
#1
Details on hydrolysis and appearance of transformation product(s):
- Formation and decline of each transformation product during test: Ethanol was identified as major transformation product and quantified. In sum nine possible transformation products, originated from de-ethoxylation, could be postulated. These nine possible structures were analysed based on their six possible molecular masses and additionally by their retention time differences based on the molecule symmetry. The monitored masses traces are m/z 258 Da, 286 Da, 314 Da, 342 Da, 370 Da and 398 Da. For all test conditions the ln concentration vs. time plots have regression graphs with slopes significantly non zero.
- Pathways for transformation: A confirmation of pseudo first order reaction kinetics with coefficients of determination > 0.8 was achieved for all test conditions.
- Other: First order reaction kinetics were applied for data computation.
pH:
4
Temp.:
10 °C
Hydrolysis rate constant:
0.001 s-1
DT50:
14.3 min
Type:
(pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
pH:
4
Temp.:
20 °C
Hydrolysis rate constant:
0.002 s-1
DT50:
7.7 min
Type:
(pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
pH:
4
Temp.:
30 °C
Hydrolysis rate constant:
0.002 s-1
DT50:
4.73 min
Type:
(pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
pH:
7
Temp.:
10 °C
Hydrolysis rate constant:
0 s-1
DT50:
25.8 h
Type:
(pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
pH:
7
Temp.:
20 °C
Hydrolysis rate constant:
0 s-1
DT50:
11.9 h
Type:
(pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
pH:
7
Temp.:
30 °C
Hydrolysis rate constant:
0 s-1
DT50:
3.69 h
Type:
(pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
pH:
9
Temp.:
10 °C
Hydrolysis rate constant:
0.001 s-1
DT50:
12.5 min
Type:
(pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
pH:
9
Temp.:
20 °C
Hydrolysis rate constant:
0.002 s-1
DT50:
5.62 min
Type:
(pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
pH:
9
Temp.:
30 °C
Hydrolysis rate constant:
0.004 s-1
DT50:
2.7 min
Type:
(pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
Details on results:
TEST CONDITIONS
- pH, temperature, and other experimental conditions maintained throughout the study: Yes, for details see section "any other information on results incl. tables".

MAJOR TRANSFORMATION PRODUCTS
At pH4:
- Range of maximum concentrations in % of the applied amount and day(s) of incubation when observed: for details see section "any other information on results incl. tables"
- Range of maximum concentrations in % of the applied amount at end of study period: for details see section "any other information on results incl. tables"

At pH7:
- Range of maximum concentrations in % of the applied amount and day(s) of incubation when observed: for details see section "any other information on results incl. tables"
- Range of maximum concentrations in % of the applied amount at end of study period:for details see section "any other information on results incl. tables"

At pH9:
- Range of maximum concentrations in % of the applied amount and day(s) of incubation when observed: for details see section "any other information on results incl. tables"
- Range of maximum concentrations in % of the applied amount at end of study period: for details see section "any other information on results incl. tables"

Table 1: pH – value of the test system.

Intended pH-value

Measured pH‑value

at 10 °C

at 20 °C

at 30 °C

4.0 ± 0.1

4.027

4.041

4.019

7.0 ± 0.1

6.914

6.879

6.870

9.0 ± 0.1

9.098

9.039

9.045

Table 2: Temperature monitoring for the test system.

Test

Intended Temperature

Measured Temperature

Mean ± SD

Min. / Max.

pH 4

10.0 ± 0.5

10.1 ± 0.1

9.90 / 10.3

20.0 ± 0.5

20.0 ± 0.02

19.9 / 20.0

30.0 ± 0.5

30.01 ± 0.005

30.00 / 30.02

pH 7

10.0 ± 0.5

10.1 ± 0.1

9.84 / 10.4

20.0 ± 0.5

20.1 ± 0.03

20.1 / 20.2

30.0 ± 0.5

30.0 ± 0.01

30.0 / 30.0

pH 9

10.0 ± 0.5

10.1 ± 0.06

9.98 / 10.2

20.0 ± 0.5

20.0 ± 0.02

20.0 / 20.0

30.0 ± 0.5

29.9 ± 0.005

29.91 / 29.92

Table 3: Mass Balance for major transformation product ethanol at pH 4 and 10 °C.

Hydrolysis Time

[min]

Ethanol

 

[mmol/L]

As Test Item1

 

[mmol/L]

MB

 

[%]

 

0.00

0.0751

0.0811

125

1.00

0.0830

0.0800

125

2.00

0.0943

0.0770

124

4.00

0.123

0.0717

123

7.25

0.158

0.0513

103

10.0

0.179

0.0552

113

 

14.0

0.225

0.0477

114

 

18.0

0.253

0.0397

109

 

22.0

0.287

0.0315

106

 

26.0

0.299

0.0260

101

 

34.0

0.336

0.0171

97

 

42.0

0.354

0.0115

94

 

50.0

0.385

0.00672

94

 

1 = molecular factor taken into account

MB = Mass balance

Table 4: Mass Balance for major transformation product ethanol at pH 4 and 20 °C.

Hydrolysis Time

[min]

Ethanol

 

[mmol/L]

As Test Item1

 

[mmol/L]

MB

 

[%]

0.00

0.0736

0.0740

115

0.50

0.0913

0.0710

114

1.00

0.106

0.0707

117

2.00

0.122

0.0629

110

3.00

0.146

0.0548

105

5.00

0.183

0.0415

95

7.00

0.219

0.0414

103

9.00

0.258

0.0344

102

11.0

0.279

0.0246

93

13.0

0.309

0.0193

93

17.0

0.330

0.0150

92

21.0

0.361

0.0105

92

25.0

0.375

0.00891

93

1= molecular factor taken into account

MB= Mass balance

Table 5: Mass Balance for major transformation product ethanol at pH 4 and 30 °C.

Hydrolysis Time

[min]

Ethanol

 

[mmol/L]

As Test Item1

 

[mmol/L]

MB

 

[%]

0.00

0.0632

0.0672

113

0.50

0.0783

0.0654

114

1.00

0.0911

0.0619

112

1.50

0.123

0.0598

117

2.00

0.128

0.0426

93

2.50

0.141

0.0441

98

3.00

0.169

0.0474

110

3.50

0.179

0.0429

106

4.50

0.209

0.0388

107

6.00

0.239

0.0305

102

9.00

0.294

0.0174

97

12.5

0.332

0.0116

97

15.0

0.352

0.00737

96

1= molecular factor taken into account

MB= Mass balance

Table 6: Mass Balance for major transformation product ethanol at pH 7 and 10 °C.

Hydrolysis Time

[min]

Ethanol

 

[mmol/L]

As Test Item1

 

[mmol/L]

MB

 

[%]

0

0.0570

0.0602

100

120

0.0845

0.0679

115

240

0.0984

0.0575

103

360

0.111

0.0633

115

480

0.171

0.0520

113

899

0.216

0.0500

120

1077

0.216

0.0348

99

1257

0.232

0.0383

108

1440

0.270

0.0351

112

1680

0.232

0.0328

100

1906

0.242

0.0312

100

2884

0.308

0.0220

103

3346

0.334

0.0127

96

1= molecular factor taken into account

MB= Mass balance

Table 7: Mass Balance for major transformation product ethanol at pH 7 and 20 °C.

Hydrolysis Time

[min]

Ethanol

 

[mmol/L]

As Test Item1

 

[mmol/L]

MB

 

[%]

0

0.0570

0.0619

103

60

0.0886

0.0497

90

120

0.108

0.0503

96

180

0.187

0.0534

118

240

0.157

0.0467

102

420

0.193

0.0378

98

480

0.204

0.0371

100

899

0.340

0.0312

126

1077

0.374

0.0187

117

1257

0.387

0.0164

116

1443

0.326

0.0188

105

1661

0.355

0.00903

98

1= molecular factor taken into account

MB= Mass balance

Table 8: Mass Balance for major transformation product ethanol at pH 7 and 30 °C.

Hydrolysis Time

[min]

Ethanol

 

[mmol/L]

As Test Item1

 

[mmol/L]

MB

 

[%]

0.00

0.0570

0.0619

103

30.0

0.0823

0.0516

91

62.0

0.0994

0.0543

99

90.0

0.146

0.0523

107

118

0.147

0.0459

99

150

0.185

0.0468

109

178

0.180

0.0345

90

238

0.226

0.0315

97

298

0.245

0.0267

97

357

0.260

0.0214

93

478

0.317

0.0161

97

902

0.400

0.00353

101

1= molecular factor taken into account

MB= Mass balance

 

Table 9: Mass Balance for major transformation product ethanol at pH 9 and 10 °C.

Hydrolysis Time

[min]

Ethanol

 

[mmol/L]

As Test Item1

 

[mmol/L]

MB

 

[%]

0.00

0.0645

0.0682

113

0.50

0.0917

0.0687

120

1.00

0.0916

0.0697

122

3.00

0.118

0.0620

117

5.00

0.138

0.0560

113

6.42

0.172

0.0539

118

10.0

0.171

0.0475

109

13.0

0.210

0.0272

89

16.2

0.238

0.0257

94

20.1

0.252

0.0249

96

26.7

0.287

0.0217

100

33.0

0.313

0.0161

98

40.0

0.328

0.00559

86

  1= molecular factor taken into account

MB= Mass balance

Table 10: Mass Balance for major transformation product ethanol at pH 9 and 20 °C.

Hydrolysis Time

[min]

Ethanol

 

[mmol/L]

As Test Item1

 

[mmol/L]

MB

 

[%]

0.00

0.0649

0.0860

126

0.50

0.0910

0.0836

129

1.00

0.1122

0.0803

129

2.00

0.137

0.0680

119

3.00

0.161

0.0621

116

4.00

0.194

0.0567

116

5.00

0.210

0.0498

111

6.00

0.254

0.0415

109

8.00

0.278

0.0297

99

10.0

0.298

0.0296

103

13.2

0.346

0.0164

97

16.0

0.366

0.0130

96

20.0

0.406

0.00703

97

1= molecular factor taken into account

MB= Mass balance

Table 11: Mass Balance for major transformation product ethanol at pH 9 and 30 °C.

Hydrolysis Time

[min]

Ethanol

 

[mmol/L]

As Test Item1

 

[mmol/L]

MB

 

[%]

0.00

0.0929

0.0651

116

0.50

0.111

0.0653

120

1.00

0.137

0.0534

109

1.50

0.165

0.0522

114

2.00

0.186

0.0468

111

2.50

0.217

0.0404

110

3.00

0.232

0.0392

112

3.50

0.254

0.0315

106

4.00

0.265

0.0289

105

5.00

0.292

0.0219

101

6.50

0.321

0.0145

97

8.00

0.348

0.0099

97

11.0

0.374

0.00397

95

1= molecular factor taken into account

MB= Mass balance

Table 12: Validity criteria.

Validity criterion

Required

This study

First order kinetic

To confirm first order behavior, the regression graph should have a correlation factor of ≥ 0.8.

pH 4
10 °C: 0.990
20 °C: 0.987
30 °C: 0.987

pH 7
10 °C: 0.920
20 °C: 0.937
30 °C: 0.990

pH 9
10 °C: 0.940
20 °C: 0.992
30 °C: 0.992

Temperature

The test temperature should be within± 0.5 °C of the nominal temperature.

Fulfilled

Test systems

The pH values of the buffer solutions should be in the range of ± 0.1 pH at test temperature.

Fulfilled

Sensitivity

Sensitivity of the analytical method should be sufficient to quantify test item concentrations at least down to a 90% reduction of the initial concentration.

Fulfilled

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
The study according to the OECD guideline 111 showed that the test item hydrolyses fast at pH 4 and 9 (t1/2 ≤ 1 h) and all tested temperatures. At pH 7 the test item showed a hydrolysis rate of t1/2 = 11.9 h at 20 °C.
Ethanol was identified as major transformation product and quantified. Additional transformation products were postulated on basis of the expected de-ethoxylation processes with the masses (m/z) 258, 286, 314, 342, 370, and 398 Da and qualitatively determined.

Description of key information

DT50 = 11.9 h at pH 7 and 20 °C (OECD 111)

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Half-life for hydrolysis:
11.9 h
at the temperature of:
20 °C

Additional information

A reliable hydrolysis study according to OECD guideline 111 and GLP criteria is available for the registered substance. The study showed that the test item hydrolyses fast at pH 4 and 9 (t1/2 ≤ 1 h at 20 °C) and at pH 7 the test item showed a hydrolysis rate of t1/2 = 11.9 h at 20 °C. Ethanol was identified as major transformation product and quantified. Additional transformation products were postulated on basis of the expected de-ethoxylation processes with the masses (m/z) 258, 286, 314, 342, 370, and 398 Da and qualitatively determined.

The following additional information is available on the registered substance:

A preliminary test on the hydrolysis of 3-(triethoxysilyl)-N-[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]-1-propanamine (CAS No. 13497-18-2) was performed in the frame of the biodegradation test according to OECD guideline 301 and GLP. The hydrolysis test was performed in purified water with duration of 2 h. The test item hydrolyses to ethanol and the respective silanol hydrolysis product. Ethanol was analytically monitored at time points 0, 0.5, 1 and 2 h in order to gather information on the hydrolysis rate of the test item. More than half of the test material (51 – 62%) was hydrolyzed right after the preparation of the solution at time point 0. 97-99% of the test material was hydrolyzed after 0.5 h, showing that the substance hydrolyses rapidly in water at alkaline pH (9.5) and room temperature.

Furthermore, a hydrolysis study was conducted as a preliminary test within the purposes of an adsorption study according to OECD 106. The half-life of the substance was determined in soil eluates of 5 different soil types having neutral pH values (5.5 - 7.2). The parent substance was analytically monitored via LC-MS at time points 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 h. The hydrolysis half-lives were between 1 - 5.6 h, indicating rapid hydrolysis of the substance in soils of neutral pH.