Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The assessment of the repeated dose toxicity of SPE1415 is based on read-across data from the structural analogues ATMP (acid) and DTPMP (sodium salt). Additional supporting data on another confidential analogue substance is discussed in Additional Information.
In a well conducted, reliable chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study, ATMP did not give rise to any toxicological effects of concern. The NOAEL was greater than the highest dose tested of 500 mg/kg bw/day. In a good quality, reliable sub-chronic feeding study on the sodium salt of DTPMP, there were no deaths and the majority of parameters were unaffected by the treatment. Minor changes in certain haematological parameters (red blood cell count was significantly increased, mean cell volume and mean cell haemoglobin concentration were significantly decreased) were noted at the highest dose. There was also a decreased incidence in Perls' staining of the spleen. Bone density was significantly increased in both sexes in the highest dose group, and the incidence of microlithiasis in the kidney was reduced at all dose levels. The NOAEL was 1000 ppm (equivalent to 82.5 and 92.3 mg/kg bw/day of the salt in males and female, respectively).
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- sub-chronic toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 05.08.1997 to 22.04.1998
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was conducted according to an appropriate OECD test guideline, and in compliance with GLP.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 408 (Repeated Dose 90-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Alpk APfSD (Wistar derived)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Zeneca Pharmaceuticals
- Age at study initiation: 28 days
- Weight at study initiation: 159g (males); 133g (females)
- Fasting period before study: No
- Housing: Four per cage in multiple rat racks.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Acclimation period: One week
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22± 3
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 05.08.1997 To: 22.04.1998 - Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Details on oral exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: No data
DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): The experimental diets were made in 30 kg batches from premixes prepared bymixing the appropriate amount of Dequest 2066A with up to 7 lots of 1 kg batches of milled diet. The premixes were then added to the appropriate amount of diet and mixed thoroughly.
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): Milled CTL diet (no further information)
- Storage temperature of food: - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Samples of diet from the control and 1000 ppm groups were analysed pre-study and once during the study for achieved concentration of Dequest 2066A. The homogeneity of Dequest 2066A in CTL diet was determined by analysing samples from the high dose level. The chemical stability of Dequest 2066A in diet was determined at this dose level over a period of up to 36 days.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 90 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- continuous
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 100, 1000, 10000ppm
Basis:
nominal in diet - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
8.2, 82.5 and 841.9mg/kg (males) and 9.2, 92.3 and 902.6mg/kg (females) (expressed as salt)
Basis:
other: Calculated intakes from food consumption data - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 12
- Control animals:
- yes, plain diet
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: Doses were selected by the Sponsor based on previous toxicity data.
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): Random
- Rationale for selecting satellite groups: No satellite groups
- Post-exposure recovery period in satellite groups: No post-exposure recovery period in any group. - Positive control:
- None
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Daily
- Cage side observations included: significant changes in clinical condition or behaviour.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: At the same time as body weight measurements.
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: immediately before start of treatment and then on the same day of each week until termination,
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Recorded continuously throughout the study for each cage of rats.
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/rat/day: Yes
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: Yes
FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Food utilisation value per cage was calculated as the bodyweight gained by the rats in the cage per 100 g of food eaten.
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: all examined pre-treatment, and those of high dose and control groups during the week prior to termination.
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: At termination.
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: No
- Animals fasted: No
- How many animals: All surviving animals.
- Parameters checked in table [No.1] were examined.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: At termination.
- Animals fasted: No
- How many animals: All surviving animals.
- Parameters checked in table [No.1] were examined.
URINALYSIS: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of urine: In the week prior to termination over a period of 16-18 hours.
- Metabolism cages used for collection of urine: Yes
- Animals fasted: Yes, during collection.
- Parameters checked in table [No.1] were examined.
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes (see table 2)
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes (see table 2) - Statistics:
- Body weights: analysis of covariance (males and females separately).
Food consumption and food utilisation: analysis of variance (males and females separately).
Haematology, clinical chemistry and urine analysis: analysis of variance (male and female data analysed together).
Organ weights: analysis of variance.
Least squares mean for each group were calculated. Unbiased estimates of differences from control were provided by the difference between each treatment group least-squares mean and the control group least-squares mean. Each treatment group least-squares mean was compared with the control group least-squares mean using a two-sided Student's t-test, based on the error mean square in the analysis. - Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Food efficiency:
- no effects observed
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- no effects observed
- Haematological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Urinalysis findings:
- no effects observed
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Details on results:
- CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY: There were no deaths or treatment-related clinical signs of toxicity.
BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT GAIN: The group mean bodyweights for the male rats in the 1000 ppm group diverged slightly from controls in the first few weeks of the study. The differences were not statistically significant, and were mainly due to a reduction in one animal. Overall, there was no treatment-related effect on body weight gain.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): The group mean food consumption for males in the 1000 ppm group was slightly below control values during weeks 7-13. The difference was mainly due to one female, and was not considered of toxicological significance.
FOOD EFFICIENCY: No treatment-related effect.
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No effects on the appearance of the eyes.
HAEMATOLOGY: There was an increase in red blood cell levels in males and females at 10000 ppm. Mean cell volume and mean cell haemoglobin were also decreased at this dose. Haemoglobin and mean cell haemaglobin concentration were significantly decreased in females at top dose. Total iron binding capacity in the serum of males only were increased and the total serum iron decreased in females only. All changes described were statistically significant. Perls' staining for iron complexes showed decreases in the spleens of both sexes. Thus, the findings noted in these haematological parameters and serum iron and binding capacity are likely to result from a perturbation of iron homeostasis, which is supported by the reduction of staining in the spleen.The effects are therefore due to the iron binding characteristics of Dequest 2066A, which is a chelating agent. All of these observations are considered to be without toxicological significance.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Plasma albumin was statistically significantly increased in males at 1000 ppm. This increase was not dose-related and therefore considered treatment-related. Plasma creatine kinase activity and postassium levels were statistically significantly increased in females at 10000 ppm. These changes were small in magnitude and not considered toxicologically relevant.
URINALYSIS: No effects.
ORGAN WEIGHTS: There was a small but statistically significant decrease in the group mean liver weight (absolute) of male rats in the 10000 ppm group. The effect was not considered of toxicological relevance.
GROSS PATHOLOGY: No findings.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Reduced pigmentation for age in spleens of male and female rats in the 10000 ppm group. Perl' staining indicated marked reduction in positive staining (for iron complexes) for age in males and a marked or slight reduction in positive staining for age in females receiving 10000ppm. There was a reduced incidence of microlithiasis in kidneys of females at all dose levels. These findings were considered not to be of toxicological significance.
OTHER: no effect on density of cortical bone. total bone density and that of trabecular bone was increased in both females and males at highest dose. No effects seen at other doses.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 82.5 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Expressed as dose of salt
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 92.3 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Expressed as dose of salt
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- In a good quality 90-day feeding study (reliability score 1) conducted to OECD 408 and GLP, the NOAEL for Dequest 2066A was 1000 ppm (equivalent to 82.5 and 92.3 mg/kg bw/day of the salt in males and female, respectively).
- Executive summary:
In a good quality 90-day feeding study (reliability score 1) conducted to OECD 408 and GLP, groups of 12 male and 12 female Wistar-derived rats were fed diets containing 0 (control), 100, 1000 or 10000 ppm (equivalent to 8.2, 82.5 and 841.9 mg/kg bw/day in males and 9.2, 92.3 and 902.6 mg/kg for females) Dequest 2066A for 90 consecutive days. Clinical observations, bodyweights and food consumption were measured. Ophthalmoscopic and haematology examinations, clinical chemistry and urinalysis were conducted. At the end of the exposure period all animals were killed and a full microscopic examination conducted. Bone mineral density was evaluated for bone collected at termination. There were no deaths and the majority of parameters were unaffected by the treatment. Minor changes in certain haematological parameters (red blood cell count was significantly increased, mean cell volume and mean cell haemoglobin concentration were significantly decreased) were noted at the highest dose. There was also a decreased incidence in Perls' staining of the spleen. Bone density was significantly increased in both sexes in the highest dose group, and the incidence of microlithiasis in the kidney was reduced at all dose levels. These changes are indicative of the influence of Dequest 2066A on calcium homeostasis, however, without causing any changes in calcium plasma levels. Therefore, the changes were not considered to be of toxicological significance, and the NOAEL was 1000 ppm (equivalent to to 82.5 and 92.3 mg/kg bw/day of the salt in males and female, respectively).
Reference
Table 3 Selected haematology and clinical chemistry
Dietary concentrations (ppm) |
0 |
100 |
1000 |
1000 |
0 |
100 |
1000 |
10000 |
male |
female |
|||||||
Number of animals/group |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
Haematology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Haemoglobin (g/dl) |
14.9 |
15.0 |
14.8 |
14.5 |
14.9 |
15.1 |
14.9 |
14.2* |
Haematocrit |
0.465 |
0.467 |
0.462 |
0.459 |
0.452 |
0.457 |
0.452 |
0.438 |
Red blood cell count (x10**12/l) |
8.75 |
8.77 |
8.75 |
9.49** |
8.22 |
8.34 |
8.13 |
8.65* |
Mean cell volume (fl) |
53.1 |
53.3 |
52.8 |
49.6** |
55.1 |
54.9 |
55.7 |
50.8** |
Mean cell haemoglobin (pg) |
17.0 |
17.2 |
17.0 |
15.4** |
18.2 |
18.2 |
18.9 |
16.5** |
Mean cell haemoglobin concentration (g/dl) |
32.0 |
32.2 |
32.1 |
31.6 |
33.1 |
33.1 |
33.0 |
32.4** |
Blood chemistry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plasma creatinine kinase (IU/l) |
129.4 |
141.0 |
126.5 |
151.1 |
123.1 |
121.4 |
133.1 |
155.1* |
Plasma potassium (mmol/l) |
4.80 |
4.94 |
5.18 |
5.06 |
5.00 |
5.13 |
5.14 |
5.67* |
* P0.05 ** P0.01
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 82.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subchronic
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Exceeds requirements
- System:
- haematopoietic
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Structural analogues of the substance were tested in sub-chronic/chronic toxicity assays. The findings from these studies do not provide sufficient justification for classification of the substance.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)