Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 943-366-5 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Acetic anhydride (Ames, WoE.1)
No evidence of mutagenicity in the Ames test (bacteria), with and without activation (McMahon et al., 1979). Results in the mouse lymphoma gene mutation assay were equivocal without metabolic activation and not mutagenic with metabolic activation. The equivocal result may be due to acidification of the culture medium. (OECD; SIDS, 1997).
Acetic acid (Cytogenicity, WoE.2; Ames, WoE.3, WoE.5)
Acetic acid in concentrations of 100–6 666 μmole/plate with and without metabolic activation was negative in mutagenicity assays using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA97, TA98, TA100 and TA1535 (Zeiger et al 1992). Acetic acid was non-mutagenic in the Ames assay at concentrations of up to 10 mg/plate with metabolic activation (Ishidate et al., 1992). Acetic acid at concentrations close to those showing cytotoxicity (up to 16 mM) was concluded not to be clastogenic when tested in cultured Chinese hamster K1 cells; the observed induction of chromosome aberrations were considered to be due to pH-effects (Morita, 1990).
Adipic acid (Ames, WoE.4)
Adipic acid was not mutagenic in the Ames test in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, and TA1538 or in Escherichia coli (WP2(uvrA)) with or without rat microsomal activation. (Shimizu et al., 1985).
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
As WoE approach was used for assessment no single study was selected
Short description of key information:
Acetic anhydride:
Ames test (OECD 471): Non-mutagenic with or without metabolic activation (McMahon et al., 1979).
Mouse lymphoma mutagenesis assay: Negative with metabolic activation and equivocal response without metabolic activation (OECD; SIDS, 1997).
Acetic acid:
Ames test (OECD 471): Non-mutagenic with metabolic activation (Ishidate et al., 1984).
Ames test (OECD 471): Non-mutagenic with metabolic activation (Zeiger et al., 1992).
Mammalian in vitro cytogenicity test (OECD 473): Negative with or without metabolic activation (Morita et al., 1990).
Adipic acid:
Ames test (OECD 471): Non-mutagenic with metabolic activation (Shimizu et al., 1985).
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the genetic toxicity studies available of the components of the target substance the target substance will not be classified for germ cell mutagenicity in accordance with the criteria of CLP Regulation 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.