Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 223-032-9 | CAS number: 3699-54-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 44.1 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 20
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
Local effects
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 125 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 80
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Additional information - workers
Kinetics (absorption figures for oral, dermal and inhalation route of exposure)
No data on absorption are available. According to Chapter R.8 of REACH Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, it is proposed in the absence of route-specific information on the starting route, to include a default factor of 2 in the case of oral-to-inhalation extrapolation. This approach will be taken forward to DNEL derivation. For dermal absorption, based on the physico-chemical properties of the substance (log Kow < -1 and water solubility > 10000 mg/L) low dermal uptake is expected. Therefore the ratio of 0.1 for derfmal to oral absorption is provisionally suggested for DNEL derivation.
Acute toxicity
1-(2-hydroxyethyl)imidazolidin-2-one does not have to be classified for acute toxicity and therefore derivation of a DNELacuteis not necessary.
Repeated dose toxicity
The study considered for DNEL derivation of 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)imidazolidin-2-one is the combined repeated gavage dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test (OECD 422) in rats. 1-(2-hydroxyethyl) imidazolidin-2-one was administered daily to rats by gavage at doses of 0, 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day. There were no treatment-related deaths, clinical signs of systemic toxicity, treatment-related effects on body weight or feed consumption in females during premating, gestation and lactation, or in males throughout the study at any dose level. No treatment-related effects were seen in the Functional Observational Battery (FOB) parameters. There were no treatment-related changes in any hematology or clinical chemistry parameters in either sex at any dose level. No treatment-related changes in organ weights were noted in either sex at any dose level. No treatment-related gross or microscopic pathological findings were observed in either sex at any dose level. In the offspring, there were no treatment-related effects body weight at any dose. There were no external abnormalities noted at any dose level. There were no treatment-related deaths or clinical signs of systemic toxicity in pups during lactation at any dose level.Therefore, the NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg derived from the combined repeated gavage dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test (OECD 422) in rats was used.
Mutagenicity
1-(2-hydroxyethyl)imidazolidin-2-one was not mutagenic in several Ames tests and not mutagenic in the in vivo chromosome aberration test.
No HPRT study is available for 1-(2-hydroxyethyl) imidazolidin-2-one.2-imidazolidone is a structural analogue of 1-(2-hydroxyethyl) imidazolidin-2-one. Under the conditions of a HPRT test with 2-imidazolidone, the test substanceis considered to be non-mutagenic.
Reproduction toxicity
No developmental toxicity was observed in acombined repeated gavage dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test (OECD 422) in rats with 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)imidazolidin-2-one (tested at 0, 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day). Thus, the NOAEL for developmental and reproductive toxicity was considered 1000 mg/kg bw/day. No DNEL has to be derived for developmental and reproductive toxicity.
Worker DNELs
Long-term – dermal, systemic effects (based on combined oral toxicity, reproduction/developmental toxicity screening study with rats)
Description |
Value |
Remark |
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor |
NOAEL: 1000 mg/kg bw/day |
No adverse effects were observed up to the highest dose tested. |
Step 2) Modification of starting point |
0.1 |
Based on low log Kow and very high water solubility, dermal absorption is expected to be low. This is supported by the estimated Kp valueof 2.94E-05 cm/h using the Danish (Q)SAR Database (EPI Suite, DERMWIN V 2.09) indicative for a very low dermal penetration potential according to DK-EPA heuristics (User Manual for the Internet Version of the Danish (Q)SAR Database, Database Version 1, May 2005). Therefore, a ratio of 0.1 for dermal to oral absorption is therefore provisionally suggested for DNEL derivation. |
Modified dose-descriptor |
1000 / 0.1 = 10000 mg/kg bw/day |
|
Step 3) Assessment factors |
|
|
Interspecies |
4 |
Assessment factor for allometric scaling. As no adverse effects have been observed in toxicological studies an additional assessment factor for "remaining differences" has not been applied. |
Intraspecies |
5 |
Default assessment factor |
Exposure duration |
4 |
As exposure duration was 8 weeks, factor 4 is proposed for the extrapolation to chronic exposure |
Dose response |
1 |
|
Quality of database |
1 |
|
DNEL |
Value |
|
|
10000 / (4 x 5 x 4 x 1 x 1) = 125 mg/kg bw/day |
Long-term - dermal, local effects
No data are available based on which a DNEL for local effects can be derived. As the substance is not irritating to skin, no local effects are also expected by repeated dermal exposure.
Long-term –inhalation, systemic effects (based on combined oral toxicity, reproduction/developmental toxicity screening study with rats)
Description |
Value |
Remark |
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor |
NOAEL: 1000 mg/kg bw/day |
No adverse effects were observed up to the highest dose tested. |
Step 2) Modification of starting point |
2
0.38 m3/kg bw
6.7 m3/10 m3 |
Ratio of inhalation to oral absorption (default value, as proposed in the REACH guidance (R.8.4.2)
Standard respiratory volume of a rat, corrected for 8 h exposure, as proposed in the REACH Guidance (R.8.4.2)
Correction for activity driven differences of respiratory volumes in workers compared to workers in rest (6.7 m3/10 m3). |
Modified dose-descriptor |
1000 / 2 / 0.38 x (6.7/10) = 881.6 mg/m3 |
|
Step 3) Assessment factors |
|
|
Interspecies |
1 |
No allometric scaling has to be applied in case of oral to inhalation route to route extrapolation. |
Intraspecies |
5 |
Default assessment factor |
Exposure duration |
4 |
As exposure duration was 8 weeks, factor 4 is proposed for the extrapolation to chronic exposure |
Dose response |
1 |
|
Quality of database |
1 |
|
DNEL |
Value |
|
|
881.58 / (1 x 5 x 4 x 1 x 1) = 44.1 mg/m3 |
Long-term - inhalation, local effects
No data are available based on which a DNEL for local effects can be derived. There are also no data to suggest that the substance may cause local effects by inhalation exposure.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 10.9 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 40
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
Local effects
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 62.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 160
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 6.3 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 160
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Additional information - General Population
Long-term – dermal, systemic effects (based on combined oral toxicity, reproduction/developmental toxicity screening study with rats)
Description |
Value |
Remark |
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor |
NOAEL: 1000 mg/kg bw/day |
No adverse effects were observed up to the highest dose tested |
Step 2) Modification of starting point |
0.1 |
Based on low log Kow and very high water solubility, dermal absorption is expected to be low.This is supported by the estimated Kp valueof 2.94E-05 cm/h using the Danish (Q)SAR Database (EPI Suite, DERMWIN V 2.09) indicative for a very low dermal penetration potential according to DK-EPA heuristics (User Manual for the Internet Version of the Danish (Q)SAR Database, Database Version 1, May 2005).Therefore, a ratio of 0.1 for dermal to oral absorption is therefore provisionally suggested for DNEL derivation. |
Modified dose-descriptor |
1000 / 0.1 = 10000 mg/kg bw/day |
|
Step 3) Assessment factors |
|
|
Interspecies |
4 |
Assessment factor for allometric scaling. As no adverse effects have been observed in toxicological studies an additional assessment factor for "remaining differences" has not been applied. |
Intraspecies |
10 |
Default assessment factor |
Exposure duration |
4 |
As exposure duration was 8 weeks, factor 4 is proposed for the extrapolation to chronic exposure |
Dose response |
1 |
|
Quality of database |
1 |
|
DNEL |
Value |
|
|
10000 / (4 x 10 x 4 x 1 x 1) = 62.5 mg/kg bw/day |
Long-term - dermal, local effects
No data are available based on which a DNEL for local effects can be derived. As the substance is not irritating to skin, no local effects are also expected by repeated dermal exposure.
Long-term – inhalation, systemic effects (based on combined oral toxicity, reproduction/developmental toxicity screening study with rats)
Description |
Value |
Remark |
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor |
NOAEL: 1000 mg/kg bw/day |
No adverse effects were observed up to the highest dose tested. |
Step 2) Modification of starting point |
2
1.15 m3/kg bw
|
Proportion inhalation absorption (default value, as proposed in the REACH guidance (R.8.4.2)
Standard respiratory volume of a rat, corrected for 24 h exposure, as proposed in the REACH Guidance (R.8.4.2)
|
Modified dose-descriptor |
1000 / 2 x (1/1.15)= 434.8 mg/m3 |
|
Step 3) Assessment factors |
|
|
Interspecies |
1 |
No allometric scaling has to be applied in case of oral to inhalation route to route extrapolation. |
Intraspecies |
10 |
Default assessment factor |
Exposure duration |
4 |
As exposure duration was 8 weeks, factor 4 is proposed for the extrapolation to chronic exposure |
Dose response |
1 |
|
Quality of database |
1 |
|
DNEL |
Value |
|
|
434.8 / (1 x 10 x 4 x 1 x 1) = 10.9 mg/m3 |
Long-term - inhalation, local effects
No data are available based on which a DNEL for local effects can be derived. There are also no data to suggest that the substance may cause local effects by inhalation exposure.
Long-term – oral, systemic effects (based on combined oral toxicity, reproduction/developmental toxicity screening study with rats)
Description |
Value |
Remark |
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor |
NOAEL: 1000 mg/kg bw/day |
No adverse effects were observed up to the highest dose tested. |
Step 2) Modification of starting point |
- |
- |
Step 3) Assessment factors |
|
|
Interspecies |
4 |
Assessment factor for allometric scaling. As no adverse effects have been observed in toxicological studies an additional assessment factor for "remaining differences" has not been applied. |
Intraspecies |
10 |
Default assessment factor |
Exposure duration |
4 |
As exposure duration was 8 weeks, factor 4 is proposed for theextrapolation to chronic exposure |
Dose response |
1 |
|
Quality of database |
1 |
|
DNEL |
Value |
|
|
1000 / (4 x 10 x 4 x 1 x 1) = 6.3 mg/kg bw/day |
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.