Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 271-843-1 | CAS number: 68609-93-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From October 13, 2016 to December 08, 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 017
- Report date:
- 2017
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.31 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.3700 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, sulfonated, potassium salts
- EC Number:
- 271-843-1
- EC Name:
- 9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, sulfonated, potassium salts
- Cas Number:
- 68609-93-8
- Molecular formula:
- A generic formula cannot be provided for this UVCB substance. The alkyl chain length of the sulfonated fatty acids range from C12-C22, however the major alkyl chain is C18.
- IUPAC Name:
- 9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, sulfonated, potassium salts
- Test material form:
- solid
- Details on test material:
Purity/Composition: UVCB (100%);
Appearance: orange-brown crystalline powder with lumps.
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Test system Rat: Crl:WI(Han) (outbred, SPF-Quality). Untreated females were mated at the Supplier, and were at Day 0 or 1 post-coitum on arrival at the test facility (Day 0 post-coitum was the day of successful mating; confirmed by vaginal plug).
Source: Charles River Deutschland, Sulzfeld, Germany.
Total number of animals: F0-generation: 88 females; F1-generation: 951 fetuses.
Age at delivery Females were approximately 10-14 weeks.
Identification: by indelible ink.
Randomization: within one day after receipt, the animals of each subgroup were randomized by computer-generated random algorithm according to body weight. In the subgroups, body weights varied between ±20% to ±35% of the mean per subgroup. The overall group-means on Day 2 post-coitum were similar and showed no statistically significant differences when compared to controls. Females which were mated on the same day were classified in the same subgroup.
Acclimatization period: At least 5 days before the start of treatment under laboratory conditions.
Health inspection: Upon receipt of the animals.
Conditions: Environmental controls for the animal room were set to maintain 18 to 24°C, a relative humidity of 40 to 70%, at least 10 air changes/hour, and a 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle. Any variations to these conditions were maintained in the raw data and had no effect on the outcome of the study.
Accommodation: Females were individually housed in Macrolon plastic cages (MIII type, height 18 cm). Sterilized sawdust as bedding material (Lignocel S 8-15, JRS - J.Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH + CO. KG) and paper as cageenrichment/ nesting material (Enviro-dri, Wm. Lillico & Son) were supplied.
Diet: free access to pelleted rodent diet (SM R/M-Z from SSNIFF Spezialdiäten GmbH).
Water: free access to tap-water.
Diet, water, bedding and cage-enrichment/nesting material evaluation for contaminants and/or nutrients was performed according to facility standard procedures. There were no findings that could interfere with the study.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Remarks:
- Elix, Millipore S.A.S., Molsheim, France
- Details on exposure:
- Test substance preparation:
Vehicle: water (Elix, Millipore S.A.S., Molsheim, France).
Rationale for vehicle: based on trial formulations performed at the labolatory.
Method of formulation: Formulations (w/w) were prepared daily within 5 hours prior to dosing and were homogenized to a visually acceptable level. No correction was made for the purity/composition of the test substance.
Appearance of formulations: light yellow to brown solutions for the test substance treatment groups. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Samples taken from dose preparations were analyzed according to a validated method. After sampling, all samples were stored and shipped on dry ice to the test site for formulation analysis. Samples of formulations were analyzed for homogeneity (highest and lowest concentration) and accuracy of preparation (all concentrations). The accuracy of preparation was considered acceptable if the mean measured concentrations were 90-110% of the target concentration. Homogeneity was demonstrated if the coefficient of variation was ≤ 10%.
The concentrations analyzed in the formulations of Groups 2, 3 and 4 (100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/d)were in agreement with the target concentrations (i.e. mean accuracies between 90% and 110%). The formulations of Group 2 and Group 4 prepared were homogeneous (i.e. coefficient of variation ≤ 10%). - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- From Days 6 to 20 post-coitum, inclusive.
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once daily for 7 days per week, approximately the same time each day with a maximum of 6 hours difference between the earliest and latest dose.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Group 1
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Group 2
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Group 3
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Group 4
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 22
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- Dose volume: 5 mL/kg body weight. Actual dose volumes were calculated according to the latest body weight.
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- Mortality: at least twice daily. Animals showing pain, distress or discomfort, which was considered not transient in nature or was likely to become more severe, were sacrificed for humane reasons based on OECD guidance document on humane endpoints.
Clinical signs: at least once daily from Day 2 post-coitum onwards up to the day prior to necropsy. The time of onset, grade and duration of any observed signs were recorded. Signs were graded for severity and the maximum grade was predefined at 3 or 4. Grades were coded as slight (grade 1), moderate (grade 2), severe (grade 3) and very severe (grade 4). For certain signs, only its presence (grade 1) or absence (grade 0) was scored. In the data tables, the scored grades were reported, as well as the percentage of animals affected in summary tables.
Body weights: Days 2, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 21 post-coitum.
Food consumption: Days 2-6, 6-9, 9-12, 12-15, 15-18 and 18-21 post-coitum.
Water consumption: subjective appraisal was maintained during the study, but no quantitative investigation was introduced as no treatment related effect was suspected.
Pathology:
All animals surviving to the end of the observation period and all moribund animals were sacrificed using an oxygen/carbon dioxide procedure and subsequently subjected to an external, thoracic and abdominal examination, with special attention being paid to the reproductive organs.
All macroscopic abnormalities were recorded, collected and fixed in 10% buffered formalin (neutral phosphate buffered 4% formaldehyde solution).
Necropsy was conducted on the following days:
Condition Day of necropsy: females surviving to planned necropsy - Day 21 post-coitum.
Euthanized in extremis (female no. 67): when pain, distress or discomfort was considered not transient in nature or was likely to become more severe.
Each ovary and uterine horn of all animals were dissected and examined as quickly as possible to determine:
- The number of corpora lutea.
- The weight of the (gravid) uterus (not for animals sacrificed before planned necropsy).
- The number and distribution of live and dead fetuses.
- The number and distribution of embryo-fetal deaths (early and late resorptions).
- The weight of each fetus (not for animals sacrificed before planned necropsy).
- The sex of each fetus from the ano-genital distance (during necropsy) and also from
gonadal inspections (during further fetal examination).
- Externally visible macroscopic fetal abnormalities.
In case implantations were not macroscopically visible, the uterus was stained using the Salewski technique in order to determine any former implantation sites.
For female no.67, early sacrificed in extremis, the findings in ovary and uterine are presentedseparetely. The following tissues and organs with macroscopic findings for female no.67 at necropsy were collected and fixed in 10% buffered formalin (neutral phosphate buffered 4% formaldehyde solution):
Caecum
Colon
Duodenum
Ileum
Jejunum
Rectum
Stomach - Fetal examinations:
- External:
Each viable fetus was examined in detail, weighed and sexed. All live fetuses were euthanized by administration of approximately 0.05 mL (=10 mg) of sodium pentobarbital into the oral cavity using a small flexible plastic or metal feeding tube. The fetuses of female no.67 were euthanized by decapitation, because oral administration was considered not feasible in fetuses of this age. For late resorptions a gross external examination was performed. (Late) resorptions were discarded.
Visceral (Internal):
Approximately one-half of the fetuses (live and dead) in each litter (all groups) were examined for visceral anomalies by dissection in the fresh (non-fixed) state. The thoracic and abdominal cavities were opened and dissected using a technique described by Stuckhardt and Poppe. This examination included the heart and major vessels. Fetal kidneys were examined and graded for renal papillae development as described by Woo and Hoar. The sex of all fetuses was confirmed by internal examination. The heads were removed from approximately one-half of the fetuses in each litter and placed in Bouin's solution for soft-tissue examination of all groups using the Wilson sectioning technique. After examination, the tissues without variation or malformations were discarded. Any remaining tissues (from the fetuses used for fresh visceral examination) were discarded. The carcasses were processed and stained with Alizarin Red S (as described below), but not examined.
Skeletal:
From the other one-half of the fetuses (live and dead) in each litter (all groups), the sex was confirmed by internal examination. All fetuses were eviscerated, fixed in 96% aqueous ethanol, macerated in potassium hydroxide and stained with Alizarin Red S by a method similar to that described by Dawson. Skeletal examination was done for one-half of the fetuses (i.e. the fetuses with heads). The specimens were archived in glycerin with bronopol as preservative. - Statistics:
- Statistical Analyses
The following statistical methods were used to analyze the data:
- If the variables could be assumed to follow a normal distribution, the Dunnett-test (many-to-one t-test) based on a pooled variance estimate was applied for the comparison of the treated groups and the control group.
- The Steel-test (many-to-one rank test) was applied if the data could not be assumed to follow a normal distribution.
- The Fisher Exact-test was applied to frequency data.
-The Mann Whitney test was used to compare mean litter proportions (percent of litter) of the number of viable and dead fetuses, early and late resorptions, total resorptions, pre- and post-implantation loss, and sex distribution.
- Mean litter proportions (percent per litter) of total fetal malformations and developmental variations (external, visceral and skeletal), and each particular external, visceral and skeletal malformation or variation were subjected to the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric ANOVA test to determine intergroup differences. If the ANOVA revealed statistically significant (p<0.05) intergroup variance, Dunn’s test was used to compare the compound-treated groups to the control group.
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
General toxicity (maternal animals)
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment related clinical signs were observed in females surviving to scheduled necropsy and treated up to 1000 mg/kg.
Single or temporary observations of piloerection and/or hunched posture were observed among a few test substance treated females at 100 and 300 mg/kg. A relation to treatment was not apparent and in the absence of any corroborative finding and low incidence, these symptoms were considered incidental findings and of no toxicological significance.
Salivation seen after dosing among females of the 1000 mg/kg dose group during treatment period was considered to be a physiological response rather than a sign of systemic toxicity.
Scabs on the flews and rales were temporary observed in a single female at 1000 mg/kg. This finding occurred within the range of background findings to be expected. At this single incidence, these findings were considered of no toxicological relevance. - Mortality:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- One high dose female treated at 1000 mg/kg (no. 67) was sacrificed in extremis on Day 14 post-coitum. Signs of ill health, comprising piloerection, hunched posture, rales and diarrhea became apparent from Day 11 post-coitum onwards. Its health status gradually declined and marked body weight loss and reduced food consumption were noted over Days 9 to 12 postcoitum. After a further body weight loss was seen on Day 14 post-coitum (body weight of 175 grams on Day 14 post-coitum) and yellow discoloration of the urine and emaciation were additionally observed, it was decided to sacrifice the animal. No further mortality was observed.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Mean body weights and body weight gain of treated animals remained in the same range as controls until Day 18 post-coitum. A markedly decreased body weight gain was observed in females at 1000 mg/kg over Days 18-21 post-coitum, resulting in lower mean body weights in these females on Day 21, reaching levels of statistical significance for both parameters in comparison with controls.
Body weights and body weight gain in females at 100 and 300 mg/kg were similar to controls on Day 21 post-coitum. - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- In females treated at 1000 mg/kg, a lower food consumption before and after correction for body weight was observed during the treatment period (from Day 6 post-coitum onwards), achieving levels of statistical significance over the first part (Days 6-9 and 9-12 post-coitum) and the last part (Days 18-21 post-coitum) when compared to controls. The largest decrease in food consumption was observed over Days 18-21 post-coitum, which was likely to be related to the decreased body weight gain in these animals over the same period. Mean food consumption before or after correction for body weight for females treated at 300 and 100 mg/kg remained similar to the control level over the treatment period.
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No macroscopic abnormalities were observed at necropsy in females surviving to scheduled termination. In the female sacrificed in extremis (no.67) on Day 14 post-coitum, tan colored, pasty content in the ceacum and emaciation were observed. These findings confirmed the in-life observations of diarrhea and lean appearance in this animal.
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- not specified
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Number of abortions:
- no effects observed
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- A single high dose female (no.81) with nine corpora lutea and only three implantations sites determined the relatively high mean value, and corresponding large standard deviation, for pre-implantation loss in this group. Since implantation took place prior to start of treatment, the high pre-implantation loss in this animal was a fortuitous finding.
- Total litter losses by resorption:
- no effects observed
- Early or late resorptions:
- not specified
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- not specified
- Changes in number of pregnant:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Two females at 100 mg/kg and one female at 1000 mg/kg were not pregnant.
- Other effects:
- not specified
Effect levels (maternal animals)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- food consumption and compound intake
- mortality
Results (fetuses)
- Fetal body weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Male, female and combined fetal body weights were statistically significantly lower at 1000 mg/kg when compared to controls. The mean fetal body weights at 300 and 100 mg/kg remained in the same range as controls. Mean male fetal body weights were 5.4, 5.5, 5.3 and 4.7 grams for the vehicle control, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg, respectively. Mean female fetal body weights were 5.2, 5.2, 5.1 and 4.4 grams for the vehicle control, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg, respectively. The mean gravid uterus weight of high dose females was slightly lower (approx. 15%), but not statistically significant different from controls. This finding was likely to be related to the lower fetal body weights at 1000 mg/kg.
- Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The male:female ratio was considered to be unaffected by treatment up to 1000 mg/kg. Mean sex ratios (males:females) were 48:52, 49:51, 50:50 and 57:43 for the control, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg groups, respectively.
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no treatment-related effects on litter size of any group. Mean litter sizes were 11.6, 11.0, 11.5 and 11.1 viable fetuses/litter for the control, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg groups, respectively.
- Changes in postnatal survival:
- no effects observed
- External malformations:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- In Group 4, a fetus with malrotated limbs was observed at external examination, which was correlated to the skeletal observation of bent limb bones in this fetus. Since bent limb bones were also observed in all other fetuses in the high dose group that were skeletally examined, i.e. one half of the total number of fetuses, the single occurrence of malrotated limbs was considered to be related to treatment. The other malformations observed in single fetuses of Group 4, i.e. cleft palate and anasarca, are occasionally seen in fetuses of this rat strain used in this type of study and were therefore considered to be chance findings and of no toxicological significance. The fetus in the control group had a small lower jaw that was skeletally confirmed. External variations were not seen in any fetuses in all groups.
- Skeletal malformations:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- A dose related increase was observed in the number of fetuses with bent limb bones, achieving levels of statistical significance in Groups 3 and 4 when compared to controls. All fetuses in the high dose Group 3 were affected with this skeletal malformation, whereas no such malformations were observed in any of the fetuses in Group 1 and 2. In three Group 4 fetuses bent pelvic girdle bones (iliaca) were also observed. A malformation of the iliaca is rarely observed and is not seen previously in historical controls at the Test Facility. The dose related increase in litter incidence for bent ribs coincided with that observed for bent limb bones. All fetuses with bent limb bones also had bent ribs. The mean litter proportions for the skeletal variation of bent ribs were 7.7%, 12.2%, 60.7% and 99.3% per litter in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. The incidences in Groups 3 and 4 were statistically significantly increased when compared to controls. The litter incidences of 14th full ribs and caudal shift of pelvic girdle showed a dose-related increase in Groups 3 and 4. Mean litter proportions of these respective variations were 11.3%, 3.3%, 16.4%, 21.2% and 6.1%, 3.8%, 12.0%, 18.9% per litter in Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Both the Group 3 and 4 incidences of these two related findings were nearby or above their historical control maximum value (13.1% for 14th full ribs and 12.8% for caudal shift of pelvic girdle) and considered to be related to treatment. Mean litter proportions of slight to moderate malaligned sternebrae were 22.4%, 20.2%, 21.7%, 40.0% per litter in Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively, achieving a level of statistical significance in Group 4 when compared to controls. Other skeletal malformations noted in this study were a vertebral centra anomaly in Group 4 fetus and a rib anomaly, sternoschisis and costal cartilage anomaly in three of control fetuses. Due to single occurrence and/or occurrence in control fetuses only, these malformations were not considered to be treatment related. Other skeletal variations that were noted occurred in the absence of a dose-related incidence trend.
- Visceral malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no treatment related effects on visceral morphology following treatment up to 1000 mg/kg. Visceral variations were observed in 14.0%, 10.2%, 10.0% and 8.2% of fetuses per litter in Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. The individual variations all occurred in the absence of a dose-related trend, infrequently and/or at frequencies that were within the range of available historical control data. Two viscerally malformed fetuses were observed in this study; one in each of Group 2 and 3. The Group 2 fetus had an interrupted aortic arch that was accompanied with an atrial septum defect and the Group 3 fetus had a diaphragmatic hernia and malpositioned right subclavian. The single occurrence and group distribution of the above malformations did not indicate a treatment relationship and were therefore considered to be fortuitous findings and of no toxicological significance.
- Other effects:
- not specified
Effect levels (fetuses)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- fetal/pup body weight changes
Overall developmental toxicity
- Key result
- Developmental effects observed:
- yes
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Treatment related:
- yes
- Relation to maternal toxicity:
- developmental effects occurring together with maternal toxicity effects, but not as a secondary non-specific consequence of maternal toxicity effects
- Dose response relationship:
- yes
- Relevant for humans:
- yes
Any other information on results incl. tables
Results
(A) Body weight
Body weights (gms) summary - Females - F0 generation
|
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 100 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 300 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 1000 MG/KG |
POST COITUM DAY 2 |
MEAN |
216 |
217 |
211 |
215 |
|
ST.DEV. |
15.7 |
14.1 |
17.5 |
20.7 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
21 |
DAY 6 |
MEAN |
233 |
234 |
228 |
233 |
|
ST.DEV. |
15.9 |
15.8 |
18.2 |
22.1 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
21 |
DAY 9 |
MEAN |
242 |
241 |
236 |
238 |
|
ST.DEV. |
16.4 |
15.9 |
21.6 |
21.2 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
21 |
DAY 12 |
MEAN |
255 |
256 |
253 |
250 |
|
ST.DEV. |
16.5 |
18.0 |
23.8 |
24.1 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
21 |
DAY 15 |
MEAN |
270 |
270 |
265 |
265 |
|
ST.DEV. |
18.8 |
18.9 |
23.6 |
22.2 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
20 |
DAY 18 |
MEAN |
302 |
301 |
295 |
294 |
|
ST.DEV. |
21.5 |
21.2 |
27.5 |
26.1 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
20 |
DAY 21 |
MEAN |
342 |
339 |
334 |
315 ** |
|
ST.DEV. |
25.0 |
26.5 |
31.1 |
29.9 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
20 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
Body weight gain (%) summary - Females - F0 generation
|
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 100 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 300 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 1000 MG/KG |
POST COITUM DAY 2 |
MEAN |
-7 |
-7 |
-8 |
-7 |
|
ST.DEV. |
2.1 |
1.7 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
21 |
DAY 6 |
MEAN |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
ST.DEV. |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
21 |
DAY 9 |
MEAN |
4 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
ST.DEV. |
1.2 |
1.3 |
2.8 |
3.0 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
21 |
DAY 12 |
MEAN |
9 |
9 |
11 |
8 |
|
ST.DEV. |
1.9 |
2.5 |
3.8 |
7.4 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
21 |
DAY 15 |
MEAN |
16 |
16 |
16 |
15 |
|
ST.DEV. |
2.4 |
3.1 |
2.4 |
4.4 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
20 |
DAY 18 |
MEAN |
29 |
29 |
29 |
27 |
|
ST.DEV. |
3.1 |
4.4 |
3.4 |
5.5 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
20 |
DAY 21 |
MEAN |
47 |
45 |
46 |
36 ** |
|
ST.DEV. |
5.3 |
7.3 |
4.5 |
7.6 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
20 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
(B) Food consumption
Food consumption (g/animal/day) summary - F0 generation
|
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 100 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 300 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 1000 MG/KG |
POST COITUM DAYS 2-6 |
MEAN |
21 |
21 |
21 |
21 |
|
ST.DEV. |
1.7 |
2.4 |
1.9 |
2.2 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
21 |
DAYS 6-9 |
MEAN |
20 |
21 |
20 |
18 * |
|
ST.DEV. |
1.8 |
2.2 |
2.8 |
2.0 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
21 |
DAYS 9-12 |
MEAN |
21 |
22 |
21 |
19 * |
|
ST.DEV. |
1.8 |
2.3 |
2.6 |
4.8 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
21 |
DAYS 12-15 |
MEAN |
23 |
23 |
22 |
22 |
|
ST.DEV. |
1.9 |
2.4 |
2.5 |
2.4 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
20 |
DAYS 15-18 |
MEAN |
24 |
24 |
23 |
22 |
|
ST.DEV. |
2.3 |
3.6 |
2.4 |
2.1 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
20 |
DAYS 18-21 |
MEAN |
24 |
24 |
23 |
20 ** |
|
ST.DEV. |
2.2 |
3.1 |
2.8 |
3.1 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
20 |
MEAN OF MEANS |
|
22 |
22 |
22 |
20 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
Relative food consumption summary (g/kg bw/day) - Females - F0 generation
|
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 100 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 300 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 1000 MG/KG |
POST COITUM DAYS 2-6 |
MEAN |
89 |
89 |
91 |
88 |
|
ST.DEV. |
7.0 |
8.0 |
6.7 |
7.6 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
21 |
DAYS 6-9 |
MEAN |
84 |
87 |
86 |
78 * |
|
ST.DEV. |
6.2 |
7.1 |
7.3 |
8.5 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
21 |
DAYS 9-12 |
MEAN |
83 |
84 |
84 |
75 * |
|
ST.DEV. |
5.3 |
5.5 |
4.8 |
18.7 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
21 |
DAYS 12-15 |
MEAN |
84 |
84 |
83 |
81 |
|
ST.DEV. |
4.7 |
6.1 |
6.4 |
8.0 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
20 |
DAYS 15-18 |
MEAN |
78 |
80 |
79 |
75 |
|
ST.DEV. |
4.8 |
7.9 |
3.7 |
4.6 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
20 |
DAYS 18-21 |
MEAN |
70 |
70 |
70 |
64 ** |
|
ST.DEV. |
3.8 |
4.6 |
4.3 |
8.5 |
|
N |
22 |
20 |
22 |
20 |
MEAN OF MEANS |
|
81 |
82 |
82 |
77 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
(C) Macroscopic findings
Macroscopic findings summary - Females - F0 generation
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 100 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 300 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 1000 MG/KG |
POST COITUM Animals examined |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
Animals without findings |
22 |
22 |
22 |
21 |
Animals affected |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
General observations Emaciated |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Caecum Contents |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
For more parameter and data tables, kindly refer the attached background material section of the IUCLID
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the study conditions following NOAELs for the test substance were derived: maternal NOAEL: 300 mg/kg bw/d (based on the unscheduled mortality of a female and on treatment related changes in body weight and food consumption at 1000 mg/kg bw/d). Developmental NOAEL: 100 mg/kg bw/d (based on retardation of male and female fetal body weight at 1000 mg/kg bw/d and dose related increases in the incidence of several skeletal malformations and variations at 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/d).
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to determine prenatal developmental toxicity of the test substance according to OECD Guideline 414, EU Method B.31 and OPPTS 870.3700. Eighty-eight mated female Wistar Han rats were assigned to four dose groups (0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/d, Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively). The test substance was administered once daily by oral gavage from Days 6 to 20 post-coitum. The rats of the control group received the vehicle, Water (Elix), alone. Females were checked daily for the presence of clinical signs. Food consumption and body weight were determined at periodic intervals. Formulations prepared on one day during treatment were analyzed for accuracy and homogeneity. All animals surviving to Day 21 post-coitum were subjected to an examination post-mortem and external, thoracic and abdominal macroscopic findings were recorded. Gross lesions were collected and fixed from all animals at necropsy. A laparohysterectomy was performed on each surviving female of the groups. The uteri, placentae and ovaries were examined, and the numbers of fetuses, early and late resorptions, total implantations and corpora lutea were recorded. Gravid uterine weights were recorded, and corrected body weights (changes) were calculated. The fetuses were weighed, sexed and examined for external, visceral and skeletal malformations and developmental variations. All live fetuses were euthanized. One half of the fetuses were decapitated and the heads were fixed in Bouin’s fixative, these fetuses were dissected and examined for visceral anomalies. The other one-half of the fetuses were processed and stained with Alizarin Red S for skeletal examinations. Accuracy and homogeneity of formulations were demonstrated by analyses. In pregnant females at 1000 mg/kg bw/d, reduced body weight and food consumption were observed in particular shortly before scheduled cesarean section on Day 21 post-coitum. At termination of the study, body weights corrected for uterus weights were clearly lower in these high dose females in comparison to those in the other groups. One high dose female was early sacrificed because of a bad health status on Day 14 post-coitum. The cause of its bad health status could not be established in this study. However, the yellow discoloration of the urine and tan discoloured pasty ceacum-contents may indicate that treatment with the test substance was involved. Therefore, a relation to treatment was considered. No maternal toxicity was observed in the 300 and 100 mg/kg bw/d groups. Male and female fetal body weights were lower at 1000 mg/kg, when compared to controls. The mean fetal body weights at 300 and 100 mg/kg bw/d remained in the same range as controls. External examination of the high dose fetuses revealed malrotated limbs in one fetus. This malformation correlated to the skeletal malformation of bent limb bones, which was observed in all fetuses that were skeletally examined, including the fetus with the malrotated limbs. In addition, bent ribs were also observed in all these fetuses and the incidences of bent pelvic girdle bones (iliaca), caudal shift of pelvic girdle, malaligned sternebra, 14th full ribs and unossified metacarpal and/or metatarsal were increased at 1000 mg/kg. Increased incidences of most of these skeletal malformations or variations were also increased in the mid dose group treated at 300 mg/kg. The incidences of malaligned sternebra and unossified metacarpal and/or metatarsal remained within the same range as controls in the mid dose group fetuses. The skeletal malformations and variations in fetuses at 100 mg/kg bw/d remained in the same range as controls. There were no treatment related effects on visceral morphology following treatment up to 1000 mg/kg. Under the study conditions following NOAELs for the test substance were derived: maternal NOAEL: 300 mg/kg bw/d (based on the unscheduled mortality of a female and on treatment related changes in body weight and food consumption at 1000 mg/kg bw/d). Developmental NOAEL: 100 mg/kg bw/d (based on retardation of male and female fetal body weight at 1000 mg/kg bw/d and dose related increases in the incidence of several skeletal malformations and variations at 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/d) (de Raaf-Beekhuijzen, 2017).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.