Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2001-02-20 to 2001-03-06
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study is regarded as relible without restrictions because it was conducted in compliance with GLP regulation and guideline.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2001
Report date:
2001

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
adopted Feb. 1987
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
as of Jan. 1997
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
61791-19-3
Cas Number:
61791-19-3
IUPAC Name:
61791-19-3
Test material form:
other: liquid

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: Littlerussian - Chbb:HM(SPF)
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Bl Pharma KG, 88397 Biberach
- Age at study initiation: young adult female rabbits
- Weight at study initiation: 2.6 - 3.1 kg b.w.
- Housing: individually in PPO cages (floor area: 2576 sq.cm) with perforated floor
- Diet: ad libitum, pelleted complete rabbit diet "Altromin 2123" from Altromin, D-32791 Lage, Lippe
- Water: free access to bottles with domestic quality drinking water acidified with hydrochloric acid to pH 2.5
- Acclimation period: at least one week

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20°C ± 3 °C
- Humidity (%): 55% ± 15 %
- Air changes: 10 times/ hour
- Photoperiod: 12 hours light and 12 hours darkness, Light was on from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m.

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 0.1 mL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Single treatment. The eyes of the test animals were not washed out after the application of test item.
Observation period (in vivo):
The eyes were examined at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hour(s) and then at 1 and 2 weeks after the application.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 female animals
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
The eyes of the test animals were not washed out after the application of test item.

EXAMINATION OF CORNEAL DAMAGE
After the first 24 hour reading Fluorescein was instilled. After rinsing with 20 ml 0.9% sodium chloride solution the eyes were examined again using UV-light to detect possible corneal damage.

SCORING SYSTEM: The eye irritation scores were evaluated according to the scoring system by Draize (1979) and OECD 405 (24 April 2002)

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: hand-slit lamp, fluorescein

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 24/48/72 hrs
Score:
1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 weeks
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: 24/48/72 hrs
Score:
1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 weeks
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
other: 24/48/72 hrs
Score:
0.67
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 24/48/72 hrs
Score:
1
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 weeks
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: 24/48/72 hrs
Score:
1
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 weeks
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
other: 24/48/72 hrs
Score:
1
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
redness
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 24/48/72 hrs
Score:
2
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 weeks
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
redness
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: 24/48/72 hrs
Score:
2
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 weeks
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
redness
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
other: 24/48/72 hrs
Score:
2.67
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 weeks
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 24/48/72 hrs
Score:
1.33
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 weeks
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: 24/48/72 hrs
Score:
2
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 weeks
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
other: 24/48/72 hrs
Score:
2
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24/48/72 hrs
Score:
1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 weeks
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24/48/72 hrs
Score:
1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 weeks
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
redness
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24/48/72 hrs
Score:
2.2
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 weeks
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24/48/72 hrs
Score:
1.8
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 weeks
Irritant / corrosive response data:
One hour after application a scattered or diffuse area of opacity on more than one quarter, but less than half of the cornea, an iris with markedly deepened folds, congestion, swelling, moderate circumcorneal injection and existence of reaction to light were observed in all animals. A diffuse, crimson red conjunctiva with individual vessels not easily discernible, a swelling above normal and a discharge with moistening of the lids and hairs just adjacent to lids were observed in two animals and a discharge different from normal in animal 3.

24 hours after application of the test article a scattered or diffuse area of opacity on more than one quarter, but less than half of the cornea, an iris with markedly deepened folds, congestion, swelling, moderate circumcorneal injection and existence of reaction to light, a diffuse, crimson red conjunctiva with individual vessels not easily discernible, an obvious swelling with partial eversion of lids and a discharge with moistening of the lids and hairs, and considerable area around the eye were observed in all animals.

After instillation of Fluorescein all animals showed a scattered or diffuse area of opacity on more than half, but less than three quarters of the cornea.
48 hours after application of the test article after instillation of Fluorescein two animals showed a scattered or diffuse area of opacity on more than one quarter, but less than half of the cornea, whereas a scattered or diffuse area of opacity on one quarter or less of the cornea was observed in other animal.
72 hours after application of the test article two animals showed a scattered or diffuse area of opacity on more than quarter, but less than half of the cornea, an iris with markedly deepened folds, congestion, swelling, moderate circumcorneal injection and existence of reaction to light, a diffuse, crimson red conjunctiva with individual vessels not easily discernible as well as a swelling above normal.
7 days after application of the test article some conjunctival vessels definitely injectedwere observed in two animals No. 1 and No. 2. Animal No.3 did not show any signs of eye irritation.
14 days after application of the test article animals No. 1 and No. 2 were free of any signs of eye irritation, too.

14 days after application of the test article animals No. 1 and No.2 were free of any signs of eye irritation.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information