Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2010
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2010
Report date:
2010

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test using the Hprt and xprt genes

Test material

Method

Target gene:
hprt
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Phenobarbital/-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
3.9, 7.8, 15.6, 31.3, 62.5, 125 and 250 mg/L (experiment 1; 4h)7.8, 15.6, 31.3, 62.5, 125 and 250 mg/L (experiment 2; 24h, without S9)12, 25, 50, 75, 100, 125 mg/L (experiment 2; 4h, with S9)
Vehicle / solvent:
Tetrahydrofuran
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
ethylmethanesulphonate
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in mediumDURATION- Preincubation period: Two days (experiment I and experiment II with S9 mix) or three days (experiment II without S9 mix) after sub-cultivation stock cultures- Exposure duration: 4h or 24h- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 7 days- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 8 days- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 19 daysSELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 6-thioguanineNUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Population doubling time 12 - 14hNUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: not applicableDETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY- Method: cloning efficiencyOTHER: The stained colonies with more than 50 cells were counted. In doubt the colony size was checked with a preparation microscope.
Evaluation criteria:
A test item is classified as positive if it induces either a concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency or a reproducible and positive response at one of the test points.A test item is classified as mutagenic if it reproducibly induces a mutation frequency that is three times above the spontaneous mutation frequency at least at one of the concentrations in the experiment.
Statistics:
A linear regression (least squares) was performed to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies. The number of mutant colonies obtained for the groups treated with the test item were compared to the solvent control groups. A trend is judged as significant whenever the p-value (probability value) is below 0.05.

Results and discussion

Test results
Key result
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
The maximum concentration of the test item was limited by the solubility of the test item in a suitable solvent or aqueous medium. No cytotoxicity was observed in the pre-experiment when tested up to concentrations far above the limit of solubility of the test item in culture medium (2666.6 mg/L).Precipitation of the test item was observed in the first experiment at 62.5 mg/L and above in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. In the second experiment precipitation was noted at 31.3 mg/L and above without and at 100.0 mg/L and above with metabolic activation.No relevant cytotoxic effects indicated by a relative cloning efficiency I or relative cell densitiy below 50% occurred. However, in the absence of S9 mix in both experiments the cell density was reduced to approximately 63 % in one culture at the highest applied concentration of 250.0 mg/L. This considerable variability of the cell density between parallel cultures is most likely based on precipitation of the test item leading to mechanical cell damage by shear forces.

Applicant's summary and conclusion