Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
oxidising solids
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
26 August 2003 to 27 August 2003
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.17 (Oxidising Properties (Solids))
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Contact with:
powdered cellulose
Duration of test (contact time):
134 - 361
Sample tested:
test mixture (not specified)
Remarks:
migrated information
Parameter:
maximum burning rate
Result:
1.5 other: mm/s (migrated information)
Remarks on result:
other: 10 % mixture
Sample tested:
test mixture (not specified)
Remarks:
migrated information
Parameter:
maximum burning rate
Result:
1.4 other: mm/s (migrated information)
Remarks on result:
other: 30 % mixture
Sample tested:
test mixture (not specified)
Remarks:
migrated information
Parameter:
maximum burning rate
Result:
0.9 other: mm/s (migrated information)
Remarks on result:
other: 60 % mixture
Sample tested:
test mixture (not specified)
Remarks:
migrated information
Parameter:
maximum burning rate
Result:
0.6 other: mm/s (migrated information)
Remarks on result:
other: 80 % mixture
Sample tested:
reference mixture (not specified)
Remarks:
migrated information
Parameter:
maximum burning rate
Result:
3 other: mm/s (migrated information)
Remarks on result:
other: 60 % barium nitrate/cellulose
Sample tested:
reference mixture (not specified)
Remarks:
migrated information
Parameter:
maximum burning rate
Result:
1.5 other: mm/s (migrated information)
Remarks on result:
other: 100 % cellulose

Table 1: Reference mixtures

Reference mixture

Fastest Burning Time

Maximum Burning Rate

60 % Barium Nitrate/Cellulose

66s

3.0 mm/s

100 % Cellulose

130s

1.5 mm/s

 

Table 2: Test material mixtures

For each of the burning times quoted below, the test substance mixture ignited and burned with a flame, with combustion propagating fully along the train.

% Test substance

Burning Time (s)

Maximum Burning Rate (mm/s)

1

2

3

4

5

6

10%

134

141

134

137

139

140

1.5

30%

140

152

Only two tests were conducted for each of these mixtures)

1.4

60%

213

215

0.9

80%

361

353

0.6

Interpretation of results:
other: no oxidising properties
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
The burning rate of the test material/cellulose mixtures fall well below the maximum burning rate of 3.0 mm/s for the 60 % w/w barium nitrate/cellulose reference mixture. Under the conditions of the test, the test material is therefore not classified as an oxidising substance. Although the reference substance used in the study was different to that recommended in CLP (EU regulation EC No. 1272/2008), the maximum burning rate of the test substance was considerably below the reference substance. The study is considered to be reliable, relevant and adequate for risk assessment and classification and labelling purposes.
Executive summary:

The oxidising properties of the test material was determined in accordance with the standardised guideline EU Method A.17 using a reduced testing programme. Under the conditions of the test, the burning rate of the test material/cellulose mixtures fell well below the maximum burning rate of 3.0 mm/s for the 60 % w/w barium nitrate/cellulose reference mixture. A reduced testing plan is therefore considered justified and further testing was not considered necessary. Under the conditions of the test, the test material is therefore not classified as an oxidising substance. Although the reference substance used in the study is different to that recommended in the classification criteria of the CLP (EU regulation EC No. 1272/2008), the maximum burning rate of the test substance was considerably below the reference substance. The test was therefore considered adequate for assessment of the risk of physical hazards arising from the test material.

Description of key information

Not oxidising, EU Method A.17, Jackson 2003

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Oxidising properties:
no

Additional information

The oxidising properties of the test material was determined in accordance with the standardised guideline EU Method A.17 using a reduced testing programme. Under the conditions of the test, the burning rate of the test material/cellulose mixtures fell well below the maximum burning rate of 3.0 mm/s for the 60 % w/w barium nitrate/cellulose reference mixture. A reduced testing plan is therefore considered justified and further testing was not considered necessary. Under the conditions of the test, the test material is therefore not classified as an oxidising substance. Although the reference substance used in the study is different to that recommended in the study guideline (Test O.1, UN RTDG, Manual of Tests and Criteria) for CLP (Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008), the maximum burning rate of the test material was considerably below the reference substance. The test was therefore considered adequate for assessment of the risk of physical hazards arising from the test material.

The study was performed in line with GLP and an accepted standardised guideline with a high standard of reporting. The study was assigned a reliability score of Klimisch 1 and considered suitable for assessment as an accurate reflection of the test substance.

The available data is considered complete and the conclusion, not oxidising was taken forward for risk assessment.

Justification for classification or non-classification

In accordance with Regulation EC No. 1272/2008, the test material does not require classification as oxidising as the burning rate of the test material/cellulose mixtures fell well below the maximum burning rate of the reference mixture used (barium nitrate). Although the reference substance used in the study was different to that used in the guideline method for classification under CLP, the maximum burning rate of the test material was considerably below the reference substance. The test was therefore considered adequate for assessment of the risk of physical hazards arising from the test material.

In accordance with Directive 2001/59/EC, 2.2.2, the test material does not require classification as oxidising as the burning rate of the test material/cellulose mixtures fell well below the maximum burning rate of the reference mixture used (barium nitrate).