Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Remarks:
publication / peer-reviewed report
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Remarks:
peer-reviewed
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Remarks:
publication / peer-reviewed report
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Remarks:
peer-reviewed
Justification for type of information:
REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
see target record
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Remarks:
target record
Qualifier:
no guideline required
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Review of literature data
GLP compliance:
no
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
not specified
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
no data
Vehicle:
not specified
Controls:
not specified
Amount / concentration applied:
various, see free-text field below
Duration of treatment / exposure:
various, see free-text field below
Observation period (in vivo):
various, see free-text field below
Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
various, see free-text field below
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
various, see free-text field below
Details on study design:
a) Six young rabbits had 100 mg of boric acid applied to one eye of each rabbit. The eyes were rinsed after 24 hours and irritation scores in individual animals ranged from 0 to 18.
b) Six young rabbits had 77 mg of borax, Na2B4O7.10H2O, applied to one eye of each rabbit. The eyes were rinsed after 24 hours and irritation scores in individual animals ranged from 0 to 39.
c) Six young rabbits had 100 mg of disodium tetraborate pentahydrate, Na2B4O7.5H2O, applied to one eye of each rabbit. The eyes were not rinsed, and the ocular reaction was recorded after 1, 24, and 72 hours and up to 10 days after treatment.
d) About 50 mg of boric oxide was placed in the left eye of four rabbits.
e) Sodium perborate tetrahydrate was tested for eye irritation on two female rabbits and the Draize scale was used for assessment of irritation. The test substance (approximately 100 mg) was applied to the conjunctival sac of the left eye of each rabbit, the other eye was untreated. The eyes were examined after 1 to 2 hours, and up to 3 or 21 days after application for each of the animals, respectively.
f) 50 mg of sodium perborate tetrahydrate was introduced into the rabbit eye.
g) The irritation of a small volume of sodium perborate tetrahydrate was assessed in three rabbits. The methods used were similar to those described above except that the amount of test material used was less, in this case a volume of 0.01 ml was used (approximating to 6 mg).
h) A 1% solution of sodium perborate tetrahydrate was instilled to the rabbit eye.
i) A test in rabbits investigated the effect of an eye washing procedure on the irritant effect of sodium perborate tetrahydrate. After instilling 100 mg of the test material into the left eye, groups of 3 rabbits received either no further treatment or the eye was washed 4 or 30 seconds later.
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Remarks:
or less
Remarks on result:
other: irritating
Remarks:
100 mg H3BO3 in one eye
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 8-21 days
Remarks on result:
other: corneal irritation
Remarks:
77 mg Borax in one eye
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 21 days
Remarks on result:
other: severe irritation
Remarks:
100 mg Na2B4O7 * 5H2O in one eye
Remarks on result:
other: Severe irritant to the rabbit eye
Remarks:
Observed up to 21d; 100 mg NaBO3 * 4H2O in one eye.
Remarks on result:
other: Serious damage to unwashed left eye, but slight damage when rinsed after 4 or 30 seconds
Remarks:
100 mg NaBO3 * 4H2O in one eye
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 10 days
Remarks on result:
other: Acute conjunctivitis, corneal irritation at 48 hours
Remarks:
50 mg NaBO3 * 4H2O in one eye
Remarks on result:
other: moderate irritant
Remarks:
observed up to 21 d; 6 mg (0.01ml) NaBO3 * 4H2O in one eye
Remarks on result:
other: non-irritant
Remarks:
1% NaBO3 * 4H2O solution in one eye
Remarks on result:
other: severe irritant
Remarks:
Observed up to 21 days; 50 mg NaBO3 * H2O in one eye
Remarks on result:
other: corrosive to unwashed eye
Remarks:
Observed up to 21 days; 0.1 mg NaBO3 * H2O in one eye
Remarks on result:
other: Immediate conjunctivitis, caused by exothermic hydrolysis to boric acid
Remarks:
50 mg B2O3 in one eye
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
other: not available
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
other: not available
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
other: not available
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
other: not available
Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Conclusions:
The present information was based on a literature review (peer-reviewed) of various borates studies, which gave inconsistent results ranging from not irritating to irritating. The scores as indicated in Regulation 1272/2008, which are required for classification, are not given. Further, due to inconsistent results, no conclusion based on expert judgement can be drawn.
Executive summary:

A literature review of borates showed that these borates induced none to irritating responses, no conclusion on classification can be drawn.

Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Remarks:
publication / peer-reviewed report
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Remarks:
peer-reviewed
Justification for type of information:
REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
see target record
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Remarks:
target record
Qualifier:
no guideline required
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Review of literature data
GLP compliance:
no
Species:
other: mostly rabbits, also guinea pigs, rats, dogs
Strain:
not specified
Type of coverage:
other: various
Preparation of test site:
other: various
Vehicle:
other: various
Details on study design:
a) The procedure for testing and evaluating the primary skin irritation of borax, Na2B4O7.10H2O, (10 ml, 5% in water (w/v)) or boric acid (5ml, 10% in water (w/v)) on rabbit skin was identical to that described in the U.S. Regulations (21 CFR 191.11), except that the rabbits were not immobilised, and the 1-inch square cellulose pads were used instead of surgical gauze. The substance was applied to 6 rabbits with intact and 6 with abraded skin. A similar test procedure in the guinea pig included application of the aqueous solutions of the materials on cellulose pads held in contact with the skin under an appropriate sleeve. Six guinea pigs with clipped, depilated, intact abdomens and 6 with clipped, depilated, abraded backs were used with each material.
b) The primary dermal irritation of disodium tetraborate pentahydrate, Na2O4O7 * 5H2O, was determined by applying 0.5 g moistened with saline on two clipped sites on the backs of 6 rabbits. The contact time was 4 hours under an occlusive dressing, with observation for up to 76 hours.
c) The detailed toxicological properties of boric oxide (B2O3) in rats, rabbits and dogs have been published. boric oxide dust (1g/25cm2) was topically applied to the clipped wetted backs of four rabbits.
d) Sodium perborate tetrahydrate was tested for skin irritation on six male rabbits. An area on the right flank of each animal was clipped and about 500 mg perborate, moistened to a paste with water, was applied to the test site (25x25 mm) under an occlusive dressing for 4 hours. The Draize scale was used to assess the degree of erythema and oedema at the site 1 hour and 1, 2 and 3 days after the removal of the dressing.
e) Sodium perborate tetrahydrate was applied as a paste in oil, for a 4 hour exposure.
f) A study investigating the irritant effects of repeated exposures of sodium perborate tetrahydrate to rat skin was performed over a course of 12 consecutive daily applications.
Time point:
other: 24&72h
Remarks on result:
other: Mild irritant after 24 and 72 h in primary irritation test
Remarks:
H3BO3, rabbit, 5ml, 10% in water (w/v), intact and abraded skin
Time point:
other: 24&72h
Remarks on result:
other: Moderate irritant after 24 and 72 h in primary irritation test
Remarks:
H3BO3, guinea pig, 5ml, 10% in water (w/v), intact and abraded skin
Time point:
other: 24&72h
Remarks on result:
other: Mild irritant after 24 and 72 h in primary irritation test
Remarks:
Na2B4O7.10H2O, rabbit, 10ml, 5% in water (w/v), intact and abraded skin
Time point:
other: 24&72h
Remarks on result:
other: Mild irritant after 24 and 72 h in primary irritation test
Remarks:
Na2B4O7.10H2O, guinea pig, 10ml, 5% in water (w/v), intact and abraded skin
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Remarks:
Na2B4O7.5H2O, rabbit, 0.5 g, clipped back, 4h, Non-irritant
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Remarks:
NaBO3.4H2O, rabbit, 500 mg, paste with 0.2 ml water, on intact skin, 4h, Classified as non-irritant
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Remarks:
NaBO3.4H2O, guinea pig, in vegetable oil ointment, 4h, Non-irritant
Remarks on result:
other: Moderately to severely irritant, but 1% solution non-irritating after 12d
Remarks:
NaBO3.4H2O, rat, solid applied to skin, 12 daily
Remarks on result:
other: Slightly irritating
Remarks:
NaBO3.H2O, rabbit, 0.5 g on skin, 4h
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Remarks:
NaBO3.H2O, rabbit, 500 mg, paste with 0.2 ml water, on intact skin, 4h, Non-irritant
Remarks on result:
other: Produced erythema, that persisted for 2-3 d
Remarks:
B2O3, rabbit, 1 g/25cm2 dust applied to clipped wetted back
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
other: not available
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
other: not available
Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Conclusions:
The present information was based on a literature review (peer-reviewed) of borate studies, which gave inconsistent results ranging from not irritating to irritating. Edema and erythema scores as indicated in Regulation 1272/2008, which are required for classification, are not given. Further, due to inconsistent results, no conclusion based on expert judgement can be drawn.
Executive summary:

A literature review of borate studies showed that these borates induced none to irritating responses, no conclusion on classification can be drawn.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
review article or handbook
Title:
Technical Report No 63, Reproductive and General Toxicology of some Inorganic Borates and Risk Assessment for Human Beings
Author:
ECETOC
Year:
1995
Bibliographic source:
ISSN-0773-8072-63

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline required
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Review of literature data
GLP compliance:
no
Type of study:
other: "skin sensitization test"
Justification for non-LLNA method:
The present review was published in 1995 and takes into account all information available at that time. The LLNA method was not adopted as guideline at that time yet.

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Sodium peroxometaborate
EC Number:
231-556-4
EC Name:
Sodium peroxometaborate
Cas Number:
10332-33-9
Molecular formula:
NaBO3*H2O

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Hartley
Sex:
male/female

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Concentration / amount:
0.5ml of the solid
Adequacy of induction:
not specified
Challenge
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
5% dilution in distilled water
Day(s)/duration:
after 14 days
Adequacy of challenge:
not specified
No. of animals per dose:
5
Details on study design:
A skin sensitization test on sodium perborate monohydrate was carried out on 5 male and 5 female Hartley albino guinea pigs. Another similar group served as controls. Twenty four hours prior to each induction, an area of 5 x 5 cm on the left flank of each animal was clipped free of hair, 0.5 ml of the solid was applied to the depilated area and covered with an occlusive dressing. The challenge (5% dilution in distilled water) was applied to the depilated right flank 14 days after the induction.
Positive control substance(s):
not specified

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Results
Key result
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met