Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-940-6 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to microorganisms
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- activated sludge respiration inhibition testing
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 30 January 2017 - 27 June 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 209 (Activated Sludge, Respiration Inhibition Test (Carbon and Ammonium Oxidation))
- Version / remarks:
- July 22, 2010
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.11 (Biodegradation: Activated Sludge Respiration Inhibition Test)
- Version / remarks:
- updated on 1 March 2016
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Ecological Effects Test Guidelines of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA 712-C-014): OCSPP 850.3300, "Modified Activated Sludge, Respiration Inhibition Test"
- Version / remarks:
- January 2012
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Test mixtures: At the start of the test defined amounts of 5 x 300 mg test item were administered (measured into empty containers) directly. The containers were filled up with water and synthetic sewage, just before the inoculation.
- Controls:
Blank Controls: In the main test eight controls (containing water, synthetic sewage and inoculum, but without addition of the test or reference item), four at the start and four at the end of the test series were investigated.
Reference Control: In the main test the reference item 3,5-dichlorophenol was tested at three concentrations with three parallels (at the nominal test concentrations of 2, 7 and 24.5 mg/L).
Abiotic Control: The investigation of abiotic controls in the main experiment was considered as not necessary based on the preliminary information about the test item and based on the results of the preliminary test, where abiotic controls (with three parallels) were tested at the highest test item concentration (1000 mg/L) and no remarkable abiotic oxygen consumption was noticed.
Nitrification Control: In order to check whether the sludge nitrifies and at what rate, mixtures (same as the blank controls, however containing 11.6 mg/L N-allylthiourea) were included (with three parallels) in the preliminary experiment and in the main experiment. - Test organisms (species):
- activated sludge, domestic
- Details on inoculum:
- - Name and location of sewage treatment plant where inoculum was collected: supplied by the sewage plant for domestic sewage in Balatonfüred, Hungary on 26 April 2017 (one day before the main test)
- Preparation of inoculum for exposure:
The coarse particles were removed by settling for 10 minutes, and the upper layer of finer solids was decanted. The activated sludge used for this study was washed by centrifugation and the supernatant liquid phase was decanted. The solid material was re-suspended in isotonic saline solution with shaking and again centrifuged. This procedure was repeated twice. An aliquot of the final sludge suspension was weighed, dried and the ratio of wet sludge to dry weight determined. Based on this ratio, calculated amount of wet sludge was suspended in isotonic saline solution to yield a concentration equivalent to 3 g per litre (on dry weight basis).
(In the test containers the final concentration of suspended solids was 1.5 g per litre.)
The activated sludge was not used on the day of the collection but it was continuously aerated (2 L/minute) at the test temperature for about 24 hours (1 day) and was fed once with 50 mL synthetic sewage/L activated sludge.
- Initial biomass concentration: 3 g/L (on dry weight basis) - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 3 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- No post exposure observations were performed.
- Test temperature:
- The noticed temperatures in the environmental room varied between: 20.0 - 20.8°C.
- pH:
- The pH of the activated sludge inoculum was checked after preparation (pH: 7.43).
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 6.59 - 8.31 mg O2/L
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentration: 1000 mg/L
No measured concentrations. - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: Erlenmeyer bottles
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: glass, 300 mL volume
- Aeration: yes, with compressed air (0.5 litre per minute)
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 5
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 4 at the start and 4 at the end
- No. of vessels per abiotic control (replicates): 3 (only tested in preliminary experiment)
- Sludge concentration (weight of dry solids per volume): 3 g per litre (on dry weight basis)
- Nutrients provided for bacteria: synthetic sewage feed
- Nitrification inhibitor used: yes; N-allylthiourea
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: deionised water
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: no
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Range finding study
In the preliminary range-finding test three test item concentrations were tested (10, 100 and 1000 mg/L). In addition, the nitrification potential of sludge was examined with additional control mixture that contained N-allylthiourea at 11.6 mg/L.
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: In the preliminary experiment inhibitory effect of the test item was not noticed (~ 4 % inhibition) at the nominal concentration of 1000 mg/L. In the preliminary test the nitrification respiration was insignificant and it was assumed that the heterotrophic oxygen uptake equals the total uptake and no significant nitrification is occurred. In the main test the test item concentration of 1000 mg/L was examined. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 3,5-dichlorophenol (3,5-DCP)
- Key result
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Key result
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Key result
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 1 000 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Details on results:
- - Blank controls oxygen uptake rate:
The specific respiration rate of the blank controls (without the test substance or reference substance) was 46.00 mg oxygen per one gram of activated sludge (dry weight of suspended solids) in an hour with a coefficient of variation of 6.98 %.
- Nitrification controls: With the application of the nitrification control the differentiation between the total, heterotrophic and nitrification respiration was possible. The total respiration (RT) was 69.00 mg/Lh, the heterotrophic respiration (RH) was 67.57 mg/Lh, the nitrification respiration (RN): 1.43 mg/Lh was calculated according to the following equation: RN= RT-RH. The obtained 1.43 mg/Lh was considered as not significant difference within a biological variability range of the applied test system, that lower than the 5 % of RT (3.45 mg/Lh) in blank controls. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - Results with reference substance valid? yes
- Relevant effect levels: The 3-hour EC50 of 3,5-dichlorophenol was calculated to be 9.12 mg/L, (95 % confidence limits: 7.53 – 11.05 mg/L). - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the performed Activated Sludge Respiration Inhibition Test, the EC10 and EC50 values of test item were determined as higher than 1000 mg/L. Based on the statistical evaluation in this test the NOEC was ≥ 1000 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
In a 3-hour test the influence of the test item on the activity of the activated sludge was determined according OECD TG 209 by measuring the respiration rate under defined conditions.
The respiration rates (total, heterotrophic and nitrification oxygen uptake rates) of samples of activated sludge fed with synthetic sewage were measured in an enclosed cell containing an oxygen electrode after a contact time of 3 hours.
Based on the preliminary information about the test item caused effect on the activated sludge inoculum, the test item was investigated at the concentration of 1000 mg/L as a limit concentration, only. Defined amounts of the test item were added (measured) directly into the test vessels.
In parallel with the test item treatments 3,5-dichlorophenol as positive reference control in a concentrations of 2, 7 and 24.5 mg/L; furthermore blank (inoculum) control and nitrification controls were investigated. The main test was performed without abiotic controls, based on the results of the preliminary test where abiotic controls were tested at the test item concentration of 1000 mg/L and no remarkable abiotic oxygen consumption was noticed. The test was performed without pH adjustment. All validity criteria of the study were met.
The observed oxygen consumption rates consequently the specific respiration rates were in the range of the blank controls, no inhibitory effect of the test item was observed. Based on measured oxygen consumption values and calculated specific respiration rates it can be stated that the 3-hour EC10, EC50 and EC80 values of the test item are higher than 1000 mg/L.
The specific respiration rates were compared with the blank control values using 2 Sample t-Test (α=0.05). No statistical significant differences were observed in the comparison with the blank control values, consequently based on the results of this study the NOEC can be statistically and biologically determined as: ≥ 1000 mg/L.
- Endpoint:
- activated sludge respiration inhibition testing
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Please refer to section 13 for "Read-Across justification".
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Key result
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Key result
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 1 000 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: The Oxygen Consumption Rate (R), Q1, Q2 and the applied Δt values in the Blank Control and Test Item Treatment Groups
Test group |
Identifi-cation |
Concentration |
Oxygen concentration |
Δt (min) |
Oxygen Consumption Rate (R) |
Average R |
|
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||
1, 7 |
CBA |
0.00 |
7.10 |
2.23 |
4 |
73.05 |
69.00 |
CBB |
7.21 |
2.07 |
5 |
61.68 |
|||
CBC |
7.54 |
2.38 |
4.5 |
68.80 |
|||
CBD |
7.20 |
2.27 |
4 |
73.95 |
|||
CBE |
7.05 |
2.21 |
4 |
72.60 |
|||
CBF |
7.13 |
2.32 |
4 |
72.15 |
|||
CBG |
7.21 |
2.17 |
4.5 |
67.20 |
|||
CBH |
7.18 |
2.49 |
4.5 |
62.53 |
|||
6 |
T1A |
1000 |
7.30 |
2.09 |
4.5 |
69.47 |
68.46 |
T1B |
7.29 |
2.64 |
4 |
69.75 |
|||
T1C |
7.41 |
2.43 |
4.5 |
66.40 |
|||
T1D |
7.52 |
2.27 |
4.5 |
70.00 |
|||
T1E |
7.24 |
2.24 |
4.5 |
66.67 |
Table 2.: The Oxygen Consumption Rate (R), Q1, Q2 and the applied Δt valuesin the Control Groups
Test group |
Identifi-cation |
Concentration |
Oxygen concentration |
Δt (min) |
Oxygen Consumption Rate (R) |
Average R |
|
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||
1, 7 |
CBA |
0.00 |
7.10 |
2.23 |
4 |
73.05 |
69.00 |
CBB |
7.21 |
2.07 |
5 |
61.68 |
|||
CBC |
7.54 |
2.38 |
4.5 |
68.80 |
|||
CBD |
7.20 |
2.27 |
4 |
73.95 |
|||
CBE |
7.05 |
2.21 |
4 |
72.60 |
|||
CBF |
7.13 |
2.32 |
4 |
72.15 |
|||
CBG |
7.21 |
2.17 |
4.5 |
67.20 |
|||
CBH |
7.18 |
2.49 |
4.5 |
62.53 |
|||
2 |
CNA |
11.6 |
7.45 |
2.45 |
4.5 |
66.67 |
67.57 |
CNB |
7.08 |
2.42 |
4 |
69.90 |
|||
CNC |
7.52 |
2.56 |
4.5 |
66.13 |
|||
3 |
R1A |
2 |
7.26 |
2.31 |
5 |
59.40 |
60.60 |
R1B |
7.31 |
2.17 |
5 |
61.68 |
|||
R1C |
7.09 |
2.03 |
5 |
60.72 |
|||
4 |
R2A |
7 |
7.14 |
2.16 |
7 |
42.69 |
44.17 |
R2B |
7.17 |
2.29 |
7 |
41.83 |
|||
R2C |
7.32 |
2.12 |
6.5 |
48.00 |
|||
5 |
R3A |
24.5 |
7.11 |
5.28 |
10 |
10.98 |
11.08 |
R3B |
7.25 |
5.54 |
10 |
10.26 |
|||
R3C |
7.29 |
5.29 |
10 |
12.00 |
Q1: the oxygen concentration at the beginning of the selected section of the linear phase (mg/L);
Q2: the oxygen concentration at the end of the selected section of the linear phase (mg/L);
Δt: the time interval between these two measurements (min.).
Table 3.: The Specific Respiration Rate (RS) in the Blank Control and Test ItemTreatment Groups
Test group |
Identification |
Concentration |
Specific Respiration Rate |
Average RS |
1, 7 |
CBA |
0.00 |
48.70 |
46.00 CV(%)= 6.98 |
CBB |
41.12 |
|||
CBC |
45.87 |
|||
CBD |
49.30 |
|||
CBE |
48.40 |
|||
CBF |
48.10 |
|||
CBG |
44.80 |
|||
CBH |
41.69 |
|||
6 |
T1A |
1000 |
46.31 |
45.64n.s.
CV(%)= 2.58 |
T1B |
46.50 |
|||
T1C |
44.27 |
|||
T1D |
46.67 |
|||
T1E |
44.44 |
n.s.: Statistically not significant significantly different compared to the control (2 Sample t-Test; α = 0.05)
Table 4 : The Specific Respiration Rate (RS)in the Control Groups
Test group |
Identification |
Concentration |
Specific Respiration Rate |
Average RS |
1, 7 |
CBA |
0.00 |
48.70 |
46.00 CV(%)= 6.98 |
CBB |
41.12 |
|||
CBC |
45.87 |
|||
CBD |
49.30 |
|||
CBE |
48.40 |
|||
CBF |
48.10 |
|||
CBG |
44.80 |
|||
CBH |
41.69 |
|||
2 |
CNA |
11.6 |
44.44 |
45.04
CV(%)= 1.54 |
CNB |
46.60 |
|||
CNC |
44.09 |
|||
3 |
R1A |
2 |
39.60 |
40.40
CV(%)= 1.89 |
R1B |
41.12 |
|||
R1C |
40.48 |
|||
4 |
R2A |
7 |
28.46 |
29.45
CV(%)= 7.57 |
R2B |
27.89 |
|||
R2C |
32.00 |
|||
5 |
R3A |
24.5 |
7.32 |
7.39
CV(%)= 7.89 |
R3B |
6.84 |
|||
R3C |
8.00 |
Table 5 : The Percentage Inhibition (IT) of Total Oxygen Consumption
Test group |
Identification |
Test group |
Concentration |
Inhibition (IT), of total oxygen consumption |
1, 7 |
CB (A-H) |
Blank Control |
‑ |
0.00 |
2 |
CN (A-C) |
Nitrification Control |
11.6 |
2.07 |
3 |
R1(A-C) |
Reference Item |
2 |
12.17 |
4 |
R2(A-C) |
Reference Item |
7 |
35.98 |
5 |
R3(A-C) |
Reference Item |
24.5 |
83.94 |
6 |
T1(A-E) |
Test Item |
1000 |
0.78 |
Description of key information
Under the conditions of the performed Activated Sludge Respiration Inhibition Test, the EC10 and EC50 values of the calcium salt of the target substance were determined as higher than 1000 mg/L. Based on the statistical evaluation in this test the NOEC was ≥ 1000 mg/L.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for microorganisms:
- 1 000 mg/L
- EC10 or NOEC for microorganisms:
- 1 000 mg/L
Additional information
The toxicity to microorganisms was addressed with read-across approach to the calcium salt of the target substance.
In a 3-hour test the influence of the analouge substance on the activity of the activated sludge was determined according OECD TG 209 by measuring the respiration rate under defined conditions.
The respiration rates (total, heterotrophic and nitrification oxygen uptake rates) of samples of activated sludge fed with synthetic sewage were measured in an enclosed cell containing an oxygen electrode after a contact time of 3 hours.
Based on the preliminary information about the test item caused effect on the activated sludge inoculum, the test item was investigated at the concentration of 1000 mg/L as a limit concentration, only. Defined amounts of the test item were added (measured) directly into the test vessels.
In parallel with the test item treatments 3,5-dichlorophenol as positive reference control in a concentrations of 2, 7 and 24.5 mg/L; furthermore blank (inoculum) control and nitrification controls were investigated. The main test was performed without abiotic controls, based on the results of the preliminary test where abiotic controls were tested at the test item concentration of 1000 mg/L and no remarkable abiotic oxygen consumption was noticed. The test was performed without pH adjustment. All validity criteria of the study were met.
The observed oxygen consumption rates consequently the specific respiration rates were in the range of the blank controls, no inhibitory effect of the test item was observed. Based on measured oxygen consumption values and calculated specific respiration rates it can be stated that the 3-hour EC10, EC50 and EC80 values of the test item are higher than 1000 mg/L.
The specific respiration rates were compared with the blank control values using 2 Sample t-Test (α=0.05). No statistical significant differences were observed in the comparison with the blank control values, consequently based on the results of this study the NOEC can be statistically and biologically determined as: ≥ 1000 mg/L.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.