Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From 28 July, 2017 to 05 September, 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2017
Report date:
2017

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 104 (Vapour Pressure Curve)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
gas saturation method

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
-
EC Number:
450-320-3
EC Name:
-
Molecular formula:
C15H28O
IUPAC Name:
(3S,6E)- 3,7,11-trimethyldodeca-6,10-dien-1-ol
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Appearance: Colorless liquid
- Purity: 97.5%
- Lot number: 6K0001

Results and discussion

Vapour pressure
Key result
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
0.009 Pa

Any other information on results incl. tables

Test results

-Test temperature 25 °C, vapor pressure 0.00869 Pa

-Test temperature 35 °C, vapor pressure 0.0418 Pa

-Test temperature 45 °C, vapor pressure 0.133 Pa

Regression equation logP=-5632.46 x 1/T+16.8517

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
the vapour pressure of the test item at 25°C is 0.00913 Pa.
Executive summary:

It is considered that the carrier gas was sufficiently saturated with the test item at each flow rate because three measured values at each temperature were very near. it is also considered that the measured vapor pressure was well-correlatd to the test temperature because the regression equation obtained by plotting the logarithm of vapor pressure (log P) versus the reciprocal number oftest temperature (1/T) was straight line. Therefore, it is considered that the test results are acceptable.