Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 701-003-6 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Acute oral toxicity: LD50 >5000 mg/kg body weight in female Wistar rats
Acute dermal toxicity: LD50 >5000 mg/kg body weight in male/female Wistar rats.
Acute inhalation toxicity: Waived.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 25 March 2016 to 17 May 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
- Version / remarks:
- Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, Section 4, Health Effects. No.423, "Acute Oral Toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method", 2001.
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- See "Any other information" for details
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.1 tris (Acute Oral Toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
- Version / remarks:
- Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 Part B: Methods for the Determination of Toxicity and other Health Effects; B1 tris: "Acute Oral Toxicity, Acute Toxic Class Method". Official Journal of the European Union No. L142, May 2008, including the most recent amendments.
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- See "Any other information" for details
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.1100 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
- Version / remarks:
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Health Effects Test Guidelines, OPPTS 870.1100, Acute Oral Toxicity. Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Items (7101), EPA 712-C-02-190, 2002.
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- See "Any other information" for details
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: JMAFF No 8147
- Version / remarks:
- Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (JMAFF), 12 Nousan, Notification No 8147, November 2000; including the most recent partial revisions.
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- See "Any other information" for details
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Test type:
- acute toxic class method
- Limit test:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Batch: RC-1045Study specific test item informationPurity/composition correction factor: No correction factor requiredChemical name (IUPAC), synonym or trade name: Amides, tallow, N,N-bis(2-hydroxypropyl)CAS Number: 1454803-04-3Test item handling: No specific handling conditions required
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Species: Rat, Wistar strain Crl:WI (Han) (outbred, SPF-Quality). Recognized by international guidelines as the recommended test system (e.g. OECD, EC). Source: Charles River Deutschland, Sulzfeld, Germany. Number of animals: 9 Females (nulliparous and non-pregnant). Age and body weight: Young adult animals (approx. 8-10 weeks old) were selected. Body weight variation did not exceed +/- 20% of the sex mean. Identification: Earmark and tail mark Health inspection: At least prior to dosing. It was ensured that the animals were healthy and without any abnormality that might have affected the study integrity.Animal Husbandry Conditions: Environmental controls for the animal room were set to maintain 18 to 24°C, a relative humidity of 40 to 70%, at least 10 air changes/hour, and a 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle. Any variations to these conditions were maintained in the raw data and had no effect on the outcome of the study. Accommodation: Group housing of maximally 3 animals per cage in labeled Makrolon cages (MIV type; height 18 cm.) containing sterilized sawdust as bedding material (Lignocel S 8-15, JRS - J.Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH + CO. KG, Rosenberg, Germany) and paper as cage-enrichment (Enviro-dri, Wm. Lillico & Son (Wonham Mill Ltd), Surrey, United Kingdom). Acclimatization period was at least 5 days before start of treatment under laboratory conditions. Diet: Free access to pelleted rodent diet (SM R/M-Z from SSNIFF® Spezialdiäten GmbH, Soest, Germany). Water: Free access to tap water. Diet, water, bedding and cage enrichment evaluation for contaminants and/or nutrients was performed according to facility standard procedures. There were no findings that could interfere with the study.
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on oral exposure:
- The toxicity of the test item was assessed by stepwise treatment of groups of females. The first group was treated at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg. The absence or presence of mortality of animals dosed at one step determined the next step, based on the test procedure defined in the guidelines. The onset, duration and severity of the signs of toxicity were taken into account for determination of the time interval between the dose groups.
- Doses:
- Single dosage on Day 1.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 3 animals per group
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- Treatment Method: Oral gavage, using plastic feeding tubes. The test item were stirred on a magnetic stirrer during dosing. Fasting: Animals were deprived of food overnight prior to dosing and until 3-4 hours after administration of the test item. Water was available ad libitum. Frequency: Single dosage on Day 1. Dose level (volume): 2000 mg/kg (2.13 mL/kg) body weight. 5000 mg/kg (5.32 mL/kg) body weight. No correction was made for the purity of the test item.Observations Mortality/Viability: Twice daily. Body weights: Days 1 (pre-administration), 8 and 15. Clinical signs: At periodic intervals on the day of dosing (Day 1) and once daily thereafter, until Day 15. The signs were graded according to fixed scales and the time of onset, degree and duration were recorded: Maximum grade 4: grading slight (1) to very severe (4) Maximum grade 3: grading slight (1) to severe (3) Maximum grade 1: presence is scored (1). Necropsy: At the end of the observation period, all animals were sacrificed by oxygen/carbon dioxide procedure and subjected to necropsy. Descriptions of all internal macroscopic abnormalities were recorded.
- Statistics:
- No statistical analysis was performed.
- Key result
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 5 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Mortality:
- No mortality occurred at 2000 and 5000 mg/kg body weight.
- Clinical signs:
- Hunched posture was seen for all animals on Day 1 and for one animal dosed at 2000 mg/kg on Days 2 and 3 also. Piloerection was seen for the majority of animals on Day 1. Two females dosed at 5000 mg/kg showed abnormal licking on Day 2.
- Body weight:
- The body weight gain shown by the animals over the study period was considered to be similar to that expected for normal untreated animals of the same age and strain.
- Gross pathology:
- Isolated reddish foci on the thymus were found at macroscopic post mortem examination of one female dosed at 2000 mg/kg. Macroscopic post mortem examination of the other animals at termination did not reveal any abnormalities.
- Other findings:
- Incidental findings included an accessory lobe to the right median lobe of the liver for one female dosed at 2000 mg/kg. This finding is occasionally seen among rats of this age and strain and was therefore considered not related to treatment.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The oral LD50 value of MLA-3202 in Wistar rats was established to exceed 5000 mg/kg body weight.According to the OECD 423 test guideline, the LD50 cut-off value was considered to exceed 5000 mg/kg body weight.
- Executive summary:
The study was performed to assess the acute oral toxicity of MLA-3202 in the rat (Acute Toxic Class Method). The study was carried out based on the guidelines described in:
-OECD No.423 (2001) "Acute Oral Toxicity, Acute Toxic Class Method"
-Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008, B1 tris: “Acute Oral Toxicity, Acute Toxic Class Method”
-EPA, OPPTS 870.1100 (2002), "Acute Oral Toxicity"
-JMAFF Guidelines (2000), including the most recent revisions.
Initially, MLA-3202 was administered by oral gavage to three female Wistar rats at 2000 mg/kg body weight. In a stepwise procedure, one additional group of three females was dosed at 2000 mg/kg, one female at 5000 mg/kg and one group of two females at 5000 mg/kg body weight. Animals were subjected to daily observations and weekly determination of body weight. Macroscopic examination was performed after terminal sacrifice (Day 15).
No mortality occurred.
Hunched posture was seen for all animals on Day 1 and for one animal dosed at 2000 mg/kg on Days 2 and 3 also. Piloerection was seen for the majority of animals on Day 1. Two females dosed at 5000 mg/kg showed abnormal licking on Day 2.
The body weight gain shown by the animals over the study period was considered to be similar to that expected for normal untreated animals of the same age and strain.
Isolated reddish foci on the thymus were found at macroscopic post mortem examination of one female dosed at 2000 mg/kg. No other test item related abnormalities were noted in any of the remaining animals.
The oral LD50 value of MLA-3202 in Wistar rats was established to exceed 5000 mg/kg body weight.
According to the OECD 423 test guideline, the LD50 cut-off value was considered to exceed 5000 mg/kg body weight.
Based on these results, MLA-3202 does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labelling requirement for acute oral toxicity according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations (2015) (including all amendments) and Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of items and mixtures (including all amendments).
Reference
Mortality data
TEST DAY | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
HOURS AFTER TREATMENT | 0 | 2 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEMALES 2000 MG/KG FEMALES 2000 MG/KG FEMALES 5000 MG/KG FEMALES 5000 MG/KG | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - |
Clinical signs
TEST DAY | MAX GRADE | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
HOURS AFTER TREATMENT | 0 | 2 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
FEMALES 2000 MG/KG | ||||||||||||||||||
ANIMAL 1 Posture Hunched posture Skin / fur Piloerection |
(1)
(1) |
1
- |
1
1 |
1
1 |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
ANIMAL 2 Posture Hunched posture Skin / fur Piloerection |
(1)
(1) |
1
- |
1
1 |
1
1 |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
ANIMAL 3 Posture Hunched posture Skin / fur Piloerection |
(1)
(1) |
1
- |
1
1 |
1
1 |
1
- |
1
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
FEMALES 2000 MG/KG | ||||||||||||||||||
ANIMAL 4 Posture Hunched posture |
(1) |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
ANIMAL 5 Posture Hunched posture |
(1) |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
ANIMAL 6 Posture Hunched posture |
(1) |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
FEMALES 5000 MG/KG | ||||||||||||||||||
ANIMAL 7 Posture Hunched posture Skin / fur Piloerection |
(1)
(1) |
-
- |
1
1 |
1
1 |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
FEMALES 5000 MG/KG | ||||||||||||||||||
ANIMAL 8 Behaviour Abnormal licking Posture Hunched posture Skin / fur Piloerection |
(1)
(1)
(1)
|
-
-
- |
-
1
1 |
-
-
- |
1
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
ANIMAL 9 Behaviour Abnormal licking Posture Hunched posture Skin / fur Piloerection |
(1)
(1)
(1) |
-
-
- |
-
1
1 |
-
-
- |
1
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
. Observation not performed. Sufficient data was available to warrant the study integrity.
Body weights
SEX/DOSE LEVEL | ANIMAL | DAY 1 | DAY 8 | DAY 15 |
FEMALES 2000 MG/KG |
1 2 3
MEAN ST. DEV. N |
150 164 165
160 8 3 |
171 202 191
188 16 3 |
193 211 208
204 10 3 |
FEMALES 2000 MG/KG |
4 5 6
MEAN ST. DEV. N |
158 167 178
168 10 3 |
182 197 206
195 12 3 |
192 206 216
205 12 3 |
FEMALES 5000 MG/KG |
7
MEAN ST. DEV. N |
167
167 -- 1 |
199
199 -- 1 |
207
207 -- 1 |
FEMALES 5000 MG/KG |
8 9
MEAN ST. DEV. N |
174 171
173 2 2 |
195 190
193 4 2 |
200 203
202 2 2 |
Macroscopic findings
ANIMAL | ORGAN | FINDING | DAY OF DEATH |
FEMALES 2000 MG/KG | |||
1 |
| No findings noted | Scheduled necropsy Day 15 after treatment |
2 |
| No findings noted | Scheduled necropsy Day 15 after treatment |
3 | Liver | Right medial lobe: accessory liver | Scheduled necropsy Day 15 after treatment |
FEMALES 2000 MG/KG | |||
4 | Thymus | Focus/foci, isolated, reddish | Scheduled necropsy Day 15 after treatment |
5 |
| No findings noted | Scheduled necropsy Day 15 after treatment |
6 |
| No findings noted | Scheduled necropsy Day 15 after treatment |
FEMALES 5000 MG/KG | |||
7 |
| No findings noted | Scheduled necropsy Day 15 after treatment |
FEMALES 5000 MG/KG | |||
8 |
| No findings noted | Scheduled necropsy Day 15 after treatment |
9 |
| No findings noted | Scheduled necropsy Day 15 after treatment |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 5 000 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- K1. GLP Accredited laboratory study in accordance with OECD Guideline 423, EU Method B1 tris, US EPA Procedue OPPTS 870.1100 and JMAFF Guidelines (2000)
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: inhalation
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- the study does not need to be conducted because exposure of humans via inhalation is not likely taking into account the vapour pressure of the substance and/or the possibility of exposure to aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Quality of whole database:
- This study is waived on exposure grounds.
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 24 August 2016 to 20 September 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
- Version / remarks:
- Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, Section 4, Health Effects, No. 402, "Acute Dermal Toxicity", Paris, 1987.
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- See "Any other information" for details
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.3 (Acute Toxicity (Dermal))
- Version / remarks:
- Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 Part B: Methods for the Determination of Toxicity and other Health Effects; B.3: "Acute Toxicity (Dermal)". Official Journal of the European Union No. L142, May 2008, including most recent amendments.
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- See "Any other information" for details
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.1200 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
- Version / remarks:
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Health Effects Test Guidelines, OPPTS 870.1200, Acute Dermal Toxicity. Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Items (7101), EPA 712-C-98-192, August 1998.
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- See "Any other information" for details
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: JMAFF, Notification No 8147
- Version / remarks:
- Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (JMAFF), 12 Nousan, Notification No 8147, November 2000; including the most recent partial revisions.
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- See "Any other information" for details
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Batch: RC-1045Study specific test item informationPurity/composition correction factor: No correction factor requiredChemical name (IUPAC), synonym or trade name: Amides, tallow, N,N-bis(2-hydroxypropyl)CAS Number: 1454803-04-3Test item handling: No specific handling conditions required
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Species: Rat, Wistar strain, Crl:WI (Han) (outbred, SPF-Quality). Recognized by international guidelines as the recommended test system (e.g. OECD, EC). Source: Charles River Deutschland, Sulzfeld, Germany. Number of animals: 5 males and 8 females (females were nulliparous and non-pregnant). Age and body weight: Young adult animals (approx. 10 weeks old) were selected. Body weight variation did not exceed +/- 20% of the sex mean. Identification: Tail mark with indelible ink. Health inspection: At least prior to dosing. It was ensured that the animals were healthy and that the skin to be treated was intact and free from any abnormality.Animal Husbandry Conditions: Environmental controls for the animal room were set to maintain 18 to 24°C, a relative humidity of 40 to 70%, at least 10 air changes/hour, and a 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle. Any variations to these conditions were maintained in the raw data and had no effect on the outcome of the study. Accommodation: Individually housed in labeled Makrolon cages (MIII type, height 18 cm.) containing sterilized sawdust as bedding material (Lignocel S 8-15, JRS - J.Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH + CO. KG, Rosenberg, Germany) and paper as cage-enrichment (Enviro-dri, Wm. Lillico & Son (Wonham Mill Ltd), Surrey, United Kingdom). Acclimatization period was at least 5 days before start of treatment under laboratory conditions. During the acclimatization period the animals were group housed in Makrolon cages (MIV type, height 18 cm). Diet: Free access to pelleted rodent diet (SM R/M-Z from SSNIFF® Spezialdiäten GmbH, Soest, Germany). Water: Free access to tap water. Diet, water, bedding and cage enrichment evaluation for contaminants and/or nutrients was performed according to facility standard procedures. There were no findings that could interfere with the study.
- Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on dermal exposure:
- Test Item Preparation The test item was dosed undiluted as delivered by the Sponsor. The test item was kept at room temperature for a maximum of 4 hours prior to dosing. No correction was made for the purity/composition of the test item. Adjustment was made for specific gravity of the test item.TreatmentMethod: Dermal application. The test item was stirred on a magnetic stirrer during application. Clipping: One day before exposure (Day -1) an area of approximately 5x7 cm on the back of each animal was clipped. Application: The test item was applied on an area of approx. 10% of the total body surface, i.e. approx. 25 cm² for males and 18 cm² for females. The test item was held in contact with the skin with a dressing, consisting of a surgical gauze patch (Surgy 1D), successively covered with aluminum foil and Coban elastic bandage. A piece of Micropore tapewas additionally used for fixation of the bandages in females only.
- Duration of exposure:
- 24 hours, after which dressings were removed and the skin cleaned of residual test item using tap water.
- Doses:
- Frequency: Single dosage, on Day 1. Dose level (volume): 2000 mg/kg (2.13 mL/kg) body weight 5000 mg/kg (5.32 mL/kg) body weight Dose volume calculated as dose level (g/kg) / density (g/mL)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- The study was performed in a step wise fashion. Three females were dosed at 2000 mg/kg in the first step. Based on the absence of mortality and clinical signs, five females and five males were dosed at 5000 mg/kg.
- Control animals:
- not required
- Details on study design:
- Observations Mortality/Viability: Twice daily. Body weights: Days 1 (pre-administration), 8 and 15. Clinical signs: At periodic intervals on the day of dosing (Day 1) and once daily thereafter, until Day 15. The time of onset, degree and duration were recorded and the symptoms graded according to fixed scales: Maximum grade 4: grading slight (1) to very severe (4) Maximum grade 3: grading slight (1) to severe (3) Maximum grade 1: presence is scored (1). Necropsy: At the end of the observation period, all animals were sacrificed by oxygen/carbon dioxide procedure and subjected to necropsy. Descriptions of all internal macroscopic abnormalities were recorded.
- Statistics:
- No specified
- Preliminary study:
- Three females were dosed at 2000 mg/kg in the first step. Based on the absence of mortality and clinical signs, five females and five males were dosed at 5000 mg/kg.
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 5 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Mortality:
- No mortality occurred.
- Clinical signs:
- At 2000 mg/kg, no systemic clinical signs were noted. Focal erythema was seen on the nose and/or treated skin-area for the animals during the observation period.At 5000 mg/kg chromodacryorrhoea was noted for three males and two females on Day 1. Scales and/or scabs were seen on the back of one male. Erythema and/or scales were seen in the treated skin-area for the animals during the observation period.
- Body weight:
- The changes noted in body weight gain in all males and females were within the range expected for rats used in this type of study and were therefore considered not indicative of toxicity.
- Gross pathology:
- Isolated dark red foci of the thymus were found in one female treated at 5000 mg/kg. No abnormalities were found at macroscopic post mortem examination for any of the other animals.
- Other findings:
- No further findings noted in the study report.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The dermal LD50 value of MLA-3202 in Wistar rats was established to exceed 5000 mg/kg body weight.
- Executive summary:
Assessment of acute dermal toxicity with MLA-3202 in the rat.
The study was carried out based on the guidelines described in:
OECD No.402 (1987) "Acute Dermal Toxicity"
Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008, B3: "Acute Toxicity (Dermal)"
EPA, OPPTS 870.1200 (1998), "Acute Dermal Toxicity"
JMAFF Guidelines (2000), including the most recent revisions.
Initially, MLA-3202 was administered to three female Wistar rats by a single dermal application at 2000 mg/kg body weight for 24 hours. Based on the results, MLA-3202 was administered to five Wistar rats of each sex by a single dermal application at 5000 mg/kg body weight for 24 hours. Animals were subjected to daily observations and weekly determination of body weight. Macroscopic examination was performed after terminal sacrifice (Day 15).
No mortality occurred.
At 2000 mg/kg, no systemic clinical signs were noted. Focal erythema was seen on the nose and/or treated skin-area for the animals during the observation period.
At 5000 mg/kg chromodacryorrhoea was noted for three males and two females on Day 1. Scales and/or scabs were seen on the back of one male. Erythema and/or scales were seen in the treated skin-area for the animals during the observation period.
The mean body weight gain of all animals during the observation period was within the range expected for rats used in this type of study.
Isolated dark red foci of the thymus were found in one female treated at 5000 mg/kg. No abnormalities were found at macroscopic post mortem examination for any of the other animals.
The dermal LD50 value of MLA-3202 in Wistar rats was established to exceed 5000 mg/kg body weight.
Based on these results, MLA-3202 does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labelling requirement for acute dermal toxicity according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations (2015) (including all amendments) and Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of items and mixtures (including all amendments).
Reference
MORTALITY DATA
TEST DAY HOURS AFTER TREATMENT |
1 0 |
1 2 |
1 4 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
FEMALES 2000 MG/KG |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
MALES 5000 MG/KG |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
FEMALES 5000 MG/KG |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
CLINICAL SIGNS
TEST DAY HOURS AFTER TREATMENT |
MAX GRADE |
1 0 |
1 2 |
1 4 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
FEMALES 2000 MG/KG |
||||||||||||||||||
ANIMAL 1 Skin/fur Erythema focal (Nose) |
(4) |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
ANIMAL 2 Skin/fur Erythema focal (Nose) Erythema focal (Treated skin) |
(4) (4) |
1 - |
- - |
- - |
- 1 |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
ANIMAL 3 Skin/fur Erythema focal (Nose) Erythema focal (Treated skin) |
(4) (4) |
1 - |
- - |
- - |
- 1 |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
MALES 5000 MG/KG |
||||||||||||||||||
ANIMAL 4 Secretion/excretion Chromodacryorrhoea (Snout) |
(3) |
- |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
ANIMAL 5 No clinical signs noted |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
ANIMAL 6 Secretion/excretion Chromodacryorrhoea (Snout) |
(3) |
- |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
ANIMAL 7 Secretion/excretion Chromodacryorrhoea (Snout) |
(3) |
- |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
ANIMAL 8 Skin/fur Scales (Back) Scabs (Back) |
(3) (3) |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- 1 |
- 1 |
- 1 |
1 - |
1 - |
1 - |
FEMALES 5000 MG/KG |
||||||||||||||||||
ANIMAL 9 Skin/fur General erythema (Treated skin) Secretion/excretion Chromodacryorrhoea (snout) |
(4)
(3) |
-
- |
-
1 |
-
1 |
1
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
ANIMAL 10 Skin/fur General erythema (Treated skin) |
(4) |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
ANIMAL 11 Skin/fur General erythema (Treated skin) |
(4) |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
ANIMAL 12 Skin/fur General erythema (Treated skin) |
(4) |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
ANIMAL 13 Skin/fur General erythema (Treated skin) Scales (Treated skin) Secretion/excretion Chromodacryorrhoea (Snout) |
(4) (3)
(3) |
- -
2 |
- -
2 |
- -
1 |
1 -
- |
- -
- |
- -
- |
- 1
- |
- 1
- |
- -
- |
- -
- |
- -
- |
- -
- |
- -
- |
- -
- |
- -
- |
- -
- |
- -
- |
- = sign not observed
BODY WEIGHTS (GRAM)
SEX/DOSE LEVEL |
ANIMAL |
DAY 1 |
DAY 8 |
DAY 15 |
FEMALES 2000 MG/KG |
||||
|
1 2 3
MEAN ST.DEV. N |
205 194 193
197 7 3 |
196 199 200
198 2 3 |
201 207 211
206 5 3 |
MALES 5000 MG/KG |
||||
|
4 5 6 7 8
MEAN ST.DEV. N |
299 285 274 278 268
281 12 5 |
312 302 299 282 291
297 11 5 |
345 327 325 305 318
324 15 5 |
FEMALES 5000 MG/KG |
||||
|
9 10 11 12 13
MEAN ST.DEV. N |
213 190 197 207 201
202 9 5 |
220 192 204 214 207
207 11 5 |
238 204 211 225 213
218 13 5 |
MACROSCOPIC FINDINGS
ANIMAL |
ORGAN |
FINDING |
DAY OF DEATH |
FEMALES 2000 MG/KG |
|||
1
2
3
|
|
No findings
No findings
No findings |
Scheduled necropsy Day 15 after treatment Scheduled necropsy Day 15 after treatment Scheduled necropsy Day 15 after treatment |
MALES 5000 MG/KG |
|||
4
5
6
7
8
|
|
No findings noted
No findings noted
No findings noted
No findings noted
No findings noted |
Scheduled necropsy Day 15 after treatment Scheduled necropsy Day 15 after treatment Scheduled necropsy Day 15 after treatment Scheduled necropsy Day 15 after treatment Scheduled necropsy Day 15 after treatment |
FEMALES 5000 MG/KG |
|||
9
10
11
12
13
|
Thymus |
No findings noted
No findings noted
No findings noted
No findings noted
Focus/foci, isolated, dark red |
Scheduled necropsy Day 15 after treatment Scheduled necropsy Day 15 after treatment Scheduled necropsy Day 15 after treatment Scheduled necropsy Day 15 after treatment Scheduled necropsy Day 15 after treatment |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 5 000 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- K1. GLP accredited laboratory study in accordance with OECD Guideline 402, EU Method B3 and US EPA Procedure OPPTS 870.1200
Additional information
Acute Oral Toxicity
Initially, MLA-3202 was administered by oral gavage to three female Wistar rats at 2000 mg/kg body weight. In a stepwise procedure, one additional group of three females was dosed at 2000 mg/kg, one female at 5000 mg/kg and one group of two females at 5000 mg/kg body weight. Animals were subjected to daily observations and weekly determination of body weight. Macroscopic examination was performed after terminal sacrifice (Day 15).
No mortality occurred.
Hunched posture was seen for all animals on Day 1 and for one animal dosed at 2000 mg/kg on Days 2 and 3 also. Piloerection was seen for the majority of animals on Day 1. Two females dosed at 5000 mg/kg showed abnormal licking on Day 2.
The body weight gain shown by the animals over the study period was considered to be similar to that expected for normal untreated animals of the same age and strain.
Isolated reddish foci on the thymus were found at macroscopic post mortem examination of one female dosed at 2000 mg/kg. No other test item related abnormalities were noted in any of the remaining animals.
The oral LD50 value of MLA-3202 in Wistar rats was established to exceed 5000 mg/kg body weight.
According to the OECD 423 test guideline, the LD50 cut-off value was considered to exceed 5000 mg/kg body weight.
Acute Dermal Toxicity
Initially, MLA-3202 was administered to three female Wistar rats by a single dermal application at 2000 mg/kg body weight for 24 hours. Based on the results, MLA-3202 was administered to five Wistar rats of each sex by a single dermal application at 5000 mg/kg body weight for 24 hours. Animals were subjected to daily observations and weekly determination of body weight. Macroscopic examination was performed after terminal sacrifice (Day 15).
No mortality occurred.
At 2000 mg/kg, no systemic clinical signs were noted. Focal erythema was seen on the nose and/or treated skin-area for the animals during the observation period.
At 5000 mg/kg chromodacryorrhoea was noted for three males and two females on Day 1. Scales and/or scabs were seen on the back of one male. Erythema and/or scales were seen in the treated skin-area for the animals during the observation period.
The mean body weight gain of all animals during the observation period was within the range expected for rats used in this type of study.
Isolated dark red foci of the thymus were found in one female treated at 5000 mg/kg. No abnormalities were found at macroscopic post mortem examination for any of the other animals.
The dermal LD50 value of MLA-3202 in Wistar rats was established to exceed 5000 mg/kg body weight.
Acute Inhalation Toxicity.
This endpoint is waived. The substance is used within lubricants and greases at a low %. Dermal exposure is considered to be the main route of potential exposure during general use of such products.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Acute Oral Toxicity
The oral LD50 value of MLA-3202 in Wistar rats was established to exceed 5000 mg/kg body weight.
Based on these results, MLA-3202 does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labelling requirement for acute oral toxicity according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations (2015) (including all amendments) and Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of items and mixtures (including all amendments).
Acute Dermal Toxicity
The dermal LD50 value of MLA-3202 in Wistar rats was established to exceed 5000 mg/kg body weight.
Based on these results, MLA-3202 does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labelling requirement for acute dermal toxicity according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations (2015) (including all amendments) and Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of items and mixtures (including all amendments).
Acute Inhalation Toxicity.
This endpoint is waived. The substance is used within lubricants and greases at a low %. Dermal exposure is considered to be the main route of potential exposure during general use of such products.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.