Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

The substance was sensitizing in the Local lymph node assay (LLNA), the EC3 value was calculated at 3%.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
08 July 2021 - 23 Sep 2021
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Version / remarks:
July 22, 2010
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
study procedure was extended to include additional measures of lymph node response including lymph node cell count, lymph node weight and ear weight as an indicator of skin irritation
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Remarks:
CaOlaHsd, SPF
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Envigo RMS GmbH Kreuzelweg 53 NL-5961 NM Horst
- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: yes
- Microbiological status of animals, when known: SPF
- Age at study initiation: 8-12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 16.1 - 20.4 g
- Housing: single housing
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Mouse and rat maintenance diet “GLP”, Granovit AG, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland; ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Tap water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-24
- Humidity (%): 45-65
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
- IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: 06 July 2021 - 19 July 2021
Vehicle:
methyl ethyl ketone
Remarks:
MEK was used as vehicle because good solubility was achieved.
Concentration:
1%, 2.5% and 5%
The doses were determined in a pretest, in which application of 10% up to 50% (highest technically achieved concentration) caused slight to severe compound residues on the ears and slight to severe bald spots on the head during the observation period. After application of 10% concentration, the animals still showed severe increases (≥ 25%) in ear thickness measurements as indication of excessive ear skin irritation. Therefore, concentrations over 5% were considered not appropriate for testing.
No. of animals per dose:
5
Details on study design:
PRE-SCREEN TESTS:
- Compound solubility: up to 50%
- Irritation: irritation was observed at doses of 10% or higher
- Systemic toxicity: no signs of systemic toxicity were observed.
- Ear thickness measurements: ear thickness measurements showed a severe increase of ear thickness (≥ 25%) as indication of excessive ear skin irritation at doses of 10% and higher

MAIN STUDY
Each test animal was treated with 25 μL per ear of the appropriate test-substance preparation
or the vehicle alone to the dorsal surfaces of both ears on three consecutive days.
Three days after the last application, ca. 20 μCi 3H-thymidine in 250 μL sterile saline were
injected into the tail vein of the mice. About 5 hours after the 3H-thymidine injection, the mice
were sacrificed, and the auricular lymph nodes were removed. Lymph node response was
evaluated measuring 3H-thymidine incorporation (indicator of cell proliferation). The cell count
and weight of each animal’s pooled lymph nodes were also determined. In addition, a 0.8 cm
diameter sample was punched out of the apical part of each ear, and for each animal, the
weight of the pooled punches was determined to obtain an indication of possible skin irritation.

Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
Statistics:
Mean values and standard deviations of the measured parameters were calculated per test
group from the individual values. The stimulation indices of 3H-thymidine incorporation, cell
count, lymph node weight and ear weight measurements were calculated by dividing the mean
values per test group and/or single animal values by the mean of the vehicle treated group. Statistical significance of 3H-thymidine incorporation, cell count, lymph node weight and ear weight were determined using the Wilcoxon-Test.
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.92
Test group / Remarks:
1% test substance in MEK
Parameter:
SI
Value:
2.65
Test group / Remarks:
2.5% test substance in MEK
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
4.29
Test group / Remarks:
5% test substance in MEK
Parameter:
EC3
Remarks:
[%]
Value:
3
Cellular proliferation data / Observations:
CELLULAR PROLIFERATION DATA: see table in "any other information on results [...]"

EC3 CALCULATION: was calculated by linear regression to be 3%

CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: No signs of systemic toxicity were noticed in all animals during general observation. No local findings were observed during the observation period.

BODY WEIGHTS: The expected body weight gain was generally observed during the study.

SIGNS OF TOXICITY (including dermal irritation at the site of administration, if any, e.g. increased ear thickness).

3H-thymidine incorporation, cell count and lymph node weight: test group mean value, standard deviation and stimulation index


 












































 


Test Group



 


Treatment



³H-thymidine incorporation [DPM/Lymph Node Pair]



Mean



S.D.



Stimulation Index1



1



vehicle MEK



839.0



222.2



1.00



2



1% in MEK



1,614.9



817.5



1.92



3



2.5% in MEK



2,220.7



266.4



2.65 ##



4



5% in MEK



3,602.2



443.0



4.29 ##



 












































 


Test Group



 


Treatment



Cell Counts [Counts/Lymph Node Pair]



Mean



S.D.



Stimulation Index1



1



vehicle MEK



10,229,227



2,416,099



1.00



2



1% in MEK



12,854,400



3,030,382



1.26



3



2.5% in MEK



14,925,600



3,494,065



1.46 #



4



5% in MEK



18,229,333



2,185,078



1.78 ##



 












































 


Test Group



 


Treatment



Lymph Node Weight [mg/Lymph Node Pair]



Mean



S.D.



Stimulation Index1



1



vehicle MEK



4.8



0.5



1.00



2



1% in MEK



5.7



0.5



1.18 #



3



2.5% in MEK



7.6



1.0



1.58 ##



4



5% in MEK



7.9



0.6



1.65 ##



 


 


Table 13: Ear weight: test group mean value, standard deviation and stimulation index


 












































 


Test Group



 


Treatment



Ear Weight [mg/animal]



Mean



S.D.



Stimulation Index1



1



vehicle MEK



29.0



1.4



1.00



2



1% in MEK



30.0



1.2



1.03



3



2.5% in MEK



30.1



2.0



1.04



4



5% in MEK



30.6



1.2



1.05



 


1 vs. mean of test group 1 (vehicle control)


# = statistically significant for the value p ≤ 0.05


## = statistically significant for the value p ≤ 0.01

Interpretation of results:
Category 1B (indication of skin sensitising potential) based on GHS criteria
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (sensitising)
Additional information:

The skin sensitizing potential of the test material was assessed using the radioactive Local Lymph Node Assay. The assay simulates the induction phase for skin sensitization in mice. It determines the response of cells in the auricular lymph nodes to repeated application of the test substance to the dorsal skin of the ears. Groups of 5 female mice each were treated with 1%, 2.5% and 5% (w/w)
preparations of the test substance in MEK or with the vehicle alone. Each test animal was treated with 25 μL per ear of the appropriate test-substance preparation or the vehicle alone to the dorsal surfaces of both ears on three consecutive days. Three days after the last application, 3H-thymidine was injected and about 5 hours after the 3H-thymidine injection, the mice were sacrificed, and the auricular lymph nodes were removed. Lymph node response was evaluated measuring 3H-thymidine incorporation (indicator of cell proliferation). The cell count and weight of each animal’s pooled lymph nodes were also determined. In addition, an ear punch was taken for each animal and the weight of the pooled punches was determined to obtain an indication of possible skin irritation.


No signs of systemic toxicity were noticed in all animals during general observation. The mean stimulation indices (expressed as multiples of the vehicle control) for 3H-thymidine incorporation were 1.92, 2.65 and 4.29 for 1%, 2.5% and 5% treated animals, respectively. The EC 3 for 3H-thymidine incorporation was calculated by linear regression from the results of these concentrations to be 3.0%.

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification

 


Classification, Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008


The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation 1272/2008. The EC3 derived in the LLNA with the registrered substance was 3%. As a result classification for skin sensitization as category 1B under Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 is warranted.