Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: study performed according to OECD and GLP guidelines
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1992
Report date:
1992

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Phosphonium, (3-methyl-4-oxo-2-butenyl)triphenyl-, chloride
EC Number:
609-124-5
Cas Number:
3541-81-9
Molecular formula:
C23 H22 O P . Cl
IUPAC Name:
Phosphonium, (3-methyl-4-oxo-2-butenyl)triphenyl-, chloride

Method

Target gene:
TA97a: hisD6610, TA 98 TA1537, TA1538: hisD3052; TA 100 and TA 1535 hisG46, TA102: hisG428
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
other: TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA97, TA98, TA100 and TA102
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
other: rfa, delta-uvrB, pKM101
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
0, 1, 3, 10, 33, 100, 333, 500, 1000 ug/plate
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
True negative controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
2-nitrofluorene
sodium azide
other: 2-Aminoanthracene

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
other: TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA97, TA98, TA100 and TA102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
starting at 3333 ug/plate
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

-

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative

substance is not mutagenic
Executive summary:

Wittigaldehydechlorid was tested for mutagenic activity in the Ames test. A standard plate incorporation as well

as a preincubation modification assay were performed. All seven currently used standard tester strains (TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA97, TA98, TA100 and TA102) were evaluated in absence and in presence of a phenobarbital/p-naphthoflavone

induced rat liver homogenate fraction (S9-mix). Responsiveness of the tester strains and activity of the S9-mix were demonstrated by using appropriate positive controls for each specific strain.

The substance was dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO). In a preliminary toxicity experiment the compound showed bacteriotoxicity starting at 3’333 ug/plate. Therefore for the main experiments the dose range 10 to 1’000 ug/plate was selected. Due to an even stronger toxic action in the preincubation assay which became apparent at 33 ug/plate a repeat experiment in the dose

range 0.33 to 33 ug/plate was performed. No precipitation of the compound was observed up to the chosen maximum test concentration. No increase in the number of his+ revertant colonies was observed for any of the seven tester strains investigated in this study.

Therefore it can be concluded, that neither Wittigaldehydechlorid per se, nor any of its metabolites formed under the described experimental conditions is mutagenic in the Salmonella/mammalian microsome assay (Ames test).