Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Administrative data

Endpoint:
toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2010-01-29 to 2010-05-26
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study, GLP, All validity criteria fulfilled, complete identification of test substance, including chemical analyses

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2010
Report date:
2010

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Oleonitrile
EC Number:
204-016-0
EC Name:
Oleonitrile
Cas Number:
112-91-4
Molecular formula:
C18H33N
IUPAC Name:
(9Z)-octadec-9-enenitrile
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Oleylnitrile (CAS No. 112-91-4)
- Physical state: Liquid, light yellow
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: 101.1 % (w/w), active content nitriles
- Purity test date: 2009-09-21
- Lot/batch No.: S001149
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 2018-01-30
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature, protected from moisture and light

Sampling and analysis

Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
- Concentrations: From the series of loadings all loading levels and the control were analytically verified at the beginning of the test.
- Sampling method: Separate replicates of the second lowest and the second highest test loading (0.01 and 3.20 mg/L) was prepared without algae for analysis after 72 h to demonstrate stability of the test item. Analysis after 72 h of these loadings were carried out. Sorption to the walls of the glass container was checked out of one test replicate (prepared with algae) of a loading level close to the EL50-value (the second highest test loading of 3.20 mg/L was analysed).
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: All samples were stored at 6 ± 2°C until start of analysis, if necessary. The prepared samples were stored on the autosampler until measuring.

Test solutions

Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: The stock solution (10.0 mg/L was weighed out) was prepared with test medium and shaken with 20 rpm for 24 hours (WSF) at room temperature. After a separation phase of 24 hours the WSF was taken from the homogeneous liquid phase.
- Eluate: Natural water
- Differential loading: The water soluble fraction (WSF) was tested and further seven dilution levels out of the WSF with a dilution factor √10: 0.00320 - 0.0100 - 0.0320 - 0.100 - 0.320 - 1.00 - 3.20 and 10.0 mg/L
- Controls: Six replicates (without test item) were tested under the same test conditions as the test replicates.

Test organisms

Test organisms (species):
Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
Details on test organisms:
TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata HINDAK
- Strain: SAG 61.81
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): SAG Pflanzenphysiologisches Institut der Universitaet Goettingen, Nikolausberger Weg 18, D-37073 Goettingen, Germany
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): 4 days
- Method of cultivation: Fresh stocks were prepared from Z-Agar. Light intensity amounted 35 - 70 µE x m-2 x s-1 for 24 h per day.


ACCLIMATION
- Culturing media and conditions (same as test or not): Not the same, standard growth medium
- Any deformed or abnormal cells observed: No

Study design

Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
72 h
Post exposure observation period:
After 72 h of exposure aliquots of the test medium (i.e. samples of exposed algal cells) from test loadings 0.032 to 10.0 mg/L and control were transferred to 10 mL untreated test medium. Algae were then allowed to grow for further 3 days under test conditions. The test item effect was observed to be reversible at these loading. Therefore, there is potential for recovery following exposure up to 10.0 mg/L (highest test loading).
For details please refer to the table under information on materials and methods

Test conditions

Hardness:
Not measured
Test temperature:
Mean: 22.5 °C, Min: 22 °C, Max: 23 °C
pH:
Nominal test item loading Initial measured test item concentration pH-value
[mg/L] Start; 0 h End; 72 h
10.0 4.79 7.71 7.44
3.20 1.74 7.73 7.47
1.00 0.538 7.87 7.48
0.320 0.123 7.92 7.48
0.100 0.0407 7.93 7.53
0.0320 0.0129 7.96 7.58
0.0100 0.00561 7.96 7.86
0.00320 0.00175 7.96 7.91
Control 7.96 8.00
Dissolved oxygen:
Not measured
Salinity:
Not measured, freshwater
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Please refer to information on materials and methods
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks
- Type (delete if not applicable): sealed with cotton wool plugs
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: sterile 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks, test volume 100 mL
- Aeration: Test containers were placed on a rotary shaker and oscillated at appr. 70 rpm
- Type of flow-through (e.g. peristaltic or proportional diluter): None
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): One application at test start
- Initial cells density: 10058 cells/mL
- Control end cells density: Mean 1164504 cells/mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6
- No. of vessels per vehicle control (replicates): None


GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: Yes



TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: Water of the river Leine was used. This river is located near
D-31171 Nordstemmen, Marienbergstraße, Germany (52° 10’ 14.98‘’, 9° 46’ 7.64’’). Water parameters are given in Table 1. The water was filtered with a membrane filter (0.45 µm, RC, MACHERY-NAGEL). Additionally 50 % of the components concentrations of the dilution water (total application volume 6.5 mL/L) acc. to the guideline were added to enable a sufficient growth of algae

Characterisation Data of Natural River Water
River Leine
Location D-31171 Nordstemmen, Marienbergstrasse
Sampling Date 2009-12-15
Weather on Day of Sampling cloudy, ca. - 1 °C
Colour Yellowish, clear
pH 7.97
Conductivity [µS/cm] 386
DOC [mg C/L] 3.9
TOC [mg C/L] 3.9
Ammonium-N [mg N/L] 0.042
Nitrate-N [mg N/L] 2.62
o-Phosphate-P [mg P/L] 0.062
Total Phosphate [mg P/L] 0.053
Suspended Matter [mg/L] 16.2
Total Hardness [mg CO3/L] 154


OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: no
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: 24 h
- Light intensity and quality: 60 - 120 µE x m-2 x s-1



EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
- Determination of cell concentrations: [counting chamber; electronic particle counter; fluorimeter; spectrophotometer; colorimeter] Fluorimeter, via Chlorophyll-a fluorescence (excitation at 436 nm, emission at 685 nm), cell concentrations were related to all cell density values acc. to a calibration curve.



TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Range finding study: Yes
Results of the Range Finding Test (0 – 72 h)

Nominal Loading of the Water Accommodated Fraction (WAF)
[mg/L] Specific Growth Rate Inhibition[%] Yield Inhibition
[%]
10.0 100 100
1.00 56 96
0.10 7 35
0.01 2 13
0.001 3 15






Reference substance (positive control):
yes
Remarks:
Potassium dichromate

Results and discussion

Effect concentrationsopen allclose all
Duration:
72 h
Effect conc.:
8.57
Nominal / measured:
meas. (initial)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Remarks on result:
other: (6.75 - 10.7)
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
0.107
Nominal / measured:
meas. (initial)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Remarks on result:
other: (0.0817-0.148)
Details on results:
- Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Observation of abnormalities (for algal test):
- Unusual cell shape: No
- Colour differences: No
- Flocculation: No
- Adherence to test vessels: No
- Aggregation of algal cells: No
- Other: No
- Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: No
Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Results with reference substance valid? Yes
- EC50:
Rate-related inhibition: 0.74 (CI 0.71 - 0.78) mg/L
Yield Inhibition: 0.36 (CI < 0.35 - 0.36) mg/L
Reported statistics and error estimates:
EL10-, EL20- and EL50-values of the growth rate and yield
analyses inhibition after 72 h were calculated by sigmoidal dose-response regression and polynomial (fourth order) regression, respectively. Calculation of the confidence intervals of EL10-, EL20- and EL50-values were carried out from the best fit values, the standard error and the t-distribution with the software GraphPad Prism.

Any other information on results incl. tables

EL10-, EL20- and EL50- values and 95 % Confidence Intervals of
Oleylnitrile(CAS No. 112-91-4) (0-72 h)

                                based on initial measured test item concentrations [mg/L]

                               

Rate-related inhibition

ErL10

0.00857 (0.00675 – 0.0107)

ErL20

0.0152 (0.0121 – 0.0195)

ErL50

0.107 (0.0817 – 0.148)

Inhibition of yield

ErL10

0.00561

ErL20

0.00625 (0.00597 – 0.00652)

ErL50

0.0114 (0.0107 – 0.0121)

Cell Densities

 

Nominal
test item loading

Initial measured test item concentration

Replicate

Cell density [cells/mL]

[mg/L]

No.

0 h

24 h

48 h

72 h

 

10.0

4.79

1

10058

16483

16663

25082

 

2

10058

16890

17613

27313

 

3

10058

16952

17979

28245

 

Mean

10058

16775

17418

26880

 

  3.20

1.74

1

10058

17743

22684

63294

 

2

10058

17822

22236

49674

 

3

10058

18227

21427

43248

 

Mean

10058

17931

22116

52072

 

  1.00

0.538

1

10058

22640

27077

62211

 

2

10058

20386

23590

49494

 

3

10058

18415

19651

41493

 

Mean

10058

20480

23439

51066

 

  0.320

0.123

1

10058

25932

35071

88068

 

2

10058

20864

37233

87327

 

3

10058

20967

32171

76333

 

Mean

10058

22588

34825

83909

 

  0.100

0.0407

1

10058

27277

67226

219260

 

2

10058

26746

67651

242070

 

3

10058

30351

85088

245483

 

Mean

10058

28125

73322

235604

 

  0.0320

0.0129

1

10058

34378

117981

447534

 

2

10058

35425

126459

546427

 

3

10058

34708

136648

522969

 

Mean

10058

34837

127029

505643

 

  0.0100

0.00561

1

10058

39590

136970

1019350

 

2

10058

39706

161128

999134

 

3

10058

41449

163954

1039404

 

Mean

10058

40248

154017

1019296

 

  0.00320

0.00175

1

10058

38045

134076

983098

 

2

10058

38446

125789

1047464

 

3

10058

37785

142171

1000680

 

Mean

10058

38092

134012

1010414

 

Control

1

10058

40148

165868

1187598

 

2

10058

43080

163393

1207563

 

3

10058

38691

165724

1089746

 

4

10058

38543

142805

1181453

 

5

10058

41478

150142

1076580

 

6

10058

42835

189896

1244084

 

Mean

10058

40796

162971

1164504

 

Evaluation after 72 h

             

Nominal
test item loading

Initial measured test item concentration

Replicate

Growth rate

Rate-related inhibition

Yield

Inhibition of yield

[mg/L]

No.

[d-1]

[%]

[cells/mL]

[%]

10.0

4.79

1

0.305

80.8

15024

98.7

2

0.333

79.0

17255

98.5

3

0.344

78.3

18187

98.4

Mean

0.327

79.3

16822

98.5

  3.20

1.74

1

0.613

61.3

53236

95.4

2

0.532

66.4

39616

96.6

3

0.486

69.3

33190

97.1

Mean

0.544

65.7

42014

96.4

  1.00

0.538

1

0.607

61.6

52153

95.5

2

0.531

66.5

39436

96.6

3

0.472

70.2

31435

97.3

Mean

0.537

66.1

41008

96.5

  0.320

0.123

1

0.723

54.3

78010

93.2

2

0.720

54.5

77269

93.3

3

0.676

57.3

66275

94.3

Mean

0.706

55.4

73851

93.6

  0.100

0.0407

1

1.03

35.1

209202

81.9

2

1.06

33.0

232012

79.9

3

1.07

32.7

235425

79.6

Mean

1.05

33.6

225546

80.5

  0.0320

0.0129

1

1.27

20.1

437476

62.1

2

1.33

15.9

536369

53.5

3

1.32

16.8

512911

55.6

Mean

1.31

17.6

495585

57.1

  0.0100

0.00561

1

1.54

  2.77

1009292

12.6

2

1.53

  3.19

989076

14.3

3

1.55

  2.36

1029346

10.8

Mean

1.54

  2.77

1009238

12.6

  0.00320

0.00175

1

1.53

  3.54

973040

15.7

2

1.55

  2.20

1037406

10.1

3

1.53

  3.16

990622

14.2

Mean

1.54

  2.97

1000356

13.4

Control

1

1.59

1177540

2

1.60

1197505

3

1.56

1079688

4

1.59

1171395

5

1.56

1066522

6

1.61

1234026

Mean

1.58

1154446

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
Oleylnitrile (CAS No. 112-91-4) was found to inhibit the growth of the freshwater green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata after 72 h with the following effect values (initial measured test item concentrations): The EL10-values with 95 % confidence intervals for inhibition of specific growth rate (ErL10) and yield (EyL10) after 72 h were 0.00857 (0.00675 – 0.0107) and < 0.00561 mg/L, respectively. The EL50-values with 95 % confidence intervals for inhibition of specific growth rate (ErL50) and yield (EyL50) after 72 h were 0.107 (0.0817 – 0.148) and 0.0114 (0.0107 – 0.0121) mg/L, respectively.

The concentrations of Oleylnitrile (CAS No. 112-91-4) were analysed at all concentration levels at the start and the end (from two concentrations) of the study via GC-MS analysis. The measured concentrations at test start were in the range of < LOQM – 56 % of the nominal values. At the end of the test Oleylnitrile (CAS No. 112-91-4) was analysed at the concentration levels 0.01 and 3.20 mg/L (prepared without algae) and gave recoveries of < LOQM- 8 % of the nominal values. Biodegradation as possible reason for this decrease is very unlikely considering the short time frame, also the river water was frozen before use to minimize the microbial activity. The decrease is therefore attributed to additional sorption to suspended matter and DOC due to thermodynamically driven redistribution of the sorbed fraction. Measurements from the glassware (adsorption sample) after a process of concentrating
(s. Preparation of Adsorption sample) were determined below LOQS. So it can be concluded the sorbed amount of test item was < 0.625 % of the applied amount. Therefore all effect values are given based on nominal concentrations of the test item.

The test item effect was observed to be reversible at 0.0320 to 10.0 mg/L (corresponding to initial measured test item concentrations of 0.0129 to 4.79 mg/L). Therefore, there is potential for recovery following exposure up to 4.79 mg/L (highest test loading). All effect levels are given based on initial measured concentrations of Oleylnitrile (CAS No. 112-91-4).
Executive summary:

The toxicity of Oleylnitrile (CAS No. 112-91-4) (Batch no.: S001149) to the unicellular freshwater green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata was determined according to the principles of OECD 201 at Dr.U.Noack-Laboratorienin 31157 Sarstedt, Germany from January 29 to May 26, 2010 with the definitive exposure phase from May 18 to 21, 2010. The aim of the study was the determination of EL10 - , EL20- and EL50 - values of growth rate and yield over a period of 72 h.

Oleylnitrile (CAS no. 112-91-4) is insoluble in water and also has a strong tendency to adsorb to suspended matter, algae and test vessels or organic material (including dissolved organic matter such as humic acids). Many poorly soluble substances in general but long chain nitriles in particular rank among the most difficult substances to test in environmental toxicology. Standard guideline studies are inappropriate to test substances with such properties and the current REACH Guidance Documents do not provide sufficient guidance concerning bioavailability and exposure assessment for substances like the nitriles as these were written with normal hydrophobic chemicals in mind, failing to take into account the lack of bioavailability that occurs in the environment with these substances.

The aquatic ecotoxicity tests with nitriles were therefore performed in river water to allow a PECaquatic,bulk/PNECaquatic,bulk approach and is considered to be conservative but more environmentally realistic than the standard method. This approach is based on PEC estimations representing 'total aquatic concentrations'. To characterize the risk to the aquatic compartment the PECaquatic,bulkis compared with the PNECaquatic,bulk derived from river water ecotoxicity studies (ECETOC, 2003).

         

In order to class standard laboratory toxicity study valid, it is of particular importance that – besides information on test substance, test method / conditions and test organism used – suitable precautions are taken to prevent the loss of test substance by adsorption and that exposure concentrations are based upon measured levels.

         

For ecotoxicity tests performed using the bulk approach, however, adsorption to suspended matter and DOC is acceptable and only adsorption to glassware should be accounted for. For a valid bulk approach test the concentration-effect relationship should be based on the sum of adsorbed and dissolved substance in the volume of the medium tested. One of the advantages of the bulk approach tests with these difficult substances is that in the presence of suspended matter, humic acids and/or algae, the residual sorption to glassware will be negligible. The results of these bulk approach tests are therefore much easier and more realistic, and if compared to PECbulk clearly provide a more appropriate assessment of risks for the environment.

An individual test design was applied. Natural river water was used as dilution medium

The study was conducted under static conditions with an initial cell density of approximately 1 x 104 cells/mL. One water soluble fraction (WSF) and seven further dilution levels, with nominal loadings of 0.00320 - 0.0100 - 0.0320 - 0.100 - 0.320 - 1.00 - 3.20 and 10.0 mg/L were tested in a geometrical series with a dilution factor of 10. Three replicates were tested for the test item loadings and six replicates for the control. Environmental conditions were determined to be within the acceptable limits.

The concentrations of Oleylnitrile were analysed at all loading levels (prepared without algae) and the control at test start via GC-MS analysis. The measured concentrations at test start were in the range of LOQ – 56 % of the nominal values. At the end of the test Oleylnitrile was analysed at loading levels 0.0100 and 3.20 mg/L (prepared without algae) and gave recoveries of LOQ and 8 % of the nominal values. Biodegradation as possible reason for this decrease is very unlikely considering the short time frame, also the river water was frozen before use to minimize the microbial activity. The decrease is therefore attributed to additional sorption to suspended matter and DOC due to thermodynamically driven redistribution of the sorbed fraction. No test item could be recovered from the glassware ( LOQ and 0.625 % of the applied amount) which means that the test organisms were fully exposed to the initial observed test concentrations. Therefore all effect values are given based on initial measured concentrations of the test item. For details of the analytical results please refer to part 9.

Oleylnitrile (CAS No. 112-91-4) was found to inhibit the growth of the freshwater green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata after 72 h with the following effect values (initial measured test item concentrations): The EL10-values with 95 % confidence intervals for inhibition of specific growth rate (ErL10) and yield (EyL10) after 72 h were 0.00857 (0.00675 – 0.0107) and 0.00561 mg/L, respectively. The EL50-values with 95 % confidence intervals for inhibition of specific growth rate (ErL50) and yield (EyL50) after 72 h were 0.107 (0.0817 – 0.148) and 0.0114 (0.0107 – 0.0121) mg/L, respectively.

After 72 h algae were transferred from the control and the nominal loadings of 0.0320 to  10.0 mg/L (corresponding to initial measured test item concentrations of 0.0129 to 4.79 mg/L) to fresh untreated medium and allowed to grow for further 3 d under test conditions. The test item effect was observed to be reversible at these loadings. Therefore, there is potential for recovery following exposure up to the initial measured test item concentration of 4.79 mg/L (highest test loading).