Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 604-200-4 | CAS number: 14078-41-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- The study was performed between 03 March 2009 and 05 March 2009.
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 009
- Report date:
- 2009
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: SkinEthic Reconstituted Human Corneal model
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The SkinEthic RHC model consists of transformed human keratinocytes of the cell line HCE (LSU EYE Center, New Orleans, USA) that form a corneal epithelial tissue (mucosa), devoid of stratum corneum, resembling, histologically, the mucosa of the human eye. Test materials are applied directly to the culture surface, at air interface, so that undiluted and/or end use dilutions can be tested directly. The model consists of an airlifted, living, corneal tissue construct, produced in polycarbonate inserts in serum-free and chemically defined medium.
The test is based on the hypothesis that irritant chemicals are able to penetrate the stratum corneum of the SkinEthic RHC model and are sufficiently cytotoxic to cause cell death in the underlying cell layers.
Cytotoxicity was determined by the reduction of MTT (3 [4,5 dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide) to formazan by viable cells in the test material treated tissues (quantitative measurement of tissue viability) relative to the negative control. - GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Date of inspection: 19/08/08 Date of Signature: 04/03/09
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- L17_Precursor
- IUPAC Name:
- L17_Precursor
- Details on test material:
- Sponsor's identification : L17_Precursor
Description : pale yellow powder
Batch number : DALA046312
Date received : 11 November 2008
Storage conditions : room temperature in the dark
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- other: SkinEthic Reconstituted Human Corneal model
- Strain:
- other: SkinEthic Reconstituted Human Corneal model
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Not applicable, no animals used within this study.
Information on SkinEthic Reconstituted Human Corneal model:
Supplier : SkinEthic Laboratories, Nice, France
Date Received : 03 March 2009
On arrival, the SkinEthic HCE tissues (Day 6), were stored at room temperature prior to transferring into 24-well plates designated ‘arrival plates’ containing 300 µl of maintenance medium. It was important to ensure that there were no air bubbles present under the tissue inserts. The tissues were incubated overnight at 37°C, 5% CO2 in air.
- Preparation of Tissues
Using sterile techniques, 1 ml of maintenance medium at room temperature, was dispensed into the appropriate number of wells of 6-well plates designated ‘treatment plates’. Each well was labelled with details of the treatment and the appropriate exposure time. Separate treatment plates were used for the test material and negative and positive controls to avoid the possibility of cross contamination occurring. Before treatment, the Day 7 tissues were transferred from the ‘arrival plates’ into the wells of the ‘treatment plates’ containing the maintenance medium.
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: Triplicate tissues were treated with 30 µl of solution A to serve as negative controls and triplicate tissues were treated with 30 µl of 1 % w/v SDS to serve as positive controls.
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit):
30 mg of the test material
VEHICLE
Not applicable - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 10 minutes. The tissues were dosed at regular timed intervals to allow for the period taken to rinse each insert following exposure and to ensure each tissue received an equal exposure time.
- Observation period (in vivo):
- The MTT loading plate was placed into an incubator for approximately three hours.
After 1st visual observation, allowed to stand overnight ready for the optical density observation. - Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Not applicable
- Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done):
At the end of the relevant exposure period, each tissue insert was removed from the well using forceps and rinsed using a wash bottle containing Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS). Rinsing was achieved by filling and emptying each tissue insert using a constant soft stream of DPBS to gently remove any residual test material. Excess DPBS was removed by blotting the bottom of the insert with absorbent paper.
Each tissue was placed into a pre-labelled 24 well plate designated ‘holding plate’ containing 300 µl of maintenance medium (at room temperature) until all the tissues were rinsed. Following rinsing, the tissues (two per group) were transferred to a pre labelled 24-well plate designated ‘MTT Loading plate’ containing 300 µl of a 0.5 mg/ml MTT solution freshly prepared in maintenance medium. The MTT loading plate was placed into an incubator for approximately three hours at 37°C, 5% CO2 in air.
- Time after start of exposure:
10 minutes
SCORING SYSTEM:
The mean OD540 values of the duplicate tissues were calculated. Each of these OD540 values had already been corrected for blanks by the microplate reader.
The relative mean tissue viabilities (% of the negative control) were calculated as follows:
Relative mean tissue viability = (mean OD540 of test material / mean OD540 of negative control) x 100
The mean tissue viabilities for the test material was compared to the respective untreated negative control and classified according to the following table:
Relative Mean tissue viability
(% negative control) Prediction
Tissue viability <60 Irritant (I)
Tissue viability ≥60 Non-Irritant (NI)
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE:
At the end of the incubation period, the tissues were visually examined and the degree of MTT staining evaluated (qualitative evaluation of tissue viability). The inserts were blotted on absorbent paper to remove residual MTT solution and transferred to a pre labelled 24 well plate designated ‘MTT extraction plate’ containing 0.75 ml of Isopropanol in each of a sufficient number of wells. An extra 0.75 ml of Isopropanol was added onto each tissue and the plate sealed to prevent Isopropanol evaporation. The plate was wrapped in aluminium foil (to protect from light) and allowed to stand overnight at room temperature to extract the formazan crystals out of the tissue.
At the end of the extraction period, each tissue insert was pierced with a pipette fitted with a 1000 µl tip and the extraction solution forced vigorously up and down through the tissue insert until a homogeneous solution was obtained. The empty inserts were discarded. For each tissue triplicate 200 µl samples were transferred to the appropriate wells of a pre-labelled 96-well plate. 200 µl of Isopropanol alone was added to three wells designated as ‘blanks’. The optical density was measured (quantitative measurement of tissue viability) at 540nm (OD540) using the Anthos 2001 microplate reader.
Results and discussion
In vitro
Results
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- See table in "Any other information on results.."
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1 Assessment of Eye Irritation Potential – Viability of RHC Tissues
Material |
Mean Tissue Viability |
Mean OD540 |
% Viability |
Negative Controlφ |
0.950 |
0.976 |
100* |
1.001 |
|||
Positive Controlφ |
0.770 |
0.731 |
74.9 |
0.692 |
|||
Test Material |
1.057 |
1.062 |
108.8 |
1.066 |
*= The mean viability of the negative control tissues is set at 100%
φ = Control group shared with Project number 1571/0071
Table 2 Qualitative Evaluation of Tissue Viability (MTT uptake visual evaluation)
Material |
Score |
|
Tissue 1 |
Tissue 2 |
|
Negative ControlÅ |
- |
- |
Positive ControlÅ |
+ |
+ |
Test Material |
- |
- |
MTT Visual Scoring Scheme of SkinEthic Tissues
- = Blue tissue (viable)
+ = Blue/White tissue (semi viable)
++ = Tissue completely white (dead)
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: expert judgment
- Conclusions:
- According to the protocol followed the test material was considered to be a Non-Irritant (NI).
- Executive summary:
Introduction.
The purpose of this study was to determine the eye irritation potential of the test material using the SkinEthic Reconstituted Human Corneal model (HCE, SkinEthic Laboratories,,) after a treatment period of 10 minutes. The test is based on the hypothesis that irritant chemicals are able to penetrate the corneal epithelial tissue and are sufficiently cytotoxic to cause cell death.
Methods.
The experimental design of the study consists of a test for Direct Reduction of MTT by the test material followed by the main test.
For the main test, triplicate SkinEthic tissues were treated with 30 mg of the test material for 10 minutes. Triplicate tissues treated with 30 µl of Solution A served as the negative control and triplicate tissues treated with 30 µl of 1% w/v Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate served as the positive control.
At the end of the exposure period each SkinEthic tissue was rinsed. The rinsed tissues (two per group) were taken for MTT loading. The remaining tissues were retained for possible histopathology. Following MTT loading the reduced MTT was extracted from the tissues.
After extraction the absorbency of triplicate aliquots of the extracted MTT solution for each SkinEthic tissue was measured (OD540). Data are presented in the form of % viability (MTT conversion relative to negative controls).
The test material was classified according to the following criteria:
i) If the % relative mean tissue viability was ≥ 60% the test material was considered to be non‑irritant.
ii) If the % relative mean tissue viability was < 60% the test material was considered to be an irritant.
Results.
The relative mean viability of the test material treated tissues after a 10 minute exposure was 108.8%.
It was considered unnecessary to proceed with tissue histopathology.
Quality criteria.
The quality criteria required for acceptance of results in the test were satisfied.
Conclusion.
According to the protocol followed the test material was considered to be a Non‑Irritant (NI).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.