Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Species and strain : Sam;New Zealand White Rabbit
Microbiological grade : Specific Pathogen Free(SPF)
Sex : Female
Breeder : SAMTAKO BIO KOREA (105, Seorang-ro, Osan-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea, 18100)
Supplier : Yeongbio (388, Dunchon-daero, Jungwon-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggido, Republic of Korea, 13391)


Step Age(week old) Number of animals A range of body weight(g)
At receipt 10 4 1745.4~1815.2
At application 11 3 2018.4~2203.7
Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
clipped
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
Group Dose volume (g) Number of animals Animal number
1 0.5 3 1~3


The 0.5 g of test substance was applicated per site in accordance with “Testing Guidelines for Studies of Chemicals, Chapter 5 Health impact test field, Section 3 Acute Dermal Irritation/Corrosion” National Institute of Environmental Research Notification.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
3 minutes, 1 hour, 4 hours
Observation period:
24, 48, and 72 hours
Number of animals:
3
Details on study design:
3.2. Application of Test Substance
3.2.1. Justification for route of application
The dermal route was selected to investigate the skin irritation and corrosivity of the test substance.

3.2.2. Method
Onto the one site of back, 0.5 g/site of prepared test substance was applied to a small area of dermal and covered with a gauze patch moistened with a corn oil, which was held in place with non-irritating tape(Tegaderm, 3M_USA). The entire trunk of the animals was wrapped with elastic bandages(Coban, 3M). At the end of the exposure period, the dressing was removed and residual test substance was carefully washed away with corn oil. The adjacent area to the test site was served as a control.

3.2.2.1. Initial test (In vivo dermal irritation/corrosion test using one animal)
A single animal was administered sequentially first. The first patch was removed after 3 minutes of application, and the second patch was applied to a different site for 1 hour due to no serious dermal irritations observed after the first patch removal. No serious dermal irritation was observed after the second patch removal, and the third patch was applied to a different site for 4 hours.

3.2.2.2. Confirmatory test (In vivo dermal irritation test with additional two animals)
No skin corrosion was observed in the initial test. Therefore, the confirmatory test was conducted on two additional animals, each with one test substance patch, for an exposure period of 4 hours.
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not specified
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.7
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Irritant / corrosive response data:
No skin corrosion was observed after the first(applied for 3 minutes) and second(applied for 1 hour) and third(applied for 4 hours) application in the initial test conducted on one animal. Therefore, the confirmatory test with two animals were carried out. No skin corrosion was observed in all animals after the 4 hours application.

The skin irritation scores of erythema/eschar were calculated as “0.7”, “1.0”, “1.0”. The skin irritation scores of oedema was calculated as “0.0” in all animals.
The skin irritation scores for erythema/eschar and oedema calculated based on the results at 24, 48 and 72 hours are as follows.
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
This study was conducted to confirm the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemical (GHS) category through the calculation of Skin Irritation Scores based on the acute dermal irritation and corrosivity of the test substance, Fatty acids, C8-18 and C18-unsatd., zinc salts, following a single skin application to female New Zealand White rabbits. Mortality, clinical signs and body weights, skin irritations and corrosivity were evaluated after the application of the test substance.
Mortality related to the test substance was not observed in all animals.
Slight exfoliation was observed in animal No. 2 and animal No. 3 in the confirmation test. This clinical sign was fully reversible on the 12 day after patch removal.
Body weight changes related to the test substance were not observed in all animals.
Corrosion was not observed in all animals up to 72 hours after application of the test substance.
The skin irritation scores of erythema/eschar were calculated as “0.7”, “1.0”, “1.0”. The skin irritation scores of oedema was calculated as “0.0” in all animals.
Therefore, the test substance was considered to be non-irritants and the 14-day observation period required to establish reversibility was not applied.
The above results show that when applying the test substance, Fatty acids, C8-18 and C18-unsatd., zinc salts to under the conditions of this study, considered to be “Not classified” according to the GHS category.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
Species and strain : Sam: New Zealand White Rabbit
Microbiological grade : Specific Pathogen Free(SPF)
Sex : Female
Breeder : SAMTAKO BIO KOREA (105, Seorang-ro, Osan-si, Gyeonggi-do,
Republic of Korea, 18100)
Supplier : Yeongbio (388, Dunchon-daero, Jungwon-gu, Seongnam-si,
Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea, 13391)



Step Age (week old) Sex Number of animals A range of body weight(g)
At receipt 10 Female 4 1716.2~1887.8
At application 11 Female 3 2073.3~2190.2
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
0.1 g of test substance was applied per eye
Duration of treatment / exposure:
1 hour
Observation period (in vivo):
72 hours
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3
Details on study design:
3.2.2 Method
5 minutes prior to application, 1~2 drops of 0.5 % Alcaine Eye Drops (proparacaine hydrochloride,
Alcon_Korea) was applied to each eye for local anesthesia.
The test substance was administered to the conjunctival sac of the right eye of each animal after gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The lids were then gently held together for about 1 second to prevent loss of test substance. The left eye remained untreated and served as a control.
3.2.2.1 Initial test (in vivo eye irritation/corrosion test using one animal)
One animal was used in the initial test and no serious eye damage/irreversible effect was observed at 1 hour after the test substance application.
3.2.2.2 Confirmatory test (in vivo eye irritation test with additional two animals)
In the initial test conducted on one animal, no serious eye damage/irreversible effect was observed at the application site after 1 hour. Therefore, a confirmatory test was conducted with two additional animals with the same procedure.
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 3 days
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 0.3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 3 days
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 0.3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 3 days
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 3 days
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 3 days
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 3 days
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
This study was conducted to confirm the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemical (GHS) category through the calculation of Eye Irritation Scores based on the acute eye irritation and corrosivity of the test substance, Fatty acids, C8-18 and C18-unsatd., zinc salts, following a single application on the eyes of New Zealand White rabbits. Mortality, clinical signs and body weight changes, eye irritations and corrosivity were observed after the application.
Mortality and clinical signs related to the test substance were not observed in all animals.
Body weight changes related to the test substance were not observed in all animals.
Corrosion was not observed in all animals up to 72 hours after application of the test substance.
In the initial test and confirmatory tests, eye irritations of redness and swelling in conjunctiva were observed at 1(3 case), 24(3 case) and 48(1 case) hours after the application of the test substance. The effects listed above were fully reversible within 3 days of observation. The eye irritation scores of cornea, iris were calculated as “0.0” in all animals. The conjunctiva(redness) was calculated as “1.0”, “0.3” and “0.3”. The conjunctiva(swelling) was calculated as “1.0”, “0.3” and “0.3”.
Therefore, the test substance was considered to be non-irritants and the 21-day observation period required to establish reversibility was not applied.
The above results show that when applying the test substance, Fatty acids, C8-18 and C18-unsatd., zinc salts to under the conditions of this study, considered to be “Not classified” according to the GHS category.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification