Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
09 Nov 2017 - 21 Nov 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018
Report date:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-methoxy-2-methylheptane
EC Number:
816-311-7
Cas Number:
76589-16-7
Molecular formula:
C9H20O
IUPAC Name:
2-methoxy-2-methylheptane
Test material form:
liquid
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Identification DAIKON ETHER
Chemical name (IUPAC), synonym or trade name 2-Methoxy-2-methylheptane
CAS Number 76589-16-7
Appearance Colourless liquid
Test item storage At room temperature

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
cattle
Strain:
not specified
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
Bovine eyes from young cattle were obtained from the slaughterhouse

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent positive control
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
750 µl
Duration of treatment / exposure:
10 minutes
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
Triplicate
Details on study design:
- Preparation of Corneas The eyes were checked for unacceptable defects, such as opacity, scratches, pigmentation and neovascularization by removing them from the physiological saline and holding them in the light. Those exhibiting defects were discarded.
- Cornea Selection and Opacity Reading: Opacity determinations were performed on each of the corneas using an opacitometer.
- Test Item Preparation
- Treatment of Corneas and Opacity Measurements: The medium from the anterior compartment was removed and 750 l of either the negative control, positive control (Ethanol) or test item was introduced onto the epithelium of the cornea.
- Opacity Measurement: The opacity of a cornea was measured by the diminution of light passing through the cornea.
- Application of Sodium Fluorescein: Following the final opacity measurement, permeability of the cornea to Na-fluorescein was evaluated.
- Permeability Determinations: The optical density at 490 nm (OD490) of each sampling tube was measured in triplicate using a microplate reader.

Results and discussion

In vitro

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Run / experiment:
Mean
Value:
5.9
Vehicle controls validity:
not specified
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: not specified
Irritation parameter:
other: Permeability Score
Run / experiment:
Mean
Value:
0.137
Vehicle controls validity:
not specified
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: not specified
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
Mean
Value:
>= 6.3 - <= 9.2
Vehicle controls validity:
not specified
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Other effects / acceptance of results:
The negative control responses for opacity and permeability were less than the upper limits of the laboratory historical range indicating that the negative control did not induce irritancy on the corneas. The mean in vitro irritancy score of the positive control (Ethanol) was 47 and within two standard deviations of the current historical positive control mean. It was therefore concluded that the test conditions were adequate and that the test system functioned properly.
See atachment.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Conclusions:
In conclusion, since the test substance induced an IVIS > 3 ≤ 55, no prediction on the classification can be made.