Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2017
Report date:
2017

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
In the pre - incubation assay in the tester strain TA100, the test item solutions were incubated for 29 minutes. The deviation had no effect on the study integrity.
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
9-(dimethoxyphosphoryl)octadecanoic acid 10-(dimethoxyphosphoryl)octadecanoic acid
Molecular formula:
C20H41O5P
IUPAC Name:
9-(dimethoxyphosphoryl)octadecanoic acid 10-(dimethoxyphosphoryl)octadecanoic acid
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
9,12-bis(dimethoxyphosphoryl)octadecanoic acid 9,13-bis(dimethoxyphosphoryl)octadecanoic acid 10,12-bis(dimethoxyphosphoryl)octadecanoic acid 10,13-bis(dimethoxyphosphoryl)octadecanoic acid
Molecular formula:
C22H46O8P2
IUPAC Name:
9,12-bis(dimethoxyphosphoryl)octadecanoic acid 9,13-bis(dimethoxyphosphoryl)octadecanoic acid 10,12-bis(dimethoxyphosphoryl)octadecanoic acid 10,13-bis(dimethoxyphosphoryl)octadecanoic acid
Constituent 3
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Oleic acid
EC Number:
204-007-1
EC Name:
Oleic acid
Cas Number:
112-80-1
Molecular formula:
C18H34O2
IUPAC Name:
octadec-9-enoic acid
Constituent 4
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Linoleic acid
EC Number:
200-470-9
EC Name:
Linoleic acid
Cas Number:
60-33-3
Molecular formula:
C18H32O2
IUPAC Name:
octadeca-9,12-dienoic acid
Constituent 5
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Dimethyl (2-oxopropyl)phosphonate
EC Number:
224-110-5
EC Name:
Dimethyl (2-oxopropyl)phosphonate
Cas Number:
4202-14-6
Molecular formula:
C5H11O4P
IUPAC Name:
dimethyl (2-oxopropyl)phosphonate
Constituent 6
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Dimethyl propylphosphonate
EC Number:
242-555-3
EC Name:
Dimethyl propylphosphonate
Cas Number:
18755-43-6
Molecular formula:
C5H13O3P
IUPAC Name:
dimethyl propylphosphonate
Constituent 7
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Dimethyl methylphosphonate
EC Number:
212-052-3
EC Name:
Dimethyl methylphosphonate
Cas Number:
756-79-6
Molecular formula:
C3H9O3P
IUPAC Name:
dimethyl methylphosphonate
Test material form:
liquid
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: 0101891886
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 02 November 2017
- Purity test date:

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature
- Stability under test conditions: Stable, maximum temperature: 60 °C
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: Dimethyl sulfoxide: Not indicated
- Reactivity of the test substance with the solvent/vehicle of the cell culture medium: Dimethyl sulfoxide: Not indicated

TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Treatment of test material prior to testing: No correction was made for the purity/composition of the test compound. A solubility test was performed based on visual assessment. The test item was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide. Test item concentrations were used within 1.5 hours after preparation. Any residual volumes were discarded.
- Final dilution of a dissolved solid, stock liquid or gel: A solubility test was performed based on visual assessment. The test item was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide.

Method

Species / strainopen allclose all
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
The mammalian liver post-mitochondrial fraction (S9)
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Selection of an adequate range of doses was based on a dose-range finding test with the strains TA100 and the WP2uvrA, both with and without S9-mix. Eight concentrations, 1.7, 5.4, 17, 52, 164, 512, 1600 and 5000 μg/plate were tested in triplicate.
Vehicle / solvent:
The vehicle of the test item was dimethyl sulfoxide (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO; Saline
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
2-nitrofluorene
sodium azide
methylmethanesulfonate
other: ICR-191
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium; in agar (plate incorporation); preincubation; in suspension; as impregnation on paper disk

DURATION
- Preincubation period: 30 minutes
- Exposure duration:48±4 h

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3
Evaluation criteria:
A test item is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the test if:
a)The total number of revertants in tester strain TA100 or WP2uvrA is not greater than two (2) times the concurrent control, and the total number of revertants in tester strains TA1535, TA1537 or TA98 is not greater than three (3) times the concurrent control.
b)The negative response should be reproducible in at least one follow up experiment.

A test item is considered positive (mutagenic) in the test if:
a)The total number of revertants in tester strain TA100 or WP2uvrA is greater than two (2) times the concurrent control, or the total number of revertants in tester strains TA1535, TA1537 or TA98 is greater than three (3) times the concurrent control.
b)In case a repeat experiment is performed when a positive response is observed in one of the tester strains, the positive response should be reproducible in at least one follow up experiment

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
Cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants and a reduction of the bacterial background lawn, was observed in tester strain TA100 in the absence of S9-mix at the highest concentration (5000 ug/ml) tested.
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
All bacterial strains showed negative responses over the entire dose-range, i.e. no significant dose-related increase in the number of revertants in two independently repeated experiments. The negative and strain-specific positive control values were within the laboratory historical control data ranges indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly.
In conclusion, based on the results of this study it is concluded that Fatty acids, C18-unsatd., phosphates is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay.
Executive summary:

The objective of this study was to determine the potential of Fatty acids, C18-unsatd., phosphates. and/or its metabolites to induce reverse mutations at the histidine locus in several strains of Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium; TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537), and at the tryptophan locus of Escherichia coli(E. coli) strain WP2uvrA in the presence or absence of an exogenous mammalian metabolic activation system (S9).

The test was performed in two independent experiments, at first a direct plate assay was performed and secondly a pre-incubation assay.

The study procedures described in this report were based on the most recent OECD and EC guidelines.

Batch 0101891886 of Fatty acids, C18-unsatd., phosphates. was a yellow liquid. The test item was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide.

In the dose-range finding study, the test item was initially tested up to concentrations of 5000μg/plate in the strains TA100 and WP2uvrA in the direct plate assay. The test item did not precipitate on the plates at this dose level. The bacterial background lawn was not reduced at any of the concentrations tested and no biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants was observed.

In the first mutation experiment, the test item was tested up to concentrations of 5000 μg/plate in the strains TA1535, TA1537 and TA98. The test item did not precipitate on the plates at this dose level. The bacterial background lawn was not reduced at any of the concentrations tested and no biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants was observed.

In the second mutation experiment, the test item was tested up to concentrations of 5000 μg/plate in the tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 and WP2uvrA in the pre-incubation assay. The test item did not precipitate on the plates at this dose level. Cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants and a reduction of the bacterial background lawn, was observed in tester strain TA100 in the absence of S9-mix at the highest concentration tested.  In all other tester strains, the bacterial background lawn was not reduced at any of the concentrations tested and no biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants was observed.

The negative and strain-specific positive control values were within the laboratory historical control data ranges indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly.

The test item did not induce a significant dose-related increase in the number of revertant (His+) colonies in each of the four tester strains (TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100) and in the number of revertant (Trp+) colonies in tester strain WP2uvrA both in the absence and presence of S9-metabolic activation. These results were confirmed in a follow-up experiment.

In conclusion, based on the results of this study it is concluded that Fatty acids, C18-unsatd., phosphates.is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay.