Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 700-334-3 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- between 18 June 2008 and 08 July 2008
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted to GLP and in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not effect the quality of the relevant results.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 008
- Report date:
- 2008
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 10-hydroxy-2,2,4-trimethyl-4-[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]-3,8-dioxa-2,4-disilaundecan-11-yl 2-methylprop-2-enoate; 11-hydroxy-2,2,4-trimethyl-4-[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]-3,8-dioxa-2,4-disilaundecan-10-yl 2-methylprop-2-enoate
- EC Number:
- 700-334-3
- Molecular formula:
- C17H38O6Si3
- IUPAC Name:
- 10-hydroxy-2,2,4-trimethyl-4-[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]-3,8-dioxa-2,4-disilaundecan-11-yl 2-methylprop-2-enoate; 11-hydroxy-2,2,4-trimethyl-4-[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]-3,8-dioxa-2,4-disilaundecan-10-yl 2-methylprop-2-enoate
- Test material form:
- other: liquid
- Details on test material:
- identification: SiMAA2
Description : Clear colourless liquid
Lot number : 003068
Date received : 25 March 2008
Storage conditions: Approximately 4°C in the dark
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Histidine (for Salmonell), tryptophan (for E.coli).
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- phenobarbitone/beta-naphthoflavone induced rat liver (S9 mix)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary Toxicity Test: 0, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate
Mutation Test (Experiments 1 and 2): 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- The test material was immiscible in sterile distilled water at 50 mg/ml but was fully miscible in dimethyl sulphoxide at the same concentration in solubility checks performed in-house. Dimethyl sulphoxide was therefore selected as the vehicle.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rates
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- ENNG, 9AA, 4NQO used without S9 mix. BP and 2AA used with S9 mix.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 48 hours
- Exposure duration: 48 hours
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Triplicate plates
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 10-9 cells per ml
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: other: Evalaution of background lawn, frequency of revertant colonies. - Evaluation criteria:
- There are several criteria for determining a positive result, such as a dose-related increase in revertant frequency over the dose range tested and/or a reproducible increase at one or more concentrations in at least one bacterial strain with or without metabolic activation. Biological relevance of the results will be considered first, statistical methods, as recommended by the UKEMS (5) can also be used as an aid to evaluation, however, statistical significance will not be the only determining factor for a positive response.
A test material will be considered non-mutagenic (negative) in the test system if the above criteria are not met.
Although most experiments will give clear positive or negative results, in some instances the data generated will prohibit a definitive judgement about the test material activity. Results of this type will be reported as equivocal.
- Statistics:
- Standard deviation
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- - Precipitation: An oily precipitate was initially observed under an inverted microscope at 1500 µg/plate and at 5000 µg/plate by the naked eye. These observations did not prevent the scoring of revertant colonies.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Preliminary Toxicity Test
The test material was non-toxic to the strains of bacteria used (TA100 and WP2uvrA-). The test material formulation and S9-mix used in this experiment were both shown to be sterile. The number of revertant colonies for the toxicity assay were;
With (+) or without (-) S9-mix |
Strain |
Dose (µg/plate) |
||||||||||
0 |
0.15 |
0.5 |
1.5 |
5 |
15 |
50 |
150 |
500 |
1500 |
5000 |
||
- |
TA100 |
79 |
72 |
81 |
80 |
99 |
77 |
89 |
77 |
80 |
112 |
72P |
+ |
TA100 |
70 |
81 |
67 |
73 |
73 |
76 |
82 |
89 |
61 |
73 |
80P |
- |
WP2uvrA- |
29 |
20 |
28 |
29 |
27 |
21 |
17 |
22 |
23 |
20 |
36P |
+ |
WP2uvrA- |
28 |
21 |
23 |
22 |
25 |
32 |
28 |
35 |
34 |
31 |
42P |
Mutation test:
Prior to use, the master strains were checked for characteristics, viability and spontaneous reversion rate (all were found to be satisfactory). The amino acid supplemented top agar and the S9-mix used in both experiments was shown to be sterile.
Results for the negative controls (spontaneous mutation rates) are presented in Table 1 and were considered to be acceptable. These data are for concurrent untreated control plates performed on the same day as the Mutation Test.
The individual plate counts, the mean number of revertant colonies and the standard deviations for the test material, vehicle and positive controls both with and without metabolic activation, are presented in Table 2 to Table 5.
The test material caused no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawn at any dose level. The test material was, therefore, tested up to the maximum recommended dose level of 5000 µg/plate. An oily precipitate was initially observed under an inverted microscope at 1500 µg/plate and at 5000 µg/plate by the naked eye. These observations did not prevent the scoring of revertant colonies.
No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, at any dose level either with or without metabolic activation.
All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies thus confirming the activity of the S9-mix and the sensitivity of the bacterial strains.
Table1:Spontaneous Mutation Rates (Concurrent Negative Controls)
Range finding test: Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA- |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|||||
67 |
15 |
30 |
13 |
7 |
|||||
79 |
(79) |
12 |
(14) |
23 |
(24) |
19 |
(17) |
7 |
(9) |
90 |
15 |
19 |
18 |
13 |
Main test: Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA- |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|||||
117 |
20 |
29 |
18 |
7 |
|||||
129 |
(130) |
22 |
(20) |
34 |
(29) |
15 |
(17) |
6 |
(6) |
143 |
19 |
25 |
17 |
5 |
Table 2: Range finding test-without metabolic activation.
Test Period |
From: 28 June 2008 |
To: 01 July 2008 |
|||||||||||
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration (µg/plate) |
Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate) |
|||||||||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
||||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA‑ |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|||||||||
- |
0 |
86 70 70 |
(75) 9.2# |
18 21 18 |
(19) 1.7 |
30 34 25 |
(30) 4.5 |
18 19 11 |
(16) 4.4 |
14 15 11 |
(13) 2.1 |
||
- |
50 |
71 75 70 |
(72) 2.6 |
23 16 16 |
(18) 4.0 |
19 41 24 |
(28) 11.5 |
24 20 12 |
(19) 6.1 |
13 12 14 |
(13) 1.0 |
||
- |
150 |
70 71 71 |
(71) 0.6 |
16 23 16 |
(18) 4.0 |
23 20 24 |
(22) 2.1 |
20 16 22 |
(19) 3.1 |
15 12 13 |
(13) 1.5 |
||
- |
500 |
71 79 79 |
(76) 4.6 |
18 19 21 |
(19) 1.5 |
24 29 20 |
(24) 4.5 |
15 19 13 |
(16) 3.1 |
12 11 13 |
(12) 1.0 |
||
- |
1500 |
87 70 71 |
(76) 9.5 |
19 13 25 |
(19) 6.0 |
19 31 30 |
(27) 6.7 |
15 20 16 |
(17) 2.6 |
14 13 12 |
(13) 1.0 |
||
- |
5000 |
79 P 75 P 78 P |
(77) 2.1 |
20 P 24 P 19 P |
(21) 2.6 |
31 P 24 P 20 P |
(25) 5.6 |
13 P 15 P 18 P |
(15) 2.5 |
11 P 14 P 12 P |
(12) 1.5 |
||
Positive controls S9-Mix - |
Name Concentration (μg/plate) No. colonies per plate |
ENNG |
ENNG |
ENNG |
4NQO |
9AA |
|||||||
3 |
5 |
2 |
0.2 |
80 |
|||||||||
514 556 511 |
(527) 25.2 |
255 151 150 |
(185) 60.3 |
716 668 647 |
(677) 35.4 |
222 203 218 |
(214) 10.0 |
2113 2210 1974 |
(2099) 118.6 |
Table 3: Range finding test-with metabolic activation.
Test Period |
From: 28 June 2008 |
To: 01 July 2008 |
||||||||||
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration (µg/plate) |
Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate) |
||||||||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
|||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA‑ |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
||||||||
+ |
0 |
71 74 74 |
(73) 1.7# |
11 14 14 |
(13) 1.7 |
30 38 30 |
(33) 4.6 |
20 19 18 |
(19) 1.0 |
16 15 11 |
(14) 2.6 |
|
+ |
50 |
71 70 71 |
(71) 0.6 |
13 10 10 |
(11) 1.7 |
33 31 27 |
(30) 3.1 |
19 20 18 |
(19) 1.0 |
15 11 12 |
(13) 2.1 |
|
+ |
150 |
71 70 76 |
(72) 3.2 |
13 13 10 |
(12) 1.7 |
23 33 22 |
(26) 6.1 |
14 16 16 |
(15) 1.2 |
14 11 13 |
(13) 1.5 |
|
+ |
500 |
78 73 76 |
(76) 2.5 |
12 11 12 |
(12) 0.6 |
30 31 35 |
(32) 2.6 |
16 20 16 |
(17) 2.3 |
11 14 12 |
(12) 1.5 |
|
+ |
1500 |
73 77 81 |
(77) 4.0 |
11 12 12 |
(12) 0.6 |
29 31 35 |
(32) 3.1 |
19 16 18 |
(18) 1.5 |
13 10 13 |
(12) 1.7 |
|
+ |
5000 |
74 P 73 P 79 P |
(75) 3.2 |
13 P 13 P 12 P |
(13) 0.6 |
32 P 26 P 36 P |
(31) 5.0 |
20 P 20 P 15 P |
(18) 2.9 |
13 P 16 P 14 P |
(14) 1.5 |
|
Positive controls S9-Mix + |
Name Concentration (μg/plate) No. colonies per plate |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
BP |
2AA |
||||||
1 |
2 |
10 |
5 |
2 |
||||||||
1306 1178 1426 |
(1303) 124.0 |
277 376 345 |
(333) 50.6 |
299 352 293 |
(315) 32.5 |
511 387 483 |
(460) 65.0 |
260 398 389 |
(349) 77.2 |
Table 4: Maint test- without metabolic activation:
Test Period |
From: 05 July 2008 |
To: 08 July 2008 |
||||||||||||||
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration (µg/plate) |
Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate) |
||||||||||||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
|||||||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA‑ |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
||||||||||||
- |
0 |
95 99 98 |
(97) 2.1# |
20 14 20 |
(18) 3.5 |
22 14 25 |
(20) 5.7 |
26 22 22 |
(23) 2.3 |
5 11 3 |
(6) 4.2 |
|||||
- |
50 |
84 93 125 |
(101) 21.5 |
13 24 18 |
(18) 5.5 |
31 30 16 |
(26) 8.4 |
21 16 34 |
(24) 9.3 |
12 4 7 |
(8) 4.0 |
|||||
- |
150 |
112 108 124 |
(115) 8.3 |
8 21 9 |
(13) 7.2 |
30 24 16 |
(23) 7.0 |
19 25 24 |
(23) 3.2 |
10 4 5 |
(6) 3.2 |
|||||
- |
500 |
99 104 93 |
(99) 5.5 |
15 11 7 |
(11) 4.0 |
29 31 23 |
(28) 4.2 |
18 26 21 |
(22) 4.0 |
9 4 10 |
(8) 3.2 |
|||||
- |
1500 |
119 100 103 |
(107) 10.2 |
19 16 9 |
(15) 5.1 |
36 20 30 |
(29) 8.1 |
20 18 18 |
(19) 1.2 |
3 7 7 |
(6) 2.3 |
|||||
- |
5000 |
99 P 97 P 133 P |
(110) 20.2 |
13 P 10 P 21 P |
(15) 5.7 |
27 P 21 P 20 P |
(23) 3.8 |
24 P 15 P 18 P |
(19) 4.6 |
2 P 7 P 4 P |
(4) 2.5 |
|||||
Positive controls S9-Mix - |
Name Concentration (μg/plate) No. colonies per plate |
ENNG |
ENNG |
ENNG |
4NQO |
9AA |
||||||||||
3 |
5 |
2 |
0.2 |
80 |
||||||||||||
539 547 509 |
(532) 20.0 |
264 196 214 |
(225) 35.2 |
709 818 823 |
(783) 64.4 |
178 136 183 |
(166) 25.8 |
997 970 1262 |
(1076) 161.4 |
Table 5: Main test-with metabolic activation:
Test Period |
From: 05 July 2008 |
To: 08 July 2008 |
||||||||||
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration (µg/plate) |
Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate) |
||||||||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
|||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA‑ |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
||||||||
+ |
0 |
91 108 114 |
(104) 11.9# |
9 13 13 |
(12) 2.3 |
23 35 25 |
(28) 6.4 |
14 18 21 |
(18) 3.5 |
9 10 8 |
(9) 1.0 |
|
+ |
50 |
123 92 97 |
(104) 16.6 |
21 22 10 |
(18) 6.7 |
32 29 42 |
(34) 6.8 |
18 18 19 |
(18) 0.6 |
10 4 10 |
(8) 3.5 |
|
+ |
150 |
84 88 119 |
(97) 19.2 |
13 13 19 |
(15) 3.5 |
29 23 40 |
(31) 8.6 |
13 22 19 |
(18) 4.6 |
10 7 8 |
(8) 1.5 |
|
+ |
500 |
107 95 103 |
(102) 6.1 |
13 15 7 |
(12) 4.2 |
29 29 29 |
(29) 0.0 |
31 19 21 |
(24) 6.4 |
13 8 12 |
(11) 2.6 |
|
+ |
1500 |
101 99 101 |
(100) 1.2 |
20 9 14 |
(14) 5.5 |
30 25 25 |
(27) 2.9 |
25 31 16 |
(24) 7.5 |
5 9 9 |
(8) 2.3 |
|
+ |
5000 |
80 P 106 P 103 P |
(96) 14.2 |
15 P 9 P 8 P |
(11) 3.8 |
33 P 31 P 29 P |
(31) 2.0 |
22 P 11 P 18 P |
(17) 5.6 |
5 P 7 P 11 P |
(8) 3.1 |
|
Positive controls S9-Mix + |
Name Concentration (μg/plate) No. colonies per plate |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
BP |
2AA |
||||||
1 |
2 |
10 |
5 |
2 |
||||||||
723 882 811 |
(805) 79.7 |
272 274 227 |
(258) 26.6 |
465 475 459 |
(466) 8.1 |
344 326 317 |
(329) 13.7 |
431 322 368 |
(374) 54.7 |
Results of range finding test without metabolic activation.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The test material was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test.
- Executive summary:
Introduction.
The method was designed to conform to the guidelines for bacterial mutagenicity testing published by the major Japanese Regulatory Authorities including METI, MHLW and MAFF. It also meets the requirements of the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No. 471 "Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test", Method B13/14 of Commission Directive 2000/32/EC and the, EPA (TSCA) OPPTS harmonised guidelines.
Methods.
Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100 and Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA-were treated with the test material using the Ames plate incorporation method at five dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolising system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). The dose range for the range-finding test was determined in a preliminary toxicity assay and was 50 to 5000 µg/plate. The experiment was repeated on a separate day using the same dose range as the range-finding test, fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test material formulations.
Results.
The vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated.
The test material caused no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawn at any dose level. The test material was, therefore, tested up to the maximum recommended dose level of 5000 µg/plate. An oily precipitate was initially observed under an inverted microscope at 1500 µg/plate and at 5000 µg/plate by the naked eye. These observations did not prevent the scoring of revertant colonies.
No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test material, either with or without metabolic activation.
Conclusion.
The test material was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.