Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 247-092-0 | CAS number: 25549-16-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Repeated dose toxicity: oral
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 2015-03-19 to 2017-12-14
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 017
- Report date:
- 2017
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1996
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EPA, Health Effects Test Guidelines; OPPTS 870.3650: Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study With the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test
- Version / remarks:
- 2000
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Triisooctylamine
- EC Number:
- 247-092-0
- EC Name:
- Triisooctylamine
- Cas Number:
- 25549-16-0
- Molecular formula:
- C24H51N
- IUPAC Name:
- tris(6-methylheptyl)amine
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: 0008924462
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on species / strain selection:
- The test guideline requires the rat to be used as the animal species. This rat strain was selected since extensive historical control data are available for Wistar rats.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories, Research Models and Services, GmbH, Sandhofer Weg 7, 97633 Sulzfeld, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 11-13 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: males: 318.3 g - 356.9 g; females 181.3 g - 213.5 g
- Females nulliparous and non-pregnant: yes
- Housing: individually, except during overnight matings and dams with their litters
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: ca. 5 days
Male and female Wistar rats, strain Crl:WI(Han), supplied by Charles River Laboratories Research Models and Services, Germany GmbH, which were free from any clinical signs of disease, were used for the investigations. The females were nulliparous and non-pregnant at the beginning of the study. The receipt of males (11-12 weeks old) and females (10 weeks old) at different age warrants that no sibling males and females will be paired during the study. These animals were used as F0 generation parental animals. All other animals used in this study (F1 generation pups) were derived from the supplier-provided animals.
DETAILS OF FOOD AND WATER QUALITY:
The supplier assayed the food used in the study for chemical and microbiological contaminants. The drinking water is regularly assayed for chemical contaminants by the municipal authorities of Frankenthal and by the Environmental Analytics Water/Steam Monitoring Department of BASF SE as well as for the presence of microorganisms by a contract laboratory.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 20-24 °C
- Humidity: 30-70 %
- Air changes: 15 per hr
- Photoperiod: 12 / 12 hrs dark / hrs light
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: 0.5% Carboxymethylcellulose suspension in drinking water with 5 mg/100 mL Tween 80
- Details on oral exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The test substance suspensions in 0.5% Carboxymethylcellulose suspension in drinking water with 5 mg/100 mL Tween 80 were prepared in intervals, which took into account the analytical results of the stability verification. For the preparation of the administration suspensions the test substance was weighed in a calibrated beaker depending on the dose group, topped up with 0.5% Carboxymethylcellulose suspension in drinking water with 5 mg/ 100 mL Tween 80 and intensely mixed with a magnetic stirrer. During administration, the preparations were kept homogeneous with a magnetic stirrer.
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Analytical verifications of the stability of the test substance in 1% Carboxymethylcellulose suspension in drinking water + 5 mg/100 ml Tween 80 for a period of 7 days in a refrigerator were carried out prior to the start of the study. Samples of the test substance preparations were sent to the analytical laboratory once during the study period for verification of the concentration. The samples, which were taken for the concentration control analysis at the beginning of the administration period, were also used to verify the homogeneity of the samples of the low- and high-concentration. From these concentrations three samples (one from the top, middle and bottom in each case) were taken from the beaker with a magnetic stirrer running. Of each sample, one additional reserve sample (described by the suffix “R”) was retained. Details of the sampling schedule were recorded with the raw data.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- males: 14 days pre-mating; 14 days during mating; 2 days post-mating => 29 days
females: 14 days pre-mating; 14 days during mating; approx. 22 days gestation; 13 days lactation period => 63 days - Frequency of treatment:
- daily
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 10 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 30 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: Based on availble acute toxicity data
- Rationale for animal assignment: random - Positive control:
- not applicable
Examinations
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: at least daily before administration as well as within 2 hours and within 5 hours after the administration .
The parturition and lactation behavior of the dams was generally evaluated in the mornings in combination with the daily clinical inspection of the dams. Only particular findings (e.g. inability to deliver) were documented on an individual dam basis.
On weekdays (except Saturday, Sunday and public holidays) the parturition behavior of the dams was inspected in the afternoons in addition to the evaluations in the mornings. The day of parturition was considered the 24-hour period from about 15.00 h of one day until about 15.00 h of the following day.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Detailed clinical observations (DCO) were performed in all animals once prior to the first administration (day 0) and at weekly intervals during the administration period. The examinations started in the morning. The findings were ranked according to the degree of severity, if applicable.
For observation, the animals were removed from their cages by the investigator and placed in a standard arena (50 × 37.5 × 25 cm). The following parameters listed were assessed:
1. Abnormal behavior in “handling”
2. Fur
3. Skin
4. Posture
5. Salivation
6. Respiration
7. Activity/arousal level
8. Tremors
9. Convulsions
10. Abnormal movements
11. Gait abnormalities
12. Lacrimation
13. Palpebral closure
14. Exophthalmos
15. Assessment of the feces discharged during the examination (appearance/consistency)
16. Assessment of the urine discharged during the examination
17. Pupil size
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: once a week
Exceptions:
- During the mating period the parental females were weighed on the day of positive evidence of sperm (GD 0) and on GD 7, 14 and 20.
- Females with litter were weighed on the day of parturition (PND 0) and on PND 4.
Females without positive evidence of sperm, without litter or waiting for necropsy, were weighed weekly. These body weight data were solely used for the calculations of the dose volume.
FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes
- once a week for parental animals with the exceptions:
- Food consumption was not determined after the 2nd premating week (male parental animals) and during the mating period (male and female F0 animals).
- Food consumption of the F0 females with evidence of sperm was determined on gestation days (GD) 0 - 7, 7 - 14, and 14 - 20.
- Food consumption of F0 females which gave birth to a litter was determined on PND 1 - 4
Food consumption was not determined in females without positive evidence of sperm during the mating and the gestation period and in females without litter during the lactation period.
FOOD EFFICIENCY: No
WATER CONSUMPTION: No
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: in the morning
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Yes with isoflurane
- Animals fasted: Yes
- How many animals: all animals
- Parameters checked in table 1 were examined.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: see haematology
- Animals fasted: Yes
- How many animals: all
- Parameters checked in table 3 were examined.
URINALYSIS: Yes
- Metabolism cages used for collection of urine: Yes
- Animals fasted: Yes
- Parameters checked in table 2 were examined.
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: A functional observational battery (FOB) was performed in the first five male and the first five female animals with litter per group (in order of delivery) at the end of the administration period starting at about 10.00 h. The FOB started in a randomized sequence with passive observations without disturbing the animals, followed by removal from the home cage, open field observations in a standard arena and sensorimotor tests as well as reflex tests. The findings were ranked according to the degree of severity, if applicable. The observations were performed at random.
- Dose groups that were examined: all
- Battery of functions tested: sensory activity / grip strength / motor activity / home cage observations / open field observations
Home cage observations:
The animals were observed in their closed home cages (for a short period: about 10-30 seconds); any disturbing activities (touching the cage or rack, noise) were avoided during these examinations in order not to influence the behavior of the animals. Attention was paid to:
1. Posture
2. Tremors
3. Convulsions
4. Abnormal movements
5. Gait
6. Other findings
Open field observations:
The animals were transferred to a standard arena (50 * 50 * 25 cm) and observed. The following parameters were examined:
1. Behavior on removal from cage
2. Fur
3. Skin
4. Salivation
5. Nasal discharge
6. Lacrimation
7. Eyes/pupil size
8. Posture
9. Palpebral closure
10. Respiration
11. Tremors
12. Convulsions
13. Abnormal movements/stereotypy
14. Gait
15. Activity/arousal level
16. Feces (consistency/color) within 2 minutes
17. Urine (amount/color) within 2 minutes
18. Rearing within 2 minutes
19. Other findings
Sensory motor tests/Reflexes:
The animals were removed from the open field and subjected to following sensory motor or reflex tests:
1. Reaction to an object being moved towards the face (Approach response)
2. Touch sensitivity (Touch response)
3. Vision (Visual placing response)
4. Pupillary reflex
5. Pinna reflex
6. Audition (Startle response)
7. Coordination of movements (Righting response)
8. Behavior during handling
9. Vocalization
10. Pain perception (Tail pinch)
11. Other findings
12. Grip strength of forelimbs
13. Grip strength of hindlimbs
14. Landing foot-splay test
Motor activity measurement:
The Measurement of motor activity (MA) was measured at the end of the administration period in the first 5 surviving parental males and the first 5 surviving females with litter (in order of delivery) per group. Motor activity (MA) was measured from 14:00 h onwards on the same day as the FOB was performed. The examinations were performed using the TSE Labmaster System supplied by TSE Systems GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany. For this purpose, the animals were placed in new clean polycarbonate cages with a small amount of bedding for the duration of the measurement. Eighteen beams were allocated per cage. The number of beam interrupts were counted over 12 intervals for 5 minutes per interval. The sequence in which the animals were placed in the cages was selected at random. On account of the time needed to place the animals in the cages, the starting time was "staggered" for each animal. The measurement period began when the 1st beam was interrupted and was finished exactly 1 hour later. No food or water was offered to the animals during these measurements and the measurement room was darkened after the transfer of the last animal.
IMMUNOLOGY: No - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
All parental animals were sacrificed by decapitation under isoflurane anesthesia. The exsanguinated animals were necropsied and assessed by gross pathology, special attention being given to the reproductive organs. The following animals died intercurrently (animal No. 36) or were sacrificed moribund (animal No. 138) and were necropsied and assessed by gross pathology as soon as possible after their death.
Organ weights:
The following weights were determined in all animals sacrificed on schedule:
1. Anesthetized animals
2. Epididymides
3. Testes
The following weights were determined in 5 animals/sex and test group (females with litters, same animals as used for clinical pathology examinations):
1. Adrenal glands
2. Brain
3. Heart
4. Kidneys
5. Liver
6. Spleen
7. Thymus
Organ / Tissue fixation:
The following organs or tissues of all parental animals were fixed in in 4% neutral-buffered formaldehyde or in modified Davidson's solution:
1. All gross lesions
2. Adrenal glands
3. Aorta
4. Bone marrow (femur)
5. Brain
6. Cecum
7. Cervix
8. Coagulating glands
9. Colon
10. Duodenum
11. Eyes with optic nerve
12. Esophagus
13. Extraorbital lacrimal glands
14. Epididymides (modified Davidson's solution)
15. Femur with knee joint
16. Heart
17. Ileum
18. Jejunum (with Peyer's patches)
19. Kidneys
20. Larynx
21. Liver
22. Lungs
23. Lymph nodes (axillary and mesenteric)
24. Mammary gland (male and female)
25. Nose (nasal cavity)
26. Ovaries (modified Davidson's solution)
27. Oviducts
28. Pancreas
29. Parathyroid glands
30. Pharynx
31. Pituitary gland
32. Prostate gland
33. Rectum
34. Salivary glands (mandibular and sublingual)
35. Sciatic nerve
36. Seminal vesicles
37. Skeletal muscle
38. Spinal cord (cervical, thoracic and lumbar cord)
39. Spleen
40. Sternum with marrow
41. Stomach (forestomach and glandular stomach)
42. Testes (modified Davidson's solution)
43. Thymus
44. Thyroid glands
45. Trachea
46. Urinary bladder
47. Uterus (uteri of all cohabited female F0 parental animals were stained according to Salewski's method: see chapter: Female reproduction and delivery data)
48. Vagina
The testes, epididymides and ovaries of animals that died/were sacrificed intercurrently were fixed in 4% neutral-buffered formaldehyde solution.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
Please refer to table 7.
Animals that died/were sacrificed in a moribund state were processed histotechnically and assessed with all organs listed above like control animals.
Special attention was given on the stages of spermatogenesis in the testes. The organs were trimmed according to the "Revised guides for organ sampling and trimming in rats and mice" (Ruehl-Fehlert et al., 2003; Kittel et al., 2004; Morawietz et al., 2004). A correlation between gross lesions and histopathological findings was attempted. - Other examinations:
- Male reproduction data:
The pairing partners, the number of mating days until vaginal sperm was detected in the female animals, and the gestational status of the females were recorded for F0 breeding pairs. For the males, mating and fertility indices were calculated for F1 litters according to the following formulas:
Male mating index (%) = (number of males with confirmed mating* / number of males placed with females) x 100
* defined by a female with vaginal sperm or with implants in utero
Male fertility index (%) = (number of males proving their fertility* / number of males placed with females) x 100
* defined by a female with implants in utero
Female reproduction data
The pairing partners, the number of mating days until vaginal sperm was detected and gestational status was recorded for F0 females. For the females, mating, fertility and gestation indices were calculated for F1 litters according to the following formulas:
Female mating index (%) = (number of females mated* / number of females placed with males) x 100
* defined as the number of females with vaginal sperm or with implants in utero
Female fertility index (%) = (number of females pregnant* / number of females mated**) x 100
* defined as the number of females with implants in utero
**defined as the number of females with vaginal sperm or with implants in utero
Gestation index (%) = (number of females with live pups on the day of birth / number of females pregnant*) x 100
* defined as the number of females with implants in utero
The total number of pups delivered and the number of liveborn and stillborn pups were noted, and the live birth index was calculated for F1 litters according to the following formula:
Live birth index (%) = (number of liveborn pups at birth / total number of pups born) x 100
The implantations were countedand1 the postimplantation loss (in %) was calculated according the following formula:
Postimplantation loss (%) = (number of implantations - number of pups delivered / number of implantations) x 100
To determine the number of implantation sites, the apparently non-pregnant uteri were stained for about 5 minutes in 1% ammonium sulfide solution according to the method of SALEWSKI (Salewski, E.; 1964). Then the uteri were rinsed carefully with 0.9% NaCl solution. Thereafter the implantation sites were recorded for calculation of the postimplantation loss.
Litter data
Pup number and status at delivery: All pups delivered from the F0 parents (F1 litter) were examined as soon as possible on the day of birth to determine the total number of pups, the sex and the number of liveborn and stillborn pups in each litter. At the same time, the pups were also being examined for macroscopically evident changes. Pups, which died before this initial examination, were defined as stillborn pups.
Pup viability/mortality: In general, a check was made for any dead or moribund pups twice daily on workdays (once in the morning and once in the afternoon) or as a rule, only in the morning on Saturdays, Sundays or public holidays. Dead pups were evaluated by the methods, which are described in detail in section "Necropsy observations". The number and percentage of dead pups on the day of birth (PND 0) and of pups dying between PND 1-4 (lactation period) were determined. Pups which died accidentally or were sacrificed due to maternal death were not included in these calculations. The number of live pups/litter was calculated on the day of birth (PND 0), and on lactation day 4. The viability index was calculated according to the following formula:
Viability index (%) = (number of live pups on day 4 after birth / number of live pups on the day of birth) x 100
Sex ratio: On the day of birth (PND 0) the sex of the pups was determined by observing the distance between the anus and the base of the genital tubercle; normally, the anogenital distance is considerably greater in male than in female pups. The sex of the pups was finally confirmed at necropsy. The sex ratio was calculated at day 0 and day 4 after birth according to the following formula:
Sex ratio = (number of live male or female pups on day 0/4 / number of live male and female pups on day 0/4) x 100
Pup clinical observations: The live pups were examined daily for clinical symptoms (including gross-morphological findings) during the clinical inspection of the dams and documented for each pup.
Pup body weight data: The pups were weighed on the day after birth (PND 1) and on PND 4. Pups' body weight change was calculated from these results.
The individual weights were always determined at about the same time of the day (in the morning). "Runts" were defined on the basis of the body weights on PND 1. "Runts" are pups that weigh less than 75% of the mean weight of the respective control pups.
Necropsy observations: All pups with scheduled sacrifice on PND 4 were sacrificed under isoflurane anesthesia with CO2. All pups were examined externally and eviscerated; their organs were assessed macroscopically. All stillborn pups and all pups that died before PND 4 were examined externally, eviscerated and their organs were assessed macroscopically. All pups without notable findings or abnormalities were discarded after their macroscopic evaluation. Animals with notable findings or abnormalities were evaluated on a case-by-case basis, depending on the type of finding. - Statistics:
- Please refer to table 6 for more details.
Results and discussion
Results of examinations
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Several male and female animals of test group 3 (100 mg/kg bw/d) showed soft feces and/or discolored feces (light brown) during premating.
Several male animals of test groups 3 and 2 (100 mg/kg bw/d and 30 mg/kg bw/d) showed salivation after treatment (grade: slight to severe) during premating (test group 3), mating and post-mating (test group 3 and 2).
Several female animals of test groups 3 and 2 showed salivation after treatment (grade: slight to severe) during premating and mating (test group 3) and gestation and lactation (test groups 3 and 2).
One mid-dose male (No. 21) showed labored respiration (slight to moderate) on mating days 2 - 6 and encrusted eyes (red) on mating days 3 - 6. These isolated findings in one animal were considered as possibly treatment related but not substance related as no dose-response relationship occurred.
Two high-dose females (Nos. 133 and 140) showed encrusted eye (both, red) on GD 22 and GD 22 - 23 and on PND 0 - 1 and PND 0, respectively. One high-dose (female No. 140) also showed piloerection on PND 3 - 4.
No clinical signs or changes of general behaviour, which may be attributed to the test substance, were detected in any male or female F0 generation parental animals of test group 1 (10 mg/kg bw/d) during the entire study including gestation and lactation periods.
Four high-dose females did not properly nurse their pups (Nos. 131 [PND 1], 133 [PND 4], 136 [PND 1] and 137 [PND 1]).
Three high-dose females had all pups stillborn (Nos. 132, 138 and 140). One high-dose female had a complete litter loss (No. 136 on PND 2).
One sperm positive low-dose female (10 mg/kg bw/d - No. 115) and one sperm negative and one sperm positive control female (0 mg/kg bw/d - No. 102 and 103, respectively) did not deliver F1 pups. - Mortality:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- One parental male of test group 3 (No. 36 - 100 mg/kg bw/d) was found dead on mating day 7. One parental high-dose female (No. 138) was sacrificed moribund on PND 5 because it showed semiclosed eyelid (both), piloerection, reduced nutritional condition (severe), encrusted eye (both, red), closed eyelid (both), hypothermia and smeared fur (anogenital region, light brown). There were no other test substance-related mortalities in any of the groups.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The mean body weights of the high-dose parental females were statistically significantly below the concurrent control values on PND 4 (about 12%).
The mean body weights of all test-substance treated parental males and of the mid- and low-dose parental females during the entire study period as well as of the high-dose parental females during premating and gestation period were comparable to the concurrent control group.
The mean body weight change of the high-dose parental females was statistically significantly below the concurrent control values during GD 14 - 20 and 0 - 20 (about 25% and 19%, respectively) and during PND 0 - 4 (about 12%).
The mean body weight change of all test-substance treated parental males and of the mid- and low-dose parental females during the entire study period as well as of the high-dose parental females during premating period was comparable to the concurrent control group. - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Food consumption of the high-dose F0 females (100 mg/kg bw/d) was statistically significantly below the concurrent control values during premating days 0 - 7 and 0 - 13 (about 17% and 9%, respectively), during GD 14 - 20 (about 12%) and during PND 1 - 4 (about 60%).
The food consumption of all test substance-treated F0 male animals (100, 30 and 10 mg/kg bw/d) and the mid- and low-dose F0 females was comparable to the concurrent control values throughout the entire study period. - Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- In female rats of test group 3 (100 mg/kg bw/d) hemoglobin and hematocrit values were lower and relative reticulocyte counts were higher compared to controls.
In females of test groups 2 and 3 (30 and 100 mg/kg bw/d) total white blood (WBC) counts were increased which was due to higher absolute neutrophil cell counts (in females of test group 2 not statistically significantly increased). Absolute and relative large unstained cell (LUC) counts were slightly increased in females of test group 3 (100 mg/kg bw/d). Absolute lymphocyte cell counts were also higher in females of test groups 2 and 3 (30 and 100 mg/kg bw/d; in test group 2 not statistically significant), but the means were within the historical control range (absolute lymphocytes 1.99-2.97 Giga/L). Relative basophil cell counts were decreased in females of test group 3 (100 mg/kg bw/d). No pathophysiological correlate to decreased basophil cell counts is known. Therefore, the mentioned changes of lymphocyte and basophil cell counts were regarded as incidental and not treatment-related. - Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- In rats of both sexes of test group 3 (100 mg/kg bw/d) aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activities were increased and additionally in females of the same test group alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activities and triglyceride values were higher compared to controls. In males the AST activity was within the historical control range (AST 1.32-2.00 ukat/L). Therefore, the AST alteration in males of test group 3 (100 mg/kg bw/d) was regarded as incidental and not treatment-related.
In females of test groups 1 and 2 (10 and 30 mg/kg bw/d) total bilirubin levels were higher compared to controls, but the values were not dose-dependently changed and therefore, this alteration was regarded as incidental and not treatment-related. - Urinalysis findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment-related changes among urinalysis parameters were observed.
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Detailed clinical observations (DCO)
One female animal of dose group 3 (No. 138 - 100 mg/kg bw/d) showed reduced nutritional condition (severe), piloerection and semiclosed eyelid (both) on DCO day 42 (This animal was sacrificed moribund on PND 5 see 4.2.1.1).
All male and all other female animals of all dose groups (10, 30 and 100 mg/kg bw/d) did not show any abnormalities.
Functional observational battery (FOB)
Home cage observations: No test substance-related or spontaneous findings were observed in male and female animals of all test groups during the home cage observation.
Open field observations: The open field observations did not reveal any test substance-related findings in male and female animals of all test groups. One male animal of dose group 3 (No. 33 - 100 mg/kg bw/d) showed slight salivation (area around the mouth was moist).
Sensorimotor tests/reflexes: In the pupillary reflex test 4 out of 5 examined female animals of dose group 3 showed a retarded adaption of the pupil to light. This was assessed as substance related adverse finding. There were no other test substance-related findings in male and female animals of all test groups.
Quantitative Parameters: No test substance-related impaired parameters were observed in male and female animals of all test groups. The statistically significantly decreased values of the landing foot splay test in females of dose group 1 was considered as spontaneous in nature and not treatment related as no dose-response relationship occurred.
Motor activity measurement (MA):
Motor activity measurement was statistically significantly below the concurrent control values in females of test group 3 (100 mg/kg bw/d) during early exploring phase (intervals 1 and 3, about 37% and 55%, respectively). Even though it did not reach statistical significance a decrease was also seen in males and therefore assessed as treatment related finding. The statistically significantly increased motor activity measurement in females of dose group 1 and 2 (10 and 30 mg/kg bw/d) during interval 9 and the statistically significantly decreased values in females of test group 1 (10 mg/kg bw/d) during interval 11 (about 83%) was considered as spontaneous in nature and not treatment related as no dose-response relationship occurred. No other statistically significant changes on motor activity data (summation of all intervals) was observed in the male and female animals of all dose groups in comparison to the concurrent control group. - Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The increase in absolute and relative liver weights in females of test group 3 (100 mg/kg bw/day) were regarded to be treatment-related in combination with the findings in clinical pathology. The decrease in absolute and relative thymus weight in females of test group 3 (100 mg/kg bw/day) did not have a histopathologic correlate. However, due to such a decrease it was regarded to be treatment-related.
The significant increase in absolute and relative kidney weight, the increase in relative heart weight of test group 3 (100 mg/kg bw/day) as well as the increase in relative liver weight in females of test group 2 (30 mg/kg bw/day) were regarded to be incidental and not related to treatment. The reason for it was that there was no histopathologic finding that could explain the weight increase/decrease and no relevant changes in clinical pathology for these organs/dose groups were observed. For more details please refer to table 7. All other mean relative weight parameters did not show significant differences when compared to the control group 0. - Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- All findings occurred either individually or were biologically equally distributed over control and treatment groups. They were considered to be incidental or spontaneous in origin and without any relation to treatment.
Decedents:
One male (No. 36) was found dead and one female (No. 138) had to be sacrificed moribund. There were no macroscopic findings that could explain the death or the moribund state of these animals.
Fertility:
The female animals (Nos. 102, 103, and 115), which were not pregnant as well as the male mating partners (Nos. 2, 3, and 15) did not show relevant gross lesions. - Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- In the heart, there was necrosis of muscle fibers and infiltration of inflammatory cells, characterized by mainly macrophages and less granulocytes. The finding was regarded to be treatment-related. In the prostate an increase in numbers of nuclei and the height of the epithelium was noted. This finding was diagnosed as minimal hyperplasia and was regarded to be treatment-related. In the skeletal muscle of females only of test group 3 (100 mg/kg bw/day) slight to moderate necrosis of muscle fibers were observed. In addition infiltration of inflammatory cells, mainly macrophages were noted. This finding was regarded to be treatment-related. The same finding as described for the skeletal muscle was also noted in the area of the spine. This was also regarded to be treatment-related. In the testes there was an increase of abnormal residual bodies. The abnormal residual bodies were much larger and of irregular shape when compared to control males. This finding was regarded to be treatment-related. In the thyroid glands a minimal hypertrophy/hyperplasia, in combination with an increase in altered colloid was found in males of test group 2 and 3 (30 and 100 mg/kg bw/day) and females of test group 3 (100 mg/kg bw/day). The finding in males of test group 1 (10 mg/kg bw/day) was regarded to be incidental, as the same incidence was seen in a control male.
In males of test group 3 (100 mg/kg bw/day) four animals revealed a sperm granuloma in the epididymides, whereas only one male in the control showed this finding. This was still regarded to be incidental, as sperm granuloma can occur in relatively high incidences as spontaneous finding (Creasy et al., 2012).
All other findings occurred either individually or were biologically equally distributed over control and treatment groups. They were considered to be incidental or spontaneous in origin and without any relation to treatment.
The stages of spermatogenesis in the testes of males of the high dose (100 mg/kg bw/day) were comparable to those of the controls.
Decedents: There were no histopathologic findings in the male that died (No. 36). The female (No. 138) that was sacrificed in a moribund state revealed findings in the heart and skeletal muscle. A test substance-related effect cannot be excluded but could also be not proven. Furthermore, this animal revealed inflammation in the intestinal tract. This could also be the cause of the moribund state of this animal.
Fertility: The female animals (Nos. 102 and 103), which were not pregnant as well as the male mating partners (Nos. 2 and 3) did not show relevant histopathological findings. Animal Nos. 15 and 115 were not investigated histopathologically.
For more details please also refer to table 8. - Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Male reproduction data
For nearly all F0 parental males, which were placed with females to generate F1 pups, copulation was confirmed. Copulation was not confirmed for control male No. 2 paired with control female No. 102. Thus, the male mating index was 90% in the control and 100% in the low-, mid- and high-dose groups.
Fertility was proven for most of the F0 parental males within the scheduled mating interval for F1 litter.
One low-dose male (10 mg/kg bw/d - No. 15) and two control males (0 mg/kg bw/d - Nos. 2 and 3) did not generate pregnancy.
Thus, the male fertility index ranged between 80% and 100% without showing any relation to dosing. This reflects the normal range of biological variation inherent in the strain of rats used for this study. The apparently infertile male rats did not show relevant gross lesions.
Female reproduction data:
The female mating index calculated after the mating period for F1 litter was 90% in test group 0 and 100% in test groups 1 - 3. The mean duration until sperm was detected (GD 0) varied between 2.1 and 2.9 days without any relation to dosing.
All female rats delivered pups or had implants in utero with the following exceptions:
• Low-dose female No. 115 (mated with male No. 15) did not become pregnant.
• Control female No. 102 (mated with male No. 2) did not become pregnant.
• Control female No. 103 (mated with male No. 3) did not become pregnant.
The fertility index varied between 88.9% in test group 0, 90% in test group 1 and 100% in test groups 2 and 3. These values reflect the normal range of biological variation inherent in the strain of rats used for this study. None of the non-pregnant females had any relevant gross lesions.
The mean duration of gestation was similar in all test groups (i.e. between 22.1 and 22.6 days). The gestation index was 100% in test groups 0 - 2 and 60% in test group 3. Although there was no statically significance the decreased gestation index in test group 3 was assessed as substance related finding.
Implantation was not affected by the treatment since the mean number of implantation sites was comparable between all test substance-treated groups and the control, taking normal biological variation into account (10.8 / 12.0 / 12.9 and 11.1 implants/dam in test groups 0 - 3, respectively).
The mean number of F1 pups delivered (10.5 / 11.6 / 11.7 and 9.2 pups/dam in test groups 0 - 3, respectively) was in test group 3 slightly lower, but archived no statistical significance.
The post-implantation loss was statistically significantly above the concurrent control values in test group 3 (2.6 / 3.1 / 9.1 / 28.5 mean %* [*=p<=0.05] test groups 0 - 3, respectively). Also the perinatal loss (mean%/litter) was statistically significantly above the concurrent control values in test group 3 (45.8 [*=p<=0.05] vs. 0 in control).
The number of litters with stillborn pups was statistically significantly above the concurrent control values in test group 3 (6** [**=p<=0.01] vs. 0 in control).
The number of litters with all pups stillborn was significant above the concurrent control values in test group 3 (3 vs. 0 in control).
The above mentioned statistically significantly changes in post-implantation loss and delivery parameters where assessed as substance related adverse findings.
F1 generation pups/litter
The mean number of delivered F1 pups per dam was evenly distributed among the test groups. The mean number of liveborn pups/litter was statistically significantly below the concurrent control values in test group 3 (10.5 / 11.6 / 11.6 / 5.2* [*=p<=0.05] test groups 0 - 3, respectively). The absolute number of liveborn pups in this test group was also decreased (47 vs. 84 in control).
The mean number of stillborn pups/litter was statistically significantly above the concurrent control values in test group 3 (4.0* [**=p<=0.05] vs. 0 in control).
The number of found dead pups was increased in test group 3 (13 vs. 1 in control), as well as the number of stillborn pups (36 vs. 0 in control) and the number of cannibalized pups (19 vs. 0).
The viability index indicating pup mortality during lactation (PND 0 - 4) varied between 98.2%/ 100% /100% and 20.9%** [**=p<=0.01] in test groups 0 - 3, respectively.
The sex distribution and sex ratios of live F1 pups on the day of birth and PND 4 did not show substantial differences between the control and the test substance-treated groups; slight differences were regarded to be spontaneous in nature.
Four male and four female pups of test group 3 showed reduced nutritional condition this was assessed as substance related. There were no test substance-related adverse clinical signs observed in any of the F1 generation pups of test groups 1 and 2.
Mean body weights of the high-dose F1 male, female pups and both sexes combined (100 mg/kg bw/d) were statistically significantly below the concurrent control values on PND 1 (about 20%, 24% and 20%, respectively) and on PND 4 for female pups and both sexes combined (about 44% and 43%, respectively).
Due to the fact, that only 2 litters with male pups remained on PND 4, no statistical evaluation could be done on PND 4 for mean body weights and body weight change (PND 1 - 4).
The mean pup body weight change of the high-dose F1 female pups and both sexes combined was statistically significantly below the concurrent control values (about 95% and 92%, respectively).
No test substance-related influence on body weights and body weight change values of F1 pups were noted in test groups 1 - 2 (10 and 30 mg/kg bw/d).
One male runt was seen in the control, one female runt was seen in test group 1 and three male and four female runts were seen in test group 3. The increased number of runts in test group 3 was assessed as substance related.
In test group 3 (100 mg/kg bw/d) 16 male pups and 9 female pups in 8 litters showed cleft palates and 7 male and 8 female pups in 5 litters showed an empty stomach at necropsy. This was assessed as substance related and adverse.
A few pups showed spontaneous findings at gross necropsy, such as anasarca, partly cannibalized and post mortem autolysis.
Effect levels
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 10 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- haematology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
Target system / organ toxicity
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- yes
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- System:
- musculoskeletal system
- Organ:
- myofibres
- Treatment related:
- yes
- Dose response relationship:
- yes
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 7 Absolute and relative organ weights when compared to control in percent
|
Female animals |
||
Test Group (mg/kg bw/d) |
1 (10) |
2 (30) |
3 (100) |
Absolute organ weights |
|||
Kidneys |
103 |
106 |
113** |
Liver |
101 |
105 |
119** |
Thymus |
77 |
87 |
46** |
Relative organ weights |
|||
Heart |
106 |
104 |
118* |
Kidneys |
107 |
108 |
120* |
Liver |
105 |
107* |
126* |
Thymus |
81 |
89 |
49* |
*p <= 0.05; **p <= 0.01
Table 8 Histopathological findings
|
Male |
Female |
||||||
Test group (mg/kg bw/d) |
0 (0) |
1 (10) |
2 (30) |
3 (100) |
0 (0) |
1 (10) |
2 (30) |
3 (100) |
Heart |
||||||||
Necrosis, myocardial |
0 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
Grade 1 |
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
Grade 2 |
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
Prostate |
||||||||
Hyperplasia, diffuse |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Grade 1 |
|
|
1 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
Skeletal muscle |
||||||||
Necrosis, musclefiber |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
Grade 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Grade 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Skeletal muscles at spine |
||||||||
Cervical cord |
||||||||
Necrosis, musclefiber |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Grade 1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
Thoracic cord |
||||||||
Necrosis, musclefiber |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
Grade 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Grade 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Lumbar cord |
||||||||
Necrosis musclefiber |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
Grade 1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
Grade 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Testes |
||||||||
abnormal residual bodies, (multifocal) |
0 |
4 |
8 |
7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Grade 1 |
|
4 |
7 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
Grade 2 |
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
Thyroid glands |
||||||||
Hypertrophy/hyperplasia |
1 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
Grade 1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
Altered colloid |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Grade 1 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)